I like the previous videos, but this one is just not true. Emotion is replicating empathy (people are currently falling in love with AI chatbots etc), AI can solve mathematically problems better than most humans can, including critical thinking. Now AI can learn and automate itself connected to the internet, which means it will learn faster than any human can, as it will take just the time for 1 machine to learn something for all connected machines to learn it as well, unlike humans. On the other hand the self automation is not something that just happens without a reason but finding a "reason" to do so is not a hard leap to be taken by a AI. AI already takes unprogrammed decisions based on data analysis so what happens when some AI in a big truck decides all human walkers delaying the delivery of a critical package are nothing but objects delaying such a critical mission? My "guess" is just removed them (and ya the do not harm to humanity doesnt work as its been proven that AI will circunvent that if reframed in a way that saves more lives in the future - so if the package is a vaccine with potential to save a million lives in 10 years, it will outweight the lives of 1000 humans on the road to the final destination of the truck). What I would really like is for ppl in the field to actually do some work on the consequences of creating something smarter than the human, becuase like all creatures that are smarter than others (humans included) tend to reguard others species as nothing more than annoyancing creatures that should be controled if they go against their own interests (survival of the fittest and evolution applies to all things with evolutionary potential, not just living things).
I like the previous videos, but this one is just not true. Emotion is replicating empathy (people are currently falling in love with AI chatbots etc), AI can solve mathematically problems better than most humans can, including critical thinking. Now AI can learn and automate itself connected to the internet, which means it will learn faster than any human can, as it will take just the time for 1 machine to learn something for all connected machines to learn it as well, unlike humans. On the other hand the self automation is not something that just happens without a reason but finding a "reason" to do so is not a hard leap to be taken by a AI. AI already takes unprogrammed decisions based on data analysis so what happens when some AI in a big truck decides all human walkers delaying the delivery of a critical package are nothing but objects delaying such a critical mission? My "guess" is just removed them (and ya the do not harm to humanity doesnt work as its been proven that AI will circunvent that if reframed in a way that saves more lives in the future - so if the package is a vaccine with potential to save a million lives in 10 years, it will outweight the lives of 1000 humans on the road to the final destination of the truck).
What I would really like is for ppl in the field to actually do some work on the consequences of creating something smarter than the human, becuase like all creatures that are smarter than others (humans included) tend to reguard others species as nothing more than annoyancing creatures that should be controled if they go against their own interests (survival of the fittest and evolution applies to all things with evolutionary potential, not just living things).
Thank you for your feedback.