o0Donuts0o of course before Excel was Lotus 1-2-3, and before that was Visi-calc, and the ripoff clone AceCalc which gets credit for having a manual that didn’t take itself too seriously (there was a chapter entitled “on the territorial mating imperatives of the trumpeter swan”)
There's hydrogen and helium then metal, metal. Boron, carbon everywhere, nitrogen all through the air. With Oxygen so you can breath and fluorine for your pretty teeth. Neon to light up the sign. Metal for salty time. Metal, metal, silicon.
Ever heard of the 80-20 principle? Well, H and He are just 4% of the cis-uranic elements, but they make up 98% of the baryon mass in the universe (and 99.9% of atoms by number). Why bother distinguishing between all that other insignificant stuff? :)
That second titanium is actually a *Tl* thallium. Just like UA-cam here and chlorine on that table, the lower-case *L* has no horizontal foot. The *n* should be *In* Indium. Also you gotta wonder who was the freakin' genius who thought white text on a yellow background was the way to go.
Classic example of copying someone else's table with low-res OCR and not making corrections. The plagiarist probably didn't have the tools to mimic the font for the corrections (or the additions tp date)
The best thing about this video - I finally understood what potassium is. In my language it's "kālijs" which co responds with the "K", so I didn't know there is another name :D
Used to watch this waaaay back. Saw the thumbnail with Michael Aranda and got myself a real surprise that it was uploaded 20 hours ago - and not like 6 years ago.
In order for certain new technology to be expressed, or to be released, there has to be a willingness to receive it. And this requires both the change in the collective consciousness but it also requires that there are certain scientists who are willing to question what most scientists are currently not questioning, including materialism. Now, just as a concrete example here, you have the whole concept of free energy. This can be explained actually in terms of what is currently known by quantum physics. You have observations made by quantum physicists in bubble chambers, that you can have a state where there are no particles, suddenly one particle appears, divides itself into several particles, they collide again and then disappear. There have been some scientists who have been willing to speculate that, beyond what can be observed even at the subatomic level, there must be some kind of energy field, some call it a quantum field, some call it a ground state, whatever they call it, but it has basically been proven by quantum physics, that there is some state beyond the physical material realm. And in that state there is energy. And that energy can then enter the material realm and become physical matter. If you take this and put it together with a big bang, you can see that, is it actually logical that all of the matter and all of the energy that is now in this huge universe was compressed into something called a singularity? Whatever that may be. Is this really logical? Obviously, all of the matchup could not fit in there. But could the energy actually fit into a single point? Is it not just as logical to say that there was an event where energy from a different realm entered the material frequency spectrum. And this means that all of the matter that you see in the world today is actually created from energy. This was proven by Einstein. And that energy must have come from somewhere, and what has now been proven for those who are willing to see it by quantum physics, is that that energy came from another realm. It entered the material world, the physical realm from another realm. Well, is that not free energy? Is it not thereby proven that the entire world is created by free energy? So does that not mean it is also possible that technology could be created, that would be able to, so to speak, channel the energy from a different realm into the material realm, where it could then be used to perform physical work or at least create electricity that could power machines that perform physical work. This is perfectly in line with what has already been discovered. See, what you have right now is, you have a state of technology, which is a reflection of the collective consciousness and the collective consciousness does not really fully accept the existence of another realm. That is why as we have said humankind has become a closed circle, a closed system subject to the second law of thermodynamics. That is why the technology you have today, the energy sources you have today, you think that the only way to provide energy is to either burn some kind of fuel, or split the atom, and free the energy that is already in the material realm. But this is simply a certain mindset that is based on an incomplete understanding of how the world works. As I said, quantum physics has already proven that the world is created by energy from another realm, and therefore, there is naturally much more energy in that realm and it is a matter of raising our view of the world, our understanding of the world, raising the collective consciousness until we can grasp what that other realm is like, and therefore be able to receive the technology that can make use of the energy that is there. It may be not so constructive to talk about free energy, but it is free in a sense that there is no cost, there is nothing that needs to be burned or consumed in the material realm in order to harness this energy and therefore, we might call it a different name and many different names could be suggested.
