I like how Dr Wu pretty much explained why their dinosaur look different than fossil in Jurassic World. "Man, we're playing god so we at least make them look cool."
Honestly Im betting on these animals looking more like the inGen in real life cuz have you ever seen an alligator gar it hasn't changed its look since prehistoric times and it definitely is more similar looking to the inGen style so I believe that dinosaurs where more lizardy and toothy than what people really belive to be .
@@legionact And how tho? They have literal evidence of feathers and we can look at Living dinosaurs and determine colours of extinct one by the pigments there are left in the fossils
@@legionact Also ingen's display of dinosaurs wasn't even the first look of dinosaurs since dinosaurs were just portrayed as fat lizards before jp came out
That is because the Velociraptor in Jurassic Park isn't a Velociraptor, but a Deinonychus antirrhopus. They just named it Velociraptor because it was an easier name.
"By using the DNA of a frog, we filled in the wholes to complete the code." - Mr. DNA "Genetically-engineered theme park monsters" - Dr. Alan Grant "And if their genetic code was pure. Many of them would look quite different." - Dr. Wu Some quotes that prove JP/JW Dinos are quite different from real life, but actually have some realistic approaches.
@@TheUaxington No not really. Not only is that not how genetics work, but many times in the movie physics are practically ignored. In one scene Pteranodon ruptured a building with it's wing instead of just breaking it and both the Indo and t. rex practically take no harm from getting 35,000 tons of bite strength pressed into their skull while being flailed violently. Within their first bite the other should have been dead.
I say this makes sense, but I came with dumb idea, why not create realistic hybrids ? For example if they have an incomplete triceratops genome instead of completing the gap with frog DNA But instead dinosaurs DNA (in this case stegosaurus) So we can have at least a real stegoceratops with no modified genome. Why did I think of this
@@titan6012 Or use Crocodile Dna Or Bird dna. But n o o o We need to maintain the view that dinosaurs were mindless creature who just go "Bite, Slash, Roar And Attack!"
Velocilaptors basically took deinonychus spot simply because the name sounds cooler and its easier to say it. The way velociraptors act in the movies is also closer to deinonychus as deinonychus are known to hunt in packs as well as being relatively smart for an animal which is how velicoraptors are portrait in the movies.
"By using the DNA of a frog, we filled in the wholes to complete the code." - Mr. DNA Jurassic Park #1. It always annoyed me when people would complain about the dinosaurs in the Jurassic Park movies not being realistic.... cuz every single movie flat out tells you they aren't real dinosaurs, and that's consistently been the entire point.
@@durpydodo8389 You realize the scientific point of view makes no fucking difference here. 1- It's a movie not a documentary 2- LITERALLY NONE of the movies were ever made with the intention of being accurate or realistic. The entire theme and point these movies consistently convey is that it will never be real. You won't bring back the dinosaurs, you will only create "...genetically engineered theme park monsters" - Dr. Grant, J.P.3. It's like you missed the entire scene ALSO in the first movie between Jon Hammond and Dr. Sattler where she point-blank tells him it is still all an illusion. It's not the movies fault you had your own expectations that the movies creators never promised to fulfill. 3- It's literally based off a book series where those inaccuracies originated. So again, the fact that you had any expectation for Jurassic Park to be anything more than a monster movie is 100% on you, not the movie.
@@durpydodo8389 You're correct. It would be impossible to do use frog DNA. Yet that's exactly what happens in the first movie. Already the entire movies premise is not based in scientific fact, so why the hell did you expect the dinosaurs to be any bit less inaccurate?
Actually Jurassic park 3 was released at a time when our view of Spinosaurus wasn't as clear as it is today, so the spinosaurus in that movie was as realistic as you could get at that time, just a interesting fact
No it isnt, I have a dinosaur book from my childhood in the 80s that listed spino at 4 tonnes which is what the current weight estimates suggest. They also already knew about the disproportionate hide limbs already, they just needed to new villain
@@Jrut_uor what ? You mean that he wasn't in the video ? In that case there is no reason to fuck you whole video for a dinosaur that's not gonna appear
Они разные потому что , чтобы вывести реального динозавра им нужен 100% геном , а так как полное днк диноса очень сложно получить , они заполняли пробелы в геноме днк других рептилий.Вот почему они не похожи на реальных динозавров🦖🦕
Pachy’s height seems off. Everywhere I’ve checked they either didn’t include its height, or the estimates were above 10 feet (tallest I found was 17.6 feet).
Not really, our interpretations of dinosaurs change over time with the new technology we have, these measurements were good, but the measurements, weights, coloring, textures, facts, etc. keep changing because we keep finding new evidence that helps learn more about these creatures that existed long ago, like as we thought Dino’s were lizards, but now we found out that most they were closer to birds. We also discover more species almost every week, and we are still finding them.
@@moony_squish7519 He has the ingen diloposaurus weigh 1 ton. That Is very wrong. What's also wrong is that he says 1 ton equals 300 kilograms. 1 ton is like 907 kilograms. That's 2 wrong things for just 1 dinosaur. Wonder what that says about the rest
Not to mention, also with the dilophosaurus, it is measured at about .2 Meters less than the real life one, and the length is doubled. I'm no mathematician, but those numbers do not match the sizing XD Also, a ceratosaurus is double what they say it is in real-life. This whole video is dumb as shit XD
As a JP fan I appreciate that. I love all the new discoveries being made every week and the accurate dinosaurs are awesome, but people need to stop bashing on JP for not being accurate.
@@gganbp I think the only reason people do is that JP has such a huge cultural impact that its dinosaurs(and other animals) are seen by the general public to be the de facto versions of those animals, even though the plot specifically points out that this isn't true.
In Ingen's defense, their dinosaurs are literally genetic hybrids of DNA crafted to "close enough" resemble prehistoric beings. The irony is that the Indominus was just the only specimen they branded as what the whole lot of them are.
