Do Stars Move? Tracking Their Movements Across the Sky

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 151

  • @unvergebeneid
    @unvergebeneid 7 років тому +35

    Congratulations to 300 episodes! :)

    • @Barnardrab
      @Barnardrab 7 років тому +1

      His channel was one of the first that I came to when I became fascinated with astronomy. He's very good at simplifying science for the beginning enthusiasts.

  • @garrettcarver8346
    @garrettcarver8346 7 років тому +4

    Happy 300 - Thanks for such great content!

  • @dead2me282
    @dead2me282 5 років тому +7

    I live in newzealand. And for 2 years I've been watching the night sky. And I need to know is it possible for stars to move in one spot. Up down left right zig zag some Moving slow and others moving fast. Even moving in a way I could only describe as clitching. I have 4 locations I can take some one to observe this type of movement for proof. But when you see it you can't in see it so where ever I go now I see stars move in one spot. Even in the city where the light pollution should make what I'm seeing very difficult.

    • @TheAngiepangie424
      @TheAngiepangie424 5 років тому

      I am in San Diego and I see a star? to the east visible 11/15/19 and again on 11/18/19

    • @madeinjapan3333
      @madeinjapan3333 4 роки тому

      Yes i saw the same with my very own eyes when i was a kid it’s moving circulating and other straight moving then it stop as a kid watching it it’s so cool and i even call other kids to watch it with me and they are amaze.

    • @Mootly201
      @Mootly201 8 місяців тому

      Hey bra I been noticing this recently. In nz myself was in chch at Port hills noticed them moving hard to find one not doing exactly what you are explaining and tried again 4 nights later but on the west coast and still seeing the same thing been trying to find answers myself

    • @idgaf9103
      @idgaf9103 4 місяці тому

      @@Mootly201 hey did you get any answers for their motion?

    • @Mootly201
      @Mootly201 4 місяці тому

      @idgaf9103 nah man still trynna dig deep on this can't really find a while lot tho 🤔

  • @julienguieu5636
    @julienguieu5636 7 років тому +4

    If you're going to mention Tycho Brahe, then you're also pretty much required to mention that he most likely died from a burst bladder, which he suffered due to refraining from urinating for too long -- he was attending a banquet and could not bring himself to exit the room because it would have been a breach of protocol.
    Apparently, this has led to a Czech expression that translates as "I don't wanna die like Tycho Brahe", which you would use when you need to go answer the call of nature.
    (I'm not a little ashamed that this anecdote has been etched in my memory since I first heard it from a physics teacher almost two decades ago, while I keep forgetting over and over what wonders Brahe actually accomplished over his lifetime...)
    Oh, and congratulations on the 300-episode milestone! I've been working my way down the playlist for a few months and have hardly ever come across an episode I didn't find super informative and inspiring. Many thanks for lo those many hours of brain stimulation and wonder!

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому

      If you can remember two things about Brahe: nose, burst bladder. If you can remember his science contribution, that's a bonus.

  • @phoule76
    @phoule76 7 років тому +10

    Tycho Brahe was a great Dane.

  • @badasstaco3367
    @badasstaco3367 7 років тому +18

    I only watch your videos to fall asleep too. For some reason your voice is really relaxing. You'd be a good psychologist lol.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому +8

      I'm listening...

    • @Keith136ful
      @Keith136ful 7 років тому

      Is you're wife named Lillith?

    • @badasstaco3367
      @badasstaco3367 7 років тому

      Kenneth Lapre no lol

    • @kurtreber9813
      @kurtreber9813 7 років тому

      Kenneth Lapre no but "Frasier's" is :)

    • @christophtrispec3083
      @christophtrispec3083 7 років тому +1

      Err meh gawd me too. I watch his videos as I lay down for the night and begin to doze off. Sometimes I have to turn off my phone cuz I end up watching videos for hours. I especially love how Fraiser goes into hypothetical situations to satisfy the sci go geeks in all of us. Type 3 civilizations, one stage rockets, faster than light travel via worm holes.. this show is better than Star Trek since he always keeps the topic grounded to reality while explaining some of these methods. "Can we go inside a black hole?" a comments asks. "Why yes we can!" Fraiser sais, "but you wouldn't enjoy it that's for sure".. fuckin awesome.. if I may make a request for a topic. And that's how we claim to know the inner workings of a star when we can only observe them from the outside. A lot of observations really seem to contradict our current hypothesis on what we think is happening inside is why I ask. Ok ty Fraiser Cane! You rock!

