Magical Triangle - Think Outside The Box!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 чер 2020
  • Many people requested this one. It was asked to 9th grade students in India who had only learned geometry, so you are supposed to solve it without using trigonometry. I thank Anand Gautam for discovering the incredible solution!
    Polish translation credit: Tłumaczenie: Przemyslav
    Znajdź mnie tutaj: forum.cdaction.pl/blogs/blog/...
    You can also solve the problem with trigonometry. This post does so for the 2nd part of the question:
    brainly.in/question/16749924
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/MindYour...
    Send me suggestions by email (address in video). I consider all ideas though can't always reply!
    Like many UA-camrs I use popular software to prepare my videos. You can search for animation software tutorials on UA-cam to learn how to make videos. Be prepared--animation is time consuming and software can be expensive!
    Why are there comments before the video is published? Get early access and support the channel on Patreon
    / mindyourdecisions
    If you buy from the links below I may receive a commission for sales. (As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.) This has no effect on the price for you.
    Show your support! Get a mug, a t-shirt, and more at Teespring, the official site for Mind Your Decisions merchandise:
    teespring.com/stores/mind-you...
    My Books (worldwide links)
    mindyourdecisions.com/blog/my...
    My Books (US links)
    Mind Your Decisions: Five Book Compilation
    amzn.to/2pbJ4wR
    A collection of 5 books:
    "The Joy of Game Theory" rated 4.1/5 stars on 96 reviews
    amzn.to/1uQvA20
    "The Irrationality Illusion: How To Make Smart Decisions And Overcome Bias" rated 3.7/5 stars on 9 reviews
    amzn.to/1o3FaAg
    "40 Paradoxes in Logic, Probability, and Game Theory" rated 4.2/5 stars on 18 reviews
    amzn.to/1LOCI4U
    "The Best Mental Math Tricks" rated 4.3/5 stars on 19 reviews
    amzn.to/18maAdo
    "Multiply Numbers By Drawing Lines" rated 4.6/5 stars on 14 reviews
    amzn.to/XRm7M4
    Mind Your Puzzles: Collection Of Volumes 1 To 3
    amzn.to/2mMdrJr
    A collection of 3 books:
    "Math Puzzles Volume 1" rated 4.4/5 stars on 26 reviews
    amzn.to/1GhUUSH
    "Math Puzzles Volume 2" rated 4.5/5 stars on 6 reviews
    amzn.to/1NKbyCs
    "Math Puzzles Volume 3" rated 4.1/5 stars on 7 reviews
    amzn.to/1NKbGlp
    Connect with me
    My Blog: mindyourdecisions.com/blog/
    Twitter: / preshtalwalkar
    Newsletter (sent only for big news, like a new book release): eepurl.com/KvS0r
    2017 Shorty Awards Nominee. Mind Your Decisions was nominated in the STEM category (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) along with eventual winner Bill Nye; finalists Adam Savage, Dr. Sandra Lee, Simone Giertz, Tim Peake, Unbox Therapy; and other nominees Elon Musk, Gizmoslip, Hope Jahren, Life Noggin, and Nerdwriter.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @cristiluchian3567
    @cristiluchian3567 3 роки тому +1493

    Presh : 1+1=2
    Me : ok , i got that one

    • @pratyushsingh1211
      @pratyushsingh1211 3 роки тому +15

      well atleast you got that

    • @saket174
      @saket174 3 роки тому +2

      Blackpenredpen 😂😂😂

    • @Daniel_WR_Hart
      @Daniel_WR_Hart 3 роки тому +10

      Not gonna lie I had a relative once ask me if x + x = 2x, I said yes then he started arguing about it with my cousin lol

    • @vol230
      @vol230 3 роки тому +2

      @@Daniel_WR_Hart ROFL

    • @Daniel_WR_Hart
      @Daniel_WR_Hart 3 роки тому +4

      @@vol230 I wish I was trolling but unfortunately I'm not

  • @chl4327
    @chl4327 3 роки тому +1555

    I cannot believe that I’m watching this to entertain myself.

    • @jakehosten3239
      @jakehosten3239 3 роки тому +41

      Good you developed your self and you improved your level in maths

    • @nobodyknows1106
      @nobodyknows1106 3 роки тому +8

      But My Answer is Coming 70°(the asked one) and other one is coming (45+70)=115,180-115= 65°,please help!

    • @rishabh645
      @rishabh645 3 роки тому +2

      same here,each time i open youtube and i see one video from this channel

    • @henriquevianna6875
      @henriquevianna6875 3 роки тому +2

      May I ask why?

