No word from the proponents of the proposed bill on what they think the title should be, and the journalists involved weren't curious to know. “MEASURE TO (1) REPLACE VOTER SELECTION OF PARTY NOMINEES WITH NONPARTY BLANKET PRIMARY; (2) REQUIRE RANKED-CHOICE VOTING FOR GENERAL ELECTIONS.” How is that title unacceptable to the proponents? The jounalists involved weren't curious to know.
No word from the proponents of the proposed bill on what they think the title should be, and the journalists involved weren't curious to know. “MEASURE TO (1) REPLACE VOTER SELECTION OF PARTY NOMINEES WITH NONPARTY BLANKET PRIMARY; (2) REQUIRE RANKED-CHOICE VOTING FOR GENERAL ELECTIONS.” How is that title unacceptable to the proponents? The jounalists involved weren't curious to know.
Okay and?
I agree with the coalition!
Beware rank choice vote! Pay attention to who is pushing it.
Whats wrong with it? I think someone getting the majority of voter approval is a good thing
It's also worth pointing out that removing the closed primary would still benefit Republians
ranked choice voting empowers the voters, which is why it draws support form all over the map.