MacroVoices

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @jingmu1289
    @jingmu1289 2 дні тому

    Thanks for the great episode! Love to hear more about the frontier of nuclear power development!

  • @viewlesswind
    @viewlesswind 20 днів тому +2

    Thank you guys! Merry Christmas.

  • @mauritsdolmans2536
    @mauritsdolmans2536 17 днів тому +2

    Thanks. So Copenhagen Atomics and Flibe Energy are the two companies that "get it". That was my conclusion, too. Hope they will both get the finance they deserve.

  • @alanmrsic893
    @alanmrsic893 20 днів тому +3

    Great stuff, thanks again!

  • @EfficientEnergyTransformations
    @EfficientEnergyTransformations 20 днів тому +3

    A great interview and the next one will be probably even better. It would be beneficial if Thomas talks about the heat changers between the reactor and the additional on side infrastructure as finally there should be some high temperature fluid moving between the on-site facilities, with temperature-volume energy density, that will allow the exchange of 100MJ per second.between the reactor and the local electricity transforming infrastructure.

  • @cbpuzzle
    @cbpuzzle 15 днів тому

    What a crazy gr8 episode. I feel smarter already

  • @ipeteagles
    @ipeteagles 19 днів тому

    very insightful. merry Christmas

  • @RandoBox
    @RandoBox 8 днів тому

    Any commentary on CANDU reactors? Or do you treat them as another pressurized water reactor for this discussion?

  • @Dancelovecommunity
    @Dancelovecommunity 20 днів тому

    Thank you for these interviews. There is absolutely no reason people should be living in tents in America. We spend so much money and there is so much money in this country.

  • @nguentong
    @nguentong 16 днів тому +1

    It is a pity the Canadian Heavy Water Pressurized Reactors weren’t discussed. Much better, safer tech using raw uranium that doesn’t give rise to concerns of nuclear proliferation.

  • @jeoboden
    @jeoboden 16 днів тому

    Has Erik done diligence on the "simulations" that prove this, or has anyone independent confirmed the simulations are created correctly?

  • @suewarman9287
    @suewarman9287 20 днів тому

    OK, I listened to the end, shared it, and will listen next week.....but in the picture where you were inside the molten salt machine, there is miles of plastic. Is there another way to make plastic that doesn't involve the oil industry?

    • @suewarman9287
      @suewarman9287 17 днів тому

      No reply, I see, for this important question...

  • @TheDude79700
    @TheDude79700 20 днів тому

    Great!!

  • @markettrader911
    @markettrader911 20 днів тому

    Nothing matters, stocks cannot go down. We’ve reached a permanent plateau.

  • @suewarman9287
    @suewarman9287 20 днів тому

    You need A LOT of oil to build ANY new factories/industry. What am I missing?

    • @chapter4travels
      @chapter4travels 17 днів тому

      You're not missing anything, the demand for oil will only go away when the oil itself runs out.

    • @suewarman9287
      @suewarman9287 17 днів тому

      @@chapter4travels Yes, but my point is they will not be able to build these nuclear reactors either, if oil runs out?

    • @chapter4travels
      @chapter4travels 17 днів тому

      @@suewarman9287 We can make synthetic oil from any carbon source, not cheaply, but it can be done. It's pretty cheap if you start with coal.

    • @robertdewey2368
      @robertdewey2368 11 днів тому

      You're not missing anything. But the benefit from each new reactor, or the Energy Returned on (Energy) Investment or EROI, frows exponentially, and that is what humanity actually needs.

  • @quinnmartin4236
    @quinnmartin4236 7 днів тому

    Dude, ChatGPT is great but if you want stats you have to know the source

  • @thunderbird3694
    @thunderbird3694 19 днів тому

    Lost my ass on NuScale when it fell to $2

    • @chapter4travels
      @chapter4travels 17 днів тому

      That's because you bet on a reactor design that has no chance of ever being economical.