    • @smaranaggarwal5154
      @smaranaggarwal5154 3 роки тому +2

      me 2...thot i see math 1 last time b4 i die due to kidney failure @16 :) ...bye world♥

  • @obowonkonobo
    @obowonkonobo 3 роки тому +1248

    Me: *solves the problem looking at the thumbnail using trig*
    You: "the challenge is to do it without trig"
    Me: 😲

    • @nijoeli
      @nijoeli 3 роки тому +28

      Same hahaha

    • @minakumari7949
      @minakumari7949 3 роки тому +6

      Me too

    • @deadble5k
      @deadble5k 3 роки тому +17

      I don't even know what trigonometry is. Can someone tell me what it is?

    • @taowang9735
      @taowang9735 3 роки тому +23

      @@deadble5k start with sin, cos, tan, etc and then learn how to manipulate it like algebra

    • @donthavelove42
      @donthavelove42 3 роки тому +5

      Ikr, his solve is cool and all, but how to solve it pure mathematics

  • @blackhole4813
    @blackhole4813 3 роки тому +511

    These videos* make me question whether I really deserve to be in college.

    • @salmanel-farsi3744
      @salmanel-farsi3744 3 роки тому +24

      I hope you are joking. You understood the proof presented - that is vital in my opinion vs getting the ah ha momoment which can often be *not* so trivial

    • @MarvKage
      @MarvKage 3 роки тому +11

      My friend, you and I are the same

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 3 роки тому +4

      @@salmanel-farsi3744 if it is not sp trivial that means it's also important so aren't you contradicting yourself?

    • @salmanel-farsi3744
      @salmanel-farsi3744 3 роки тому +15

      @@leif1075 Thanks for highlighting the possible confusion. My point was to celebrate the understanding of the proof even if one could not arrive at the proof themselves. I will go back to adjust the wording..

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 3 роки тому +6

      @@salmanel-farsi3744 Thanks but I need to be someone who arrives at the proof themselves or comes up withba different proof..I don't want to be unexceptional..recognizing the proof or understanding it doesn't require nearly as much ability.

  • @carcaperu4041
    @carcaperu4041 4 роки тому +476

    "Nothing out of the box is good, trust me"
    Pandora

    • @user-sf4zu2dy3z
      @user-sf4zu2dy3z 3 роки тому +12

      That made my day🤣🤣😂

    • @asktnegi5723
      @asktnegi5723 3 роки тому +7

      Presh should give this comment a heart.

    • @theobolt250
      @theobolt250 3 роки тому +4

      @Cara Peru. I always love being inside the box. 😜

    • @PhilemonXIV
      @PhilemonXIV 3 роки тому

      Classic!!! 🔥💯😆

    • @arunavabhar2170
      @arunavabhar2170 2 роки тому +2

      Schrodinger approves too

  • @JaredOwen
    @JaredOwen 3 роки тому +869

    Oh dang - that was intense!

    • @ankitmeena6842
      @ankitmeena6842 3 роки тому +7

      Just another jee problem 😪

    • @NamVu-im2xm
      @NamVu-im2xm 3 роки тому +14

      3D god is watching 2D thing lmao

    • @adwaitT
      @adwaitT 3 роки тому +2

      @@NamVu-im2xm lol

    • @Sunfish789
      @Sunfish789 3 роки тому +4

      How are you here?

    • @nobodyknows1106
      @nobodyknows1106 3 роки тому +2

      But My Answer is Coming 70°(the asked one) and other one is coming (45+70)=115,180-115= 65°,please help!

  • @ashwinidasanchal4402
    @ashwinidasanchal4402 3 роки тому +63

    3:37 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 being an Indian student that amazed me

    • @HeckaS
      @HeckaS 3 роки тому +3

      Yes because race determines your reactions.

    • @ashwinidasanchal4402
      @ashwinidasanchal4402 3 роки тому +8

      @@HeckaS no way , you got that wrong , as a student in Indian education system it's quite difficult to find someone who looks upon such questions and problems and I was amazed just because of the beauty of the question , I hope that you got my point ..

    • @Dev_1907
      @Dev_1907 3 роки тому +2

      Why you have to mention "Indian " ??

    • @studytimevibes3206
      @studytimevibes3206 3 роки тому +4

      @@Dev_1907 cuz this que is frm an indian 9th grade que paper

    • @astitva3072
      @astitva3072 2 роки тому +1

      @@HeckaS they said that because the question was from the main course maths book for 9th graders in India

  • @fedryfirman.a5783
    @fedryfirman.a5783 3 роки тому +16

    Beautiful. The problem, the explanation, and everything this channel brings is pure amazing

  • @photocopi
    @photocopi 4 роки тому +627

    I've always found those problems so cool! Just rotating a triangle was the key, and I would never think about it until you showed us. Great job Presh!

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 4 роки тому +36

      Dont you find it annoying and frustrating and insulting?