Yup, the books nicely elaborate on this as well. With the techniques used in the fiction the majority of restored DNA is definitely from the dinosaur in question, but the gaps are filled with other species. This isn't necessarily a problem as we still share over 60% of our DNA with bananas and 98.8% with chimpanzees. The base biomechanics clearly come in a very similar package. With enough of the original code and enough knowledge of the workings you could figure out what should be in the missing spots. This fiction conveniently assumes and simplifies both. The result is both as close to a dinosaur as we can get and not a real dinosaur at all at the same time. Whether we judge the result to be a succes or not in fact largely depends on what we believe a dinosaur *should* look like. We weren't there 65 million years ago, some of our assumptions are always bound to be incomplete or simply wrong. Even today. Michael Crichton was absolutely aware of this and didn't avoid the discussion, it's actually a continuous theme in his books. The most obvious example is the Dilophosaurus. I assume he chose it as it was pretty well known and one of the earliest known carnivorous dinosaurs, with presumed weak jaws. Then he added a frill and poison glands, soft tissues we wouldn't expect a dinosaur to have. Sure since then many paleontologists have pointed out that the real animal looked nothing like it and that nothing in the fossil record suggests the presence of any such features or traces of expected attachments. However I think we can safely say not many if any people looked at Dilophosaurus as having a frill and poison before Crichton did, which was his point. Dinosaurs could have had features we simply aren't looking for or haven't found evidence for. Feathers and some colour data are among those discovered for some dinosaurs since. Wu tells Hammond in the book he wants to go the next version because these dinosaurs move "too fast" and the visitors won't accept them as real dinosaurs. Crawling swamp lizards was the dominant view then. Even though the very first fossils were originally pictured to belong to quick birdlike animals. Until the view that dinosaurs came before and went extinct and therefore should have been slow and primitive took hold. Fast forward to today and many probably should have had some kind of skin covering, yet a 1993 feathered chicken rex would likely have been rejected by audiences. And a fully feathered one is probably wrong again..or not, the debate goes on ;) Then there's the raptors. Around the time Michael Crichton did his initial research, there were some findings and a buzz about potentially fast and clever smaller theropods. Velociraptor was known, as was Deinonychus with it's terrible claw. Obviously the perfect type of animal to scare your readers with. Crichton weaves them in via the uncertainty of the mosquito blood method. They basically have no idea what species they are even growing. They do have some crude methods of confirming that it's in fact dino DNA and a rough idea on clade and taxa, but mostly they go for the slightly cheaper method and just inject the restored DNA in an artificial egg and see what it is. So the raptors are what happens when they get DNA from a previously unknown species and misidentify and possibly mix and misrepair it. The idea is that no sane person would ever willingly create such dangerous predators. But many millions of dollars per hatched specimen later and sanity takes a back seat to financial considerations. They also had no idea how many or what species they could succeed in "bringing back" and the raptors meant at least one more attraction for the park. The rest comes down to chaos theory and how seemingly small decisions quickly spiral out of control.
Dr Wu did say that because of different animal DNA in their genomes, they are not close enough to their real life counterparts, or something like that.
try doing that excuse with the new movie where they show giganotosaurus not only in the wrong time period of 65MYA but still in their version, the inaccurate version.
Eh, the crest is pretty good, other than that no, also, your deinonychus size is wrong, it was 10 feet long,3.3 feet tall at the hips, 5 at the head and 75 kilograms, some large specimens could maybe be 100
@@davemiller7742 when the movie released it wasn’t a juvenile. Fans got butthurt so they said it was a juvenile and they even had to change the size of it on the size chart that came with the movie
In ww2 they had a spino skeleton so idk why it wasnt used as memory, but i find it weird that first it was like jp3 a bit and now its completely changed and they used other dino bones even sometimes thej said. I think the changed spino a bit to much maybe
When they made the brachiosaurus in the movie, they based it off of a related species known as the giraffatitan (atleast in the head) brachiosaurus' head shap was unknown at the time, but is now believed to have been shaped different then we see in the movie.
I did it. Not everyone has english as the first language, and some of us need a bit more time to recognize the informations. Stop complaining y'all, if it really bothers you, speed up the video or something. I found the video speed really fitting, it was quite useful.
@@anarchistmaverick9507 lmao why so salty tho? You look really good at being an asshole. By the way, Bully is a great game, your pfp deserves better than an asshat who goes around insulting people for no reason.
while i agree, the first movie was made in 1993, so there are many differences in the paleological fields, and velociraptor was supposed to be utah raptor i believe
@@ajbricks3828 i believe he is talking for the scaling in the video the Carnotaurus is supposed to be 3 meters tall but in the video it looks like it is 7 meters tall
@@ajbricks3828 No, the scaling on behalf of the video editor. At times the human looks way tinier than it should, even contradicting the stats of the dinosaurs provided in the very video.
Actually the velociraptor in real life is based on a deinonychus and says the wiki website fandom... Sorry about my English is that I'm using google translator. greetings from Argentina
You are right, it was just a marketing trick, "velociraptor" sounds really really better than Deinonychus, more agressive name, something like "indominus rex" :)
@@fubene5495 JP Velociraptors are genetically modified, they just put Velociraptor because the movie is inspired on the fucking books made by Michael Crichton which the Velociraptors are also genetically modified.
The Velociraptor is actually Achillobator or Deynonichus, when they made the book the Deynonichus didn't was considered a gender, was just a species of Velociraptor. So isn't this, the small one, is Deynonichus too.
Velociraptor are more based on deinonychus the name was actually supposed to be deinonychus antirrhopus but they changed the name to velociraptor antirrhopus because it’s sound better
Plus, at the beggining of the film Alan was discovering a "velociraptor" in Montana, but there are no velociraptors in Montana, velociraptor is a Gobi dessert animal. However there are Deynonichus in Montana.
