You can tell the 5600x did worse in tests where it was hotter. When the temp was lower it would beat the other two. Cooling wasn’t sufficient for the 5600x.
Different platform (motherboard) for the 5600x... All thongs should be equal, or as much as possible... Different buos could implement different memory timings and Ryzen is very sensitive to ram performance... It makes no sense that 5600 is 10% faster than 5600x for example
@@GraaD-87 yes, there is. 5600g is not a final product for a costumer, it's just a bridge to future upgrade, nobody's gonna keep a 5600g after buying a graphic card cause it's a trash processor, it's just for low budget future build pc gamer or for office automation pcs with a520
@@velk_wanggoudan First of all, I was talking about an honest comaprison. Same motherboard, same memory and all. Second of all, you're sooo wrong about 5600g... It is actually the ultimate go-to CPU for so many use cases! SFF builds in particular. Between 5600 and 5600g for a low-profile build (even with a dGPU in it) I would go for 5600g without a doubt: less actual TDP, goes well with PCI 3.0 raiser cables and cheaper mini-ITX MBs, has built-in GPU for troubleshooting scenarios... and it also allows you to use onboard video ports whenever you need a 2nd HDMI (dGPUs nowdays only have one HDMI you know). As for actual FPS in games and etc. I'd say it's more or less on par with 5600x most of the time for any reasonable task in low-mid build price segment. Anything below RX 6700 XT will run just fine with 5600g. unless you absolutely MUST squeeze every single frame out of your hardware... for whatever reason. Seriously, the quality of life features that iGPU provides combined with great TDP values out of the box make 5600g THE processor to go to on AM4 platform if MB is PCIE 3.0 only or it's a low-mid tier SFF build where heat-to-performance actually matters.
@@velk_wanggoudan 5600 is hardly different in cinebench tests, obviously for gaming itll do a little worse than 5600 but igpu is good, saves power, and they are all budget pc cpus anyways, so it doesn't matter about frame differences.
yes i do recommend that. But, right now, I would recommend waiting for the ryzen 9000's series to come out because most likely, the prices of the ryzen 5000 series would go down and you could go for ryzen 5 5600x instead. Also if you are planning to get a amd cpu, maybe also get a amd gpu so you can get a nice fps boost. The 6750 xt or 6700xt are the same price as the 4060, but have a 5-10% fps boost in gaming. (I am speaking from a gamers point of view, so things may change if youre using the combo for productivity/editing).
i have a 5700x for my 4060 (1080p). absolutely good combo. i don't even need a better CPU, at 1080p especially. this trend of buying always the latest CPU/GPU is just like the trend to buy the latest phone. it only generates e-waste as people sell their perfectly good hardware for something slightly better... just keep in mind the 5600 came out in 2022, the 5600x in 2020. i would get the 5600 just because it's 2 years newer
Intel Core i5-14600K: This CPU is a great value option, available for around $300. It offers 14 cores, 20 threads, and a 5.3GHz Turbo clock, making it suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming duties with the RTX 4060. Intel Core i7-14700K: For those willing to spend around $400, the Core i7-14700K provides 20 cores, 28 threads, and a 5.6GHz Turbo boost, offering more processing power and compatibility with the latest generation. AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: If you’re looking to maximize CPU performance without breaking the bank, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a strong contender. It offers 8 cores, 16 threads, and a 5.5GHz boost clock, making it a great option for gaming and content creation.
If you can afford 4060 you should probably use a fucking gud cpu. Its a waste if using a high end gpu with a budget friendly cpu now thats doesnt make sence lol
The comparison you made is not a good one. You need to compare the same scenes at the same time, because fps differences in the same scene at the same time reflect reality.
just a tip for your future testings; testing your fps in the Firing Range in apex legends is completely useless and does not show the realistic fps value you would get. Instead of Firing Range, you should play a match and especially show us when you leave the ship because that's when you have the minimum possible fps since the game renders the whole map because you are looking at the whole map from above. This minimum fps while looking from above is also almost the same amount of fps when you are on the very edge of a map and you are looking at the direction of the center of the map which also causes the game to render the whole map. so yeah, either record while jumping off of the ship or record while you are on the edge of a map. that's literally the only way to show us a card's TRUE PERFORMANCE. Any serious fps gamer will lock their fps to the minimum fps they get in the game. Say I have 240+ fps while in the middle of the map but I have 180 fps while on the edge of a map, then I will simply lock my fps to 180 fps. This is not something preferable. It is a MUST to have balanced frametimes and balanced input lag between each frame. Going from 240 fps to 180 fps in one frametime will not only change your input lag value but also it might give you stuttering on the screen.