@scishow you should've mentioned Dobereiner's Triads and John Newland's Law of Octaves as well...These two were also landmark efforts in the arrangement of elements in periodicity
Damn the left step table would've been so useful in high school. All those sp notation exercises would've been a lot easier; it should be at least taught in school because it makes said part of chemistry easier to understand.
Have you heard that oxygen went on a date with potassium? Heard it was OK. I am a stem cell researcher doing science videos but my greatest experiment is finding the perfect pun! #hiddenads
From a physics standpoint, there are way better and more acurate models of the atom and its electrons now, but the one in the video is still thaught in svhools, because it is way easier and works most of the time fir chemistry.
Puta mae y por qué a mí me enseñaron con la tabla de Gil Chaverri? Yo ya pensando que era heroe nacional y la vara y ni en un video de SciShow aparece😂😂
That's a bit misleading - just because Cl, Ar, K is a progression in atomic number doesn't mean that the elements have that much in common. Chlorine is a viciously reactive gas, argon is an incredibly unreactive gas, and potassium is a metal.
Our world is better expressed in 3d than on paper. Seems like the spiral table is the 1st step in understanding the 1st part of the blueprint to the universe...
my favorite one that i learned in nuclear power school, called a chart of nuclides, very big but very fun to look at www.nuclidechart.com/xcart/images/D/full_chart.jpg
Unfortunately, by the time Alexandre-Émile Béguyer de Chancourtois finished telling people his name, they'd lost all interest in hearing about his Telluric screw.
You think that's bad. Imagine the world of music where we rarely hear about the greatness of Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfern-schplenden-schlitter-crasscrenbon-fried-digger-dingle-dangle-dongle-dungle-burstein-von-knacker-thrasher-apple-banger-horowitz-ticolensic-grander-knotty-spelltinkle-grandlich-grumble-meyer-spelterwasser-kurstlich-himbleeisen-bahnwagen-gutenabend-bitte-ein-nürnburger-bratwustle-gerspurten-mitzweimache-luber-hundsfut-gumberaber-shönendanker-kalbsfleisch-mittler-aucher von Hautkopft of Ulm simply because we don't have time to speak his full name.
@Gabriel Cabana It was not that bad. I wouldn't know how to pronounce "Beguyer" but I would go for a "b'aiguiller" as he did. He just pronounced "chacroutrois" instead of "chancourtois". But still. A noble effort there. :D
Another really cool thing that comes up in radiochemistry (which is chemistry, but with super-heavy or radioactive atoms) is that really large atoms (actinides) actually have electrons moving at appreciable fractions of the speed of light, deforming orbital shapes and significantly altering chemical properties. In fact, arranging the periodic table to group electrons (the "standard" periodic table) generally also groups elements by chemistry, since valence electrons usually are the ones that form the bonds. But this isn't true for the actinides. Because of the deformed orbitals, chemical bonds form very differently, and they behave very differently, breaking periodicity. This has led radiochemists to propose another table arrangement based on chemistry trends.
What do you do with a dead chemist? Barium! When I heard Oxygen and Magnesium were dating, I was like OMg! So sorry, I wanted to tell some chemistry jokes, but all the good ones Argon.
Well so are the f ones but that's just a mess of exceptions and d-d and f-f interaction, shielding, whatever the hell lanthanoid contraction is, and many other things coming up in my exam I haven't studied for.
i agree. it makes the most sense to me. if readers understand the way the orbitals are arranged, they can derive Group and Period properties directly from it, without having the La and Ac series floating below.
There is enhanced left-step table called Adomah Periodic Tale (APT) and it is actually used for deriving electron configurations. See this web page www.wikihow.com/Write-Electron-Configurations-for-Atoms-of-Any-Element and scroll down to Option 2.
I expanded on the left step and put the noble gases in the center due to valences being zero, like a maths sliding scale. Ended up making ahem, the telluric screw...
