Nice and clear. Thank you. Question: @15:30 I am a little confused about the value of the weight: Shouldn't it be the same multiplicative factor i.e. 0.965 in this case, for all entries in the transposed matrix, and not "0.8 something" for the (0,2) location? The math works out that way, with non-zero entries being 1x0.965=0.965; 2x0.965=1.931; 3x0.965=2.895, etc (bias=0) and agrees with the earlier statement that there are only two parameters to learn (unclear why bias would be zero though). Cheers.
Thanks, Dr. Bhattiprolu,
you did an amazing job.
Jurij Schaber
Thanks
Thanks for your nice videos
Nice and clear. Thank you.
Question: @15:30 I am a little confused about the value of the weight: Shouldn't it be the same multiplicative factor i.e. 0.965 in this case, for all entries in the transposed matrix, and not "0.8 something" for the (0,2) location?
The math works out that way, with non-zero entries being 1x0.965=0.965; 2x0.965=1.931; 3x0.965=2.895, etc (bias=0) and agrees with the earlier statement that there are only two parameters to learn (unclear why bias would be zero though).
Cheers.
Great video !!!! thanks a lot
Thanks for teaching us. I would like to know if I could email you, Dr. Sreenivas Bhattiprolu. Have a great day.
Thank you very much.
Sir is this your second channel?