@@noreaster08 thank you for tuning in! Feel free to share it with people who might be interested. Glad I got the video done before the snow we got last night!
@@edwardhamm5535 thank you. There were several moments of amazing discovery in this field work. The basin and drain was found half way through filming the original episodes. And the connection of the mid-point of the serpent effigy to sunrise from the split boulder cairn were quite a lot of fun.
Excellent! And good to hear your dog’s input As I’m watching, reminded just how wholistic ancient worship tended to be compared to modern- incorporating -community-heavenly transits/cycles-seasonal celebrations-environmental/geological landmarks/routes for spiritual direction/community cohesion. -Makes modern worship styles seem rather anemic
It amazes me how much energy people waste commenting that they dont agree or get it. No you dont get it and destroy these structures everywhere you put your cul-de-sacs and rock climbing gear. Thank you for your energy that you basically said you wasted. But its not wasted. Thank you. These rocks ate the basis of the new world and the light returning to the mind
@@bloodnthuner I haven’t, but have studied it quite a bit. This video and the ones I’ve done before rely heavily on studies (mostly by Mary Gage) don’t on the Am Stonehenge and Gungywamp in Groton CT. Have you been?
@@Stones_and_Stories No but Ive visited the one in NH its worth the ride. Cool little museam up there too. They say it was built by the druids but I dont know...
@@woodyaborn5641 I’ve been in search of a geologist to better understand the landscape changes from the time of the glaciers’ retreat up to now. I think that topic is important to the understanding how old some of these objects are. I have been told by a state archeologist that trees started to grow in this area 8000 years ago. So it stands to reason that if objects require a line of sight the horizon, they may have been erected during the period prior to the trees blocking the line of sight.
This is why Archaeologists don't believe in this phenomena, a white person's interpretations of what are truly ancient Native built structures. It's a shame, they deserve more attention.
@@atolmec13 that’s a big part of why I do this. I hope some day it will help motivate someone interested in archeology to take this up in ernest and give it the attention it deserves.
Maybe, maybe not. Where is the written documentation that fuels all your theories? It's interesting that no one finds any artifacts within any of these rock formations. Where are the petroglyphs and pictographs, like the ones seen out west? There is no human evidence at any of these structures. I believe its glacial, valcanic, and colonist that created what you interpret as ancient man.
This video was the 10 minute abbreviated version. This playlist has the long form videos that contain the research and the comparisons between the published research and this site. ua-cam.com/play/PL4cqSBfYNAQK1yxW5f-NFawEwhfrxnuQz.html&si=aCFXo2ca_4LpWFBK As for the comparisons to western tribal practices, it is well known that practices varied widely across regions (for instance, the great serpent mound in Ohio v stone effigies in the north east). Also, artifacts tend not to be found in areas of ceremonial stone landscapes. It seems they did leave behind every day items in those areas. That topic is covered in my recent book review: ua-cam.com/play/PL4cqSBfYNAQJr3mY0_BbLuGlUodUeK4zB.html&si=HZiX8V7Z0gOPhCF4 Lastly, it is also illegal to dig in state or town forests in this state, so at this particular site there would be no way to know what is below the surface.
I see a pile of rocks... I am not trying to be negative on what your getting at. but I think its a reach. I will need to do more research. I do not believe main stream archeology with a lot of what they claim.. I have seen some areas with rock walls etc that just dont make sense . So I do believe the official explanation for many of these rock structures are weak
@@Chuck-he1jd this playlist has all of the research cited in the description, and compared to the site, step by step. It’s important to use resources that relate to ancient practices in this region. Practices varied widely among the tribes and nations.
Excellent presentation, thank you for your work.
@@noreaster08 thank you for tuning in! Feel free to share it with people who might be interested. Glad I got the video done before the snow we got last night!
Brilliant, thankyou.
@@edwardhamm5535 thank you. There were several moments of amazing discovery in this field work. The basin and drain was found half way through filming the original episodes. And the connection of the mid-point of the serpent effigy to sunrise from the split boulder cairn were quite a lot of fun.
Thank you for your hard work to bring this info to the rest of us. Looking forward to 2025. Merry Christmas. 🎄
@@Stillwater933 merry Christmas!