For Nuclear physicists there is also the chart of nucleotides which works on similar principals except built around the configuration of the nucleus yet another example of the many ways people categorize things. The key to keep in mind should be that our categories are never absolute take the periodic table where as you go down the periods the elements start behaving strangely as the electron valence shells become increasingly relativistic. Another example is plate tectonics if you consider everything to be plates not just the continental material swap out the idea of plates for oceanic crust for the tops of mantle convection cells and treat the continents as buoyant rafts of rock and the way "plates" behave suddenly seems far clearer. For each pattern one representation will bring it to clarity but it comes at the expense of the other dimensions of complexity to the world around us.
What always gets me is that all these chemists prior to the 20th century had no idea how any of this worked. Until you understand protons and valence electrons it's all just magic.
Also cool is that in Chinese, the characters for the elements include a compound that signifies whether it’s a gas, a metal etc. The left part of the character tells you its state and the right part which element it is.
@@user-zz3sn8ky7z I'm not sure what exactly are you saying, but the periodic table is based on the atomic composition. I guess you can, say, heat up any element so much that it completely dissolves into a particle goo?... But then you don't really have any elements at all, and a table wouldn't even make sense
@@user-zz3sn8ky7z like, hydrogen remains hydrogen regardless if it's liquid or a gas or a solid. When it stops being hydrogen then you kinda move away from chemistry as a specialized thing altogether and it becomes just general particle physics
@NJ-wb1cz Periodic tables will occasionally if not often have an indication of that element's state of matter at room temperature. It has no effect whatsoever on how the table itself is ordered. The effectiveness of having that state built into the element symbol itself is debatable
I really like the left step table but I think it would be even better if each orbital block was shifted up by half an element so that the shell connections where more clear
7:20 "When read from top to bottom and left to right, it gives the exact order in which electrons fill up an atom's available energy shells." 10% or so of the elements beg to disagree. (Chromium, silver, and friends, in case that's unclear.)
I'm completely distracted by the shadow the sweater makes in his neck. It looks like he has a big dark patch of skin. Took me a while before I even figured out what it was. 😃
I didn't notice. Mostly because I was too distracted by his constant hand motions. On and on and on with the hand motions. Matching hand motions. Matching finger pointing. Matching hand motions. I just started closing my eyes to listen. But then, wait!! What if there's another illustration? Sigh. Hand motions......
All of these are pretty sick tbh. As useful as the typical table is my autistic brain cries interally every time I look at the lanthanide/actinide group. I've wanted to try and make a 3d or 2.5d table of my own that finds a way to put them back in without stretching everything out... idk.
A perfect vacuum, i.e. a space with absolutely no particles in it, won't even have a temperature, or at least not in the same sense that matter does. Temperature is based on the kinetic energy of the particles of the matter. If there are photons passing through the perfect vacuum, then they can provide a 'temperature' based on the energy of those photons.
What we all need to recognize is that Mendeleev actually invented the Excel spreadsheet.
200th Like. This is funny 😂
Its actually more advanced than Excel. You can put more data in every cell
@o0Donuts0o thank you for honoring my namesake>...🤣🤣🤣🤣
More like Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet...
o0Donuts0o of course before Excel was Lotus 1-2-3, and before that was Visi-calc, and the ripoff clone AceCalc which gets credit for having a manual that didn’t take itself too seriously (there was a chapter entitled “on the territorial mating imperatives of the trumpeter swan”)
The astronomers' periodic table: hydrogen, helium, and everything else they call "metals".
There's hydrogen and helium then metal, metal. Boron, carbon everywhere, nitrogen all through the air. With Oxygen so you can breath and fluorine for your pretty teeth. Neon to light up the sign. Metal for salty time. Metal, metal, silicon.
@@jerungbiru55 silicon
@@notpulverman9660 thanks
@@notpulverman9660 Ill edit that
Ever heard of the 80-20 principle? Well, H and He are just 4% of the cis-uranic elements, but they make up 98% of the baryon mass in the universe (and 99.9% of atoms by number).