The dilophosaurus in the jurassic park book was a little more accurate in size, it literally lifts Nedry by the head until his feet aren't touching the ground, then just walks off with him dangling from its jaws Edit: after disembowling him
1:42 Fun fact, Jurrasic Park Velociraptors are actually deinonychus, another type of raptor. When the book was written, deinonychus was called Velociraptor however the name now refers to a different dinosaur.
Things I noticed, Ingen dinosaurs weigh more and are often taller, real counterparts weight less and are often lengthier. Ingen dinosaurs are more muscular, real dinosaurs have more hollow bones and are more specialized. In the case of the cerata and the stego there were huge differences, but for most dinos the differences were quite small in proportions yet noticable in weight. The real Tyrannosaurus and Brachio were absolutely enormous though
Good, in terms of providing information. The text was covered, when I rotated my phone to get the larger screen. The text, viewed at the scale at which it was featured on my default screen, was often, too small for me to read. There would have been more than enough room to have fit both the pictures and the text at a much larger scale. This, not-only would have made it possible to have "read" the text "at all--;" but would have made it possible to have read it quickly enough for this video to have been over in one-tenth of the time--; which also would have avoided having the background music score's having-gotten so really-cloyingly repetitious--.
Some of the dinosaurs are pretty different but other than that, most could be considered accuratelly portrayed being that not all specimens are the same and small size differences could be atributed to that
one complaint, Velociraptor was really suppose to be Deinonycus in the book, one of Criton's friends had been pushing for Deinonycus to be replaced under the Velociratpor genus at the time.
And the heaviest is the T.Rex , 8 tons in average but specimens like Scotty can surpass 9 tons , and yes Spinosaurus is longer than other theropods but there is no evidence of it even getting close to 50 feet let alone surpassing
@@julienfoussereau937 yea like I said Sinosaurus is the longest head to tail but is not really tall if you don't count the sail because of it's shorter legs.
1:25 the real comparison should be with Deinonychus, velociraptor was a name that Crichton and Spielberg both liked more, but the velociraptor of JP is based on Deinonychus Antyrhopus, not Velociraptor Mongoliensis. Also, at the time when the JP book was writen Deinonychus Antyrhopus was also called Velociraptor Antyrhopus.
I feel like if dinosaurs still existed and were able to comprehend things like we do, and they watched JP movies, they'd look at their own species and react similar to the way some of us do to a hairless cat
The 18 meters in length was heavily flawed and based on certain assumptions that we know are not true. Today it is argued that ir was likely more in the 13 meter to 15 meter range.
Michael Crichton wrote the book and used deinonychus as his reference, but chose the velociraptor name because it was more menacing. Spielberg then used the same reasoning.
No wonder the Ankylosaurus in Jurassic World got defeated so easily. Its legs were so tall that it was easily flipped over(Its only weakness), in prehistoric times its legs were short so it was much harder to flip.
Don't know where this info comes from for the video, but I just read the wiki pages of a bunch of these dinos and they're wildly different in mass from what is depicted in this video for both "IRL" and Ingen.
comparisons are always interesting. but some depictions look a little outdated and the pcitures of both sides seem not correspond to the measures in the text. Even the weights of the actual dinos have to be estimated. So...its nice to watch (if you play it al least 1.5-time). I wonder if you could update the video with the measurements of the oversized ARK-Animals. ;-)
![[~40K SUBS] Dinosaurs Reconstructions Evolution Special Animation (Stick Nodes)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/piGgcOrxqpQ/mqdefault.jpg)
"But you didn't ask for realism, you asked for more teeth." - Wu to Masrani.
Indian and Chinese then
Indian and Chinese now
@@rooseveltingudam6354
How so?
@@thalmoragent9344 Haha I'm just saying Dr. Wu is Chinese and Simon Masrani is Indian u know
@@rooseveltingudam6354
Oh, I see, but why did you say it twice?
@@thalmoragent9344 Have u ever heard of the current relationship between India and China ?
I like how Dr Wu pretty much explained why their dinosaur look different than fossil in Jurassic World.
"Man, we're playing god so we at least make them look cool."
Yep true but no one knows why god designed them like that
I mean look at the anky I swear there’s some snapping turtle in that guy.
Honestly Im betting on these animals looking more like the inGen in real life cuz have you ever seen an alligator gar it hasn't changed its look since prehistoric times and it definitely is more similar looking to the inGen style so I believe that dinosaurs where more lizardy and toothy than what people really belive to be .
@@legionact And how tho? They have literal evidence of feathers and we can look at Living dinosaurs and determine colours of extinct one by the pigments there are left in the fossils
@@legionact Also ingen's display of dinosaurs wasn't even the first look of dinosaurs since dinosaurs were just portrayed as fat lizards before jp came out
This scaling is very confusing, sometimes the human is like nine feet tall and sometimes he is 5 feet tall
The human is always 6 ft tall to show comparison to the animals, at whatever scale being used.
@@thaliazelmer2327 But the Allosaurus was never that big lol
@@xRhamnusia Carnotaurus neither
@@xRhamnusia also the compy is way to big compared to the man
Agree. The scales are well off.
Real Velociraptor: Am I a joke to you?
Ingen Velociraptor: Yes.
That is because the Velociraptor in Jurassic Park isn't a Velociraptor, but a Deinonychus antirrhopus. They just named it Velociraptor because it was an easier name.
@@Mamurai No, because when the Original movie (Jurassic Park) was made, Deinonychus was still in Raptor Category of Dinosaurs.
The name came from Michael Crichton's book. Not from the Movie.
Ingen velociraptor is big as real Dakota raptor
@@Mamurai it's a utah raptor
This video was 20x longer than it needed to be..
