There is a name for the sum over "God Equation". It is called the partition function. Here is a description of the partition function from David Tong, a professor at Cambridge University, in his book Statistical Field Theory: "Even though Z (partition function) is first introduced as an innocuous normalisation factor, it actually contains everything we want to know about the system." Here is a wiki page on the partition function: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_function_(mathematics)
@@CompuFlair The partition function is not typically referred to as the "God equation." The term "God equation" isn't a formal concept in physics or machine learning. If someone used the term "God equation" for the partition function, it would likely be in a metaphorical or philosophical sense, reflecting its central role in understanding a wide range of physical systems through statistical mechanics. However, it is not a commonly accepted term.
does this god equation have a name?
There is a name for the sum over "God Equation". It is called the partition function.
Here is a description of the partition function from David Tong, a professor at Cambridge University, in his book Statistical Field Theory:
"Even though Z (partition function) is first introduced as an innocuous normalisation factor, it actually contains everything we want to know about the system."
Here is a wiki page on the partition function:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_function_(mathematics)
@@CompuFlair The partition function is not typically referred to as the "God equation." The term "God equation" isn't a formal concept in physics or machine learning. If someone used the term "God equation" for the partition function, it would likely be in a metaphorical or philosophical sense, reflecting its central role in understanding a wide range of physical systems through statistical mechanics. However, it is not a commonly accepted term.
Great! You are great! and you have a super well way to explain! Thanks!...
Im glad you liked it!
Nice explanation. Like the way you described this. But you should have put the link to the next video in the information or at the end of the video :)
Thanks for the comment. I'll do it next time :)