No you don't (I use 5600g + gpu). Just make sure you use the video output from the video card. It might be possible to disable igpu and see some kind of improvement, but I wouldn't know.
I mean like it should handle up to a 3090, If you play games at the intended resolution(4k) but I f u can wait u should and get the 5600x because of the l3 cache which 32 instead of 16mb o the 5600g(I personally have a 5600g too and am really happy with it, pulls ahead of the 5600x sometimes too which is funny)
I'm planning to upgrade my 5600g to 5600 but i wonder if the performance gain would be enough to justify the upgrade, specially on modern titles such as Dead Space Remake, Starfield, Forza, etc...
i think instead of that you should get a 5600x, since a lot of benchmarks recommend it and it is the same mobo slot. or you should pay a little extra for a future proof r7
@@Zephyrus-Zedd Def not a good idea unless they're selling the 5600g to recoup the cost, if not it's absolutely not worth it. Either don't upgrade or get an AM4 X3D chip or upgrade to AM5. Almost everyone recommends to get the 5600 instead of the 5600x, the price to performance difference between them isn't good as. You'd be paying more percentage in costs than percentage gains in performance. Around 20% price increase for 5% higher performance
Yeah, I don't really understand the low 5600g fortnite performance. gpu is showing 98% usage, if cpu was bottlenecking, gpu usage would be lower I believe
Actually the 5600G has a missleading naming, as it's even based on a different microarchitecture, yes the 3 of them are Zen 3, but the 5600G is actually based on Cezanne while the 5600 and 5600X are based Vermeer, in fact, the 5600G has completely different specs than the 5600 and 5600X, less cache, weaker cores and PCIe 3.0 support instead of 4.0, so it's not simply a 5600 with integrated graphics but actually a different CPU, what the 5600G is is actually a 5500 with integrated graphics
Totally fake or something wrong in his testing components there's no way the X version slower than the others. u can check with other videos as well 5600x always 3% faster than the non x versions. and 5600g outperform the others 🤯no way.
The true question now in 2024 is does newer games rely more now on multicore tasking 😊. I have a cpu ryzen 5600G which has higher multicore than those two. Im playing First Descendent which is a looter shooter game and for a game like this a higher multicore count is more beneficial than a single core. Dont confuse your self thats why some games run on hinger fps and some dont but talking about single core like ryzen 5600x it should have more fps than 5600? Now that doesnt make sence at all? Does it have todo with there software?😂
PCIE is not a big deal. The main advantage of non G CPU is the 32 mb L3 Cache , and it should have roughly 20-30% performance uplift over 5600g so something is wrong with this video.
Even a RTX4090 shows max 5fps difference between PCIe Gen 3 vs Gen 4. Brutally honest? PCIe Gen 4 is currently entirely pointless for GPUs as they don't even use that much bandwidth (not even a 4090)
@@Knaeckebrotsaege RTX 4090 is not a x8 card, is a x8. There is no big difference is this scenario. At most, is latency. But on x8 cards its a bigger deal
Eso significa que el ryzen 5 5600x es el mas caliente de los 3 procesadores y aparte obtienes un rendimiento similar a sus hermanos menores. Yo tengo un disipador royal talent de 120mm y con el core performance boost activado jugando al fornite llega los 90 grados celcius. Tengo que desactivar el core performance boost para mantenerlo fresco entre 60 y 70 grados.
