A look at some of the worst and best wide angle to normal lenses for true-to-life rendering

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @cameraconspiracies
    @cameraconspiracies 2 місяці тому +5

    This man knows his lenses :)

    • @sneye1
      @sneye1  2 місяці тому +2

      Thanks. Enjoying your channel a lot.

  • @matteobregante5656
    @matteobregante5656 12 днів тому

    Hey! Do you racomend any MFT lenses in this category? Thanks!!

    • @sneye1
      @sneye1  12 днів тому +1

      Hi. Yes. Olympus 12mm f/2 is exceptionally nice. Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 (the pancake one) is not bad either. There may be others too.

  • @ElRubio864
    @ElRubio864 11 днів тому

    I see a relation between low count of lens groups and 3d pop in my experience, and I see it works for your examples aswell. What do you think? I thought I heard you say its the other way 😅

    • @sneye1
      @sneye1  11 днів тому

      According to my analyses it's the chemistry of the glass. Some of the best pip comes from zooms with loads of elements.

    • @ElRubio864
      @ElRubio864 11 днів тому

      @@sneye1 What do you mean by chemistry?

    • @sneye1
      @sneye1  11 днів тому +1

      @@ElRubio864 The explanation is too long for a swift reply. You can watch the third video published on this channel.

    • @ElRubio864
      @ElRubio864 11 днів тому

      @@sneye1 Thankyou

  • @KirmesRuf6
    @KirmesRuf6 3 дні тому

    Hey! Do you think the Voigtländer 21mm F1.8 is as "poppy" as the F1.4? Cheers :)

    • @sneye1
      @sneye1  3 дні тому

      Don't know. It should be...

    • @KirmesRuf6
      @KirmesRuf6 2 дні тому

      @@sneye1 Thanks ! Looks like it's pretty similar and it's predecessor :)