0:17 Rapidly Growing Population leads to - Starvation - Economic Depression - National Instability 0:30 Rapidly Shrinking Population - Aging 0:50 Population change over time 1:06 Demographic Transition state 1. Birth Rate 2. Death Rate 3. Difference: The Rate of National Population Growth/Decline 3:11 Birth rate decline, death rate decline, standard of living boon
that video was really helpful, just before a mock exam on tuesday, way better than revision guide, I think! I'm a very visual learner and I finally understand that, wayheyy! Thank you :)
In year 2085 i bet the natural increase rate will increase rapidly as we explore space, set up colonies and self-replicating robots collect produce, minerals. People will think: "why the hell not?" and have children as it is no longer necessary to work.
but how are they going to earn enough money to support a family? If robots do all the work, money will most likely be evenly distributed through out the human race, making it very unlikely that families can earn enough income to support more than themselves. Just my 2 cents
Ben Fung Fook I can't see anything that would require the use of money if humans had access to computers and a system that functions in this way: 1. The human makes a request of a physical product for the army of robots to produce (such as a house, food, water, a computer, video games, etc), 2. The robots adjust their plans of construction to cater to the requests of each human, 3. by doing things such as setting up mines and spaceports on planets and tranfering the materials to human societies, 4. manufacturing products in automated factories (powered by solar panels), and constructing our cities and living spaces, with every physical requirement for us layed out on shelves, free for us to take. Additionally, the robots would multiply and improve their facilities exponentionally to supply the needs of humans, so there would be an abundance of resources. Also, different types of robots will be used. Some would perform the physical labor and others repair any damage, so there would be no concern with the system eroding over time. Money and human labour is quite a primitive concept that humans have needed to use in their early stages of technology, but it's reasonable to think that machines could passively harvest the energy and resources of the universe, with humans merely sitting in the center of it as it functions as a sort of life support system, requiring no human effort (except for the construction of the initial system) to maintain.
AMrTheAn But even with current technologies, we only have a finite amount of resources, even if we were to colonize other planets. A with a population that will reach 9 billion by 2050, I think that human greed and our desire to be the best will get the best of us. Also, we live in a unsustainable world (in terms of natural resources). Robots and taking from other planets won't help with this. Since we will likely never change our ways, increasing our population just because will only great a generation of truly ungrateful and greedy people expecting to much from this world.
10 years later, most are in decline now. The 6th stage is death. Conservatively speaking, the United States of America will be at zero birth rate in 2039. 2111 no one will be here. Here's my numbers from a couple months ago. Earth Birth Rate (births per woman, replacement level is 2.1 for reference) 23 out of 96 countries will possibly make it after 2053 73 wont and we're one of them. THE AMERICAS 1. US 1.64 2. Mexico 1.90 3. Canada(w) 1.40 4. Guatemala 2.48 5. Nicaragua 2.35 6. El Salvador 1.82 7. Costa Rica 1.56 8. Panama 2.34 9. Columbia 1.74 10. Venezuela 2.23 11. Ecuador 2.05 12. Peru 2.22 13. Bolivia(o) 2.65 14. Chile 1.54 15. Argentina 1.91 16. Brazil 1.65 17. Cuba 1.50 18. Jamaica 1.36 19. Haiti 2.87 20. Dominican 2.30 EUROPE 22. Ireland 1.63 23. Portugal 1.40 24. UK 1.56 25. Norway 1.48 26. Sweden 1.66 27. Finland(o) 1.37 28. Denmark 1.67 29. Germany 1.53 30. France 1.83 31. Spain 1.23 32. Portugal 1.40 33. Austria 1.44 34. Poland 1.38 35. Ukraine 1.22 36. Italy 1.24 37. Romania 1.60 38. Serbia 1.48 39. Croatia 1.48 40. Hungary 1.56 41. Moldova 1.77 MIDDLE EAST 43. Turkey 1.92 44. Syria 2.80 45. Lebanon 2.10 46. Isreal 2.90 47. Jordan 2.87 48. Iraq(t) 3.55 49. Saudi Arabia 2.46 50. Yemen 3.89 51. UAE 