Nomads (1986) - Movie Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @YusukeKnight
    @YusukeKnight Рік тому +1

    Good review

  • @jimjoyce4423
    @jimjoyce4423 9 місяців тому +1

    Sounds like your opinion of him affected your review

  • @Flaccid.Mohawk
    @Flaccid.Mohawk 9 місяців тому +1

    Did... did you watch it on mute with the screen off..? Sir, with all do respect, the majority of this movie was spoon fed to the audience. The only way this movie would have made Zero Sense ™️ is if you didn’t:
    1. Know what an anthropologist is/does
    Or
    2. Didn't watch the ending
    I'm genuinely not trying to be rude but i am flabbergasted that you found Nomads to be poorly done. It's one thing to not like it, but don't hate it because you didn't understand it.

    • @strangemichaelhorror
      @strangemichaelhorror  9 місяців тому

      Bruh, get out of here with that “didn’t understand it” bullshit; the movie sucks and has no actual story to tell lmao. The movie CAN’T make any sense, because there’s almost nothing to make any sense OF.

    • @Flaccid.Mohawk
      @Flaccid.Mohawk 9 місяців тому

      @@strangemichaelhorror How does it make zero sense? Outside of the Doctor taking on Jean Charles' perspective with whatever phrase or what have you he used, they straight up explained EVERYTHING. Everything. The whole fucking thing, including the French that was pivotal to the plot. Which, not translating it in the beginning made the whole thing even better.
      The movie isn't the issue, dude. Having five-plus shelves stocked with media doesn't make your analysis any better.
      Your take is bad.

    • @strangemichaelhorror
      @strangemichaelhorror  9 місяців тому

      @@Flaccid.Mohawk Bruh, cope harder lmao. Just because you like a boring ass, long ass, slow ass, dull ass movie that has practically no plot, and the plot it HAS is nonsensical is not my problem lol. Go whine to someone else about your bad tastes.

    • @ElDuffman
      @ElDuffman 2 місяці тому

      It had some flaws, but it was a good original film.

    • @Flaccid.Mohawk
      @Flaccid.Mohawk Місяць тому

      @@strangemichaelhorror Nah, not whining. Just annoyed you call yourself any kind of legitimate critic when you can't read the basic-ass outline of a film. Some details were a bit foggy, but it isn't a hard film to understand. They literally lay it out for you. Try paying attention to one screen at a time. Just accept the fact that you had a bad take, and the next time you watch the movie, you won't reply because you'll be pissed off enough to learn what subtext is 😀 and will never admit that you were wrong and your take Is Bad 😀
      Saying a movie is bad because you didn't understand it (when everyone else did) is like saying food is bad because you don't like the taste.