Still waiting for efficiency/fuel consumption figures. The most significant problem is where are you going to get hydrogen from and how are you going to keep it in your tank?
MOST PROMISING WOULD BE A SOURCE OF POWER FOR BACK UP POWER SUPPLY - MAYBE FUNCTIONAL THROUGH THE PHASE OUT PERIOD. NOT SURE HOW IMPORTANT IT WILL BE TO OBTAIN FOSSIL FUELS IN THE FUTURE.
This is a joke machine. The whole thing could be a click bait game. First off the engine shown appears to be leaking gasses. That could be the water vapor from hydrogen but it seems to be blowing out where it would be inside the engine compartment. And while it claims to reduce Nox that does not like an electric eliminate Nox. It also seems under powered for heavy duty vehicles. Adding extra engines will require more space, more cost and more maintenance. That's a serious problem given the financial impact and long production chain of hydrogen in particular the huge energy costs of working with green hydrogen. Hydrogen has already been debunked as a viable fuel because of these issues. Try again combustion engine guys or just wise up and start working with electric motors - smaller more efficient and more powerful.
Extra st8ll to complicated expensiwe short time using expensiwe,,,,,yustvtry Balkan 3x Neodium Engine 20 kg 200 hp cheep ,,long ride some 100 years ++... quiet slide ..long service time x ..x ..x...end more...,,,no fuel tank pipes senzors noting...2x4 4x4vorc8x8 plus if its need reductors
To become useful for a wide number of applications the Engine will have to operate on Natural Gas. Vaporized Gasoline would be better. A Multi-fuel design would be best supported by existing infrastructures.
I agree, this is critical. If it requires an entirely new fuel like hydrogen it will likely be a non starting in all but very specialized applications.
Rpms can't be reached..gasket failures are problematic. Gasket leaks blow out after 1000rpm. No gasket solutions can be found. This is already a failed design.
This is an old scam...show me a proper running real prototype...the few videos of a running motor were junk...this concept looks good on paper, but in the real world motor is junk!!
Viable LENR is back.
This is our possible future.
Avanti!
Thats old news and this vid is made just for views
Still waiting for efficiency/fuel consumption figures. The most significant problem is where are you going to get hydrogen from and how are you going to keep it in your tank?
Make it as needed from Water!🤦
Thank you! Easy!@@spiritzweispirit1st638
@@spiritzweispirit1st638jajaja la próxima guerra es por agua y estos motores
What about torque. Does it bogg down as soon as a load is applied
Where can i get the engine
... great concept ! ...
Looks like Dale Granthams air dragster air engine from 1962/63
Surely all motors are revolutionary, they all have rotating parts.
MOST PROMISING WOULD BE A SOURCE OF POWER FOR BACK UP POWER SUPPLY - MAYBE FUNCTIONAL THROUGH THE PHASE OUT PERIOD. NOT SURE HOW IMPORTANT IT WILL BE TO OBTAIN FOSSIL FUELS IN THE FUTURE.
Likeeeee 🎉
TOO MUCH, TOO LATE. IT'S WHY MECHANICAL COMPUTERS ARE JUST NOVELTIES.
Too bad the clickbait comes through on this video.
Let's see the Total cost of ownership after 3000 hours.
hydrogen not viable bros !
This is a joke machine. The whole thing could be a click bait game. First off the engine shown appears to be leaking gasses. That could be the water vapor from hydrogen but it seems to be blowing out where it would be inside the engine compartment. And while it claims to reduce Nox that does not like an electric eliminate Nox. It also seems under powered for heavy duty vehicles. Adding extra engines will require more space, more cost and more maintenance. That's a serious problem given the financial impact and long production chain of hydrogen in particular the huge energy costs of working with green hydrogen. Hydrogen has already been debunked as a viable fuel because of these issues. Try again combustion engine guys or just wise up and start working with electric motors - smaller more efficient and more powerful.
Electric motor four parts and no gearbox needed.So!! its no good.
Extra st8ll to complicated expensiwe short time using expensiwe,,,,,yustvtry Balkan 3x Neodium Engine 20 kg 200 hp cheep ,,long ride some 100 years ++... quiet slide ..long service time x ..x ..x...end more...,,,no fuel tank pipes senzors noting...2x4 4x4vorc8x8 plus if its need reductors
To become useful for a wide number of applications the Engine will have to operate on Natural Gas. Vaporized Gasoline would be better. A Multi-fuel design would be best supported by existing infrastructures.
I agree, this is critical. If it requires an entirely new fuel like hydrogen it will likely be a non starting in all but very specialized applications.
Novel design. A little late. Replace electric motors hahahaha
Rpms can't be reached..gasket failures are problematic. Gasket leaks blow out after 1000rpm. No gasket solutions can be found. This is already a failed design.
Well, dang.
I have been following this engine for a while. Where did you learn about the gasket failures past 1000rpm?
BS
Just use EV...easy...no exhaust 😂
This is an old scam...show me a proper running real prototype...the few videos of a running motor were junk...this concept looks good on paper, but in the real world motor is junk!!