@@bowerpower2160 no The guys was right it was way to long
Even with watching at 2x speed it's way too long
I just want to say 6:38 carno 10ft tall....yet it is 5 times taller then the person it's next to
@@kuminanida333 wow
@@DR3_34D the bad part is literally the text next to it says that....so why is it 28ft tall?
Bruh, played it at 2x speed and I still could read the text 3 to 5 times over, no need to display the info for that long.
yeah, even I could but some people couldnt so yeah...
Hey, not even everybody is english natives ok
@@hugooliveira2350 I'm not a native English speaker.
Hugo Oliveira well i speak pashtoh but i almost speak english as good as my language
@@hugooliveira2350 i learned 2 languages before english and I still could (spanish and catalan)
"By using the DNA of a frog, we filled in the wholes to complete the code." - Mr. DNA
"Genetically-engineered theme park monsters" - Dr. Alan Grant
"And if their genetic code was pure. Many of them would look quite different." - Dr. Wu
Some quotes that prove JP/JW Dinos are quite different from real life, but actually have some realistic approaches.
I mean it makes sense, people would get bored of the normal velociraptor
@@TheUaxington No not really. Not only is that not how genetics work, but many times in the movie physics are practically ignored. In one scene Pteranodon ruptured a building with it's wing instead of just breaking it and both the Indo and t. rex practically take no harm from getting 35,000 tons of bite strength pressed into their skull while being flailed violently. Within their first bite the other should have been dead.
I say this makes sense, but I came with dumb idea, why not create realistic hybrids ? For example if they have an incomplete triceratops genome instead of completing the gap with frog DNA
But instead dinosaurs DNA (in this case stegosaurus) So we can have at least a real stegoceratops with no modified genome.
Why did I think of this
@@titan6012 Or use Crocodile Dna Or Bird dna. But n o o o We need to maintain the view that dinosaurs were mindless creature who just go "Bite, Slash, Roar And Attack!"
@@titan6012 You never asked for realism, you just wanted more teeth
- Dr. Wu
Damn Deinonychus really had its spotlight taken away from these movies, deinonychus should be the household rapter we all know
Velocilaptors basically took deinonychus spot simply because the name sounds cooler and its easier to say it. The way velociraptors act in the movies is also closer to deinonychus as deinonychus are known to hunt in packs as well as being relatively smart for an animal which is how velicoraptors are portrait in the movies.
The movie ones are actually deinonycus
Jurassic World 2015 quote
Dr. Henry Wu: And if their genetic code was pure. Many of them would look quite different.
"By using the DNA of a frog, we filled in the wholes to complete the code." - Mr. DNA Jurassic Park #1.
It always annoyed me when people would complain about the dinosaurs in the Jurassic Park movies not being realistic.... cuz every single movie flat out tells you they aren't real dinosaurs, and that's consistently been the entire point.
You realise that aint gonna make a fucking difference in a scientific point of view
and it would be impossible to fill in missing part with frog dna because frogs are not even closely related to birds or reptiles
@@durpydodo8389 You realize the scientific point of view makes no fucking difference here.
1- It's a movie not a documentary
2- LITERALLY NONE of the movies were ever made with the intention of being accurate or realistic. The entire theme and point these movies consistently convey is that it will never be real. You won't bring back the dinosaurs, you will only create "...genetically engineered theme park monsters" - Dr. Grant, J.P.3. It's like you missed the entire scene ALSO in the first movie between Jon Hammond and Dr. Sattler where she point-blank tells him it is still all an illusion. It's not the movies fault you had your own expectations that the movies creators never promised to fulfill.
3- It's literally based off a book series where those inaccuracies originated. So again, the fact that you had any expectation for Jurassic Park to be anything more than a monster movie is 100% on you, not the movie.
@@durpydodo8389 You're correct. It would be impossible to do use frog DNA. Yet that's exactly what happens in the first movie. Already the entire movies premise is not based in scientific fact, so why the hell did you expect the dinosaurs to be any bit less inaccurate?
Actually Jurassic park 3 was released at a time when our view of Spinosaurus wasn't as clear as it is today, so the spinosaurus in that movie was as realistic as you could get at that time, just a interesting fact
No it isnt, I have a dinosaur book from my childhood in the 80s that listed spino at 4 tonnes which is what the current weight estimates suggest. They also already knew about the disproportionate hide limbs already, they just needed to new villain
@@creativescreenname2750 you’re right but that was before we discovered spinosaurus had short back legs
@@creativescreenname2750 LMAO what tf are you talking about?
@@creativescreenname2750 modern estimates of Spino have it amphibious and absolutely massive tho? Easily pushing 50ft
@@SoulThornReaper it was long but wasnt the heaviest it's also not the once thought 60 foot spino it's 7 tonnes now
So basically the T-Rex is like the most accurate carnivore?
They made the "actual trex" a bit taller then it actually was, they put it at 5 when it should have been around 4
@@lotusnaturals1897 and they made it weaker
No not really. The trex needed feathers
@@randomstuff1816 TRex most likely did not have feathers.
@@alphawolf8031 the adult trex wouldn’t have feathers and the young trex would. My bad
Why did you make the images of the person and dinosaurs so small? There’s so much empty space.
For other much bigger dinos
@@Jrut_uor exactly
@@Jrut_uor even for Brachiosaurus (the biggest dino in the video) half of the screen is still empty 🤷♀️
@@gamefan987 think abt mososaurus but he wasn't at film
@@Jrut_uor what ? You mean that he wasn't in the video ? In that case there is no reason to fuck you whole video for a dinosaur that's not gonna appear
*ingen if a Dino's 10ft:* "just add three more feet no one will notice."
can u tell me what the hell is ingen?
@@Thisorthat00009 Ingen is the company that designed the Dino's in Jurassic Park
@@x_deadmelody_x6992 ok ty 👍
@@Thisorthat00009 np
“Eh, maybe another foot or 20”
sometimes the human looks like whopping 75 cm
Yeah, if Pachycephalosaurus is 2m tall, why does it dwarf the human like half meter? Is that human a small child?