Why bother distinguishing between all that other insignificant stuff? :)
I know this is lame but I love y'alls diligence in citing your sources
I think it’s important to express gratitude for the things you appreciate!
Nothing lame about that 😊
I like the left-step table the most. I actually think it would make more sense for us to use that one.
4:37 close enough. You deserve an award for even trying^^
Anyone else notice the periodic table at 0:23 is not only out of date, but also has Ti twice, and a new mystery element with the symbol n?
That second titanium is actually a *Tl* thallium. Just like UA-cam here and chlorine on that table, the lower-case *L* has no horizontal foot.
The *n* should be *In* Indium.
Also you gotta wonder who was the freakin' genius who thought white text on a yellow background was the way to go.
Classic example of copying someone else's table with low-res OCR and not making corrections. The plagiarist probably didn't have the tools to mimic the font for the corrections (or the additions tp date)
@@massimookissed1023But the lowercase L in Tl is actually an i. It was probably a spelling error.
5:33 HEY! ...I'm a geologist... and YES! it's a science, a VERY important SCIENCE!
Thiago Lanni, hit a nerve there, huh?
Go study your damn rocks pleb
I'm a chemist - and I feel no professional obligation to read about rocks ;)
You guys rock.
@@peterlewerin4213 LOL
The best thing about this video - I finally understood what potassium is. In my language it's "kālijs" which co responds with the "K", so I didn't know there is another name :D
Whoooooooo the year of periodic table!!!!
Welcome back Michael where have you been I enjoy your videos peace 👍🏻
nazmi safin I want to know as well
elements are pretty awesome to be so organized, this needs to be recognised
Used to watch this waaaay back.
Saw the thumbnail with Michael Aranda and got myself a real surprise that it was uploaded 20 hours ago - and not like 6 years ago.
In order for certain new technology to be expressed, or to be released, there has to
be a willingness to receive it. And this requires both the change in the
collective consciousness but it also
requires that there are certain scientists who are willing to question
what most scientists are currently not questioning, including
materialism.
Now, just as a concrete example here, you
have the whole concept of free energy. This can be explained actually in
terms of what is currently known by quantum physics. You have
observations made by quantum physicists in bubble chambers, that you can
have a state where there are no particles, suddenly one particle
appears, divides itself into several particles, they collide again and
then disappear. There have been some scientists who have been willing to
speculate that, beyond what can be observed even at the subatomic
level, there must be some kind of energy field, some call it a quantum
field, some call it a ground state, whatever they call it, but it has
basically been proven by quantum physics, that there is some state
beyond the physical material realm. And in that state there is energy.
And that energy can then enter the material realm and become physical
matter. If you take this and put it together with a big bang, you can
see that, is it actually logical that all of the matter and all of the
energy that is now in this huge universe was compressed into something
called a singularity? Whatever that may be. Is this really logical?
Obviously,
all of the matchup could not fit in there. But could the energy
actually fit into a single point? Is it not just as logical to say that
there was an event where energy from a different realm entered the
material frequency spectrum. And this means that all of the matter that
you see in the world today is actually created from energy. This was
proven by Einstein. And that energy must have come from somewhere, and
what has now been proven for those who are willing to see it by quantum
physics, is that that energy came from another realm. It entered the
material world, the physical realm from another realm. Well, is that not
free energy? Is it not thereby proven that the entire world is created
by free energy? So does that not mean it is also possible that
technology could be created, that would be able to, so to speak, channel
the energy from a different realm into the material realm, where it
could then be used to perform physical work or at least create
electricity that could power machines that perform physical work. This
is perfectly in line with what has already been discovered. See, what
you have right now is, you have a state of technology, which is a
reflection of the collective consciousness and the collective
consciousness does not really fully accept the existence of another
realm. That is why as we have said humankind has become a closed circle,
a closed system subject to the second law of thermodynamics. That is
why the technology you have today, the energy sources you have today,
you think that the only way to provide energy is to either burn some
kind of fuel, or split the atom, and free the energy that is already in
the material realm. But this is simply a certain mindset that is based
on an incomplete understanding of how the world works. As I said,
quantum physics has already proven that the world is created by energy
from another realm, and therefore, there is naturally much more energy
in that realm and it is a matter of raising our view of the world, our
understanding of the world, raising the collective consciousness until
we can grasp what that other realm is like, and therefore be able to
receive the technology that can make use of the energy that is there. It
may be not so constructive to talk about free energy, but it is free in
a sense that there is no cost, there is nothing that needs to be burned
or consumed in the material realm in order to harness this energy and
therefore, we might call it a different name and many different names
could be suggested.