1.46 52. Oman 2.69 53. Iran 1.71 ASIA 55. Pakistan 3.56 56. India 2.05 57. Nepal 2.06 58. Bangladesh 2.00 59. Myanmar 2.17 60. Thailand 1.34 61. Laos 2.54 62. Cambodia 2.38 63. Vietnam 1.96 64. China(z) 1.28 65. Russia 1.50 66. Mongolia 2.90 67. Singapore 1.10 68. Indonesia 2.19 69. Philippines 2.78 70. S. Korea 0.81 71. Japan 1.34 Oceana 73. Australia 1.58 74. New Zealand 1.61 Africa 76. Morocco 2.35 77. Tunisia 2.11 78. Algeria 2.94 79. Libya 2.51 80. Egypt 2.96 81. Sudan 4.54 82. Niger 6.89 83. Chad 6.35 84. Camaroon 4.54 85. South Africa 2.40 86. Botswana 2.84 87. Namibia 3.35 88. Zambia 4.38 89. Zimbabwe 3.54 90. Angola 5.37 91. Mozambique 4.71 92. Tanzania 4.80 93. DRC 6.21 94. Rwanda 3.87 95. Burundi 5.18 96. Uganda 4.69 97. Kenya 3.40 98. Ethiopia 4.24 99. Somalia 6.42 100. Djibouti 2.85
![The DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION MODEL, Explained [AP Human Geography Review-Unit 2 Topic 5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-gf4hakk_WY/mqdefault.jpg)
0:17 Rapidly Growing Population leads to
- Starvation
- Economic Depression
- National Instability
0:30 Rapidly Shrinking Population
- Aging
0:50 Population change over time
1:06 Demographic Transition state
1. Birth Rate
2. Death Rate
3. Difference: The Rate of National Population Growth/Decline
3:11 Birth rate decline, death rate decline, standard of living boon
i love you
that video was really helpful, just before a mock exam on tuesday, way better than revision guide, I think! I'm a very visual learner and I finally understand that, wayheyy! Thank you :)
This was concise and very interesting. Very well done, I'd love to see more videos!!
Finally OMG. I wanted to see something that goes along with the overall population growth. Good Job. You are the reason I Ace the MCAT exam.
this is a banger ong
I just want to recommend the video. Its a blessing. Am soo grateful for your tutorial.
thanks for giving me all my answers for my AP class
6 years ago, dang. I feel old now
@@alex21091 10 years ago, dang, I feel old now
Definition of ground zero
1: the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs
Really helpful, thanks! Got my GCSE Geography exam this wednesday
very Interesting and detailed. thank you for making me understand this.
تحياتي وأشواقي للسير مدالله من جامعة الامارات العربية المتحدة اللي خلنا نشوف هالفيديو ونحفظة ....
In year 2085 i bet the natural increase rate will increase rapidly as we explore space, set up colonies and self-replicating robots collect produce, minerals.
People will think: "why the hell not?" and have children as it is no longer necessary to work.
but how are they going to earn enough money to support a family? If robots do all the work, money will most likely be evenly distributed through out the human race, making it very unlikely that families can earn enough income to support more than themselves. Just my 2 cents
Ben Fung Fook I can't see anything that would require the use of money if humans had access to computers and a system that functions in this way:
1. The human makes a request of a physical product for the army of robots to produce (such as a house, food, water, a computer, video games, etc),
2. The robots adjust their plans of construction to cater to the requests of each human,
3. by doing things such as setting up mines and spaceports on planets and tranfering the materials to human societies,
4. manufacturing products in automated factories (powered by solar panels), and constructing our cities and living spaces, with every physical requirement for us layed out on shelves, free for us to take.
Additionally, the robots would multiply and improve their facilities exponentionally to supply the needs of humans, so there would be an abundance of resources.
Also, different types of robots will be used. Some would perform the physical labor and others repair any damage, so there would be no concern with the system eroding over time.
Money and human labour is quite a primitive concept that humans have needed to use in their early stages of technology, but it's reasonable to think that machines could passively harvest the energy and resources of the universe, with humans merely sitting in the center of it as it functions as a sort of life support system, requiring no human effort (except for the construction of the initial system) to maintain.
