Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 126

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  Рік тому +8

    Applications of Integration - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3ZdKSnK
    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/
    Calculus 1 Final Exam Review: ua-cam.com/video/WmBzmHru78w/v-deo.html
    Next Video: ua-cam.com/video/df1Qr8pepx0/v-deo.html

    • @EdisonvsTesla
      @EdisonvsTesla Рік тому

      I have no words to express my dignity for you . Thanks in advance from Ethiopia 🇪🇹

  • @johnortiz6129
    @johnortiz6129 4 роки тому +708

    The difference between part 1 and part 2 for those who don't know is that for part 1 we found the derivative of the antiderivative F(x) but here we do not do that step and just plug in the values to F(x) and solve for it

    • @ltahoe9257
      @ltahoe9257 2 роки тому +35

      Finally, a short enough description to put on my flashcards for FTOC pt 1 and pt 2 lol

    • @haseebnizamani7919
      @haseebnizamani7919 2 роки тому +6

      Thankyou John ortiz

    • @nrgking1667
      @nrgking1667 Рік тому +5

      🐐

    • @emanuelmtubo
      @emanuelmtubo 8 місяців тому +1

      Of coz

    • @julianaakello
      @julianaakello 3 місяці тому

      No as for me I think the difference is in case 1 the interval has a x limit while the case two the interval has only integers

  • @hye6158
    @hye6158 3 роки тому +162

    His "In this video" is the best and foremost anti anxiety med I have ever taken.

  • @HanaaAHamed
    @HanaaAHamed 3 роки тому +48

    I literally couldn’t have passed any of my 1st year of cs exams without you

  • @ash7-f6v
    @ash7-f6v Місяць тому +6

    This guy is the living proof of Math is not difficult; it just requires a good tutor.

  • @jshsnipa
    @jshsnipa 2 роки тому +36

    I always watch these videos, even if I am very confident in my understanding of a subject because he always shows me something I didnt know before.

  • @karenzheng8905
    @karenzheng8905 4 роки тому +176

    why does this make so much more sense than what my professor has been doing?!?!

    • @calmstorm5632
      @calmstorm5632 4 роки тому +24

      explaining/teaching is an art.

    • @kennyhuang7393
      @kennyhuang7393 3 роки тому +7

      My Calculus II professor has this thick Russian accent, so it was really hard for me to understand when English is my second language.

    • @ethana2359
      @ethana2359 3 роки тому +3

      @@kennyhuang7393 i feel that, my teacher as well in BC Calculus has a very thick Russian accent and broken English.

    • @nexon7610
      @nexon7610 10 місяців тому +4

      ​@@kennyhuang7393"no more than one unmarketable tomato"

    • @selinm
      @selinm 9 місяців тому +2

      @@nexon7610 BAHBAHDBJHAFBGJHASF no one understood i guess

  • @robertchatterton5357
    @robertchatterton5357 3 роки тому +19

    OCT: "In this video, we are gonna talk about..."
    Me: Immediately understands the concept

  • @whotrekkier2086
    @whotrekkier2086 5 років тому +218

    Him: "In this video..."
    Me: "YES God! Is that you God?"
    What would we do without this guy?

    • @gisasalvatory2277
      @gisasalvatory2277 5 років тому

      Hlw

    • @Chris-ld5vk
      @Chris-ld5vk 4 роки тому +6

      whotrekkie R I don’t know about everyone else but for me F A I L

    • @finnar7973
      @finnar7973 3 роки тому +3

      spend time reading the confusing af stuff in the textbook

  • @yatsumleung7181
    @yatsumleung7181 4 роки тому +43

    an absolute legend

  • @owenharper429
    @owenharper429 6 років тому +169

    So it's basically definite intergrals, right?

  • @masonp5
    @masonp5 6 років тому +81

    i thought the part 2 was just my teacher dividing it up

  • @spnfangirl67
    @spnfangirl67 3 роки тому +10

    Thank you so much for this clear and easy explanation, God bless you

  • @NicholasJLochner
    @NicholasJLochner Рік тому +5

    universities should just show this guys videos. makes way more sense than some old ass dude trying to use words he doesn't know

  • @robertcooper9291
    @robertcooper9291 Рік тому +1

    Love your videos...I have been learning from them for over a year they are great and explain the concepts very well. Thank you

  • @milespq5561
    @milespq5561 4 роки тому +8

    Ur more clutch than LeBron’s chase down block. Carrying me thru BC fr🙏🏾

  • @vamsikrishna1474
    @vamsikrishna1474 5 років тому +3

    Great explanation keep uploading this kind of videos BRO

  • @pilaranamarief.7267
    @pilaranamarief.7267 3 роки тому +2

    Happy 3M subscribers 💖

  • @nataliogonzalez306
    @nataliogonzalez306 6 років тому +4

    Great videos! keep up the good stuff

  • @thomasschneller7081
    @thomasschneller7081 3 роки тому +2

    I use JG as a verb. “Son, I don’t remember that stuff. Give me a second and I’ll JG that stuff.”