    • @goodplacetostart9099
      @goodplacetostart9099 4 роки тому

      Ahaa photocoPI

    • @photocopi
      @photocopi 4 роки тому +5

      sumakit cjs well, in french π is prononced like "pee" so my username works better

    • @Tiqerboy
      @Tiqerboy 4 роки тому +11

      I eventually realized you had to do it if you wanted a non trig solution to this problem but I wouldn't have satisfied the time constraints of a traditional math test.
      That is why trig was invented. To save time and eliminate the need to come up with tricks.

    • @hafez591
      @hafez591 4 роки тому +3

      It took me a couple of days jumping from one way to another until finally could jump out of the box

  • @bluechicken4866
    @bluechicken4866 4 роки тому +440

    I always love "Out Of The Box" thinking like this. Thanks again Presh!

    • @tjejojyj
      @tjejojyj 3 роки тому +6

      Hmmm. Sure it was an “out of the square” solution. 😜

    • @jonathanwood8847
      @jonathanwood8847 3 роки тому +5

      I can't stand them. They always seem completely arbitrary

    • @arunamankar
      @arunamankar 3 роки тому

      @@tjejojyj 😂 AMAZING BRO !! 😀👍🏻😂

    • @nobodyknows1106
      @nobodyknows1106 3 роки тому +1

      But My Answer is Coming 70°(the asked one) and other one is coming (45+70)=115,180-115= 65°,please help!

    • @vaughnjohnson8767
      @vaughnjohnson8767 3 роки тому

      The first part was real easy. 45 and 70 degrees part of the triangle has to equal 180 degrees. So the missing part must be 65. I didn’t exactly understand what the second part needed me to do so I just watched it after. Took me about 5 minutes tops

  • @ankitroy6915
    @ankitroy6915 4 роки тому +2

    I really love this channel as it shows 'out of the box thinking'.It feels cool to do so.

  • @ajourneytoabeautifulparadi2026
    @ajourneytoabeautifulparadi2026 3 роки тому +6

    I have just came across this channel and I am so glad about it
    And I definitely became the constant member of it :)

  • @lifeofphyraprun7601
    @lifeofphyraprun7601 4 роки тому +47

    I actually thought about rotation and solved the first part.I was too lazy for the second part.But the point I wanna make is that due to your videos,Presh,I was able to get better at geometry quite a bit,and also in Math problem solving in general.I wanna thank you for that.My creativity also actually increased.Please keep coming up with such good Math videos.

  • @avikdas4055
    @avikdas4055 4 роки тому +525

    Surprised that the solution doesn't involve the gougu theorem.

    • @chhabisarkar9057
      @chhabisarkar9057 4 роки тому +10

      Lmao

    • @nutsbeta1325
      @nutsbeta1325 4 роки тому +9

      what

    • @yfliu592
      @yfliu592 4 роки тому +43

      Vszk 010 Pythagorean Theron is known as gougu theorem among mandarin speaking countries.

    • @paradox5468
      @paradox5468 4 роки тому +5

      Use hua

    • @saetainlatin
      @saetainlatin 4 роки тому +19

      This channel should be renamed as the Gougu theorem channel

  • @charlesdang2557
    @charlesdang2557 3 роки тому +6

    Nice puzzle. I was content to solve this using brute force and was surprised to find whole number answers. This of course meant there was a more elegant solution. Thanks for showing the reflection trick. Immediately this brings to mind folding tricks, origami as one. if we fold the two flaps on either side, they would fit neatly within the larger triangle in the middle. Super neat!

  • @pgbollwerk
    @pgbollwerk 3 роки тому +6

    I'm impressed with myself that I actually understood this one from start to finish.

  • @mohabatkhanmalak1161
    @mohabatkhanmalak1161 4 роки тому +23

    Very interesting, I love Geometry and this is my edutainment. Thank you.

  • @thenegotiator5471
    @thenegotiator5471 4 роки тому +7

    I’ve been watching you channel for a long time that i am able now to every problem you upload. It feels amazing when you say did you figure it out and the answer is yes :)

    • @milan3066
      @milan3066 3 роки тому

      Ah yes, the negotiator

  • @phuongcasso42
    @phuongcasso42 3 роки тому +1

    Watching your last videos enables me to solve this problem on my own! Thanks Presh!

  • @elyn1391
    @elyn1391 3 роки тому +11

    Dayummmmm....Why i'm not find your channel early?... I just want to entertain myself with this something useful rather than a meme video or drama that wasting my time a lot while quarantine 😭😭😭

  • @pointless6781
    @pointless6781 4 роки тому +7

    Also we can find the angle by folding ADE and ABF when we draw the height of AEF

  • @marcushendriksen8415
    @marcushendriksen8415 4 роки тому +8

    I clicked the video thinking that I'd have to hear all about the Gougu theorem. Imagine my pleasant surprise when I didn't.

