RECLAIMING POK / LT GEN DUSHYANT SINGH / LT GEN P R SHANKAR
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- #GUNNERSSHOT #InternationalRelations #UPSC #CSE #StrategicAffairs #defence
RECLAIMING POK / LT GEN DUSHYANT SINGH / LT GEN P R SHANKAR
GUNNERS SHOT IS A CHANNEL FOR DEFENCE & STRATEGIC AFFAIRS, TECHNOLOGY AND WELFARE OF ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL.
GUNNERS SHOT is a channel in which the best of Indian Military and Strategic experts express their views and opinions.
GUNNERS SHOT is a non partisan channel devoted to high quality.
Support Gunners Shot with your contribution through GPay to +91 9384855773
SUBSCRIBE TO GUNNERS SHOT UA-cam CHANNEL@ / @gunnersshot9829
SUBSCRIBE TO GUNNERS SHOT TECH CHANNEL @ / @gunnersshottech-jl6gp
Join the channel as a member @ / @gunnersshot9829
THIS VIDEO IS AVAILABLE IN PODCAST FORM @ / @gunnersshot9829
Gunners Shot UA-cam Channel has multiple .playlists to enhance your viewing experience.
All articles are available @ www.gunnersshot.com
Follow Gunners Shot WhatsApp Channel @ whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaEZ...
Twitter : @palepurshankar or @gunners_shot1
Join Telegram group @ t.me/gunnersshot
Disclaimer : Views expressed on this channel by this who appear on it are their personal opinions and can not be attributed to GUNNERS SHOT
PoK is only strategic value, else it is a burden to India.
GB is of strategic value AJK has religious value ( Sharda Peeth ).
@varga64
Attention is on PoK or POJK, the thin strip (about 25 km wide strip) of Jhelum River left bank that has the least strategic value (contrary to what you say). Real strategic value is in Gilgit-Baltistan, that is also Pakistan occupied Kashmir territory. PoK is in the news now.
You have no idea about how strategic and rich in natural resources that area is.
@@RamaKrishna-em5xt
I think you are talking about Gilgit-Baltistan (which too is under Pak occupied territory). PoK that is in the news now, is the 40 km wide left bank of Jhelum River (area about 13,000 square kilometers).
Please continue to keep a good proportion of the discussion in English. Those in south India simply cannot follow Hindi podcasts and interviews, even if the topics are very interesting.
Sir but understand this , that in norther part people cant understand english . And all other geopolitical dudes are explaining in English . There should be room left for indian languages too.
I mean , if there is choice to adjust in hindi podcast or English podcast then i think chossing language which is bhartiya is better option than English . Maybe , i hope tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , kannada language become more prominent in rest of India or hindi in rest of india .
I want that link language shoul be BHARTIYA LANGUAGE WHEATHER ITS HINDI , TAMIL , TELUGU ETC
I CANT SEE FOREIGN LANGUAGE LIKE ENGLISH TO BE CALLED AS LINK LANGUAGE , IT WOULD BE SHAME .
@@nehalgupta2674😂😂😂😂😂 well said friend they don't understand English and only want to stay with Hindi. Why can't we maintain neutrality so this channel can be an educative for everyone. I hope this is a fair request sometime we understand that some guest might not be able to speak English fluently or sturggle in that case we understand let gunner shot be a world channel
Respected Sir salute both of you
If we want less people/headaches, and more strategic land area, GB should take priority.
PoGB & Shakshagam Valley is more important
Hmm
Development of India is the first priority. Right sir, apni line itni barih karo,naki durse ki line choti.
पर्यावरण संरक्षण, प्रदूषण से मुक्ति, जल संरक्षण, प्लास्टिक कचरा प्रबंधन,वृक्षारोपण कर आने वाली पीढ़ी को बचाना होगा ।जागरण जागो
Hope someone in the Govt is also watching this.
Sat sri akaal Honorable Dushyant Singh Ji, Shankar sahib ji as well all listeners, it's always a pleasure to listen you sir... Jai Hind, Vandematram.....
Excellent discussion 👍🏻
Take back only the land not the liabilities.
Hmm
GB has less radicalized population than the Muzaffarabad belt but not sure if it's possible to pick and choose. Our government seems pretty serious since so many ministers have given statements already, but do we know fully what we are potentially signing up for? is the juice worth the squeeze? It is possible that a good number of these people may never truly be patriotic to kafir India. yes, you simply cannot discount the religious angle.
We can control them ..THEY WILL LIVE THEIR LIFE without any disturbance.
For example. In Kashmir PEOPLE ONLY GO FOR VACATIONS .. they don't want to settle their .
It will be their state of how they want to manage .
Indian government will develop infrastructure and revive temples ..And it will give immense job opportunities to them .
So PEOPLE ARE NOT PROBLEM AS WE THINK OF IT
They should join with us,we should not deviate from our goal
Jai hind Jai hind ki sena
Diffusion is nature's destiny
Sir can you please make video on naxalism like you made about the north east problem.
ok
Linkage of the CPEC to Xinjiang is detrimental to India’s long term interests vis-a-vis China. GB needs to be integrated into India. Defense is much easier when all access to the Kashmir valley are controlled by India. To this extent we need to integrate relevant areas of POJK. The non-strategic portions may be negotiated with Pakistan for long term stability in the region.