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 3 роки тому +7

    Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for a basic introduction to The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 2. This is also another important theorem in Calculus. Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, although the final solution is correct in all your examples, equal signs are missing in between the problem and the final solution. Please correct these small errors in the video.

  • @williamsparano
    @williamsparano Рік тому +1

    I love you so much man

  • @lucaslayton234
    @lucaslayton234 6 років тому +17

    Why is this part 2 when the techniques used in this video were required for part 1?

    • @tinahuang1177
      @tinahuang1177 5 років тому +8

      That is why in some textbooks it is the first part of FTOC

    • @keijuanwhite3538
      @keijuanwhite3538 3 роки тому

      you're right. it is because some textbooks explain how to evaluate the limit definition of a integral before showing the fundamental theorem of calculus. therefore using that definition, they are able to take the definite integral. Then in part 2, they learn how to apply the Leibniz notation for the definite integral. That is my best guess as to why some textbooks show it in the same order Julio did in his videos.

  • @vom3342
    @vom3342 2 роки тому +4

    Why never add the constant (“C” ) when you resolve the anti derivative F(x)? For the first exercise (1:32”), (3/2)x^2-4x +C, shall we at least keep the “C”here to make the equation true?

    • @scatter2darknes463
      @scatter2darknes463 2 роки тому +4

      Because its a definite integral which describes the area between a and b. If you used trapezoidal method or riemann sums you will see they approach the definite integral.

    • @sofiawong9681
      @sofiawong9681 Рік тому +6

      because when you use the fundamental theorem, you do F(a)-F(b). imagine F(x)=x+c so if you did the fundamental theorem, it would be (a+c) - (b+c), which would automatically cancel the c out, giving you a+c-b-c = a-b. i've found that a lot of teachers just omit the c entirely in FTC problems because it cancels out anyway.

    • @tylerdryman
      @tylerdryman Рік тому

      @@sofiawong9681 great explanation!

    • @neelg7057
      @neelg7057 Рік тому

      Because later you take the derivative of the expression so the constant cancels out

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    Thank you 💛💛💛

  • @CatherineMkandawire-r9y
    @CatherineMkandawire-r9y 5 місяців тому

    Well explained

  • @MediaByMatias
    @MediaByMatias 6 років тому

    This videos will forever help me pass

  • @antoineaoude
    @antoineaoude 3 роки тому +3

    All heroes have a catchphrase... this one is: "In this video"

  • @elvischrezzy1797
    @elvischrezzy1797 6 років тому

    You videos have helped me😉

  • @radbones3172
    @radbones3172 4 роки тому +16

    Whatever you get paid, it isn't nearly enough of what you deserve

  • @marjanmathilda1475
    @marjanmathilda1475 4 роки тому

    Thank you 🙏

  • @lucianarequena6350
    @lucianarequena6350 2 роки тому

    THANK YOU SO MUCH

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    Great 💛💛💛

  • @parkerdunn5270
    @parkerdunn5270 3 роки тому

    Thanks mate!

  • @thomasoppong4393
    @thomasoppong4393 Рік тому

    Hello..please have you covered Leibniz's theorem in any video

  • @KaylenApril
    @KaylenApril 6 років тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @virtua1boy988
    @virtua1boy988 5 років тому

    Thank you!!

  • @SimonWMZ
    @SimonWMZ Рік тому

    You never know you are going to do for the next step in calculus

  • @sajjadsaad4239
    @sajjadsaad4239 5 років тому

    Nice, thank you

  • @user-pr6ed3ri2k
    @user-pr6ed3ri2k 2 роки тому +1

    plozed inerval / inerfal

  • @willkitching9833
    @willkitching9833 3 роки тому +1

    at 10:03 why is 1 ^3/2 1?

    • @kevinhall2601
      @kevinhall2601 11 місяців тому

      Anything raised to 1 is just 1

  • @nthn8663
    @nthn8663 4 роки тому

    Ur my hero

  • @HardFlip310
    @HardFlip310 4 роки тому

    SAVED MY BEHIND!!!

  • @azzizzg8622
    @azzizzg8622 4 роки тому

    May God bless you

  • @AlionziFrancis
    @AlionziFrancis 9 місяців тому

    I always feel I am passing whenever I watch these videos,

  • @Genefever1
    @Genefever1 11 місяців тому

    Whats power rule? The normal one in derivatives?

  • @gracehu3031
    @gracehu3031 4 роки тому

    ahhh thank you!!