  • @fabriciolopes6007
    @fabriciolopes6007 2 роки тому +1

    There is another elegant way to do this question, this was the way i did this question when it first came to me:
    My solution is about to prove that this EF segment defined by a 45° in the square is aways tangent to the quarter of circunference with unity radious and center in A.
    To do this take the quarter of circunference and trace a tangent segment of it, now with the intersection point "P" trace AP and look that the pairs of triangles ADE, APE and ABF,APF are congruents by the Side Side Angle case (SSA - common sides, unity side and straight angle). With it, see the congruence between DAE, PAE and PAF, BAP angles, nevertheless how DAE+PAE+PAF+BAP=90° and DAE=PAE, PAF=BAP, then PAE+PAF=45°, proving that EAF will aways be 45°.
    So, we can guarantee that if we pass a quarter circunference in the problem with radious 1 and center A it will tangent EF. Doing this, let the intersection be an X point, now observe the AXF and ABF triangles - they are congruent by the same case before - and see that AFB and AFX(AFX=AFE) angles are both 70°, letting angle AEF= 65°(AFE+FEA+EAF=180° - EAF=45°, AFE=70°). (:

  • @ashyniles8991
    @ashyniles8991 3 роки тому +1

    The first time coming across ur videos I have started liking maths.you really have comprehensive explanations.THANK YOU.

  • @harshalgunjal5749
    @harshalgunjal5749 4 роки тому +3

    Love from Mumbai, India.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
    Love your videos, "Mind your decisions".

  • @anyone6830
    @anyone6830 4 роки тому +4

    I thought ur previous problems r simple but this one is truly some big brain stuff!!

  • @md.abdulawalkhan3702
    @md.abdulawalkhan3702 4 роки тому +3

    Amazing solution!!!!!!! That's why I love this channel very much.

  • @ascaniuspotterhead2484
    @ascaniuspotterhead2484 3 роки тому +9

    I’d have chosen a brute force method and simply made equations over equations and then slowly eliminating the unknown parts till I can solve it. But your way is much faster and easier. Thank you for making this awesome content.

    • @mohammadahmednooruddin5990
      @mohammadahmednooruddin5990 8 місяців тому

      I tried this but I was only got x+y=135 over and over again (where x is angle AEF and y is angle AFE)

  • @wiellnyan
    @wiellnyan 4 роки тому +187

    When you know how to do the first part but the second part is a struggle.

  • @asapmath9329
    @asapmath9329 4 роки тому +5

    We are inspired by you. Thanks for motivating us to do math videos 😌💝

  • @asrarahmad8210
    @asrarahmad8210 2 роки тому +1

    I love your learning mindset that great people never stop learning.

  • @user-qy8re3yx3d
    @user-qy8re3yx3d 2 роки тому +1

    Спасибо, Мастер! Благодаря Вам я увидела большие пробелы в своём образовании и в характере. Особенно много мне дали Ваши задачи по геометрии. Я восхищаюсь Вами!

  • @charlesbromberick4247
    @charlesbromberick4247 3 роки тому +3

    Your "rotations" are always beyond the access of my imagination. Nice problem and solution.

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 3 роки тому

      Doesn't that make you feel bad?

  • @xz1891
    @xz1891 4 роки тому +5

    Presh's way ("half angle" model) is good, I just want to show alternative, which is good too. Draw FH perpendicular to AE and meet @ H, thus A,B,F,H and E,C,F,H are co-circular (concyclic), respectively.
    So ∠HBF=∠HAF=45° (circumferential angle), so BH must be the diagonal of ABCD; connect DH (which must be diagonal), so ∆ADH congruent to ∆CDH, thus ∠DAH=∠DCH=90-45-20=25°, hence, ∠HFE =25° too, bcz it's circumferential angle, so we get ∠AEF=90-25=65°
    As for second part of the problem, we can use Gougu theorems and similar triangles (∆ADE and ∆FHE) to get answer, that's 2 (for you guys to do 😁).

    • @ujjwalnarayan07
      @ujjwalnarayan07 3 роки тому

      Dude I have two doubts
      First is that what you mean by co circular
      Do you mean concyclic???
      And second is that gougou is pythagoras theorem??

    • @20.nguyenvongockhue80
      @20.nguyenvongockhue80 3 роки тому

      iam asian

    • @xz1891
      @xz1891 3 роки тому +1

      @@ujjwalnarayan07 1, by that it means the four pts are at same circle. 2, yes, Gougu = Pythagorean

  • @atmosphere6796
    @atmosphere6796 2 роки тому

    Good thing i stumbled upon this channel by chance. This is a good brain exercise. Looking forward to more math problems.

  • @kingcrimson1631
    @kingcrimson1631 2 роки тому +2

    I couldn't solve this one, I tried the linear system of equations but it was singular. However, having watched this, I feel that I now have learned a trick that might help me solve problems in the future. Thanks so much for this wonderful channel!