@scishow you should've mentioned Dobereiner's Triads and John Newland's Law of Octaves as well...These two were also landmark efforts in the arrangement of elements in periodicity
7:10 The Periodic Table V2.
5:04 I didn't know "So-on" was an element.
So
That's it's atomic symbol
It's a noble gas
@@daveharrison84 no it's the other name for nitrogen
The free one from Oscar Mayer is the best. It includes elements like bolognium. :)
Yeah, but their half-life calculation is based on the rate at which a flock of ten year olds devour your samples.
True, but Oscar Mayer only uses the tastiest electrons. :)
4:38 impressed
Well written and produced show. Lots of info presented wonderfully!
4:37 He did a lot better than most people must of resulted in a lot of outtakes.👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
brilliant video and thanks so much.
I am playing catch up from very poor schooling as a kid, so vids like this are AWESOME.
Keep em comin :-)
alexander WHAT!?!
-Émile Béguyer de Chancourtois
Damn the left step table would've been so useful in high school. All those sp notation exercises would've been a lot easier; it should be at least taught in school because it makes said part of chemistry easier to understand.
Round of applause for Michael after perfectly pronouncing that French dudes name👏👏👏
I have a chart of the nucleotides (isotopes of every element) and that thing is about 5'×10' and each square is only about a cm across
The Telluric screw could have been revolutionary...that lowkey pun got me giggling.
Have you heard that oxygen went on a date with potassium? Heard it was OK. I am a stem cell researcher doing science videos but my greatest experiment is finding the perfect pun!
#hiddenads
okay this one was genuinely good
Too bad I heard Oxygen is now two timing with Magnesium .OMg !
I heard it was KO
That left-step table might help me with electron orbitals coming up soon. Thanks!
Damn I wish I knew about the Left-Step Table when I was taking organic chemistry.. oh well too late lol
Gerry, another in use these days is the "Karlsruher Nuklidkarte" (Karlsruhe Nuclide Chart).
nice work, thanks
Good job on the name!
There was a little scientist who isn’t anymore, for what he thought was H2O was H2SO4
From a physics standpoint, there are way better and more acurate models of the atom and its electrons now, but the one in the video is still thaught in svhools, because it is way easier and works most of the time fir chemistry.
How a holographic periodic table? That shows the different ways of arrangement for the elements?
Puta mae y por qué a mí me enseñaron con la tabla de Gil Chaverri? Yo ya pensando que era heroe nacional y la vara y ni en un video de SciShow aparece😂😂
That's a neat-looking table, I didn't even know about it. I like the subshell column on the left. It's kind of a shame they missed that one.
4:36 that was so good what the heck
that FLAWLESS PRONUNCIATION of the french guy's name had me do a triple take of the clip
The only problem is that is had a FLAW
That's a bit misleading - just because Cl, Ar, K is a progression in atomic number doesn't mean that the elements have that much in common. Chlorine is a viciously reactive gas, argon is an incredibly unreactive gas, and potassium is a metal.
I just wanted to say: Hair is on point
I don’t know why but the periodic table always makes me feel so calm 😂
Those in the know, understand that Gil Chaverri's is the superior table.
It has all the information needed in order
the french pronounciation is vey cool
I much prefer number 5 rather than the standard one. The rare earth metals being under the rest of the table makes no sense.