  • @superbrick5045
    @superbrick5045 7 років тому +1

    Music used at 3:51? I checked the description and all the comments but didn't find any reference to it. Reminds me of a few older space games I used to play.

  • @sergio_botero
    @sergio_botero 7 років тому

    300 episodes... Great work, Fraser.

  • @chinjeremy6825
    @chinjeremy6825 7 років тому +2

    Nice touch with the background music :) love it.. Congrats!!

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому

      Always experimenting. :-)

  • @MusiCaninesTheMusicalDogs
    @MusiCaninesTheMusicalDogs 7 років тому +2

    300? Woah! That's a lot! Congratulations for all the hard and amazing work! I think I'm gonna check the first one to see what you looked like when you still had hair!

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому

      I don't think I had hair back then either.

  • @tauceti8060
    @tauceti8060 7 років тому +4

    If earth was in a globular cluster the night sky would be bright with stars that's beautiful.

  • @jackd42o
    @jackd42o 7 років тому

    Fantastic stuff. I had to watch some parts a couple times but it clicked for me! The animations help a ton. Thank you!

  • @rickysmyth
    @rickysmyth 7 років тому +1

    Do you have to make much adjustments if your watching a star to see if it has planets? That could take weeks

  • @thefirefly1234
    @thefirefly1234 7 років тому +3

    hi fraser would it be possible to animate the observable universe of what it will look like in the distant future? or even in reverse to show how the universe formed from the big bang? congrats on 300 episodes!

    • @dantess2693
      @dantess2693 7 років тому

      This would be awesome!

    • @daveross7731
      @daveross7731 2 роки тому

      Well it can be shown in theory. Fine. But no human saw it. So it will be nothing more than speculation. So good luck on that. That's straight up truth.

  • @brucehayman4206
    @brucehayman4206 7 років тому

    great episode Fraser

  • @kylehazachode
    @kylehazachode 7 років тому +3

    new lighting/camera? looks great

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому +10

      We got a Panasonic Lumix GH5 and a couple of portable LED lighting stands. Definitely leveling up our production.

  • @zapfanzapfan
    @zapfanzapfan 7 років тому

    The 300 :-)
    Btw, I have been on the island that Tycho lived on while making his observations. His castle no longer exists but you can see the remains of his observatory and a church has been repurposed as a museum that houses several replicas of his instruments.
    And there is a distillery making whisky on the island, The Spirit of Hven :-)

    • @Drakcap
      @Drakcap 7 років тому +1

      Very cool. I've added it to my list of places to try to visit.

  • @berzerkskwid
    @berzerkskwid 7 років тому

    Ian Douglas's new book from the Star Carrier series just came out, and it mentions Shkadov thrusters. Have you been doing some sci-fi reading lately?

  • @j0e916
    @j0e916 7 років тому

    the prospect of finding an obviously-engineered configuration of stars completely blew my mind. perhaps in a few million years.

  • @brendansully12
    @brendansully12 7 років тому

    Great! Can't wait for the next 300 :-D

  • @s.wollberg4247
    @s.wollberg4247 7 років тому

    Yay 300 episodes!

  • @KMallinson
    @KMallinson 7 років тому

    I'm confused about how we calculated that galaxies don't appear to have enough mass to hold themselves together unless there's invisible matter; how does one calculate the mass of an entire galaxy cluster?

  • @willemvandebeek
    @willemvandebeek 7 років тому

    Your music usage is getting better. :)
    Ring singularities!

    • @Drakcap
      @Drakcap 7 років тому +2

      Thanks! I was trying out some new ideas after ditching the music for a bit.

