SpaceX BIG Change for Dragon Reusability is totally HUMILIATED Starliner and Soyuz...!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 тра 2024
- SpaceX BIG Change for Dragon Reusability is totally HUMILIATED Starliner and Soyuz...!
===
0:00 Introduction
1.59 The future of Crew Dragon Endeavour
4:23 Flight Test Program
6:01 How did Crew Dragon go through the certification process?
9:00 Conclusion
===
Sources of image & video:
iamVisual: / @iamvisualvfx
TijnM: / @tijn_m
Cosmic Perspective: / @cosmicperspective
===
SpaceX BIG Change for Dragon Reusability is totally HUMILIATED Starliner and Soyuz...!
Launching cargo and crew dozens of times, with 5 times being reused might sound ordinary if you stand from SpaceX's perspective. But it's something that SpaceX's competitors, Soyuz and Starliner, cannot achieve. Soyuz launches frequently but lacks reusability, while Starliner is still struggling to launch its first crewed flight.
SpaceX BIG Change for Dragon Reusability is totally HUMILIATED Starliner and Soyuz...!Therefore, after SpaceX conducts Crew-8 and undocks Crew-7, I believe now is the appropriate time to discuss Dragon's reusability and how SpaceX has humiliated its competitors.
Let’s find out on today’s episode of Alpha Tech:
SpaceX BIG Change for Dragon Reusability is totally HUMILIATED Starliner and Soyuz...!The space frontier can't be settled with throwaway rockets and spacecraft. Recognizing this and pursuing a philosophy of reusability, SpaceX has achieved remarkable milestones throughout its tenure. By safely ferrying astronauts to the International Space Station aboard a previously flown Dragon spacecraft, SpaceX has demonstrated the capabilities they deem essential for significantly reducing the extraordinary costs associated with human spaceflight, while also contributing to ushering in a new era of autonomy for the entire U.S. aerospace industry.
===
#alphatech
#techalpha
#spacex
#elonmusk
#starship
===
Subcribe Alpha Tech: / @alphatech4966
=== - Наука та технологія
At age 80 I feel so privileged to be able to follow this trail to MARS in the vomfort of my home! To see them land there is my goal!
You can be lucky to see them land on the moon.
I'm 66 and plan on GOING to Mars!
May it be so 🙏🏻
@@jcdisci Society grows great, when old men occupy planets they know they will never see terraformed.
At least until they make aging obsolete.
Amusingly, the intro mentioning that “the space frontier can’t be achieved with throw away rockets and spacecraft” made me think about how just about ALL space flight fiction ever written always assumed re-usability and would talk about refuelling etc. funny how reality is only now catching up with the fiction of the 40’s and 50’s and beyond 😊
With SpaceX and Starship, there is a need to get things geling - and fast. Yes, it has to be done safely and with safety in mind.... Achieve the goals that are being set then call it out, until then..
SpaceX continues to be innovative and efficient, while the legacy aerospace industry continues to waste time and money doing things the old way. Starship vs SLS, Vulcan & Ariane 6, 'nuff said.👍👍
I agree with you but to be fair to nasa they are required by the government to have a back up plan in case space x fails. Just wish there was another company that was willing to take the same risks when it comes to rapid innovation.
@@ColourX_ Yeah, and congress complains about overruns & delays after telling them what to do and how to do it. Dream Chaser is a step in the right direction, hopefully their upcoming launch goes well.
Effective at trowing engines away with Starship.
@@triage2962 you do understand they are ordered to destroy the ship per the launch license and on top of that they make the engine so that who cares if he wants to uses his money to make rockets and engines that most parts of the world depend on. Now he is making it bigger to save everyone more money. Now for the last tid bit while other companies are wasting hundreds of millions trying to make a falcon 9 so in the end who is really wasting money.
Government contractors exist on a cost-plus business plan. They have an incentive to fail and then charge more.
It's a pity your headline sent the opposite intended message.
