Just one slight correction. The statement GDPR applies to EU residents is incorrect. In fact you cannot find the word Resident in the entire article or recitals. It applies simply to any nature persons (Data subjects) residing in the EU. The terms EU Resident would generally imply someone that working in the EU and paying taxes, even though he/she might be a non EU citizen. However GDPR covers an even larger group. You can be a temporary visitor to the EU and this will apply to you as well.
At ua-cam.com/video/nG9RJLhDTXc/v-deo.html you say that it cannot be a "tick" that says somebody "opts in" as consent but rather the "complete separate opt in requirement". And this means what? How do you show that somebody "ticked" what is likely only a box? Does it mean you have to grab the web-session, details about their machine, etc. And if you have mailing lists and want to know if people will consent to you marketing to them - whether pre 2018-05-25 or after, how do you get this sort of consent?
Demande d'aide financière pour la réalisation des projets en Afrique L'association aide aux enfants mal-nourris et aux personnes déshéritées est une association à but non lucratif et humains D'organiser des collectes de fonds des médicaments des aliments des vêtements et des fournitures scolaires pour redistribuer Aux personnes déshéritées et aux personnes nécessiteuses De mener et entretenir des liens avec les gouvernements et les organisations non gouvernementales ONG internationales enfin d'obtenir leurs soutiens De créer des actions sociales culturelles médicales et paramédicales de caractères associatifs afin d'améliorer les conditions de vie des populations les plus défavorisées De former et suivre des groupements des mutualistes et des communautaires pour un développement durable
Not a great seminar in my view - did not deal sufficiently with the very obvious problem of Payment Processors - widespread in use by businesses of all sizes to collect payments for purchases of goods/services. There's clearly NO WAY that a breach at one of those (eg Paypal or Stripe) could even be picked up by a micro business and communicated to customers within a 72 hour timeframe. For one thing the business is unlikely to know what data was collected other than perhaps a customer name and possibly a transaction ID/amount and date. Given that the payment processors may hold information for some time (keeping card details on file for future transactions being a common thing) the business where the Data Controller resides has no way of knowing any of that information, where it's kept or how. Therefore I would have expected some insight into how these Payment Processors are expected to handle this stuff. Personally I would expect them to be able to contact the customer direct - after all they have all the relevant information Name, Address and Financial Details.
A payment processor maybe a data controller with respect to the payment aspects of a business transaction, and therefore have the responsibility of notifying the data subject in the event of a breach. Think of paying using PayPal where you interact directly with PayPal, rather than the business you are purchasing goods from. In that case PayPal would be the data controller and have the responsibility of notifying the customer of breaches.
it's an intro seminar as the name suggests. Instead of hammering others, do your own search if you're frustrated not to find ready-to-use answers regarding the specific context you expose !
that controller defines the purpose and needs or processing and is the one that does DPIA so obviously it has know black and white how the data is processed and records of processing is just the reason to have for such scenarios.
this will only benefit larger companies; regulation only affects chance for the small companies to grow and compete with the large fish; UE is closing more and more to a socialist empire
Gigel Chiazna This law isn't meant to benefit companies. It's meant to benefit the consumers and I think it will. We'll be more in charge of our own data. Also, it seems far more likely to me that the EU countries will take a good look at the bigger companies than the smaller ones. The big companies probably have the most data, after all.
@@Anna133199 well this kind of EU paperwork obstacle is a big issue for a small business owner that does not have a corporate lawyers department. So in the way it is implemented clearly favours huge companies.
Helpful, the 10 step action plan is at 29:45 mark in video for those interested.
Thanks
I have showed this to my 5 year old and he is not speaking to me now. Please help.
lol
He's not speaking to you until you tell him what sort of information you have on him and how you are storing it.
@Vihaan Gerald why though?
Sue
amazing video BetterCloud. I crushed the thumbs up on your video. Keep on up the amazing work.
Just one slight correction. The statement GDPR applies to EU residents is incorrect. In fact you cannot find the word Resident in the entire article or recitals. It applies simply to any nature persons (Data subjects) residing in the EU. The terms EU Resident would generally imply someone that working in the EU and paying taxes, even though he/she might be a non EU citizen. However GDPR covers an even larger group. You can be a temporary visitor to the EU and this will apply to you as well.
play it at 1.5 speed...
Nice tip
hahahaha you're the MVP for today!
:-D Great tip!
1.25 is okay, I'm not an english native speaker though :D
dude .. you're a genius :D
her voice is actually less annoying .. who would have guessed that .. PATRYK STRZYZ DID
my man _0_
This helped me to understand the GDPR principles and requirements.
