How to Solve for Deflection Using Superposition Method - 1/2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @AFMathandEngineering
    @AFMathandEngineering  7 років тому +2

    Part 2: ua-cam.com/video/1f5UwQHdXnw/v-deo.html
    Check out our newest, better quality video on superposition!! ua-cam.com/video/SZsrXsS-NSM/v-deo.html

  • @rahulbhatt1391
    @rahulbhatt1391 3 роки тому +9

    how did you get ML^2/16EI

  • @hurtamor6445
    @hurtamor6445 6 років тому +10

    Can you provide a link for the table of formula of the deflections? Thanks. Much appreciated 😇

  • @dominicsomeone6523
    @dominicsomeone6523 5 років тому +1

    Take sum of moment at c, find M at B, its 110KNm CW. It makes sense since B resists the rotation of A, it must be CW since A goes CCW

  • @ahmadfathur1823
    @ahmadfathur1823 Рік тому

    In case 8, can u explain why the moment 8×2,5 is positive?, doesn't this moment direction is anticlockwise?

  • @aymenelmoubarik6332
    @aymenelmoubarik6332 3 роки тому

    what was the previous video about integration. where can i find it

  • @Mr.P539
    @Mr.P539 4 роки тому

    can we use superposition method in two span beam or continuous beam?

  • @nathanlaughlin6887
    @nathanlaughlin6887 3 роки тому

    Just wondering where you got the formula for deflection at the midpoint ? i understand why its not the max deflection but would like to know where you got the formula for midpoint

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  3 роки тому +1

      It's a standard deflection formula that is derived using deflection by integration. They are widely available. Your textbook should have some theory on how they are arrived at, also check out deflection by integration video.

    • @nathanlaughlin6887
      @nathanlaughlin6887 3 роки тому

      @@AFMathandEngineering thanks, I see that now! The formula sheet I have just didn’t include the mid point formulas

  • @umeshkumarsingh6150
    @umeshkumarsingh6150 6 років тому +1

    ML^2/16 is a deflection at L/√3 distance not mid way .,but we have to find out at midpoint,so is it correct??

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому

      ML^2/16EI is the deflection at the midpoint of the span for that case, not the maximum deflection, which occurs at L/sqrt(3) and is ML^2 / (9 * sqrt(3) *EI).

    • @umeshkumarsingh6150
      @umeshkumarsingh6150 6 років тому

      AF Math & Engineering I am not getting case 8 ,when max deflection you get is ml^2/9√3,then how come centre deflection which is ML^2/16 greater than the maximum.and could you please send me that table to my gmail umesh9436@gmail.com

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому +1

      you must be putting it in your calculator wrong..the term is exactly the same, the difference is that the max deflection has the term 9 sqrt 3 in the denominator and the midspan deflection has 16. 9 sqrt 3 = 15.59 which is < 16, which means you should be getting a larger value for the 9 root 3. check again.

    • @umeshkumarsingh6150
      @umeshkumarsingh6150 6 років тому

      AF Math & Engineering okay I thought ml^2/16 is deflection at L/√3.so at L/2 it's ml^2/16 ,got it and thanx ..could u plz send me mail of that sheet

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому +1

      Ill have to see if i still have the book, it might be a while. Google a beam deflection table or find one in the back of a structural analysis or mechanics of materials pdf book.

  • @ahmedkorim6420
    @ahmedkorim6420 6 років тому +1

    thx u saved my ass =D

  • @EE-pq8yn
    @EE-pq8yn 7 років тому

    video is great but can you check the conversion fromm mm^4 to m^4? im getting 9*10^4 i could be wrong!!

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  7 років тому

      i think you're confusing the ^4 from the mm^4 and the 10^6 which is what you should be converting
      try 90*10^6/1000^4

    • @EE-pq8yn
      @EE-pq8yn 7 років тому +1

      great work overall ....I can't complain...you made it very clear...God bless you..

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  7 років тому +1

      Much appreciated Eslam, we're really glad you're enjoying our content!

    • @EE-pq8yn
      @EE-pq8yn 7 років тому +2

      My final is tomorrow morning and you made it very clear!!
      i hope you'll be doing more advance stuff on mechanic hopefully by August..take care and keep the excellent work up.

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  7 років тому +3

      Good luck, we're really glad we could help. We'll be uploading at least 50 new videos this summer including advanced structural analysis, computer aided structural analysis techniques including graphing calculators and a big section on statically indeterminate structures. Stay tuned, and of course let your friends know about us too :D

  • @emirbfitness
    @emirbfitness 2 роки тому

    whatta guy

  • @eddimishreyash1562
    @eddimishreyash1562 4 роки тому

    The case 7 formula is wrong , there will be no negative sign

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  4 роки тому +2

      Incorrect, case 7 will cause a downward deflection, we've assigned downwards as negative and an upwards deflection as positive. Maybe you should ask before declaring something you don't understand as wrong.

    • @eddimishreyash1562
      @eddimishreyash1562 4 роки тому

      My bad , sry