No coverage of the hexagon Periodic spiral is so sad
If you want to learn about the periodic table, read The Disappearing Spoon.
M E N D E L E E V L E F T G A P S
Here after listening to Terrance Howard, i want to learn more about what he’s doing
I think on the title you meant 5 *elements of the* periodic table we don't use and why
Wow good timing
Our world is better expressed in 3d than on paper. Seems like the spiral table is the 1st step in understanding the 1st part of the blueprint to the universe...
my favorite one that i learned in nuclear power school, called a chart of nuclides, very big but very fun to look at
www.nuclidechart.com/xcart/images/D/full_chart.jpg
wait... gallium is credited with "Credit: en:user:foobar", I think we might have found a little bug
Now what's with the new Russian version?
Would be great to see a follow up
Aren't elements sorted by protons not electrons? I know atoms have the same number of electrons and protons, but that's still a difference
Mendeleev? for instance :-) at 1826
No one: Energy levels!
Unfortunately, by the time Alexandre-Émile Béguyer de Chancourtois finished telling people his name, they'd lost all interest in hearing about his Telluric screw.
You think that's bad. Imagine the world of music where we rarely hear about the greatness of Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfern-schplenden-schlitter-crasscrenbon-fried-digger-dingle-dangle-dongle-dungle-burstein-von-knacker-thrasher-apple-banger-horowitz-ticolensic-grander-knotty-spelltinkle-grandlich-grumble-meyer-spelterwasser-kurstlich-himbleeisen-bahnwagen-gutenabend-bitte-ein-nürnburger-bratwustle-gerspurten-mitzweimache-luber-hundsfut-gumberaber-shönendanker-kalbsfleisch-mittler-aucher von Hautkopft of Ulm simply because we don't have time to speak his full name.
Talk about a name being a mouthful...
@@ObadiahtheSlim Yeah. Right.
@@ObadiahtheSlim Monty lives on!
Fred
Yes. Alex is more catchy.
Dear god! Number 3 I have no idea if he said that name right but you win
It was so glorious I had to listen to it several times.
as someone who speak french, it was a valiant effort
@@samuelfaille-denis8098 détester going to haine
@Gabriel Cabana It was not that bad. I wouldn't know how to pronounce "Beguyer" but I would go for a "b'aiguiller" as he did. He just pronounced "chacroutrois" instead of "chancourtois". But still. A noble effort there. :D
Hey Frenchmen, y'all gotta admit that he did it confidently! Us non-speakers had no idea. It just sounded fancy
Another really cool thing that comes up in radiochemistry (which is chemistry, but with super-heavy or radioactive atoms) is that really large atoms (actinides) actually have electrons moving at appreciable fractions of the speed of light, deforming orbital shapes and significantly altering chemical properties. In fact, arranging the periodic table to group electrons (the "standard" periodic table) generally also groups elements by chemistry, since valence electrons usually are the ones that form the bonds. But this isn't true for the actinides. Because of the deformed orbitals, chemical bonds form very differently, and they behave very differently, breaking periodicity. This has led radiochemists to propose another table arrangement based on chemistry trends.
Alexandre-Emile Beguyer De Chancourtois.Mumbling to himself, "If I can't get this table to make sense, I am screwed.WAIT!"
+
I wish your twin brother would stop shining lights at us from that train. I can barely see my clock.WAIT!
What do you do with a dead chemist? Barium!
When I heard Oxygen and Magnesium were dating, I was like OMg!
So sorry, I wanted to tell some chemistry jokes, but all the good ones Argon.
Lolololo XD XDDD XDDDDDD
When I heard Oxygen and Magnesium were dating, I had a lung cancer!
-MgO is asbestos-
Edit: no, it's not, sorry everyone!
Good going, Einsteinium.
Helium dubnium back at you (he ha)
Cheers
Tony Those are hilarious!!!
For transition metals, the highest D shell electrons are also considered valence electrons.
Well so are the f ones but that's just a mess of exceptions and d-d and f-f interaction, shielding, whatever the hell lanthanoid contraction is, and many other things coming up in my exam I haven't studied for.