@@birdsteak9267 I think the worse was carnotaurus. Real-10 feet but looked like it tripled the height of the human.
Они разные потому что , чтобы вывести реального динозавра им нужен 100% геном , а так как полное днк диноса очень сложно получить , они заполняли пробелы в геноме днк других рептилий.Вот почему они не похожи на реальных динозавров🦖🦕
This is true !!! 😯❤️❤️
Pachy’s height seems off. Everywhere I’ve checked they either didn’t include its height, or the estimates were above 10 feet (tallest I found was 17.6 feet).
Pachycephalosaurus was not that big, it was about 17 feet long and about 5 feet tall depending on the pose
The inaccuracies of the real life dinos is painful.
Wait wha-
Who cares paleontologists change what is accurate or inaccurate almost as much as Facebook changes it's features.
@@samcarter2371 It's called science
@@samcarter2371 there is still an inaccurate version no matter how much time goes by. Might as well not use what we know can’t be real.
its not the velociraptor in jp is based on the utah raptor
Scientists: how big do you want your dinosaurs?
InGen: *Yes!*
Well a lot of them are smaller than their actual counterparts too...
@@AllosaurusJP3 true, mostly for the compsognathus
@@zerogtoxik6020 and brachiosaurus
More or less some of them are bigger and some of them are smaller
They were made as theme park attractions, ofc they’re going to be big because they want money
I loved the video, it has the exact comparisons. it was very good!
Frog DNA: * chuckles in background *
Do InGen dinos VS ARK: Survival Evolved dinos size comparison
Edit: Six months have passed!
Ok! ill see
frick ark is going to be inaccurate as hell
@@primisoda1400 A least the Ark dinos look better than the InGen dinos
@@primisoda1400 True
I think there already is a video about that but that would be a good video
Some of the "real dinosaurs" are still slightly inaccurate
Like the Tyrannosaurus Rex who lacks lips.
Slightly? More like completely
@@Nahuelx and what was that spino bruh
@@andrepita4067 What about it?
1 ton=300 kilos lmfao
The size scale is so unravelling, imagine, a height of 6 ft. is even half of 10 ft.! So amazing!!!
That's is a EPIC music bro.
🔥👈✌️
Jurassic park: our dinosaurs are the most exaggerated!
Ark Survival Evolved: Hold my beer.
100% Orginal but more like "Hold my tamed Dino"
Our not are wtf
@@prehistoricpaddock9013 Lol
Minus the Dilo
jurassic world the game: hold my cards
these sizes are about as inaccurate as the movies themselves
Oh
Not really, our interpretations of dinosaurs change over time with the new technology we have, these measurements were good, but the measurements, weights, coloring, textures, facts, etc. keep changing because we keep finding new evidence that helps learn more about these creatures that existed long ago, like as we thought Dino’s were lizards, but now we found out that most they were closer to birds. We also discover more species almost every week, and we are still finding them.
No cap
@@moony_squish7519 He has the ingen diloposaurus weigh 1 ton. That Is very wrong. What's also wrong is that he says 1 ton equals 300 kilograms. 1 ton is like 907 kilograms. That's 2 wrong things for just 1 dinosaur. Wonder what that says about the rest
Not to mention, also with the dilophosaurus, it is measured at about .2 Meters less than the real life one, and the length is doubled. I'm no mathematician, but those numbers do not match the sizing XD Also, a ceratosaurus is double what they say it is in real-life. This whole video is dumb as shit XD
1:24 just confirmed my dear that Velociraptors didn’t actually team up to take down T rexes 💔
Everyone pver the age of 10 should know
velocirptor didn't even live alongside T. rex
T-rex is from north america ,velociraptor mongolia
I love those tiny feather patches on Trex. They make it look even nicer. And I loove Veloci and Spino
I actually prefer accurate Dino’s but that doesn’t mean I don’t like jp or jw those are good on its own ways
As a JP fan I appreciate that. I love all the new discoveries being made every week and the accurate dinosaurs are awesome, but people need to stop bashing on JP for not being accurate.
@@gganbp I think the only reason people do is that JP has such a huge cultural impact that its dinosaurs(and other animals) are seen by the general public to be the de facto versions of those animals, even though the plot specifically points out that this isn't true.
@@gganbp EXACTLY, I mean will people enjoy Jurassic Park 3 if it had 2021 accurate Spinosaurus??
In Ingen's defense, their dinosaurs are literally genetic hybrids of DNA crafted to "close enough" resemble prehistoric beings.
The irony is that the Indominus was just the only specimen they branded as what the whole lot of them are.
Yet people still believe spino can defeat a trex
Yup, the books nicely elaborate on this as well. With the techniques used in the fiction the majority of restored DNA is definitely from the dinosaur in question, but the gaps are filled with other species. This isn't necessarily a problem as we still share over 60% of our DNA with bananas and 98.8% with chimpanzees. The base biomechanics clearly come in a very similar package. With enough of the original code and enough knowledge of the workings you could figure out what should be in the missing spots. This fiction conveniently assumes and simplifies both.
The result is both as close to a dinosaur as we can get and not a real dinosaur at all at the same time. Whether we judge the result to be a succes or not in fact largely depends on what we believe a dinosaur *should* look like. We weren't there 65 million years ago, some of our assumptions are always bound to be incomplete or simply wrong. Even today.
Michael Crichton was absolutely aware of this and didn't avoid the discussion, it's actually a continuous theme in his books.
The most obvious example is the Dilophosaurus. I assume he chose it as it was pretty well known and one of the earliest known carnivorous dinosaurs, with presumed weak jaws.
