Tăblițele de la Tărtăria nu sunt cele mai vechi din România. Există o colecție particulară cu obiecte descoperite în România cu mult mai vechi decât tăblițele de la Tărtăria, doar că nu a fost niciodată expusă public.
@@claudiubucovina1532 Abia aștept, dar (totdeauna este un dar!) sunteți sigur că nu sunt falsuri ? De ce nu au fost expuse ? Eu nu am competența necesară pentru a decide asta, dar vor fi mulți care vă vor blama și ironiza !
Eu înțeleg unele semne și le am și scris fara sa știu de iei acuma am văzut chiar va zic vouă ăștia care vreți să înțelegeți nu trebuie să aflați că voi vreți să schimbați multe
Spune traducerea corectă:"Vine furtuna ,anunta-i pe toți din neam ,în jos sub deal e un adapost pentru oameni și animale..Du-i pe toți acolo....că cerul va vorbi prin tunet amarnic" mesajul pe cea rotundă!
Cine-i personajul asta care evita numele lui Cristos cand zice * 5000 de ani inainte de.....(pauza)* ???? Decat un istoric ( sau ce hram poarta) ca asta, Mai bine lipsa !!
Grover S. Krantz (1931-2002), a world-renowned American anthropologist and professor at Washington State University, in his work "The Geographical Formation of European Languages", recognizes Hungarian, which until now has been treated as a stepchild of Europe, as the founder of Europe's culture. According to him, the u.n. "Indo-European languages" developed very late in Europe. That is why 30% of their vocabulary is not of "Indo-European" origin, and there are no "Indo-European" river names on the early maps of Europe. We are more interested in the following sentence: "...so the Greek language was formed in its current location in 6500 BC, and the Celtic language in Ireland in 3500 BC. The antiquity of the Hungarian language in the Carpathian Basin is similarly surprising; I find that its origins lead to the Mesolithic, preceding the Stone Age." Furthermore: "At least on one important point, the theory of people's migration is the opposite of the previous theorem. It is generally believed that the Hungarians of the Urals lived in the 9th century. century, they moved into the Carpathian basin from an eastern area. I find that all groups speaking the Uralic language spread from Hungary, in a much earlier age, in the opposite direction." Grover S. Krantz, The Geographical Formation of European Languages. (Ÿsi Örökségünk Alapítvány, Budapest, 2000) Original title and publisher of the work: Geographical Development of European Languages Peter Lang Publishing Inc. New York 1988. Translated by: Imre Kálmán
The archeological finds of the Tordos-vinča culture cannot in any way be connected to the Romanian and Serbian language and people. Both are very young Indo-European languages. Neither the Romanians nor the Serbs ever wrote in runes. However, Hungarian does. All serious scientists are aware of this, only the Romanian and Serbian propaganda does not want to acknowledge this. This is true even if someone thinks of it as pictorial writing and not writing! The Hungarian language is linked to the ancient Carpathian basin!
I watched the video. Only speculation, no proof. I have nothing about the supposed existence of the Hungarian ancient runing language. But please, provide lots and lots of proof.
Look at the ancient Hungarian runic alphabet and put Romanian next to it! Yes! That the Romanians wrote in Cyrillic letters until the 19th century! Then don't put it next to it! 🤣😂🤣
FELICITĂRI pentru postare
🙋♂️👍
Tăblițele de la Tărtăria nu sunt cele mai vechi din România. Există o colecție particulară cu obiecte descoperite în România cu mult mai vechi decât tăblițele de la Tărtăria, doar că nu a fost niciodată expusă public.
De unde aveți informația ??!!
Si de unde ai stii asta? Pune un articol, vreau sa stiu si eu te rog
@@petruvitoga392 Bine. Incerc azi.
@@corneliuluncan928 E sigur foarte sigur și adevărat ce am zis. Incerc azi să pun măcar câteva poze.
@@claudiubucovina1532 Abia aștept, dar (totdeauna este un dar!) sunteți sigur că nu sunt falsuri ? De ce nu au fost expuse ? Eu nu am competența necesară pentru a decide asta, dar vor fi mulți care vă vor blama și ironiza !