@@TheBluePhoenix008Can't wait for that in a year or 2. Sounds like fun and depresstion all in one.
@@TheBluePhoenix008 They aren't really exceptions. The rules are fairly logical.
"Alexandre-Émile Béguyer de Chancourtois" Ok, guys and gals, let's take a minute to admire and pay attribute to Michael and Scishow.
I wonder how many times he had to practice that, and how many outtakes there were.
* pay tribute
but yeah, it was a decent effort ^^
I rewound it three times when he pronounced that name .😁 👍👍
Finally someone said it lol. I was thinking the same thing. I rewound it a bunch too lmao
Memorization Technique: s p d f = super.pdf
I just remember S, pdf
I just always said it really fast to remember it. Espeedief. Just certain letters said together that always make sense, like TMNT.
Period, period, period. I found this video, sadly, _strongly_ anti-semicolon and anti-comma. Be warned.
But have you performed a semicolonoscopy first?
@@RustyTube yeah, but i did a half-assed job of it
@@RustyTube of that procedure found a tumor, would it be a dangling polyciple?
And what about the colon?
@@GRBtutorials yeah, about the colon: an explanation will follow.
The OG Periodic Table: Water, Earth, Fire, Air.
Table of elements organized by how much I, personally, like each element
Nah, arrange 'em by how much money they're worth.
By alphabet 🤣🤣🤣
Holy crap the left-step one is actually awesome
i agree. it makes the most sense to me. if readers understand the way the orbitals are arranged, they can derive Group and Period properties directly from it, without having the La and Ac series floating below.
There is enhanced left-step table called Adomah Periodic Tale (APT) and it is actually used for deriving electron configurations. See this web page www.wikihow.com/Write-Electron-Configurations-for-Atoms-of-Any-Element and scroll down to Option 2.
I expanded on the left step and put the noble gases in the center due to valences being zero, like a maths sliding scale. Ended up making ahem, the telluric screw...
Different Elements: Exist
French guy: "Screw" that
Sandrosian ♥️😂😂😂
That was an astounding effort in pronunciation. It was wrong but glorious
We are now at war with France, but still, A for effort.
Darn left step table would have made my a level chemistry exams much simpler. I lost a lot of time working out the shells.
For Nuclear physicists there is also the chart of nucleotides which works on similar principals except built around the configuration of the nucleus yet another example of the many ways people categorize things.
The key to keep in mind should be that our categories are never absolute take the periodic table where as you go down the periods the elements start behaving strangely as the electron valence shells become increasingly relativistic.
Another example is plate tectonics if you consider everything to be plates not just the continental material swap out the idea of plates for oceanic crust for the tops of mantle convection cells and treat the continents as buoyant rafts of rock and the way "plates" behave suddenly seems far clearer.
For each pattern one representation will bring it to clarity but it comes at the expense of the other dimensions of complexity to the world around us.
Dragrath1 Do you mean nucleons? Nucleotides are the monomers of nuclei acids.
@@elijahmikhail4566 Whoops should have been Nuclides >_>
Its HUGE
Oh damn, that left-step is nice.
What always gets me is that all these chemists prior to the 20th century had no idea how any of this worked. Until you understand protons and valence electrons it's all just magic.
7:46 evolution of the pacifier
Also cool is that in Chinese, the characters for the elements include a compound that signifies whether it’s a gas, a metal etc. The left part of the character tells you its state and the right part which element it is.
That's umm dumb. The beauty of the table is that it lets go of archaic notions like "gas" "liquid" and instead simply lists elements.
@@NJ-wb1cz Don't vast majority of period tables used list the state of the given element at room temperature as well?
@@user-zz3sn8ky7z I'm not sure what exactly are you saying, but the periodic table is based on the atomic composition. I guess you can, say, heat up any element so much that it completely dissolves into a particle goo?... But then you don't really have any elements at all, and a table wouldn't even make sense
@@user-zz3sn8ky7z like, hydrogen remains hydrogen regardless if it's liquid or a gas or a solid. When it stops being hydrogen then you kinda move away from chemistry as a specialized thing altogether and it becomes just general particle physics
@NJ-wb1cz Periodic tables will occasionally if not often have an indication of that element's state of matter at room temperature. It has no effect whatsoever on how the table itself is ordered.