Then he added a frill and poison glands, soft tissues we wouldn't expect a dinosaur to have. Sure since then many paleontologists have pointed out that the real animal looked nothing like it and that nothing in the fossil record suggests the presence of any such features or traces of expected attachments. However I think we can safely say not many if any people looked at Dilophosaurus as having a frill and poison before Crichton did, which was his point. Dinosaurs could have had features we simply aren't looking for or haven't found evidence for. Feathers and some colour data are among those discovered for some dinosaurs since.
Wu tells Hammond in the book he wants to go the next version because these dinosaurs move "too fast" and the visitors won't accept them as real dinosaurs. Crawling swamp lizards was the dominant view then. Even though the very first fossils were originally pictured to belong to quick birdlike animals. Until the view that dinosaurs came before and went extinct and therefore should have been slow and primitive took hold. Fast forward to today and many probably should have had some kind of skin covering, yet a 1993 feathered chicken rex would likely have been rejected by audiences. And a fully feathered one is probably wrong again..or not, the debate goes on ;)
Then there's the raptors. Around the time Michael Crichton did his initial research, there were some findings and a buzz about potentially fast and clever smaller theropods. Velociraptor was known, as was Deinonychus with it's terrible claw. Obviously the perfect type of animal to scare your readers with.
Crichton weaves them in via the uncertainty of the mosquito blood method. They basically have no idea what species they are even growing.
They do have some crude methods of confirming that it's in fact dino DNA and a rough idea on clade and taxa, but mostly they go for the slightly cheaper method and just inject the restored DNA in an artificial egg and see what it is.
So the raptors are what happens when they get DNA from a previously unknown species and misidentify and possibly mix and misrepair it.
The idea is that no sane person would ever willingly create such dangerous predators. But many millions of dollars per hatched specimen later and sanity takes a back seat to financial considerations. They also had no idea how many or what species they could succeed in "bringing back" and the raptors meant at least one more attraction for the park.
The rest comes down to chaos theory and how seemingly small decisions quickly spiral out of control.
Dr Wu did say that because of different animal DNA in their genomes, they are not close enough to their real life counterparts, or something like that.
@@niuqra Ingen really wanted to make the Spinosaurus a meat eater instead of a fish eater and this is what we got
try doing that excuse with the new movie where they show giganotosaurus not only in the wrong time period of 65MYA but still in their version, the inaccurate version.
Man, idk why, but I liked so much of that music. Why? I was sleepy while listening to this.
Can't believe you got the background music from Brawl Stars lol! Thank you for putting it in the description💙
I don’t care what anyone say, InGen’s Deinonychus is hideous
THE EYES BURN MY EYES!!
Is that a Deinonychus or a giant deformed chicken?
@@dragonleo_ Nice though
Eh, the crest is pretty good, other than that no, also, your deinonychus size is wrong, it was 10 feet long,3.3 feet tall at the hips, 5 at the head and 75 kilograms, some large specimens could maybe be 100
Yeah, it's the worst thing I have ever seen 🤮
Looks like an alien amphibian xD
The real Deinonychus looks way better.
Jurassic Park Spinosaurus: *large and terrifying monster, able even to kill a T.rex.*
Real Spinosaurus: *semi-marine fish eater.*
I think you mean able to kill juvi rex
Wish I could pin 2 comments... :(
@@davemiller7742 when the movie released it wasn’t a juvenile. Fans got butthurt so they said it was a juvenile and they even had to change the size of it on the size chart that came with the movie
I've very rarely seen ideas that spino was smaller than rex, so I don't see this one as very accurate either lmao
Real spinosaurus still has lot to be discovered ,the real reason ppl loved spino was cuz of its unique design and ofc cuz it defeated the rex
Now I know why the Ceratosaurus got the hell out of there when it smelled Spino's doo doo.
Not sure what I stumbled upon here but it's cool
*brawl stars theme blaring in the background*
I thought it was coc or cr at first lol
I noticed that
Yeah. Haha
Yeah 😂😂😂
yeah! XD
The deinonychus is velociraptor in Jurassic Park. When the novel was written some referred to deinonychus as a type of velociraptor.
Velociraptor was actually a utahraptor in the movie.
Huntz games no utahraptor was a recent discovery at the time they wouldn’t have known about it
@@soyuzfox5355 no it wasn't look it up
@@soyuzfox5355 Jurrasic Park came out in 1990 and Utah Raptor was discovered in 1991 dumbass
I think that was a common belief at the time
In ww2 they had a spino skeleton so idk why it wasnt used as memory, but i find it weird that first it was like jp3 a bit and now its completely changed and they used other dino bones even sometimes thej said. I think the changed spino a bit to much maybe
Funfact: velociraptors are actually deunonychus but they called it “velociraptor” because it sounded cooler
I learned that 3 years ago, about the deinonychus
13 metres for the Spinosaurus
The largest skeleton of Spinosaurus Aegipticus was nearly 16 metres and jp3 spino was 18.3 metres!
But if you check the website Jp3 Spinosaurus would be around 15 meters.
Oh, I was comparing jp3 spino to Alan grant
@@magnusminecraft154 oh ok
Spinsaurs in Jurassic park was 15meters
It’s 18meters I think
@@prehistoricpaddock9013 the spino in jp3 was a teeneager
7:54 Baryonyx height: 10 feet
Rudy: laughs in like 50 feet high
Ah yes ice age where their baryonyx is bigger than A T-Rex
as a kid I always thought Rudy was just a sail-less spinosaurus lol
@@sirlongshanksthelongshank8786 well, me too
😂😂😂
I thought rudy was a suchomimus?
When they made the brachiosaurus in the movie, they based it off of a related species known as the giraffatitan (atleast in the head) brachiosaurus' head shap was unknown at the time, but is now believed to have been shaped different then we see in the movie.
