The Nato Civil War | The Fun alternate future of the world(2023-2026) #1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @DeclanIrishMan
    @DeclanIrishMan 4 місяці тому +2

    we just reacted to your video. Great video, though it may not be entirely accurate. Ae you Turkish by chance. You should make a reaction video to our reaction infinite content glitch. Am i right?

    • @GodzillaBro2019
      @GodzillaBro2019  4 місяці тому

      Nope, it's just that i wanted to make a fun video. Besides, that is what the series is all about.

  • @FunnySpaceMan.
    @FunnySpaceMan. 2 місяці тому

    (I decided not to put this with my other comment since it was too big)
    This isn't really a complaint but just a general misconception that people have about the way NATO Works. NATO is a complex and complicated alliance. But the way most people know it is the "Funny North American and European Alliance that if you attack one guy in that alliance almost all of Europe and North America at war with you" But that couldn't be more wrong.
    NATO has multiple procedures and action plans that it would put into use before Article 5 would need to be invoked. Article 5 is sort of a last-ditch effort once all other action plans & security procedures have failed or are exhausted.
    NATO has and still does assign action plans to specific countries in an area or with some quality for them to collaborate and work on an action plan if a scenario occurs on one of their soil (E.G. the Baltic states may be assigned an action plan exclusive for them to use in case Russia attacked them.) There are HUNDREDS of these and there's 100% a NATO action plan for if Greece and Turkey got into a war that likely wouldn't require Article 5.

  • @FunnySpaceMan.
    @FunnySpaceMan. 5 місяців тому +3

    Nice video. However, it isn't completely realistic for a variety of reasons. However, that's okay. You're obviously a small mapper and you're going to need a ton of time to approve!!! I would explain ways to help out with future mapping but I don't really feel like typing entire articles right now, + you're probably not going to read everything I say. But overall, this is a fairly decent animation!

    • @GodzillaBro2019
      @GodzillaBro2019  5 місяців тому

      I respect this comment, I do take note o. How realistic it is. And usually try to push it. But in terms of military strength and overall geography, I do try to keep accurate.

    • @FunnySpaceMan.
      @FunnySpaceMan. 2 місяці тому

      @@GodzillaBro2019 Also btw it's not really a "Civil War" it would be more of a war that occurred due to major failures of the Alliance.

  • @FunnySpaceMan.
    @FunnySpaceMan. 2 місяці тому

    I do like this video and your content, but I want to list some things I don't think would happen realistically
    - Ukraine probably would not collapse after NATO enters a conflict. Sure, they probably wouldn't receive that many supplies anymore but they prob wouldn't collapse.
    - Greece would also last longer against Turkey. Although Turkey is MUCH stronger, it would still be able to resist a bit longer than that
    - Why would there be "Pro-Turkish Rebels" in France? I know French people don't like their government, and there would def be Turkish supporters, but they and Turkey are WAY different, and I doubt rebels would occur. Let alone winning
    - The U.S. would NOT have lost much stability due to fighting with Turkey They were only in the first half of the war for just a couple months and are the most powerful country in the world. Fighting Turkey for only 4 months would probably only put a small dent into the United States military capability at most
    - France wouldn't be partitioned. It would be restored back to normal. There would be no reason to partition it.

  • @SpeasyYT
    @SpeasyYT 5 місяців тому

    Civil war

  • @Nolleboi
    @Nolleboi 5 місяців тому

    Sweden lol