Pero pasa algo curioso que note en tu video. El ryzen 5 5600 aparte de que se calienta unos 8 o 10 grados menos que el ryzen 5 5600x. Con el ryzen 5 5600 obtienes unos 10 fps mas que el ryzen de la X. Cuando se supone que debria ser al reves. El 5600x deberia obtener mas fps. Acaso sera que el silicio de tu 5600 es mejos que tu 5600x?
this test can not give confidence on a cpu! because not everyone can afford an RTX 3074! there are some PCs that mount the 1060! if a player is looking for clarity on cpu or a test! for me it is instantly failed! test failed
En Juegos Offline El 5600G no Se queda Atras...Pero cuando se trata de Juegos Online sí, Ya que el Juego ocupa el procesador al estar conectados a un servidor Online que usa la Cpu y no la GPU
The Ryzen 5 5600 got clocked up to the Ryzen 5 5600x lvl or the Ryzen 5 5600x got downclocked like u see in corners with all the extra information about clock speeds and stuff like that
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
You can tell the 5600x did worse in tests where it was hotter. When the temp was lower it would beat the other two. Cooling wasn’t sufficient for the 5600x.
Boost Overdrive PBO - Ryzen 5600x - now 58 degree
its not that hot which will cause the cpu frequency though
CPU don't care about temp, tbh it could be much hotter without any differences
i thinks this guys confused everything. It's no way 5600x is slower than 5600 or 5600g.
It's bc the tests where the Ryzen 5 5600x was hotter were really bad thats why you should get a good cooler for your cpu
@@Nuteby its only at 67 degrees max which wont cause any thermal throttling
Unfair all got gpu.. why dont they do right all stocksss no gpu...
I doubt it 5600g win😂
@@dispelledword7818 well your right..because the ryzen 5600 and 5600x will not run output a display without a GPU HAHAHA
The other 2 might not work bro@@dispelledword7818
How come the cheaper version R5 5600 produces the highest framerate.
cache, ask the 5800x3d although I don't know why the 5600 outperforms the x
coz X is simply for overclocking? and games isnt the best way to test CPU
@lankogaming9458por el Tema de calidad/precio cuál conviene más el Ryzen 5500 o el Ryzen 5600?
@@juzoCHthe x isnt for over clocking, well it is but not specifically as it also has an extra 200mhz boost clock so it really should be faster
different mobo. Anyway i think the differences are few. And the 5600 cost -30 euros.
Different platform (motherboard) for the 5600x... All thongs should be equal, or as much as possible... Different buos could implement different memory timings and Ryzen is very sensitive to ram performance... It makes no sense that 5600 is 10% faster than 5600x for example
5600x is for an overclock setup, so there's no sense on putting it at a b450
@@velk_wanggoudan yet there's no reason not to put 5600g in a b550.
@@GraaD-87 yes, there is. 5600g is not a final product for a costumer, it's just a bridge to future upgrade, nobody's gonna keep a 5600g after buying a graphic card cause it's a trash processor, it's just for low budget future build pc gamer or for office automation pcs with a520
@@velk_wanggoudan First of all, I was talking about an honest comaprison. Same motherboard, same memory and all. Second of all, you're sooo wrong about 5600g... It is actually the ultimate go-to CPU for so many use cases! SFF builds in particular. Between 5600 and 5600g for a low-profile build (even with a dGPU in it) I would go for 5600g without a doubt: less actual TDP, goes well with PCI 3.0 raiser cables and cheaper mini-ITX MBs, has built-in GPU for troubleshooting scenarios... and it also allows you to use onboard video ports whenever you need a 2nd HDMI (dGPUs nowdays only have one HDMI you know). As for actual FPS in games and etc. I'd say it's more or less on par with 5600x most of the time for any reasonable task in low-mid build price segment. Anything below RX 6700 XT will run just fine with 5600g. unless you absolutely MUST squeeze every single frame out of your hardware... for whatever reason. Seriously, the quality of life features that iGPU provides combined with great TDP values out of the box make 5600g THE processor to go to on AM4 platform if MB is PCIE 3.0 only or it's a low-mid tier SFF build where heat-to-performance actually matters.