  • @ryanramjattan8714
    @ryanramjattan8714 4 роки тому +8

    As a Canadian middle schooler, I got so incredibly close. The outside the box for me

  • @fabianosemsobrenome2513
    @fabianosemsobrenome2513 4 роки тому +5

    Just found another way! By drawing two circles with radii DE and BF, in vertices E and F, respectively. Ultimately finding the altitude of triangle AEF. The rest is pretty straightforward.

  • @shivamshankar2683
    @shivamshankar2683 3 роки тому +1

    The first video I fully understand, thank you!

  • @creativejapanese
    @creativejapanese 3 роки тому +1

    This is so cool! Thank you for sharing!

  • @mehmetkarakose0
    @mehmetkarakose0 3 роки тому +27

    Takılmışız "sadece müziğin dili evrenseldir" diye.
    Oysa ki her müziğin bir matematiği vardır ve asıl evrensel olan belki de matematiktir .
    2+2 tüm dillerde 4 eder .

    • @evrenunal3644
      @evrenunal3644 3 роки тому

      Newton matematik için "Evrenin dili" tanımlamasını yapmış.

    • @johnjordan3552
      @johnjordan3552 3 роки тому +1

      Verdigin hesplamanın sonucu 2'nin 4'un +'nin.... tanımına bağlı. Eğer mantik zincirimizde bunlarin tanımiyla ya da bu fonksiyonlarla ilgili bir kırıklık, eksiklik ya da bu işlemin tümünün koşullarını overridelayan bir değişken/etken varsa düpedüz yanlış olan bir şey bile bazen teknik olarak doğru olabilir

    • @furkanbaris8988
      @furkanbaris8988 3 роки тому

      katılıyorum geometriye bayılırım, ingilizcede sadece basit tanışma faslını bilirim ama videoyu çok iyi anladım :)

    • @enigmad2485
      @enigmad2485 3 роки тому

      O zaman Matematik yapamayanlar da dilsiz oluyor herhalde? :)

    • @furkanbaris8988
      @furkanbaris8988 3 роки тому

      :)

  • @Ganeshkumar-to6xw
    @Ganeshkumar-to6xw 4 роки тому +157

    It's a problem of 9th grade student of India

    • @loureed654
      @loureed654 4 роки тому +9

      china the same

    • @user-ow2vf1dd3j
      @user-ow2vf1dd3j 4 роки тому +11

      Korea in 8th grade

    • @Tiqerboy
      @Tiqerboy 4 роки тому +5

      Maybe they say "Grade 9" in India :-)

    • @Ganeshkumar-to6xw
      @Ganeshkumar-to6xw 4 роки тому +6

      @@Tiqerboy its not a bymistake. This is what he said in video

    • @sarvesh_soni
      @sarvesh_soni 4 роки тому +14

      @@user-ow2vf1dd3j in india 9th grade students are 13-14 years

  • @echo10es
    @echo10es 3 роки тому +2

    This is crazy! This is about depth of mind. and very impressive. Thank you☄

  • @gauravpandey3853
    @gauravpandey3853 3 роки тому +1

    I am totally surprised☺ to subscribe a person like me. Sir, you are playing a vital role in transforming the education in simple and convenient way. Will gift your books to students on their b'day ☺.

  • @johnscarceforpresident1647
    @johnscarceforpresident1647 4 роки тому +6

    Sorry i need to turn the bell on i refreshed the page at the perfect time tho

  • @canonicalensemble8727
    @canonicalensemble8727 3 роки тому +7

    Never thought I’d encounter this problem again lmao we had it in year 8 math in China

  • @koruko634
    @koruko634 3 роки тому +1

    deserved a sub man, i'm refreshing my math skills with this channel, amazing job

  • @unclereefer37
    @unclereefer37 2 роки тому

    I got that one with triangle math but you still blew my mind twice in this one

  • @vaibhavgt0
    @vaibhavgt0 4 роки тому +17

    Thinking “Out Of The Box” is something that I should apply in geometry too.
    Never thought Congruency will be used.
    Love from Haridwar (India)❤️

  • @lilac2698
    @lilac2698 2 роки тому +16

    As a ninth grader in India, I'll admit that I was unable to solve this one, but I was able to understand exactly how you reached the conclusions. I just didn't think about rotation. Thanks for sharing this problem, we have tons of questions like these in our book since almost half our chapters in the book are geometry this year (Quadrilaterals, Triangles, Lines and Angles, Circles, etc).

    • @stupidstuart6478
      @stupidstuart6478 Рік тому +2

      This one must be of RD

    • @gvedk
      @gvedk 7 місяців тому

      yeah it must be
      @@stupidstuart6478

  • @MetaView7
    @MetaView7 3 роки тому

    Your channel is making me feel so inadequate. LOL
    Thanks for all the challenges, and answers.

