People sometimes think I'm shooting film with my first Gen Sony 7s/r and manual focus lenses. They'll just think I'm a bloody hipster, not rich, with this one😂
@@shellshock10 People that hit the lottery. People who invested in bitcoin when it was pennies. People who inherited 14 generations of blood line of money.
I know where there is a free Hassleblad you can simply pick up and keep. Its a one owner and used only for a few days. Its a classic film 60's model and comes with a unique history. Most likely you have seen photographs taken with it. Yours free. Just pick it up. The only problem is its on the moon, left by the Apollo 11 astronauts.
@@m3photo726 sensor? Baha, 1960's medium format film camera my friend, long, long before digital still cameras. She will be dusty though, and have a lot of UV/heat damage from spending so long in the sun.... would love to see one in a museum when we return to the moon
I had a friend who's an advance amateur. He was shooting with his 35 camera for quite some time. Then he tried a Hasselblad. He was impressed with the increase of the picture quality it gave him. He jumped in feet first into medium format. Then he tried a 4x5 view camera. Again he was impressed with the improvement of picture quality. He moved quickly to 8x10 and worked with that for a few years. He was doing direct printing from the negative. His girlfriend had did a couple of books. They took off for a few weeks to take photos of county fairs around a few states. It was going to be for her next book.
Finally !!.... After 15 years in the business countless hours, sleepless nights, the hard work the blood, sweat and tears, the grind, All put in to afford ... A Hassalblad branded camera strap !
Hardly like that, they are expensive compared to say Nikon, but not by a gigantic difference at feature parity. I've played with several - just not my jam. Very nicely made but not practical or particularly usable in general. I used to be a Nikon guy, but after using and owning all sorts of cameras by all brands, what do I use by FAR the most? Sony. I'll take Sony over anything else every day of the week, and twice on Sunday. Most of all because of the picture quality, or rather the versatility, by which I mean that a Sony is more likely to take very consistently good pictures regardless of circumstances. Nikon is great in a studio set up, Canon will capture magic in nature, but Sony is so close it's near impossible to tell at both of those AND all the junk in between. I don't love Sony menus, and it'll disable or change settings on it's damn own without warning. BUT they work always and take good pictures. I'll live with the menu system and self changing settings.
The mirrorless part is new, the interchangeable backs have been around basically as long as Hasselblad has been making 120mm cameras. I used this style Mayima back in the day, the clarity on this style camera for either brand was just astounding.
I’ve wanted the Hasselblad x1d since the first one was shown at Photo Expo in NYC . Then the 907 when it was first introduced. Can’t afford them but love them!
@@SamRielly Did the Nikon ever make it down to the surface? IIRC on Apollo 15 it was mounted in the rendezvous window. Not a knock on Nikon, their cameras made a tremendous difference in photojournalism in that same period of history but my recollection is that Hasselblads took pretty much all of the famous and influential handheld still photo moon shots like the Apollo 8 Earthrise photo etc
@@SamRielly i had a look through the USRA Lunar Planetary Institute site’s Apollo Atlas and browsed by camera and for 35mm Nikon I can only find orbital shots and shots of things inside of the capsule and only for Apollo 17. Which isn’t nothing, but also does not appear to include anything actually shot while on the surface of the moon. I think it may have seen much more use during later missions like Skylab IIRC
@@Chirishman6 You know, you could be right. I have a nikkor 50mm 1.4 from the 60's that I could have sworn was used on the moon. It may have just been in space from the same time period
First of all, it would be rather difficult to make it, and it would weigh a lot(likely to be heavier than you can carry(and just remember that you would require bigger and heavier lenses to give coverage over the whole sensor). Another reason is that nobody would have enough kidneys to pay for that
Yes, sure - what makes this one revolutionary is that you can attach the digital back to hasselblads film cameras. Even to those multiple decades old. You get one of the best sensors and software, but with the look of old film cameras. Thats what makes this camera great. Sad almost no one can actually afford it reasonably.
I know very little about photography... But have always admired the quality of Engineering in all Cameras... This looks stunning.. and no doubt will function perfectly for years.