@@velk_wanggoudan 5600 is hardly different in cinebench tests, obviously for gaming itll do a little worse than 5600 but igpu is good, saves power, and they are all budget pc cpus anyways, so it doesn't matter about frame differences.
it doesn't really make sense how in Apex the 5600g and 5600x have the same average frame rate but the 5600 is nearly 30fps higher.
What about rust?
coz cooling
With same cooling 5600x go throttling more often than 5600.
Do you recommend the Ryzen 5 5600 for an RTX 4060?
Same question mate, if u find the answer do share with me plz
yes i do recommend that. But, right now, I would recommend waiting for the ryzen 9000's series to come out because most likely, the prices of the ryzen 5000 series would go down and you could go for ryzen 5 5600x instead. Also if you are planning to get a amd cpu, maybe also get a amd gpu so you can get a nice fps boost. The 6750 xt or 6700xt are the same price as the 4060, but have a 5-10% fps boost in gaming. (I am speaking from a gamers point of view, so things may change if youre using the combo for productivity/editing).
i have a 5700x for my 4060 (1080p). absolutely good combo. i don't even need a better CPU, at 1080p especially. this trend of buying always the latest CPU/GPU is just like the trend to buy the latest phone. it only generates e-waste as people sell their perfectly good hardware for something slightly better...
just keep in mind the 5600 came out in 2022, the 5600x in 2020. i would get the 5600 just because it's 2 years newer
Intel Core i5-14600K: This CPU is a great value option, available for around $300. It offers 14 cores, 20 threads, and a 5.3GHz Turbo clock, making it suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming duties with the RTX 4060.
Intel Core i7-14700K: For those willing to spend around $400, the Core i7-14700K provides 20 cores, 28 threads, and a 5.6GHz Turbo boost, offering more processing power and compatibility with the latest generation.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: If you’re looking to maximize CPU performance without breaking the bank, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a strong contender. It offers 8 cores, 16 threads, and a 5.5GHz boost clock, making it a great option for gaming and content creation.
If you can afford 4060 you should probably use a fucking gud cpu. Its a waste if using a high end gpu with a budget friendly cpu now thats doesnt make sence lol
Just advice use different collor for cpu overlay(not red) because in low resolution hard to read
The comparison you made is not a good one. You need to compare the same scenes at the same time, because fps differences in the same scene at the same time reflect reality.
just a tip for your future testings;
testing your fps in the Firing Range in apex legends is completely useless and does not show the realistic fps value you would get. Instead of Firing Range, you should play a match and especially show us when you leave the ship because that's when you have the minimum possible fps since the game renders the whole map because you are looking at the whole map from above. This minimum fps while looking from above is also almost the same amount of fps when you are on the very edge of a map and you are looking at the direction of the center of the map which also causes the game to render the whole map.
so yeah, either record while jumping off of the ship or record while you are on the edge of a map. that's literally the only way to show us a card's TRUE PERFORMANCE. Any serious fps gamer will lock their fps to the minimum fps they get in the game. Say I have 240+ fps while in the middle of the map but I have 180 fps while on the edge of a map, then I will simply lock my fps to 180 fps. This is not something preferable. It is a MUST to have balanced frametimes and balanced input lag between each frame. Going from 240 fps to 180 fps in one frametime will not only change your input lag value but also it might give you stuttering on the screen.
does the ryzen 5 5600 require a gpu?
yes, only 5600g don't need a gpu.
This series cpu partnered with 3070 considered as MID RANGE set up pc? Im Planning to build mid range set up soon🙂 100-110fps is enough for me.🤧
Noob u only need 60 FPS
why does the 5600 g do randomly double digit worse, but other times it is almost same?
because 5600 and 5600x have its clock unlocked and on 5600 g its locked
5600g is unlocked dude.@@kjtn4313
5600G has half the L3 cache of the other two, which heavily cripples it in some games, but not so much in others
Because 5600g for kids 5600 for boy and 5600x for the man
@@AbuGarcia88 5600X has no reason to exist. you're paying 20-30eur more for a pathetic 200MHz (0.2GHz) increase
Wich cpu will work if your if your gpu stops working? Because 72 fps on a 60 fps monitor i will take all day
ryzen 5 5600g
perfect video, the one i have been looking for months:)
You need to learn more about Motherboard compatibility.