  • @ck3908
    @ck3908 4 роки тому

    good problem, not too hard, not too easy - and good clue on the title - which sort of gave the answer. Took me a while but got it.

  • @chhabisarkar9057
    @chhabisarkar9057 4 роки тому +59

    Love from india presh sir .. one thing I want to tell you that for your such amazing geometry videos i am able to improve my geometry to a great extent . ❤️ Btw i solved the problem using trigonometry and my answer came approximately ≈ 64.743 ≈ 65 . (Reason is because the values which the calculator gave was approximated ) but TBH your solution about rotating the triangle was great 👍 . Came to learn a new thing form you , thanks 😀

    • @paradox5468
      @paradox5468 4 роки тому +2

      It can be also done by similarity and in most of the square triangle question rotating the triangle is clue:-)

    • @paradox5468
      @paradox5468 4 роки тому

      We can also generalize it by taking angle theta instead of 45 degrees

    • @siddharthabhattacharya391
      @siddharthabhattacharya391 4 роки тому +1

      @CHABBI SARKAR PJ Sir ka Bhakt

    • @IS-py3dk
      @IS-py3dk 4 роки тому

      Really I cant live without Presh Sir

    • @paradox5468
      @paradox5468 4 роки тому

      @@siddharthabhattacharya391 kon

  • @nanawartana5210
    @nanawartana5210 4 роки тому +6

    Amazing from indonesia🇮🇩

  • @jaganmohanreddymothe6695
    @jaganmohanreddymothe6695 3 роки тому +1

    I learnt the answer and advice others to learn. Thanks so much.

  • @mrmacross
    @mrmacross Рік тому

    Watched a handful of these videos in the last two days. I noticed not once (yet) has the Law of Sines come into play. It actually made finding the perimeter easier than finding the measure of the angle. Still, the solution does seem more satisfying than using Law of Sines.

  • @canaryfishcat
    @canaryfishcat 3 роки тому +46

    Now I know I can't pass grade 9 in India. Thanks! :)

    • @Anish-Kumar-Verma
      @Anish-Kumar-Verma 3 роки тому +7

      Its not bro i m indian i m in 10th
      It was just a miscellaneous question

    • @theUnmeshraj
      @theUnmeshraj 3 роки тому +2

      @@Anish-Kumar-Verma bruh if you're weak in studies Dont actually defame us...
      I am studying for IMO from grade 7 and we used to get such questions.

    • @Anish-Kumar-Verma
      @Anish-Kumar-Verma 3 роки тому +9

      @@theUnmeshraj if u r overintelligent dont pop yr ass

    • @Anish-Kumar-Verma
      @Anish-Kumar-Verma 3 роки тому +3

      @@theUnmeshraj btw. Best of luck Hoping under 1k rank in jee. Its not in sarcastic way. Imo atudents are really worth it.

    • @kaos7012
      @kaos7012 3 роки тому +3

      @@theUnmeshraj Dude being able to answer this question isn't even a flex lol. A waste of time not to use trig, but I didn't and still got the answer. This question proves nothing about intelligence.

  • @user-zm6nm1ot8n
    @user-zm6nm1ot8n 3 роки тому +4

    16 years ago i could solve it in 5 minutes ) but now i think "wow, amazing" :)

  • @Al.2
    @Al.2 3 роки тому

    I almost gave up on this one even after guessing the answer, but took a pen and paper and quickly did it. Satisfying this one.

  • @heldercomp
    @heldercomp 3 роки тому +1

    It’s possible to prove, using the exact same argument, that EF is tangent to the circle centered in A with radius 1, for ALL pair of points EF on the sides such that EAF = 45.
    It’s easy to see that if P in EF is the circle’s point of tangency, then DE = EP and FB = FP.
    Therefore,
    p(CEF) = (CE + ED) + (CF + FB) = 2.

  • @ralphbanaga8096
    @ralphbanaga8096 3 роки тому +7

    This made me realise how out of shape I am with math. I remember having this in my grade 4 mock exams in the Philippines.

  • @user-eo1wn9tk4v
    @user-eo1wn9tk4v 3 роки тому +32

    What is the perimeter?
    Paul: Imagine that we have a ruler.
    I guess he has left his ruler somewhere out of the box.

  • @freeminitv121
    @freeminitv121 4 роки тому

    That's awesome I loved the way you figure it out......

  • @puspamadak
    @puspamadak 3 роки тому

    👌. I haven't even thought of such a solution like this. Thanks for sharing this problem.

  • @savitajaiswal446
    @savitajaiswal446 3 роки тому +11

    Just one word to say:- "WOW"

  • @barryjohnson7730
    @barryjohnson7730 3 роки тому +3

    Directly connect the diagonal!

