Розмір відео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показувати елементи керування програвачем
Автоматичне відтворення
Автоповтор
This man knows his lenses :)
Thanks. Enjoying your channel a lot.
Hey! Do you racomend any MFT lenses in this category? Thanks!!
Hi. Yes. Olympus 12mm f/2 is exceptionally nice. Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 (the pancake one) is not bad either. There may be others too.
I see a relation between low count of lens groups and 3d pop in my experience, and I see it works for your examples aswell. What do you think? I thought I heard you say its the other way 😅
According to my analyses it's the chemistry of the glass. Some of the best pip comes from zooms with loads of elements.
@@sneye1 What do you mean by chemistry?
@@ElRubio864 The explanation is too long for a swift reply. You can watch the third video published on this channel.
@@sneye1 Thankyou
Hey! Do you think the Voigtländer 21mm F1.8 is as "poppy" as the F1.4? Cheers :)
Don't know. It should be...
@@sneye1 Thanks ! Looks like it's pretty similar and it's predecessor :)
This man knows his lenses :)
Thanks. Enjoying your channel a lot.
Hey! Do you racomend any MFT lenses in this category? Thanks!!
Hi. Yes. Olympus 12mm f/2 is exceptionally nice. Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 (the pancake one) is not bad either. There may be others too.
I see a relation between low count of lens groups and 3d pop in my experience, and I see it works for your examples aswell. What do you think? I thought I heard you say its the other way 😅
According to my analyses it's the chemistry of the glass. Some of the best pip comes from zooms with loads of elements.
@@sneye1 What do you mean by chemistry?
@@ElRubio864 The explanation is too long for a swift reply. You can watch the third video published on this channel.
@@sneye1 Thankyou
Hey! Do you think the Voigtländer 21mm F1.8 is as "poppy" as the F1.4? Cheers :)
Don't know. It should be...
@@sneye1 Thanks ! Looks like it's pretty similar and it's predecessor :)