You should do somthing like this but with beasts of Bermuda or the isle
Imagine watching this without skipping through it
I put the speed to 2x and still had to skip
imagine complaining
I got a headache just for the first one without skip
I did it. Not everyone has english as the first language, and some of us need a bit more time to recognize the informations. Stop complaining y'all, if it really bothers you, speed up the video or something. I found the video speed really fitting, it was quite useful.
@@anarchistmaverick9507 lmao why so salty tho? You look really good at being an asshole.
By the way, Bully is a great game, your pfp deserves better than an asshat who goes around insulting people for no reason.
I can not express how bad the scaling is, and how inaccurate a lot of this paleoart is
while i agree, the first movie was made in 1993, so there are many differences in the paleological fields, and velociraptor was supposed to be utah raptor i believe
@@ajbricks3828 yep
@@ajbricks3828 i believe he is talking for the scaling in the video the Carnotaurus is supposed to be 3 meters tall but in the video it looks like it is 7 meters tall
@@ajbricks3828 No, the scaling on behalf of the video editor.
At times the human looks way tinier than it should, even contradicting the stats of the dinosaurs provided in the very video.
Bruh this guy made countless dinosaurs 20x bigger
Will you be doing an update to this, to include the species in JWE2?
I like how ever donosaur is pretty acurate then theres just velociraptor that is the size of a chicken irl but bigger than a human in jw
Actually the velociraptor in real life is based on a deinonychus and says the wiki website fandom... Sorry about my English is that I'm using google translator. greetings from Argentina
You are right, it was just a marketing trick, "velociraptor" sounds really really better than Deinonychus, more agressive name, something like "indominus rex" :)
@@fubene5495 JP Velociraptors are genetically modified, they just put Velociraptor because the movie is inspired on the fucking books made by Michael Crichton which the Velociraptors are also genetically modified.
Luciano is right about the movie inspiring on the Deinonychus but theres a lot more than just that, get more deep in the info before concluding.
Que Honda Crack xD
Deinonychus used to be known as velociraptor antirrhopus
Bro the dilophosaurus was young, not undersized
Real dilophosourus didn't have a neck frill or poison spit. Plus in the game and in the new series it proves that they are.
Lmao the Clash of Clans War music in the background tho
Respect for that little black man that standed up with all that carnivors next him. Expecially when the InGen Carnotaurus roared in front of him
In other videos, he was whipped by a Tyrannotitan and Butted by a Pachycephalosaurus!
WHY IS IT SO SLOW EVEN AT 2 SPEEED ITS SLOW AF
The Velociraptor is actually Achillobator or Deynonichus, when they made the book the Deynonichus didn't was considered a gender, was just a species of Velociraptor. So isn't this, the small one, is Deynonichus too.
Velociraptor are more based on deinonychus the name was actually supposed to be deinonychus antirrhopus but they changed the name to velociraptor antirrhopus because it’s sound better
Plus, at the beggining of the film Alan was discovering a "velociraptor" in Montana, but there are no velociraptors in Montana, velociraptor is a Gobi dessert animal. However there are Deynonichus in Montana.
@Kris De Roo It was still Velociraptor antirrhopus, not Deynonichus antirrhopus
@Kris De Roo
Teacher: “Are you a boy or girl?”
Kid: “Deinonychus.”
It's funny how ingen velociraptor was literally a deinonychus but they just took the name and slapped it on a completely different dinosaur
Deinonychus was what the ingen velociraptors were inspired by, as confirmed by Steven Spielberg.
The dilophosaurus in the jurassic park book was a little more accurate in size, it literally lifts Nedry by the head until his feet aren't touching the ground, then just walks off with him dangling from its jaws
Edit: after disembowling him
WHOA. THAT IS GRUESOME. 😳
For all we know, even the modern estimation would be wrong.
1:42
Fun fact, Jurrasic Park Velociraptors are actually deinonychus, another type of raptor. When the book was written, deinonychus was called Velociraptor however the name now refers to a different dinosaur.
Many of them appear to be pretty damn close, despite giving the "real" ones awkward poses and speculative color schemes.
OMG! Your real life Carnotaurus's size is soooo unaccurate. The height is more than the triple of the human size??
Yes the Autosize was a problem for almost all the dinosaurs, that's why I wrote the info
@@prehistoricpaddock9013 But most of your estimates are also wrong. Brachiosaurus is about 13m high and Triceratops is estimated about 6-7tons
True
It would have been easier to pass off the velociraptor as a utahraptor
To be precise they were Utahraptor not Velociraptor, right?
No in the movie they named deinonychus as velociraptor but in ark utahraptor is named raptor. In real life velociraptor is size is 🦃
no the real utah was even bigger than jw velociraptor
@@Techpriest_Skitarii4935 THE JURASSIC PARK RAPTORS ARE *DEINONYCHUS* NOT UTAHRAPTORS! UNDERSTAND? *D-E-I-N-O-N-Y-C-H-U-S*
Tbh. Most of them are quite accurate in size which is quite surprising.
Me after seeing the Velocirapror comparison:
My Life, is a lie?
I like how you made some of the 10 ft tall dinosaurs bigger than other dinosaurs of the same height 😂
The music is of brawl stars xdd
Yesss XD
XD
Clash Royale
I hate brawl stars
Lol
Awesome video!!!!
Man I can’t believe the spinosaurus is actually a sauropod irl
Things I noticed, Ingen dinosaurs weigh more and are often taller, real counterparts weight less and are often lengthier. Ingen dinosaurs are more muscular, real dinosaurs have more hollow bones and are more specialized. In the case of the cerata and the stego there were huge differences, but for most dinos the differences were quite small in proportions yet noticable in weight. The real Tyrannosaurus and Brachio were absolutely enormous though
Except for Tyrannosaurus rex of which Ingen version has the same measurements as the real one but weighs less.
Good, in terms of providing information.
The text was covered, when I rotated my phone to get the larger screen.