  • @user-mx8sj1nc6v
    @user-mx8sj1nc6v 3 роки тому

    It is nice to prove your claim at 3:30 that the perimeter of CEF is always 2. If EC is 1-tg(alpha) and CF is 1- tg(45-alpha) .... It is nice to see it.

  • @WabiWasabi
    @WabiWasabi 3 роки тому

    The rotation solution is really elegant and satisfying! I got there maybe a little more laboriously just solving a system of equations with unknown angles AEF, AFE, FEC, and EFC: AFE + EFC = 110; AEF + FEC = 115; FEC + EFC = 90; AEF + AFE = 135. So AEF = 65, FEC = 50, EFC = 40, and AFE = 70.

    • @shubhambairagi7866
      @shubhambairagi7866 2 роки тому

      Angle e and f both side satisfy with 65 and 70 so this doubt create because exactly answer not solve angle e is 70 or 65 confusion create

  • @miken3260
    @miken3260 3 роки тому +3

    I found the length of the perimeters interesting, as far as the angles all triangles equal 180 degrees so solving the unknown angle was no problem .

  • @uninstalledsoftwares6266
    @uninstalledsoftwares6266 3 роки тому +11

    Everything was cool until this rotation.. I mean wth!

  • @radhikadesai7781
    @radhikadesai7781 3 роки тому +1

    I used trignometry and sin rule but your solution is beautiful

  • @Sjejdbangdw
    @Sjejdbangdw 4 роки тому

    Great question and explanation!

  • @souvik_pradhan_
    @souvik_pradhan_ 4 роки тому +23

    Love from INDIA..🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @wiellnyan
      @wiellnyan 4 роки тому +2

      One of the greatest nations.

    • @sanjaykanna4797
      @sanjaykanna4797 4 роки тому +1

      Me 2 India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @johnscarceforpresident1647
      @johnscarceforpresident1647 4 роки тому +2

      India is the smartest country in the world

    • @ChilloutLibrary
      @ChilloutLibrary 3 роки тому +1

      Only love will not work, you need to solve the problem in in the first place 😉 Btw, both Asia and Europe are smart

  • @sunrevolver
    @sunrevolver 4 роки тому +5

    Alternative solution
    Create 2 equations involving 2 unknown variables on point E and F.
    Problem solved..

  • @shivlalborana1700
    @shivlalborana1700 3 роки тому +1

    You are God Sir, Best teaching in my whole life and learn very easily. GREAT SIR 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @cyberdefender1859
    @cyberdefender1859 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you very much for solving this problem. Good luck. Hi from Russia.

  • @snackydibs4465
    @snackydibs4465 3 роки тому +3

    Oh god I can actually recall something like this coming in my 9th grade exams

  • @thelearnersshowgv5064
    @thelearnersshowgv5064 3 роки тому +4

    Equations are Boring part of Mathematics, But I used to see everything in the form of Geometry - Stephen Hawking
    Me: It's really True !

  • @don5349
    @don5349 3 роки тому +1

    I didn't think of that much,just using tanθ to find BF and DE,then find EC and FC,then pyth.thm to find angle FEC

  • @user-sk4em5zn7s
    @user-sk4em5zn7s 3 роки тому +1

    it's really amazing!!!
    thank-you!!

  • @abdullahisk9432
    @abdullahisk9432 3 роки тому +3

    İngilizcem yetersiz olmasına rağmen görerek anladım gayet anlaşılıyor, umamırım mesajımı anlamışsınızdır 😌

  • @googlecorum462
    @googlecorum462 3 роки тому +4

    i miss you mathematics&geometry.. now im a med student :(

    • @root8009
      @root8009 3 роки тому +2

      merhabalar. videonun kapak fotografindaki bilinmeyen aciyi 80 derece buldum. siz bu konuda ne dusunuyorsunuz ?

    • @cerencemal1617
      @cerencemal1617 3 роки тому

      Şimdi evrenin sırrını çözücen hadi bakalım

    • @googlecorum462
      @googlecorum462 2 роки тому

      @@cerencemal1617 kim evrenin sırtını cözecek reyiz?

  • @Raindeux
    @Raindeux Рік тому

    I always make a point to try the problem before watching. I did the whole thing using trig, and when I started watching the first thing you said was "without using trig", duh, no wonder it wasn't so trivial. What a clever solution though. Good video!

  • @davidjin9713
    @davidjin9713 3 роки тому +2

    Just saw the problem. But as a ninth grader in China, this is a model all of us had to learn "角含半角模型“ translated to an angle that is half of another angle. Basically, there is this thing that is always true, and it's that if there is a 45 degree angle inside a 90 degree angle, then BF+DE is always equal to EF. And if tanBAF=1/2, then tanDAE is always 1/3 ( The second part is proofed by the formula tan(a+b)= 1+tana+tanb/ 1-tanatanb). This is a problem that is really easy for us 9th graders in China, and there are all kinds of variations, like 30 degrees or 60 degrees, or removing some sides. Though it is good to see other countries actually have these kind of problems as well.