AMrTheAn But even with current technologies, we only have a finite amount of resources, even if we were to colonize other planets. A with a population that will reach 9 billion by 2050, I think that human greed and our desire to be the best will get the best of us. Also, we live in a unsustainable world (in terms of natural resources). Robots and taking from other planets won't help with this. Since we will likely never change our ways, increasing our population just because will only great a generation of truly ungrateful and greedy people expecting to much from this world.
natural increase for the entire human race or a specific place
Excellent video!
pog
this video is worth value thanx
Great summary! Thanks.
Has any society moved backwards through the stages?
+Dave C no, not to my knowledge.
Syria
High mortality due to the war conditions in Syria. But birth rates are about the same.
Grove City really got us watchin youtube
great
thank u bossman
this could possibly be the reason I pass my exam.
If anyone here is part of Mr.Huston's class at Central High School, comment.
no
Japan and Germany are pretty much stage 5! :)
trinity boys wya
10 years later, most are in decline now. The 6th stage is death. Conservatively speaking, the United States of America will be at zero birth rate in 2039. 2111 no one will be here. Here's my numbers from a couple months ago.
Earth Birth Rate (births per woman, replacement level is 2.1 for reference)
23 out of 96 countries will possibly make it after 2053
73 wont and we're one of them.
THE AMERICAS
1. US 1.64
2. Mexico 1.90
3. Canada(w) 1.40
4. Guatemala 2.48
5. Nicaragua 2.35
6. El Salvador 1.82
7. Costa Rica 1.56
8. Panama 2.34
9. Columbia 1.74
10. Venezuela 2.23
11. Ecuador 2.05
12. Peru 2.22
13. Bolivia(o) 2.65
14. Chile 1.54
15. Argentina 1.91
16. Brazil 1.65
17. Cuba 1.50
18. Jamaica 1.36
19. Haiti 2.87
20. Dominican 2.30
EUROPE
22. Ireland 1.63
23. Portugal 1.40
24. UK 1.56
25. Norway 1.48
26. Sweden 1.66
27. Finland(o) 1.37
28. Denmark 1.67
29. Germany 1.53
30. France 1.83
31. Spain 1.23
32. Portugal 1.40
33. Austria 1.44
34. Poland 1.38
35. Ukraine 1.22
36. Italy 1.24
37. Romania 1.60
38. Serbia 1.48
39. Croatia 1.48
40. Hungary 1.56
41. Moldova 1.77
MIDDLE EAST
43. Turkey 1.92
44. Syria 2.80
45. Lebanon 2.10
46. Isreal 2.90
47. Jordan 2.87
48. Iraq(t) 3.55
49. Saudi Arabia 2.46
50. Yemen 3.89
51. UAE 1.46
52. Oman 2.69
53. Iran 1.71
ASIA
55. Pakistan 3.56
56. India 2.05
57. Nepal 2.06
58. Bangladesh 2.00
59. Myanmar 2.17
60. Thailand 1.34
61. Laos 2.54
62. Cambodia 2.38
63. Vietnam 1.96
64. China(z) 1.28
65. Russia 1.50
66. Mongolia 2.90
67. Singapore 1.10
68. Indonesia 2.19
69. Philippines 2.78
70. S. Korea 0.81
71. Japan 1.34
Oceana
73. Australia 1.58
74. New Zealand 1.61
Africa
76. Morocco 2.35
77. Tunisia 2.11
78. Algeria 2.94
79. Libya 2.51
80. Egypt 2.96
81. Sudan 4.54
82. Niger 6.89
83. Chad 6.35
84. Camaroon 4.54
85. South Africa 2.40
86. Botswana 2.84
87. Namibia 3.35
88. Zambia 4.38
89. Zimbabwe 3.54
90. Angola 5.37
91. Mozambique 4.71
92. Tanzania 4.80
93. DRC 6.21
94. Rwanda 3.87
95. Burundi 5.18
96. Uganda 4.69
97. Kenya 3.40
98. Ethiopia 4.24
99. Somalia 6.42
100. Djibouti 2.85
this is dull.