Nike Zoom Freak 6 Performance Review - But WHY!??

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @spencerkogut107
    @spencerkogut107 Місяць тому +8

    It’s interesting that besides KD and Bron, Giannis is the only current player that’s a champion that Nike has. Plus, he is very marketable. They gotta do better with this line

  • @Monstaray0210
    @Monstaray0210 Місяць тому +1

    I’m tired of that stupid oversized BS swoosh. Smfh

  • @Natt2x
    @Natt2x 26 днів тому

    In your tts do you have about a finger's width of space between your big toe and the end of the shoe?

  • @DanielEndres-cu3tt
    @DanielEndres-cu3tt Місяць тому +3

    This line (and most of Nike’s signature models) straight up sucks at this point. This is what we were getting for $90 in the mid 2010s. This is why I’m playing in new balances now 😂

    • @snkrtechtalk6005
      @snkrtechtalk6005  Місяць тому

      @@DanielEndres-cu3tt couldn’t agree more 😂👍👍

    • @DanielEndres-cu3tt
      @DanielEndres-cu3tt Місяць тому

      @@snkrtechtalk6005 I feel like there’s maybe something to be said for inflation, but then why are Li-Ning, NB, and Adidas all delivering much better products at the same price points? The poor quality and lack of intentional design is just incredible to me I don’t see an excuse for it.
      This may be a controversial take, but I almost wish Nike would leave air technology in the past and focus on innovating with their newer technology like ZoomX. They’ve been making shoes with the same cushion set ups for over 20 years. Anything new or innovative they’ve done with zoom and air have been things that they got rid of after 2-3 years. Like what happened to zoom strobel? It literally vanished when for a while it was showing up on the majority of their new models.
      Nike figured out a formula that works really well and was ahead of the curve decades ago, but now other brands have technology that’s catching up and beating Nike’s formula. On top of that, the people working in the brand have forgotten most of what that formula good in the first place. So now we’re getting half-baked copies of everything they’ve already been doing for 20 years and the other brands are starting to pass them up.

  • @zo2shifty
    @zo2shifty Місяць тому +2

    I remember when this channel was called 23mj88

  • @GavinDavisMusic
    @GavinDavisMusic 23 дні тому

    Really like this design and colorway! Definitely love the plain look, but wish there were more premium materials! Maybe they’ll come out with a SE or something idk

  • @Wladislav
    @Wladislav 28 днів тому

    Optimal Giannis sneaker line:
    Freak 1
    Freak 4
    Immortality 3
    😅

  • @markg5419
    @markg5419 Місяць тому

    Even though I like the shoe aesthetically, how you said there’s nothing special about the cushion is how to sum up his line in general. Same oversized swoosh a basic cushion setup. His signature line is very stale and it’s sad this being his 6th shoe.

  • @ttvWideShoes
    @ttvWideShoes Місяць тому

    With the 5's, I felt so unsafe changing direction (especially from left to right), and was wondering if you think this sensation may be gone in the 6's?

  • @johnwu149941
    @johnwu149941 Місяць тому

    Hi great review!
    just wondering do you think if the move insole would make you feel higher from the ground with this model?

    • @robbysimmons9901
      @robbysimmons9901 Місяць тому +1

      why would you drop $130 bucks on this phylon mess............and try to fix it with $50 insoles....sabrina 2's done.

    • @johnwu149941
      @johnwu149941 Місяць тому +1

      @@robbysimmons9901 that is very true! For me its more so the fit and material problem. Sabrina 2's mid foot section is just a bit too tight for me(feel like part of my feet is not landing on the insoles if that maeks sense), also the material in forefoot area seems too soft for me personally.

  • @marknoelpuno5412
    @marknoelpuno5412 Місяць тому

    Are they lighter than the fives?