Eu înțeleg unele semne și le am și scris fara sa știu de iei acuma am văzut chiar va zic vouă ăștia care vreți să înțelegeți nu trebuie să aflați că voi vreți să schimbați multe
Spune traducerea corectă:"Vine furtuna ,anunta-i pe toți din neam ,în jos sub deal e un adapost pentru oameni și animale..Du-i pe toți acolo....că cerul va vorbi prin tunet amarnic" mesajul pe cea rotundă!
😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Știu ce scrie e de rău
Cine-i personajul asta care evita numele lui Cristos cand zice * 5000 de ani inainte de.....(pauza)* ????
Decat un istoric ( sau ce hram poarta) ca asta, Mai bine lipsa !!
5000 de ani inainte de... CRISTOS?!? Te auzi cand spui?!??
@@violetagiorgiogheorghe2716 5 000 si un pic🤓 care-i problema ?
@@violetagiorgiogheorghe2716 5 000 si un pic🤓 care-i problema ?
@@mariusbonciu8409 Daca vroia sa vorbeasca de Hristos, trebuia sa spuna doar 2000 de ani!!
Grover S. Krantz (1931-2002), a world-renowned American anthropologist and professor at Washington State University, in his work "The Geographical Formation of European Languages", recognizes Hungarian, which until now has been treated as a stepchild of Europe, as the founder of Europe's culture.
According to him, the u.n. "Indo-European languages" developed very late in Europe. That is why 30% of their vocabulary is not of "Indo-European" origin, and there are no "Indo-European" river names on the early maps of Europe.
We are more interested in the following sentence: "...so the Greek language was formed in its current location in 6500 BC, and the Celtic language in Ireland in 3500 BC. The antiquity of the Hungarian language in the Carpathian Basin is similarly surprising; I find that its origins lead to the Mesolithic, preceding the Stone Age."
Furthermore: "At least on one important point, the theory of people's migration is the opposite of the previous theorem. It is generally believed that the Hungarians of the Urals lived in the 9th century. century, they moved into the Carpathian basin from an eastern area. I find that all groups speaking the Uralic language spread from Hungary, in a much earlier age, in the opposite direction."
Grover S. Krantz, The Geographical Formation of European Languages. (Ÿsi Örökségünk Alapítvány, Budapest, 2000) Original title and publisher of the work: Geographical Development of European Languages Peter Lang Publishing Inc. New York 1988. Translated by: Imre Kálmán
It sounds like bullshit.
The archeological finds of the Tordos-vinča culture cannot in any way be connected to the Romanian and Serbian language and people. Both are very young Indo-European languages. Neither the Romanians nor the Serbs ever wrote in runes. However, Hungarian does. All serious scientists are aware of this, only the Romanian and Serbian propaganda does not want to acknowledge this. This is true even if someone thinks of it as pictorial writing and not writing! The Hungarian language is linked to the ancient Carpathian basin!
🤣
Și minciuna e o vorbă nu? ...🤦
@@dianaveres9354
da, romanii sunt maestri ai minciunii. Acestea sunt semne runice antice maghiare!
Miért nem magyarul írsz?
😂😂😂
😅😅😅
Tatárlaka. Only today (1918-) Romania! Ancient Hungarian language. (........-1918) Magyarország, Hungary, Ungaria!
ua-cam.com/video/kBkJc6Cxke4/v-deo.html
What did you smoke dude?
@@costincalistru7619
I suck at Romanian and Serbian lies! Don't you understand that you have nothing to do with the ancient Hungarian runic writing???
I watched the video. Only speculation, no proof. I have nothing about the supposed existence of the Hungarian ancient runing language. But please, provide lots and lots of proof.
Look at the ancient Hungarian runic alphabet and put Romanian next to it! Yes! That the Romanians wrote in Cyrillic letters until the 19th century! Then don't put it next to it! 🤣😂🤣
ua-cam.com/video/GnP2E6eFl8k/v-deo.html