  • @ahmadkhalil3051
    @ahmadkhalil3051 7 років тому

    keep it going ! great episode.

  • @ositandupu9713
    @ositandupu9713 4 роки тому

    Pls i need some education. Where are the stars located in the sky?. Beyond the moon or where?

  • @cloneskiller
    @cloneskiller 7 років тому

    happy 300!!!

  • @kurtreber9813
    @kurtreber9813 7 років тому

    Hi Fraser,
    Another star will be 8600 AU (or thereabouts) from us in a couple hundred thousand years? Thats WAY WAY closer than the Proxima Centauri system. Would it necessarily be the brightest star in the sky?

  • @Barnardrab
    @Barnardrab 7 років тому

    According to Issac Arthur's episode on the topic, the more massive the star, the easier it is to move, due to its increased energy output.
    That said, I would assume the Type III civilization would focus on the biggest stars and use them to sheppard the smaller ones.
    I wonder how long it would take to move VY Canis Majoris...

  • @billwheeler7243
    @billwheeler7243 4 роки тому

    FRASIER... HAVE YOU DONE A VIDEO ON ROUGE PLANETS WITHIN 100-500 LIGHT YEARS FROM EARTH... AND THEIR RELITIVE POSITIONS IN THE NIGHT SKY ??

  • @cj19ization
    @cj19ization 4 роки тому +1

    I have seen the stars moves. I went out to walk my dogs at 5 A.M and hold and behold the stars were moving in a uniform way. I have never seen anything like that before.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  4 роки тому

      All the stars at the same time?

    • @ranjithlove8504
      @ranjithlove8504 4 роки тому

      @@frasercain not all stars
      I also witnessed some stars moves like the same way u see airplanes
      After 1 or 2 hours the sunset wait in a dark place and state the sky
      You will definitely note it. It will move from nowhere and start to vanishes when it reaches the sides.
      I witnessed in childhood in my tution class when power cut happens and we enjoy the scenery of sky and stars. 😍

  • @viktorzeman7571
    @viktorzeman7571 7 років тому

    5:07 a globular star cluster. I love to show these to people at our observatory. Looking forward to summer. Summer means more globular star clusters. I live at the northern part of the globe.

  • @SkyDiving_StormTrooper
    @SkyDiving_StormTrooper 7 років тому

    Great video Fraser! Are you guys doing something different? Using new gear or editing? Whatever it is, bottle it!

  • @LordBitememan
    @LordBitememan 7 років тому

    Have you done any videos on stellar collisions?

    • @christophtrispec3083
      @christophtrispec3083 7 років тому

      LordBitememan I'm pretty sure I just saw a video about solar collisions. He mentioned how they would, (depending on the trojectory of the solar masses) either sling shot off, orbit each other or one would fall into the other consuming it as it goes through the consuming Star. I dont remember anything about a collision type, car crash type crash where one just explodes though.

  • @CarlaWatkins-c4o
    @CarlaWatkins-c4o 9 місяців тому

    Nice video! Good information and great graphics. Thank you. Is it possible to show new crescent moon phases and ecliptic location after sunset for each month of the year in succession? There are a few images of new crescent moons on the internet but not the progression through the year or the actual angles of the crescents. As a matter of fact, oftentimes, the pictures are reversed showing what would be a waning moon rather than a waxing crescent. Thank you.

  • @fredriksuokas7697
    @fredriksuokas7697 7 років тому

    Can photons interfere with each others trajectory if their paths are crossing? for example by gravitationally destorting, by bouncing of each other, or by some other force.

  • @stren000
    @stren000 7 років тому +2

    In the last WSH you mentioned Gaia among the missions that would help in finding exoplanets, which is not the case BTW. Other then that, keep up the good work

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому +1

      No? What about this page from ESA? sci.esa.int/gaia/58784-exoplanets/

    • @stren000
      @stren000 7 років тому +1

      well the way you bunched it with those other missions seemed like you were saying about direct detection like transit/radio velocity. Non direct help for sure

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому +2

      It's going to identify tens of thousands of planets using astrometry. In a way that no other technique can, by watching how the planets cause a spiral pattern in their parent star. And this'll be a side effect of tracking star locations. I would absolutely put Gaia in the same class as any other planet finding mission out there.

