As a Bangladeshi I agree with this . End of Hasina’s reign is good for the people and might bring some good changes in our country ! Although she did many good things but her govt failed to understand the new generation. Except supporters of Modi and Hasina from India (whom you could see crying at comment section) everyone is happy.......
I can see him as a westernized polished individual. Though I wonder does he have any record of working with the people of Bangladesh? He is, I think, just like a technocrat. Nevertheless, I wish him success in his work.
Regime change means for Dr. Siddique one autocrat replaced by a branded autocrat named as Dr. Yunus. Mr. Siddique said infrastructure is quite decent and digitally connected young generation. Sir who created this decent infrastructure and digitally connected young generation? And lastly Sri Lanka and Bangladesh has no comparison. Sri Lanka technically literacy percentage far more beyond Bangladesh. Bangladesh has gdp per capita in 2009 and 2024 you haven’t compared. Bangladesh needed a benevolent autocrat as the citizens of Bangladesh doesn’t suit to democracy if we will see regime change after 1990 to 2009. Even most of the South East Asian countries have also the benevolent dictators. Who contributed in fixing the countries micro economy. Freedom has a price and people of Bangladesh will surely not pay for it. Because Bangladesh economy will be contracted by at least 20 percent in the coming years. Dr. Yunus will also have the expiry date, the way Sheikh Hasina had.
Illiterate Indian economist wannabe spewing propaganda in the guise of a flawed argument without the slightest understanding of macroeconomics. Study up on the "fundamentals" of a nation that function as the underlying growth producer. Your shallow statement is similar to saying that France won the football World Cup in 2018 because Macron was the president. Bangladesh would have grown even if whatever government was there had only provided the slightest support. The ousted regime was lucky to ride the country's demographic dividend, which helped line their pockets as well. In fact, when the unprecedented looting and policy mistakes are taken into account, we missed out on more growth. On a different note, just like you don't want India to be at the behest of China, we don't want tro be at the behest of India or any other external actor. Mutual respect is much welcomed.
As a Bangladeshi I agree with this . End of Hasina’s reign is good for the people and might bring some good changes in our country ! Although she did many good things but her govt failed to understand the new generation. Except supporters of Modi and Hasina from India (whom you could see crying at comment section) everyone is happy.......
Good to see him after so many years. We were neighbors when I was in grade 7 in Dhaka.
Congratulations added new inturm gov ❤ mr siddiki
I can see him as a westernized polished individual. Though I wonder does he have any record of working with the people of Bangladesh? He is, I think, just like a technocrat. Nevertheless, I wish him success in his work.
Already buttering the current GOVT, good job SIDDIQI!
1:47 true
So there’s nothing left to do - enjoy your virtuous cycle.
We just broke the long cycle of 30 years. Were you living under a rock last few weeks?
180 billion USD debt.
Regime change means for Dr. Siddique one autocrat replaced by a branded autocrat named as Dr. Yunus. Mr. Siddique said infrastructure is quite decent and digitally connected young generation. Sir who created this decent infrastructure and digitally connected young generation? And lastly Sri Lanka and Bangladesh has no comparison. Sri Lanka technically literacy percentage far more beyond Bangladesh. Bangladesh has gdp per capita in 2009 and 2024 you haven’t compared. Bangladesh needed a benevolent autocrat as the citizens of Bangladesh doesn’t suit to democracy if we will see regime change after 1990 to 2009. Even most of the South East Asian countries have also the benevolent dictators. Who contributed in fixing the countries micro economy. Freedom has a price and people of Bangladesh will surely not pay for it. Because Bangladesh economy will be contracted by at least 20 percent in the coming years. Dr. Yunus will also have the expiry date, the way Sheikh Hasina had.
Randian stop ✋✋
Don't vomit here plz.
Illiterate Indian economist wannabe spewing propaganda in the guise of a flawed argument without the slightest understanding of macroeconomics. Study up on the "fundamentals" of a nation that function as the underlying growth producer. Your shallow statement is similar to saying that France won the football World Cup in 2018 because Macron was the president. Bangladesh would have grown even if whatever government was there had only provided the slightest support. The ousted regime was lucky to ride the country's demographic dividend, which helped line their pockets as well. In fact, when the unprecedented looting and policy mistakes are taken into account, we missed out on more growth. On a different note, just like you don't want India to be at the behest of China, we don't want tro be at the behest of India or any other external actor. Mutual respect is much welcomed.
usa happy now
Is India?
Bangladeshi people no longer have to live under a corrupt dictator. Go away Indian troll
Don't know about usa but india is definitely crying 😂
Islamist. He should be no where near LSE.
Wondering how you got your education, I'd say the same to you 😂. Got any cred to back your statement or are you gonna tell me something illiterate?
Pajets 😂
Well, his/ her credentials are in his/ her comment which can be summed up in one word and that is “ Islamophobia “ .
India is the safest country for rapists😂😂😂😂
probably went to modi school of extremism.