  • @notdolo
    @notdolo 3 роки тому +1

    POV: watching this 40 minutes before your proctored exam

  • @JustBaileey
    @JustBaileey 5 місяців тому

    so the second part of the theorem is essentially finding the area under a curve

  • @ferny4603
    @ferny4603 3 роки тому +1

    yes I will pass now

  • @selinm
    @selinm 9 місяців тому +2

    so its just definite integrals

  • @Asan-nk1th
    @Asan-nk1th 2 місяці тому

    So there is no difference between the FTC Part 2 and doing definite integrals. Interesting.

  • @nashawali2659
    @nashawali2659 4 роки тому

    What apps are you using for writing all this math equation?

  • @suleyman7478
    @suleyman7478 2 роки тому

    Why the first and second part is different? And how we know which one we will use for the question.

    • @No_BS_policy
      @No_BS_policy 2 роки тому

      First part allows us to find the derivative of F(x) while the second part allows us to evaluate definite integrals by evaluating F(x) from a to x. Stated otherwise, the first one gives you the instantaneous rate of change of F(x) while the second one gives you the area under the curve of the function f(x) in the interval [a b].

    • @azizaishambayeva2910
      @azizaishambayeva2910 Рік тому

      do you know how to find the anti derivative, im kind of confused @@No_BS_policy

  • @imnobody101
    @imnobody101 5 місяців тому

    Bro I start Calc 2 tmr and i got scared asf and started doing some last minute studying bc i forgot everything

  • @lasithaamarasinghe9251
    @lasithaamarasinghe9251 2 роки тому

    💫

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    💛💛💛

  • @ZeroTwo00002
    @ZeroTwo00002 Рік тому

    tysm

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    💛💛💛💛

  • @AmazingDerick
    @AmazingDerick Рік тому

    It's giving

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    💛💛💛💛💛💛

  • @danianajem1700
    @danianajem1700 Рік тому

    4.26

  • @ibile2922
    @ibile2922 2 роки тому

    Can I ever be this good???

  • @azamatdzholbunov9694
    @azamatdzholbunov9694 3 роки тому

    why F(4) - F(1), not F(4) - f(1)???????

    • @ooooio1512
      @ooooio1512 3 роки тому +1

      You need to subtract integrations no the main equation

  • @VinOnline
    @VinOnline 4 роки тому +2

    My midterm is tommorow :(

  • @sanchitjoshi6661
    @sanchitjoshi6661 8 місяців тому +2

    The answer for the first is 57/2 and not 39/2 (3:00). As it becomes 75-18/2, and 75-18 is 57.

    • @tynnfoil1146
      @tynnfoil1146 Місяць тому

      why would you divide 18 by 2? Since F(b) = (75/2)-20 and F(a) = -2, shoudlent the result of F(b)-F(a) be (75/2)-20+2?
      From my understanding (75-18)/2 would be the equivalent to (75/2)-(20/2)+1
      Genuine question I'm tryna learn calculus rn

  • @Beanbagtop
    @Beanbagtop 2 роки тому

    I love you

  • @GillAgainsIsland12
    @GillAgainsIsland12 3 роки тому +1

    A much easier method of solving the integral of (2x - 3)^2 from 1 to 4 is using u-substitution. Just let u = 2x - 3 and change the limits to -1 and 5. Don't need to FOIL the binomial and integrate each part. You'll get 126/6 = 21. Done.

    • @adesolao.2585
      @adesolao.2585 Рік тому +1

      why change the limits

    • @GillAgainsIsland12
      @GillAgainsIsland12 Рік тому

      @@adesolao.2585 Because the old limits were x values, the new limits are u value where u=2x-3.

    • @adesolao.2585
      @adesolao.2585 Рік тому +1

      @@GillAgainsIsland12 I SEEE. so u plug in the old values into whatever U is? and make those the new limits. do u do this for every definite integral u solve with U sub?

    • @GillAgainsIsland12
      @GillAgainsIsland12 Рік тому

      @@adesolao.2585 I do 😉

  • @rachelpark7958
    @rachelpark7958 4 роки тому +1

    Can you please be the professor at my school

  • @connorblankenship4751
    @connorblankenship4751 Місяць тому

    I'm gonna marry this man

  • @yzoononononn
    @yzoononononn 2 роки тому

    yt💫

  • @nickmaille5951
    @nickmaille5951 3 роки тому

    So thats why we do some weird stuff to get the limit to be from zero. So the equation gets canceled.

  • @janinegumela6302
    @janinegumela6302 2 роки тому

    meow

  • @jimhalpert9803
    @jimhalpert9803 4 роки тому

    Easy much?

  • @shamasbegum1616
    @shamasbegum1616 6 років тому +1

    First to comment

  • @jjao824
    @jjao824 Рік тому

    Marry me please. College gpa saved

  • @MasterBronzeElite
    @MasterBronzeElite 5 років тому +1

    This is wrong

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    💛💛💛

  • @Jawahir-l5u
    @Jawahir-l5u 2 роки тому

    💛💛💛💛💛💛