  • @Cambria399
    @Cambria399 7 років тому

    Excellent video, thanks. I think the stars in Orions belt are not as well aligned, visually, as they were when I was in Scouts over 50 years ago. Is it likely that that is true?

  • @sozimorad6051
    @sozimorad6051 7 років тому +1

    سبحانك ربي ما قدرناك حق قدرك،شكرا على هذا الوثائقي

  • @stp77rising11
    @stp77rising11 7 років тому

    Fascinating! I can't help but think that once the James Webb telescope is up and running, and once we start gathering data from it, we're going to have more questions than answers. It could completely revolutionize everything we know thus far. We might have to re-think a lot of things. Am I being overly optimistic here? It's exciting!

    • @rustysancho
      @rustysancho 2 роки тому

      5 years later and the Webb telescope that cost taxpayers $10 billion has given us nothing but edited CGI fakery. I honestly feel sorry for you because of how excited you were over such a scam.

  • @qkproductions4188
    @qkproductions4188 7 років тому

    What do you think the highest distance of visible light the naked eye can see. What is the furthest star from us we can look out for?

  • @davecarsley8773
    @davecarsley8773 7 років тому

    I wonder, when/if _Hipparcos 85605_ gets to within 8,200 AU of us, would it be any kind of neat sight [visually] in the sky? Extremely bright like a supernova? Noticeably much bigger than all the other stars?

  • @fairybox1111
    @fairybox1111 7 років тому

    Happy 300 Spartans!!

  • @petrkopac
    @petrkopac 7 років тому

    Good job!

  • @ositandupu9713
    @ositandupu9713 4 роки тому

    Are they higher than the moon or lower?. Are they located within the earth orbit?. Were they arranged like the planets or how?. Can anyone recommend a video of the milky way for me

  • @jamesmorrow9093
    @jamesmorrow9093 7 років тому +1

    love you Channel I got an idea for a program what will happen to the moons of Jupiter and Saturn when our sun goes red giant?

  • @RazielStar
    @RazielStar 7 років тому +1

    how is it possible that the mass of stars vary so widely? why does one cloud of gas go critical and form a red dwarf While others managed to accumulate enough Mass to become a blue supergiant?

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому

      It just depends on the amount of gas in the stellar nebula. The more gas, the more massive stars that form.

  • @drghost2999
    @drghost2999 7 років тому

    We could rearrange the stars of our galaxy to spell "FUCK OFF" to any passer by...that would be awesome

  • @Threedog1963
    @Threedog1963 7 років тому

    Frasier, how about a a quantum entangled communication system?
    Entangle one computer to another. Keep one on Earth, send one to, say Mars. Couldn't they theoretically communicate instantly?

  • @nsudhir_here
    @nsudhir_here 4 роки тому

    what do you mean by "against the more distant background of galaxy"

    • @zounds010
      @zounds010 2 роки тому

      The nearby stars move visibly. Faraway stars move through a much smaller angle.

  • @Snowy123
    @Snowy123 7 років тому

    QUESTION! Logistically and financially what would it take to build a telescope on the moon?

  • @hydictube
    @hydictube 4 роки тому

    The sun is a star. How does the sun form planets surrounding it? Is there any possibility that other star having planets surrounding it too?

  • @nqinadlamini
    @nqinadlamini 7 років тому

    Can the stars moving at hyper-velocity hold on to their planets?

  • @rustysancho
    @rustysancho 2 роки тому

    Yes, stars, sun and moon are moving in a constant circular motion over this stationary earth. It's so obvious.

    • @rustysancho
      @rustysancho 2 роки тому

      Just like Ptolemy said. Funny that the article that brought me here said his charts and tables were incredibly accurate, with a picture of his flat earth map listing many of the stars above the plane. But of course you say "his observation of the universe was wrong" because it doesn't fit the spinning, wobbling globe narrative.