    • @shaswatranjan8720
      @shaswatranjan8720 3 роки тому

      Bro u don't have to use trigo in this question otherwise it's very simple

  • @bekolops
    @bekolops 3 роки тому +10

    I couldnt solve this even with trigonometry

  • @hydradynamo3538
    @hydradynamo3538 3 роки тому +4

    I had a doubt how can you construct 20°and AF=AF' AT SAME TIME

  • @n.662
    @n.662 Рік тому

    It's very cool! I don't understand this fact! Thank you!

  • @studyzoneofficial2011
    @studyzoneofficial2011 3 роки тому

    Thanks man for such interesting question and solution.

  • @tommydecarite4121
    @tommydecarite4121 3 роки тому +7

    2:00
    F' : let me introduce myself

    • @tommydecarite4121
      @tommydecarite4121 3 роки тому +2

      btw this was a cool problem even tho i wasn't able to solve it and found it complicated you made it seem easy

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 роки тому

      @@tommydecarite4121
      That's the thing with any master of skill, they are so good at it that when they do it they make it seem easy. Goes for math, goes for juggling and about anything in between. You only discover how hard it actually is when you are trying to do it yourself.

  • @Peter_1986
    @Peter_1986 3 роки тому +3

    When I see these types of problems, I usually try to set up a bunch of equations and then solve for the unknown variables.

    • @randomrainbow8423
      @randomrainbow8423 3 роки тому

      Yeah everyone does that ig because we've all been taught that way. Whenever something is unknown just start assuming variables and then it's just one variable after another and then try and get those many number of unique equations.

  • @bruce4139
    @bruce4139 3 роки тому

    This is one of my more enjoyable ones to watch

  • @thankdi
    @thankdi 3 роки тому +1

    thank you for sharing, the method is great

  • @thechessplayer7076
    @thechessplayer7076 3 роки тому +4

    Wait a min.
    In triangle EFC
    EF square = FC square + EC square
    That isnt satisfying for their values in terms of x and/or y

  • @Sam_on_YouTube
    @Sam_on_YouTube 4 роки тому +26

    If, instead of rotating 90 degrees, you fold both flaps in to the central triangle, solving the 2nd question becomes trivial.

    • @zaqmko0
      @zaqmko0 4 роки тому +1

      Nicely done.

    • @ito4167
      @ito4167 3 роки тому +1

      Nice..

    • @herculesperseus6326
      @herculesperseus6326 3 роки тому

      How would you actually do it with this method lol, there's no clue to prove any triangle to be congruent

    • @vampire_catgirl
      @vampire_catgirl 3 роки тому

      @@herculesperseus6326 The triangle has a 45 degree angle in the middle of a 90 degree angle. The other angles have to add up to 45 to meet the 90, so they're the same

    • @herculesperseus6326
      @herculesperseus6326 3 роки тому +1

      @@vampire_catgirl which means one of them is 20 and the other is 25. How would you mathematically fold both flaps into the central triangle with any evidence it's a perfect fit

  • @hammad3180
    @hammad3180 3 роки тому

    First ever ( mind your decisions )question I was able to solve.

  • @HemanthHemu
    @HemanthHemu 2 роки тому

    Brilliant. Thinking outside the polygon

  • @leonardoginting9307
    @leonardoginting9307 4 роки тому +16

    Finally, no gougu

  • @christianfunintuscany1147
    @christianfunintuscany1147 4 роки тому +4

    I found x = 65 and P = 2 ... it looked easier than what it actually is 🧐

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 3 роки тому

      How did you solve for P though? The way he did it?

    • @christianfunintuscany1147
      @christianfunintuscany1147 3 роки тому

      Leif we know the angles DEA = 65 and AFB = 70 so we can find EC = 1- 1/tg(DEA), FC = 1 - 1/tg(AFB) and EF comes straight from Pitagora ...

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 3 роки тому

      @@christianfunintuscany1147 what the heck is tg?? And pythagoras doesnt eliminate the variables in this case so you dont get the answer..

    • @christianfunintuscany1147
      @christianfunintuscany1147 3 роки тому

      Leif sorry ... tg is the function tan, if you know the angle you know its tangent and because the side equal 1 you can easily find the other side, you can do this in both triangles ADE and ABF in this way you find FC and EC then with Pitagora theorem you find EF and you have the perimeter FC + EC + EF. ok ? Sorry for the confusing tg ... :)

  • @zozomul373
    @zozomul373 2 роки тому

    i think is more intuitive to begin just by drawing a vertical line from A to EF and then continue in almost the same approach, than rotate triangle ABF

  • @dariopirtea5409
    @dariopirtea5409 3 роки тому

    Very nicely explained!