This video is Nonsense.
Me too, it has the same motherboard
If i don't overclock cpu, should i buy 5600x or 5600?
5600 and you save 30€. It's good for gaming, pratically it has the same performance as the 5600x.
@@Warmalin Thank you, is it ok if i pair it with b550 arous elite
@@Minhuc_oye
@@Minhuc_oit's a good choice. Enjoy.
@@Warmalin iam gonna use a msi mag forge m100a with 4 fans included, do i really need to buy 2 more fans since my room don't have air conditioner ?
When using a dedicated GPU + apu Do I need to turn off the igpu in the apu processor?
No you don't (I use 5600g + gpu). Just make sure you use the video output from the video card. It might be possible to disable igpu and see some kind of improvement, but I wouldn't know.
the same gpu?
This test is misleading
I thinking about buying a 5600G untill i get enough to buy a decent GPU should i?
I mean like it should handle up to a 3090, If you play games at the intended resolution(4k) but I f u can wait u should and get the 5600x because of the l3 cache which 32 instead of 16mb o the 5600g(I personally have a 5600g too and am really happy with it, pulls ahead of the 5600x sometimes too which is funny)
hey i have a 5600g and I am going to buy the rx 6750 do you think it would have bottleck@@mohsininamdar3131
That is some extraordinary bullcrap.
I'm planning to upgrade my 5600g to 5600 but i wonder if the performance gain would be enough to justify the upgrade, specially on modern titles such as Dead Space Remake, Starfield, Forza, etc...
get a 5800x3d or get a future proofed 7000 series
No.
@@BlackOilyMenKissingyour pfp what the fuck
i think instead of that you should get a 5600x, since a lot of benchmarks recommend it and it is the same mobo slot. or you should pay a little extra for a future proof r7
@@Zephyrus-Zedd Def not a good idea unless they're selling the 5600g to recoup the cost, if not it's absolutely not worth it. Either don't upgrade or get an AM4 X3D chip or upgrade to AM5. Almost everyone recommends to get the 5600 instead of the 5600x, the price to performance difference between them isn't good as. You'd be paying more percentage in costs than percentage gains in performance. Around 20% price increase for 5% higher performance
Listen, as long as if it’s not gltichy or laggy, i’ll be fine
this video whithout a graphics card ??
Bro your tests ar messed up like really messed up I get 165+fps with the ryzen 5600G and an Rx6500xt like huh
you are in gpu limit most of the time. thats not a CPU test u have done
Yeah, I don't really understand the low 5600g fortnite performance. gpu is showing 98% usage, if cpu was bottlenecking, gpu usage would be lower I believe
5600g vs 3600 ????
ua-cam.com/video/PngizbBVqgE/v-deo.html
5600g easily beats 3600x
does 5600 have an encoder? can i use relive with it?
5600g has an iGPU, but no, the 5600 (non g) does not have an encoder unless you mean x264
The power consumption r5 5600g is impressive
Why does the 5600g in the warzone have a low percent of GPU load, but fps like on 5600/5600x, but on 5600-5600x GPU load +-90%???
thays engnelearing bruv
@@angibono sorry, I don't understand you
@@rustamkasimov8406 i mean thats engineering😛😛
The cpu is the bottleneck, it can't process fast enough to keep up with the gpu. Due to the L3 cache .maybe?
Actually the 5600G has a missleading naming, as it's even based on a different microarchitecture, yes the 3 of them are Zen 3, but the 5600G is actually based on Cezanne while the 5600 and 5600X are based Vermeer, in fact, the 5600G has completely different specs than the 5600 and 5600X, less cache, weaker cores and PCIe 3.0 support instead of 4.0, so it's not simply a 5600 with integrated graphics but actually a different CPU, what the 5600G is is actually a 5500 with integrated graphics
Totally fake or something wrong in his testing components there's no way the X version slower than the others. u can check with other videos as well 5600x always 3% faster than the non x versions. and 5600g outperform the others 🤯no way.