  • @Lockout469
    @Lockout469 7 років тому +1

    Fraiser can you make a video on artifical gravity and what a rocket or space station would need to do to obtain it? Thanks!

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому

      Here's a video for you: ua-cam.com/video/DMUj--rULZk/v-deo.html

  • @pipertripp
    @pipertripp 7 років тому

    I think Bessel made the first successful parallax measurement in 1838.

  • @bpklive9605
    @bpklive9605 4 роки тому

    28.4.2020 night between 7.30 to 8.30 i m seating on terrace with my naighbour friends and suddenly i see on sky two stars are moving opposite direction very fast / i m from country india/ city chennai

  • @danielwheels9529
    @danielwheels9529 7 років тому +3

    What's your thoughts on solar energy??
    I feel that we have the means to get all our power from solar sources, however the government has yet to figure out how to charge us money for it.
    Do you think solar isn't enough for our needs, or is there are greater conspiracy at play?

    • @christophtrispec3083
      @christophtrispec3083 7 років тому +1

      Daniel Wheels Fraiser !!! Answer this guys question !!!!!! Omg answer this one!!!!!

    • @JustOneAsbesto
      @JustOneAsbesto 7 років тому

      Yes, we could get all of our power from solar, however that would be more expensive (for *now*, solar is rapidly becoming cost-effective as far as I know).
      Also, having multiple different sources of power generation is probably a safe bet, in case something goes wrong.
      Also also... power distribution grids can be kind of fickle, as power consumption throughout any individual grid is constantly fluctuating, and the output from the plant has to constantly fluctuate to match the demand.
      Obviously if output falls short of demand, there will be power issues; but if output EXCEEDS demand, that can also cause serious problems to the grid.
      The way most systems (whether they be oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric, or nuclear) work is to use the raw power from that source to get tonnes and tonnes and tonnes of metal spinning very quickly, which also generates the actual electricity.
      All that inertial mass can be used to sort of balance out the irregularities in electricity consumption from the user-end, because if demand gets too high, it can just suck some of the rotational energy from the tonnes of spinning steel to meet demand. This buffer also allows the system some leeway to prevent it from OVERproducing.
      You can't really do that with solar though. In order to deal with those irregularities, you'd have to store all that raw power in some kind of battery before it actually gets transmitted to end-users, and we just don't have good enough battery technology to really do that cost effectively right now.

  • @elementus2857
    @elementus2857 7 років тому

    THIS IS SPARTA!!!

  • @brocpage4204
    @brocpage4204 7 років тому +1

    Fraser, do you know why light particles are red shifted by the expansion of space? I know the reason they are red shifted is because of the expansion of space, but what is happening that shifts it?
    I never hear much about blue shift, but is that a thing too?

    • @thiagobaldwin2700
      @thiagobaldwin2700 7 років тому +1

      It have to do with the wavelength of the visible light, it gets stretched and compressed, and different colors have different wavelengths.

    • @Barnardrab
      @Barnardrab 7 років тому

      I think its the same principle as that of a sonic boom.

    • @brocpage4204
      @brocpage4204 7 років тому

      Yeah... I know how the wavelength of light represents how much energy it has, but how is it losing energy simply by traveling through space, even if it is expanding? What is happening to the energy?

    • @ptmarkoviitanen
      @ptmarkoviitanen 7 років тому

      It works just like soundwaves. When object is coming towards you, waves are compressed to high pitch, which is blue and when objects move away from each other, waves are stretched and it is low pitch, which is red.

    • @brocpage4204
      @brocpage4204 7 років тому

      I understand the doppler effect, but I was under the impression light can not have a doppler effect due to relativity.
      if i'm standing still, and you are moving towards me at half the speed of light, time would just move more slowly for you but we would both still see the light traveling at the same speed.
      shouldn't time be the emerging change? hence my question on what is actually happening that is redshifting the light, why is it losing energy? on the same note, if it's moving towards you, how is it gaining energy?