I was tempted to tell UA-cam to not recommend this channel because of how the title was written. I also tend to do this when titles have all-caps words. That said, the video was a lot better than I would have expected from the title.
Maybe continue using the capsule for cargo after 15 crewed flights?
Lets gooooo SpaceX! To the Mars and beyond!!!
Mars? With SpaceX? Hahahahahahaha they struggle with the Moon.
What would it take to certify to make a Super Draco propulsive landing?
First of all, you'd need to make changes to the spacecraft. The Super Draco valves were replaced by burst disks, after a leaky valve caused the explosion of the Demo-1 Dragon during a test. Burst disks mean the SuperDracos can only function as escape engines, as they'll run at full throttle until depletion when the disks are burst. They'd have to be changed back to valves, and the spacecraft would need landing legs, which would need to go through the heat shield. That's a potential problem, and was the initial dealbreaker.
I think that especially the American space companies should share technology or trade technology so that the space industry doesn't go through similar issues.
Ummm, no. Let the rest try to catch up. Let the mediocre flounder and fail.
Will Starship ever be Human Rated or will it be exclusively flying Teslabots??
Does this channel mis-say words just to get the comment count up?
Even the title has grammar issues. Bots these days!
Starliner humiliates itself. It needs no effort from SpaceX.
This need for CAPTION BAITING by declaring every non-spacex endeavor to be subpar is getting tiring.
Yeah saying the truth is boring.😂
Excellent ❕
CON ELON
ARRIBA Y ADELANTE
HACIA EL MUNDO 🌎
MÁS DISTANTE.❤
Soon astronauts will prefer riding in space proven capsuls. Single use vehicles will be frowned on as unsafe if it won't survive for reuse.
National pride is real again, the only difference is it starts with a private company vice a federal agency.
100% taxpayer funded either way, and most of the tech was developed by the agency.
@@Conserpov The SPECIFICATIONS are developed by the agency....... Please understand the difference
@@bendingguru227
Buddy, literally a LOT of work was done by the government employees at Redstone Arsenal etc.
Also, when work is done by government contractors with 100% government funding it's not "private companies doing stuff".
Not fully reusable
Soyuz has nothing to be embarrassed about.
Out standing
thank you for your comment! have a good day!
out·stand·ing
If I were A Dem id be pretty upset with Elon's success. Maybe they can slow him down by getting the FAA or some other agency to slow the Progress.
I see the trolls are here.
Soyuz has been shipping astronauts for decades now. And not being reusable is a minnor thing
Reusability massively reduces cost for SpaceX. You couldn't afford an airline ticket if they had to build a new aircraft for each trip. You couldn't afford to drive anywhere if you had to buy a new car for every excursion. Reusability is *_not_* a "minor thing."
Reusability is they key to affordability,
Reusability is a minor thing??? Hahahahhahahahaha!
@@frankmcgowan9457 не уверен что у многократного использования ракет есть вообще судьба, после каждого применения ракеты ресурсы двигателя и обшивки в связи в большими перегрузками значительно снижаются, это вам не машину заправить, не уверен что после повторного запуска ракета будет в состоянии полететь снова, есть большой риск аварии, или того хуже, смертельного исхода, всем известна судьба шаттлов Челленджер и Колумбия.
@@Xolod_nochi We all know why there were accidents in the shuttle program; NASA got complacent and reckless, ignored calls for safety and became obsessed with agendas while reducing budget, do more with less. Plus, no way to rescue astronauts if something went wrong during the launch. In the end, that was what killed the astronauts.
It is, and i root for SpaceX, but saying Soyuz is humiliated is a complete crazytalk. Nasa is humiliated by SpaceX.
Soyuz did its job well and Ruskies are working on reusable rocket
@@frankmcgowan9457
Blah blah, 2 min in and I am still not at the point of the video. Stop with the lengthy prolog and get to the point.
Thank for your reminder! I will note this