I just keep watching as this has also changed my ceremony. If you every have a class you host in the area, Id love to attend. Thank you.
@@spiritualanarchy5465 I am thinking of pulling (or attempting to) a permit for a tour event this spring. I’ll keep the community updated!
🌬️❄️🕯️🌞
Excellent! And good to hear your dog’s input
As I’m watching, reminded just how wholistic ancient worship tended to be compared to modern- incorporating
-community-heavenly transits/cycles-seasonal celebrations-environmental/geological landmarks/routes for spiritual direction/community cohesion.
-Makes modern worship styles seem rather anemic
@@jeffmcclure2603 certainly much more connected to the natural world and its interconnections.
It amazes me how much energy people waste commenting that they dont agree or get it. No you dont get it and destroy these structures everywhere you put your cul-de-sacs and rock climbing gear. Thank you for your energy that you basically said you wasted. But its not wasted. Thank you. These rocks ate the basis of the new world and the light returning to the mind
It is important to raise awareness of these structures, and it does seem like a lot of time is wasted on naysayers. Thank you for the support.
Have you been to america's stonehenge in NH would like to hear your take on it.
@@bloodnthuner I haven’t, but have studied it quite a bit. This video and the ones I’ve done before rely heavily on studies (mostly by Mary Gage) don’t on the Am Stonehenge and Gungywamp in Groton CT. Have you been?
@@Stones_and_Stories No but Ive visited the one in NH its worth the ride. Cool little museam up there too. They say it was built by the druids but I dont know...
Those stone structures were heavily altered by the property owner.
@@onasledoverland Yes some were but not all. There used to be a house on it. The sacrificial table is still there though.
I think you should do some research on glaciers, erosion, freeze thaw and stuff like that. You have a wonderful imagination.
@@woodyaborn5641 I’ve been in search of a geologist to better understand the landscape changes from the time of the glaciers’ retreat up to now. I think that topic is important to the understanding how old some of these objects are. I have been told by a state archeologist that trees started to grow in this area 8000 years ago. So it stands to reason that if objects require a line of sight the horizon, they may have been erected during the period prior to the trees blocking the line of sight.
I agree completely.
AXIS MUNDI
This is why Archaeologists don't believe in this phenomena, a white person's interpretations of what are truly ancient Native built structures. It's a shame, they deserve more attention.
@@atolmec13 that’s a big part of why I do this. I hope some day it will help motivate someone interested in archeology to take this up in ernest and give it the attention it deserves.
Maybe, maybe not. Where is the written documentation that fuels all your theories? It's interesting that no one finds any artifacts within any of these rock formations. Where are the petroglyphs and pictographs, like the ones seen out west? There is no human evidence at any of these structures.
I believe its glacial, valcanic, and colonist that created what you interpret as ancient man.
This video was the 10 minute abbreviated version. This playlist has the long form videos that contain the research and the comparisons between the published research and this site. ua-cam.com/play/PL4cqSBfYNAQK1yxW5f-NFawEwhfrxnuQz.html&si=aCFXo2ca_4LpWFBK
As for the comparisons to western tribal practices, it is well known that practices varied widely across regions (for instance, the great serpent mound in Ohio v stone effigies in the north east). Also, artifacts tend not to be found in areas of ceremonial stone landscapes. It seems they did leave behind every day items in those areas. That topic is covered in my recent book review: ua-cam.com/play/PL4cqSBfYNAQJr3mY0_BbLuGlUodUeK4zB.html&si=HZiX8V7Z0gOPhCF4
Lastly, it is also illegal to dig in state or town forests in this state, so at this particular site there would be no way to know what is below the surface.
I see a pile of rocks... I am not trying to be negative on what your getting at. but I think its a reach. I will need to do more research. I do not believe main stream archeology with a lot of what they claim.. I have seen some areas with rock walls etc that just dont make sense . So I do believe the official explanation for many of these rock structures are weak
@@Chuck-he1jd this playlist has all of the research cited in the description, and compared to the site, step by step. It’s important to use resources that relate to ancient practices in this region. Practices varied widely among the tribes and nations.
ua-cam.com/play/PL4cqSBfYNAQK1yxW5f-NFawEwhfrxnuQz.html&si=uwdxx9dh-BveaKEf