  • @doncarlodivargas5497
    @doncarlodivargas5497 7 років тому +2

    to move a star must be the worlds most boring job ever, how far would I manage to move a star in one day you think, let's say for 7,5 hour? approximatly
    by the way, congratulations, your videos are great, thanks

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому +1

      The star slowly accelerates over a billion years or so. It would be incredibly boring.

    • @doncarlodivargas5497
      @doncarlodivargas5497 7 років тому

      Fraser Cain - just the taught of stopping it again after accelerate it makes me understand this is nothing for me, far too boring

  • @GauravChavan
    @GauravChavan 3 роки тому

    Does anyone knows fast objects which looks like stars , moving in night sky in some patterns

    • @rivercity7808
      @rivercity7808 3 роки тому

      ANGELS..

    • @zounds010
      @zounds010 2 роки тому

      Those are probably satellites in Earth orbit.

  • @PrincessTS01
    @PrincessTS01 7 років тому

    not only do stars move but our star is orbiting the milky way creating a awesome spiral wave effect they say we have a sister star called hd162826 which moved to the hercules constellation

    • @christophtrispec3083
      @christophtrispec3083 7 років тому

      PrincessTS01 wait a minute, if this is true then we have cousins on the planets orbiting that star!!! Fuckin awsommee

  • @minalshroff7709
    @minalshroff7709 5 років тому

    I was travelling by train I was watching sky. There was one star in sky. I kept watching that star from Andheri to Bhayandar I got down. First I felt star was moving with me because when clouds came it got hide behind cloud and then came out of cloud and kept moving with me. But when I got down at Bhayandar the same star stood still at same position. I thought it will move but it didn't. It means star was not moving than how I saw same star from Andheri to Bhayandar if it didn't move as there were no other stars in sky

    • @crnigruja2220
      @crnigruja2220 Рік тому

      What's the point of your comment? i don't get it :S.

  • @rimeandtreason5565
    @rimeandtreason5565 7 років тому

    What are the leading theories about the axis of evil?

  • @universemythologymitologia4397
    @universemythologymitologia4397 2 роки тому

    I have some videos of moving star , star even can change color and shape

  • @jerry3790
    @jerry3790 7 років тому

    We should look out for stars arranged to say I love you, possibly to impress a cyclops

    • @kurtreber9813
      @kurtreber9813 7 років тому

      Jerry Rupprecht haha i get it. but that sexy cyclops never sees it

  • @AubriGryphon
    @AubriGryphon 7 років тому

    If you stretched out a millions of light years long rope and attached it to a piezoelectric crystal, could you generate power from the Hubble Expansion?

  • @daveross7731
    @daveross7731 2 роки тому

    Mapping the stars in said numbers is great but not every star is gonna be mapped because as the Bible says, "innumerable stars". Written before, long before the mentioned astronomer in this video, started mapping/cataloguing..

  • @christopherdemo9884
    @christopherdemo9884 5 років тому

    16 light years away and in 8200000000000 years from now we know exactly where it will be. lel

  • @khaliffoster3777
    @khaliffoster3777 4 роки тому

    It is good, but you didn't make a convert from scale to next scale that is arcsec to mph. One thing is mph, and another is arcsec? But no connect to both. I am sure ya base mph on one star which is not an arc but horizontal motion, not degree motion?? So, you base arcsecond for hair that is 10 meter away which is horizontal distance but not degree distance. So, the degree per distance. And you base need to know the number of speed or so, which we need to go to rocket, so can't know the answer from earth to calculate? You mention going to rocket to gain knowledge about the motion of star?

    • @zounds010
      @zounds010 2 роки тому

      That conversion depends on distance. So we measure in arcseconds, then we measure the distance to the star, then we can calculate its speed in mph.

    • @khaliffoster3777
      @khaliffoster3777 2 роки тому

      @@zounds010 Then explain it. Ya didn't so ya just saying a statement but not explaining that matches my statement above to convert arc to non-arc, the degree to non-degree. So, how do you convert it?