The effectiveness of having that state built into the element symbol itself is debatable
4:36 Can we just appreciate the flow Micheal has when saying this name? Smooth as liquid gallium m8
He just went right ahead, didn't even blink.
I was stunned, a ggs to him for it.
Probably had to do a lot of takes, though.
I really like the left step table but I think it would be even better if each orbital block was shifted up by half an element so that the shell connections where more clear
7:20 "When read from top to bottom and left to right, it gives the exact order in which electrons fill up an atom's available energy shells." 10% or so of the elements beg to disagree. (Chromium, silver, and friends, in case that's unclear.)
What about the element of surprise?
Which periodic table is that element in???
"Periodic surprise" kinda seems like an oxymoron
Unexpectium.
It's in the table of the Spanish Inquisition
@@Giraffinator not necessarily. Just because you know it's coming doesn't mean you know what to expect. The surprise could be different every day.
Thassalante k'Reskel we could slap bet over it xD
Hmm at 8:05 where it talks about the energy shells. I thought by Aufbau Principle you will fill 4s first before 3d?
I'm completely distracted by the shadow the sweater makes in his neck. It looks like he has a big dark patch of skin. Took me a while before I even figured out what it was. 😃
This was driving me crazy!
ADHD?
I didn't notice. Mostly because I was too distracted by his constant hand motions. On and on and on with the hand motions. Matching hand motions. Matching finger pointing. Matching hand motions.
I just started closing my eyes to listen. But then, wait!! What if there's another illustration? Sigh.
Hand motions......
2:36: The invention of the periodic table is credited to both Dmitri Mendeleev and Lothar Meyer, who discovered it independently.
+SciShow It has been a long time since I last did chemistry but the couple of minutes after 0:55 brought it all back. Fantastic. Concise.
The first periodic table you show has Thallium (81) marked Ti (TI) instead if Tl (TL). Titanium is angry about the impostor.
I thought it said "Argonising".
That would've also been very interesting.
And here I thought all the chem jokes were gone... The argon pun doesn't work in past tense, though.
@@ganaraminukshuk0 you're welcome. i hope.
we don't use that periodic table because it's just lithium
Lol
4:01 what the heck is 'Ur'
Uranium but i added an r because i like the letter r
Best information-packed explanation I have seen i a long time!
WOW!!! wish i knew about left step table when i was in college WTF PROFESSOR !!
I think I could make a periodic table no one would use
Are you a crappy carpenter?
Do it! For science!
As long as it's a nice shape, you're good.
@@firippumartinezu1782 its gonna be so disorganized bro dont worry
All of these are pretty sick tbh. As useful as the typical table is my autistic brain cries interally every time I look at the lanthanide/actinide group.
I've wanted to try and make a 3d or 2.5d table of my own that finds a way to put them back in without stretching everything out... idk.
Some of those tables WE do use. It just depends who “WE” is.
This makes me reminisce about high school chemistry and accounting for mathematical errors by blaming valence electrons lol
The periodic table was not complete when I took my first college chemistry class in 2006.
Lorax Dave Walters cool
Aloha saw your 🍌 video funny I have had a day off Harvesting this past week from Utah originally heavy plants
Disappointing you didn't include any of those "Periodic Table of [video game or movie or such]" t-shirts.
for some reason this video made me wonder: Does a vacuum have a set temperature or can it be any temperature?
A perfect vacuum, i.e. a space with absolutely no particles in it, won't even have a temperature, or at least not in the same sense that matter does. Temperature is based on the kinetic energy of the particles of the matter. If there are photons passing through the perfect vacuum, then they can provide a 'temperature' based on the energy of those photons.
@@BuildersOfBlocks thank you
Love the back to basics content