Honestly, it was stupid of them to make heroes illegal. There are worlds with citizens who can’t always save themselves. Superheroes are there to serve and protect.
@@JustinFrazier_360 yeah. Like, there’d be no Gotham city without Batman… I still miss Conroy 😔 some people just don’t have common sense, that’s all I’m saying. If metropolis didn’t have Superman, then that city would be a wasteland of crime and danger.
Exactly! Removing superheroes from society is basically like telling every person on Earth to leave their front doors wide open all night; it’s just asking for trouble. And BTW, if the police had been doing their job and give chase to the Underminer as soon as he surfaced, the Parr’s might not have had to get involved in the first place. But nope, instead they arrived precisely when you’d expect them to show up; AFTER the bad guy gets away.
The second part with the kids was not needed but it was completely unnecessary for the first part to be cut short. As it shows the police’s full opinion of the incredibles return.
What made these detectives very stupid was they were so self-centered to even realize that what was there were no casualties. That was a little more important than the damage that was happening in the city.
As superhero, Mr. Incredible was in the wrong here. But as a father, Bob was totally in the right. Violet and Dash are NOT Detective 3’s kids. He had NO right to raise his voice to them and pressure them like that. And don’t give me that “he’s an officer of the law doing his job” bullshit! The police are supposed to protect the greater good, not traumatize children.
Legally they had no right to question the kids, especially in that manner, so Bob had every right to act that way both as a parent and human being. The Guy questioning violet and dash could have easily been dismissed or charged for badgering them let alone yelling at them. Not only did they not have a lawyer or any legal council, but they were underage so without parental permission the entire precinct could be charged for interrogating the kids.
It is not entirely incorrect to call a teenager "a kid" colloquially, they are still too young to be treated as adults. Also, legally, teenagers and kids are the same.
![Why The Screenslaver is Pixar's Stupidest Villain [Incredibles 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g-ceg-ppNo4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Why The Screenslaver is Pixar's Stupidest Villain [Incredibles 2]](/img/tr.png)
(2:27)
Fact: The police officer saying "FREEZE!" was from the recorded archive of The Incredibles (2004).
Clever
@@JustinFrazier_360 So that same police officer truly got revenge on Mr. Incredible by arresting him.
"I'm thirsty"
Honestly, it was stupid of them to make heroes illegal. There are worlds with citizens who can’t always save themselves. Superheroes are there to serve and protect.
True
@@JustinFrazier_360 yeah. Like, there’d be no Gotham city without Batman… I still miss Conroy 😔 some people just don’t have common sense, that’s all I’m saying. If metropolis didn’t have Superman, then that city would be a wasteland of crime and danger.
Exactly! Removing superheroes from society is basically like telling every person on Earth to leave their front doors wide open all night; it’s just asking for trouble. And BTW, if the police had been doing their job and give chase to the Underminer as soon as he surfaced, the Parr’s might not have had to get involved in the first place. But nope, instead they arrived precisely when you’d expect them to show up; AFTER the bad guy gets away.
@johnnymanize So true
@@johnnymanize thank you
The second part with the kids was not needed but it was completely unnecessary for the first part to be cut short. As it shows the police’s full opinion of the incredibles return.
What made these detectives very stupid was they were so self-centered to even realize that what was there were no casualties. That was a little more important than the damage that was happening in the city.
@@dexterjones2201 True
As superhero, Mr. Incredible was in the wrong here. But as a father, Bob was totally in the right. Violet and Dash are NOT Detective 3’s kids. He had NO right to raise his voice to them and pressure them like that. And don’t give me that “he’s an officer of the law doing his job” bullshit! The police are supposed to protect the greater good, not traumatize children.
I agree
I agree neither
It was one of those catch 22 type things where the action is obviously wrong, but it is kind of understandable why'd it be done.
Legally they had no right to question the kids, especially in that manner, so Bob had every right to act that way both as a parent and human being. The Guy questioning violet and dash could have easily been dismissed or charged for badgering them let alone yelling at them. Not only did they not have a lawyer or any legal council, but they were underage so without parental permission the entire precinct could be charged for interrogating the kids.
Whats the matter with those people? A bunch of ignorant citizens should be great full that there lives are saved, not property.
no, no.. Dash is the only kid and Violet is not a kid.
Ikr
It is not entirely incorrect to call a teenager "a kid" colloquially, they are still too young to be treated as adults.
Also, legally, teenagers and kids are the same.
@Mortimer_RS no, no. Wrong dude. teenagers are olders like Young adults but they're still youngs. kids and Teenagers are not the same thing. Fool.
@@Alex-ni6ot legally they are treated as the same tho
@Mortimer_RS yes But they're not the same. The kid Is a different things than teenager
0:29
What's going on in your house bro
@@suitestheband Nothing
@JustinFrazier_360 they loud
@@suitestheband Not loud