  • @sammysam2615
    @sammysam2615 7 років тому +1

    How many stars have come and gone throughout the history of the universe, that have shaped the universe we see today?
    Is there an estimated number? Is it possible to answer this question?

    • @universemythologymitologia4397
      @universemythologymitologia4397 2 роки тому

      Star is first exist then earth, moon and sun. They never gone , they are exist forever . Star, moon, sun, earth are aircraft . Sun is aircraft of God sun where his descendants live later this aircraft because rotate then absord ash then the aircraft shape like it is loik like now.

    • @crnigruja2220
      @crnigruja2220 Рік тому

      @@universemythologymitologia4397 U think moon is older than Earth? :D.

    • @universemythologymitologia4397
      @universemythologymitologia4397 Рік тому

      @@crnigruja2220 sorry , star first then Mother Earth create earth then God give moon and sun because mother Earth kepp crying while making earth on her aircraft cos Dragon keep moving her land from the bottom of water then land become not straight then becomes mounts, cliff, hole, contonent because of less light then she has difficulty to create earth accordingly tgen God give Moon and Sun . But then God Moon and Sun transform into her descendant.

    • @crnigruja2220
      @crnigruja2220 Рік тому

      @@universemythologymitologia4397 That's good fairytale for children :)

  • @yvonnemartinez7843
    @yvonnemartinez7843 4 роки тому

    The other might a bunch of star's where moving really fast??????

  • @grahamehadden4320
    @grahamehadden4320 7 років тому

    Will our solar system be thrown out when Andromeda and the Milky Way collide

  • @OlaJustin
    @OlaJustin 7 років тому

    I doubt anyone can get funding of a project that will be completed in "a few billion years". ;)

  • @highchamp1
    @highchamp1 7 років тому

    Atlantropa
    German architect Herman Sörgel
    I was watching "The man in the high castle" TV Series
    and then "Wha...? A model for Atlantropa.
    See UA-cam "Atlantropa Explained by Reichminister Heusmann"

  • @pooyafitness
    @pooyafitness 7 років тому +1

    Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi was not Arab. He was Persian.

  • @kayeannedimayugabalao2717
    @kayeannedimayugabalao2717 Рік тому

    Nandito ako kasi ang bogak ni Denndii🤦🏻‍♀️

  • @kohhor
    @kohhor 7 років тому

    SOOOOOOO😅🗯SOOOOOooooo...... What your telling Us is that There will never be A lot of star movement in our LIFE😧TIME...HERE COME THE FLAT💥😖EARTH

  • @WilhelmDrake
    @WilhelmDrake 6 років тому

    Why are you ignoring the previous few thousand years of Near-Eastern Astronomy?

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  6 років тому

      How am I ignoring it? The Arabian astronomers have so many stars named after them.

  • @samsungliza3286
    @samsungliza3286 6 років тому +2

    Hey guys id you want to know i see the star move around i think the star is goku

  • @Skynet_the_AI
    @Skynet_the_AI 4 роки тому

    Oops . . .

  • @G274Me
    @G274Me 7 років тому

    Betelgeuse is hauling ass.

  • @cinthiaavila6302
    @cinthiaavila6302 5 років тому

    OMG

  • @izvarzone
    @izvarzone 7 років тому

    60 FPS!

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  7 років тому

      +izvarzone yup, 4k is next. Got our new Lumix GH5

  • @Skynet_the_AI
    @Skynet_the_AI 4 роки тому

    Like 7 7 8

  • @amandahernandez9852
    @amandahernandez9852 6 років тому +1

    The earth doesnt move at all the sun is the same size as the moon and they are 50 miles away if that...we are our the creators most precious creation so ofcourse everything revolves around us...the stars are alive and not like a plant or tree alive, I mean alive alive and they watch every disgusting thing we do and there praying for us less then 10 miles away most of them..if you think you can see stars a trillion miles away or that something 93 million away can heat your face then I feel sorry for you...Science is a fairytale and we have all been lied to...You better go talk to our creator soon OUTSIDE because are chance is almost up

  • @rivercity7808
    @rivercity7808 3 роки тому

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA 🤣🤣🤣🤣