The true question now in 2024 is does newer games rely more now on multicore tasking 😊. I have a cpu ryzen 5600G which has higher multicore than those two. Im playing First Descendent which is a looter shooter game and for a game like this a higher multicore count is more beneficial than a single core. Dont confuse your self thats why some games run on hinger fps and some dont but talking about single core like ryzen 5600x it should have more fps than 5600? Now that doesnt make sence at all? Does it have todo with there software?😂
повторяемость сцен уровень бога...
You haven't titled the videos to show which is which.
do you cpu's?
they are labelled at the top of each screen view in red.
@@cherylspann2396Very difficult to see - on a mobile screen almost impossible to see.
The MB only supports PCIe 3.0, masking the real bennefits of 5600 and 5600X with PCIe 4....
only if you have a b550 motherboard...
@@slaydog5102exactly, this video was made with a B450
PCIE is not a big deal. The main advantage of non G CPU is the 32 mb L3 Cache , and it should have roughly 20-30% performance uplift over 5600g so something is wrong with this video.
Even a RTX4090 shows max 5fps difference between PCIe Gen 3 vs Gen 4. Brutally honest? PCIe Gen 4 is currently entirely pointless for GPUs as they don't even use that much bandwidth (not even a 4090)
@@Knaeckebrotsaege RTX 4090 is not a x8 card, is a x8. There is no big difference is this scenario. At most, is latency. But on x8 cards its a bigger deal
Eso significa que el ryzen 5 5600x es el mas caliente de los 3 procesadores y aparte obtienes un rendimiento similar a sus hermanos menores. Yo tengo un disipador royal talent de 120mm y con el core performance boost activado jugando al fornite llega los 90 grados celcius. Tengo que desactivar el core performance boost para mantenerlo fresco entre 60 y 70 grados.
Pero no entiendo porque el 5600 normal tiene más fps que el 5600X
Yo digo que debe ser cuestión de cuello de botella o alguna cosa
Pero pasa algo curioso que note en tu video. El ryzen 5 5600 aparte de que se calienta unos 8 o 10 grados menos que el ryzen 5 5600x. Con el ryzen 5 5600 obtienes unos 10 fps mas que el ryzen de la X. Cuando se supone que debria ser al reves. El 5600x deberia obtener mas fps. Acaso sera que el silicio de tu 5600 es mejos que tu 5600x?
Broo ur video contains flaws. Ryzen 5 5600g is slower than 5600 an 5600x
this test can not give confidence on a cpu! because not everyone can afford an RTX 3074! there are some PCs that mount the 1060! if a player is looking for clarity on cpu or a test! for me it is instantly failed! test failed
Song name at the end pls. my bad its in the description.
The bottleneck is what makes the FPS different
why the 5600G so low in Rust?
because 5600G has low level 3 cache - 16MB. but 5600 / 5600X - 32MB L3 cache
Que opinan acerca de 5500 + rtx 2060 para Fortnite en 140 fps?
Vale la pena en 2024?
Si
How is the X version not the best
you basically paying 30$ more for a letter bud
En Juegos Offline El 5600G no Se queda Atras...Pero cuando se trata de Juegos Online sí, Ya que el Juego ocupa el procesador al estar conectados a un servidor Online que usa la Cpu y no la GPU
Guys he is using pcie 3 gen mobo and the ryzen 5 5600 non x/5600x are gen 4 so they are limited with their performance...
5600x is thermal throttling
Can you do valorant?
Really 5 600 better than 5 600G
Almost the same performance, but the 5600g carries an integrated card. The best thing is for the difference between them to exceed 40%.
The Ryzen 5 5600 got clocked up to the Ryzen 5 5600x lvl or the Ryzen 5 5600x got downclocked like u see in corners with all the extra information about clock speeds and stuff like that
Yea I can bs on this. I have had both 5600g and 5600x - charts or naming is off
This is fake video.
VALORANT?
Fake
Flawed tests brother
fake
Não si testa processador com gráficos no máximo i sim placa de vídeo.
is this real, like how
very bad trash even content