The text, viewed at the scale at which it was featured on my default screen, was often, too small for me to read.
There would have been more than enough room to have fit both the pictures and the text at a much larger scale.
This, not-only would have made it possible to have "read" the text "at all--;" but would have made it possible to have read it quickly enough for this video to have been over in one-tenth of the time--; which also would have avoided having the background music score's having-gotten so really-cloyingly repetitious--.
Some of the dinosaurs are pretty different but other than that, most could be considered accuratelly portrayed being that not all specimens are the same and small size differences could be atributed to that
The clash royal/brawl stars music is pog
one complaint, Velociraptor was really suppose to be Deinonycus in the book, one of Criton's friends had been pushing for Deinonycus to be replaced under the Velociratpor genus at the time.
I’m dying the comparison with the human is so funny
Holy crap that was longer then what it needed to be
That was awesome
Spino speciemans have been estimated to be over 50 feet long, making it the longest carnivore to ever live, as in tallest would be Giganotosaurus
And the heaviest is the T.Rex , 8 tons in average but specimens like Scotty can surpass 9 tons , and yes Spinosaurus is longer than other theropods but there is no evidence of it even getting close to 50 feet let alone surpassing
@@MichoElBicho with the sail yes but without the sail T.Rex , Giganotosaurus and Carcharadontosaurus are all taller than Spinosaurus
Spino is not the longest carnivore.
@@alunaticwithashotgun9840 Lasted evidence brought by Abraham estimated the Spino to be around 15 meters.
@@julienfoussereau937 yea like I said Sinosaurus is the longest head to tail but is not really tall if you don't count the sail because of it's shorter legs.
1:25 the real comparison should be with Deinonychus, velociraptor was a name that Crichton and Spielberg both liked more, but the velociraptor of JP is based on Deinonychus Antyrhopus, not Velociraptor Mongoliensis. Also, at the time when the JP book was writen Deinonychus Antyrhopus was also called Velociraptor Antyrhopus.
utahraptor:u serious
@@chingyik123 What do you mean by that?
@@blaisepayzdexter7944 I mean that jp velociraptor size is same as utahraptor
Bro! please do the comparison of BBC walking of Dinosaurs vs real ones
I feel like if dinosaurs still existed and were able to comprehend things like we do, and they watched JP movies, they'd look at their own species and react similar to the way some of us do to a hairless cat
Dr. Wu: "if we hadn't modified the genoma, the dinosaurs would look totally different!"
The spinosaurus was not 13 metres, it was 15, some even say it was 18 metres in length
The 18 meters in length was heavily flawed and based on certain assumptions that we know are not true. Today it is argued that ir was likely more in the 13 meter to 15 meter range.
Yeah the scale was off in the entire video. They made all of the dinosaurs bigger that what they should have been on the pictures.
It's ridiculous how some people thing some creature had exactly some size, are all people same tall? No, so probably even not all dinosaurs were same.
@@Pidalin no we were going of by average. There is more chance you getting struck by lightning than being over 7ft tall
@@monkey-ep8bn Yes, but you have people who have 210 cm and you have people who have 150 cm, it can be very different.
Maybe he did it for dyslexic ppl or ppl with learning disabilities? I mean, if so then he deserves a round of applause 👏
I hate how people trash on a movie because it isn't realistic.
It's a movie for entertainment, let's just enjoy it.
The Velociraptor was loosely based on the Deinonychus at first which is why they came out as tall as a human in the final movie
Deinonychus is half the size of a normal human. It was actually based off utahraptor
@@coltonparker7436 the old Deinonychus cause Utahraptor is discovered in 1993 and the book has be create before 1993, the old Deinonychus is big
Michael Crichton wrote the book and used deinonychus as his reference, but chose the velociraptor name because it was more menacing. Spielberg then used the same reasoning.
No wonder the Ankylosaurus in Jurassic World got defeated so easily. Its legs were so tall that it was easily flipped over(Its only weakness), in prehistoric times its legs were short so it was much harder to flip.
That, and the Indominus Rex scratched its legs to make it easier to flip it over.
And it could probably tuck it's legs under it for even better protection.
Hey nice brawl stars music in the background! Just sayin’ they got a new update including a dinosaur brawler!
so youre telling me we got the worst end of the spectrum for rexy? I want my money back!
Extremely slow and ful of mistakes...
I confirm
+ or -
The velociraptor being that small and uncool broke my heart
science doesn't care, move on and accept the fact that feathered dinosaurs are a thing
It's genetically altered to look cool. Still sad though
Hey I think the velociraptor is still cool
Well technically the jurassic park velociraptor is based on the Deinonychus, the name the Velociraptor just sounded cooler so basically swapped them
If it makes you feel any better, the real one would still rip you to shreds.
Honestly surprised just how heavy the Ingen variants are. Like they are CHONKY. Very few cases seemed to be outweighed by the realistic counterpart
Yo is that the brawl stars lobby music in the background?
Don't know where this info comes from for the video, but I just read the wiki pages of a bunch of these dinos and they're wildly different in mass from what is depicted in this video for both "IRL" and Ingen.
Could have at least use scientifically accurate designs for the real Dinosaurus.
Big fucking bird
InGen's Velociraptor seems like an Utha Raptor
I wonder where did you get data since some of the entries are incorrect both from IRL perspective and InGen lore 🌚
the dilophosaur. actually the scale of the two dinos looks pretty good.for this video at least. but that dude is like 10 feet tall...
I mean you can kinda see why they're like that since they're technically a clone dinosaur
comparisons are always interesting. but some depictions look a little outdated and the pcitures of both sides seem not correspond to the measures in the text. Even the weights of the actual dinos have to be estimated.
So...its nice to watch (if you play it al least 1.5-time). I wonder if you could update the video with the measurements of the oversized ARK-Animals. ;-)