Nicely explained , amazing . Thanks for clearing each bits of GDPR Concept !
Very insightful overview! Thank you
explain like I'm 5 but runs over 56 minutes?
Yeah seriously. What 5 year old has that kinda attention span?!
A 5-year-old that runs an online business...
Exactly! Literally no-one has an hour to watch a video. Should be 10 key points briefly explained over 5 minutes tops!!
lol
1:46
"im gonna jump right in to it"
Awesome explanation.
At ua-cam.com/video/nG9RJLhDTXc/v-deo.html you say that it cannot be a "tick" that says somebody "opts in" as consent but rather the "complete separate opt in requirement". And this means what? How do you show that somebody "ticked" what is likely only a box? Does it mean you have to grab the web-session, details about their machine, etc.
And if you have mailing lists and want to know if people will consent to you marketing to them - whether pre 2018-05-25 or after, how do you get this sort of consent?
Very helpful thank you Jodi for taking the time to explain
Great webinar
Thanks. Detailed and crystal clear great job
Demande d'aide financière pour la réalisation des projets en Afrique
L'association aide aux enfants mal-nourris et aux personnes déshéritées est une association à but non lucratif et humains
D'organiser des collectes de fonds des médicaments des aliments des vêtements et des fournitures scolaires pour redistribuer Aux personnes déshéritées et aux personnes nécessiteuses
De mener et entretenir des liens avec les gouvernements et les organisations non gouvernementales ONG internationales enfin d'obtenir leurs soutiens
De créer des actions sociales culturelles médicales et paramédicales de caractères associatifs afin d'améliorer les conditions de vie des populations les plus défavorisées
De former et suivre des groupements des mutualistes et des communautaires pour un développement durable
We have a shorter video on Data Protection and GDPR which you might find interesting - select our logo to see all our videos
Can a ceo of a,housing association divert my emails to a locality manager without my consent
Good video thanks
Not a great seminar in my view - did not deal sufficiently with the very obvious problem of Payment Processors - widespread in use by businesses of all sizes to collect payments for purchases of goods/services. There's clearly NO WAY that a breach at one of those (eg Paypal or Stripe) could even be picked up by a micro business and communicated to customers within a 72 hour timeframe. For one thing the business is unlikely to know what data was collected other than perhaps a customer name and possibly a transaction ID/amount and date. Given that the payment processors may hold information for some time (keeping card details on file for future transactions being a common thing) the business where the Data Controller resides has no way of knowing any of that information, where it's kept or how. Therefore I would have expected some insight into how these Payment Processors are expected to handle this stuff. Personally I would expect them to be able to contact the customer direct - after all they have all the relevant information Name, Address and Financial Details.
A payment processor maybe a data controller with respect to the payment aspects of a business transaction, and therefore have the responsibility of notifying the data subject in the event of a breach. Think of paying using PayPal where you interact directly with PayPal, rather than the business you are purchasing goods from. In that case PayPal would be the data controller and have the responsibility of notifying the customer of breaches.
it's an intro seminar as the name suggests. Instead of hammering others, do your own search if you're frustrated not to find ready-to-use answers regarding the specific context you expose !
that controller defines the purpose and needs or processing and is the one that does DPIA so obviously it has know black and white how the data is processed and records of processing is just the reason to have for such scenarios.
I'm almost 50 and I turned off after the 1st 5 seconds after seeing how long it was. Lol.
Explain like I'm five ... but with a REALLY long attention span?!
This is good morning g
like.. totally!
How is this ELI5 ? Granted its well explained but i doubt any 5 year old understands any of what you are talking about.
Explain Like I’m Five ??? the kid would fall asleep as i almost did....
Marco Cerqueira It's no one's fault if your attention span is as long as a 5 year old's.
######=so Viele.#####Liebe.#Liebe.
this will only benefit larger companies; regulation only affects chance for the small companies to grow and compete with the large fish; UE is closing more and more to a socialist empire
Gigel Chiazna This law isn't meant to benefit companies. It's meant to benefit the consumers and I think it will. We'll be more in charge of our own data. Also, it seems far more likely to me that the EU countries will take a good look at the bigger companies than the smaller ones. The big companies probably have the most data, after all.
@@Anna133199 well this kind of EU paperwork obstacle is a big issue for a small business owner that does not have a corporate lawyers department. So in the way it is implemented clearly favours huge companies.
@@Jacur1980 They want to protect the consumer while the small blogger's private info is released.
Explain like I am five my ass....
TL;DW
FawkesMuldarr lmao, yeah I think most of us "Didn't Wank" either 😂