Gen,,sahiban ap urdu me bat kare plz ma gilgit se hun
Ok
Why not have PoK as a dominion state of India. If 8 lakh brithishers could rule over whole Indian subcontinent, why not India extend its military and administrative personnel and keep these areas as a dominion. No need to mingle and give citizenship.
Hmm
They were not even 100k
Concentrate attention on Gilgit-Baltistan.
Hmm
Why govt is after pok i don't understand. Its going to be a security concern for india . Who adopts a 75 year old person. Can he really integrate? It will be blunder if we do it. Already we have 20 cr burden because of gandi and Nehru
It’s high time Indian thinkers realized the fact that PoK is in effect CoK for all intents and purposes…election sloganeering aside….
Reclaiming POK is an emotive issue for our countrymen and this is exploited to the fullest by politicians for obvious reasons. In one's honest opinion, despite our military prowess and strength, we do not have overwhelming military superiority over Pakistan to annexe POK by force, contrary to what people may believe. Secondly, the recent demonstrations and unrest in POK against the government in Islamabad may lull people here into believing that there is a clamour for reintegration with India. One believes that this is not the case because the population there has been equally indoctrinated as the rest of Pakistan against a 'Hindu' India since the past seven and half decades. One guesses, maybe wrongly, that this unrest is temporary born out of frustration, but as soon as the Pakistani state is forced to make concessions, cosmetic or surprisingly, even otherwise, things may be back to square one, and India will be once again enemy number one. We may dream of taking POK, the physical land, but the people of that region are beyond integration.
If India were to acquire pok and GB, it will require humongous amount of investment in securing the new extra long border and territory sparsely occupied which will be a huge draw on Indian economy. Our military budget will have to damn near double. In summary loc is relatively blessing in disguise while Pakistan is burdened with hanging on to inhospitable territory.
Soon after Simla agreement, then foreign secretary j n.dixit was criticised by the Indian press for surrendering territory gained in the 1971 war, Dixit replied that India does not have the capacity to ensure security and development of the territory so acquired.
Hmm
The situation today is vastly different from 1971. Linkage of the CPEC to Xinjiang is detrimental to India’s long term interests vis-a-vis China. GB needs to be integrated into India. Defense is much easier when all access to the Kashmir valley are controlled by India. To this extent we need to integrate relevant areas of POJK. The non-strategic portions may be negotiated with Pakistan for long term stability in the region.
Fight for strategic access to sources of indus is pok port is Karachi where indus meets the sea Kabul river drains into indus
If pojk is got back we have a bargaining chip against China we can negotiate a deal with them we can get back our china occupied kashmir also and solve arunachal Pradesh dispute we can pressure china we can even get into cpec project which can benefit india also it may happen if India negotiate good with India
Pakistan will break if it has to, but India need not be the mid-wife! .
The people living in "Pak occupied territories" are not kashmiris. Then, is it not appropriate to call this area as "Pak occupied Jammu" or POGBJ or west Jammu in stead of POK or POJK?
Hmm
Sir thank you for taking time to translate in English other most of the information we won't be able to get it. Please maintain in English as possible because many of us are from deep south following your channel i hope this is a fair request to stay in English
Kuch ni hone Wala.
Main bachpan se sun raha hun,
Pakistan bankrupt ho gya hai,
Ab POK hamara..
Lekin hota kuch ni.
Hmm
It will be unwise to even absorb POK, thin strip of land with no infrastructure and full of islamic fundamentalists. We have nothing to gain from it. The people will be a liablity and within 5 years they would be unhappy with India as well.
Question is: Does India want the highly radicalised population of PoK? Land is of strategic importance, but the people are mostly Jahils who are religiously radicalised and will be just a political nuisance for India’s growth and development.
Hmm
It is is I propaganda
"Stated position of India, POK is part of India." Gen. Shankar and Gen. Singh, why were you not able to occupy Kashmir and the "POK"? Were you incompetent, or the Indian republic cannot achieve its "Stated Position." Being an Indian Army officer, you know that your military never could run over Pakistanis. With the kind of advanced weaponry they have now, India cannot even dream of getting an inch of "POK" In my humble opinion, watch your "Chicken Neck" seven states and the two more, I do not want to name now.
I challenge you both and the rest of your colleagues to prove it on paper that the Indian military can take Kashmir for the Pakistanis. You have failed militarily and physically in the past 77 years to capture even a small jurisdiction across the LOC in Pakistan. Have some sense, and be an ethical soldier. Stop fooling yourself and the people of India.
Ha ha
@@gunnersshot9829 HAHAHAHAHA ???
India can never reclaim PoK. सिर्फ कहने की बात है.
Hmm
You never know
Sir there is dialogue in hindi “udta teer lena”.POK lena matlab udta teer lena!Sabse manhoos din hoga!What will you do with the radicalized population?
Hmm