Expansiv? Yes! Worth the money? Yes!! The best of the digital and analog world. I worked with a Mamyia 645 and a Yashica 124 MAT and still with the Yashica going out for a shoot is so relaxing and brings you down to earth😊
Given that my hobbies are playing guitar, photography, and collecting watches. The price tag on this thing is fairly reasonable. It's all about perspective.
Buying stuff isn’t a hobby. The act of photographing is a hobby, buying gear isn’t. As as for watches, neither wearing watches nor buying watches is a hobby. That’s just being a collector of watches.
@@ilovedagreenday I was shocked too, but they acquired majority in stock back in 2017. Which is why the name was added to the drones and other products.
I had something like that when i was a kid. You had all these little disky thingies you could put in it and pull down on this springy lever thingy and if you held it up toward the light you could cycle through a cartoon. I loved it so much I kept it til the dog got ahold of it and ate it. Then I replaced it with a Lite Brite and an Etch-a-Sketch. Those were the days bruh!
Of all the cameras in the world thats the one i want most esp with a old hasselblad like in the video with it . Such a Beautiful and inspirimg camera to use
Close friend of mine has a 501CM he brings to events regularly. I've gotten to use it on a couple occasions. A bit disorienting at first but it's so much fun.
They use them on the moon for the Apollo missions.(well similar model with stunning quality as well) thats why we can enjoy a really good quality pictures of those missions.
It's a work tool and tax deductable, plus depreciation at around 30% p/year makes it affordable to nearly any working pro who has their taxes done properly.
Gorgeous??? You are living in the past i think...please look a little better at what exists because your hasseblade who has been sleeping for a long time in front of what the Japanese are doing thanks to whom photography has evolved
F**k! That is yet, by far, the sexiest digital 'nostalgia" camera. I have ever seen. I used to take photos with the crank system and look down at the viewfinder. I am drooling...
Overpriced files are huge these cameras are only for the rich. I just wish you tubers wouldn't waste their time on reviewing expensive cameras like this .
Stunning and comes with a stunning price tag too. 😊
How much is it?
@@jordanbarnett7247in Switzerland it's about chf8000 ($8800 USD) - without the lens or the mechanical box part.
@@jordanbarnett7247too much
@@jordanbarnett7247 Just the camera body, so no lens or anything €7800, but hey, shipping is included 😅
It’s like a 15k kit
"💸this💸is💸the💸most💸beautiful💸camera💸that💸i've💸ever💸used💸"
Exactly what I was thinking while watching this 😭
It's just 10$ more than my budget otherwise I would've bought it😤
If I win the lottery I wouldn’t tell anyone but I’ll leave hints 😂😂
If I win the lottery, I would be happy to buy you one, plus send you 50 bucks as well.
$8,100
People sometimes think I'm shooting film with my first Gen Sony 7s/r and manual focus lenses. They'll just think I'm a bloody hipster, not rich, with this one😂
Lol that's what I always say. Great minds think alike.
The only way to go about it. 📷 😂😂😂
That's a lot of kidneys.
Yup! The whole universe of them 😅
How much does it cost?
@@appy01-y5z more than a leica
Thats like 5 babies...😂
😂😂😂😂
Homeboy got an affiliate link like im going to pick this up tomorrow. 😢
I wonder how many could actually afford these cameras
@@shellshock10 People that hit the lottery. People who invested in bitcoin when it was pennies. People who inherited 14 generations of blood line of money.
😂
Don't know what is more stunning, the looks, or the price.
Brilliant I used to use them in the 70s working for photographers fantastic camera ..the best I would say
Wow! Hasselblad doing Hasselblad things! That’s soooooo cool!
I know where there is a free Hassleblad you can simply pick up and keep. Its a one owner and used only for a few days. Its a classic film 60's model and comes with a unique history. Most likely you have seen photographs taken with it. Yours free. Just pick it up. The only problem is its on the moon, left by the Apollo 11 astronauts.
Bet the sensor is dusty as hell 😂
@@m3photo726 sensor? Baha, 1960's medium format film camera my friend, long, long before digital still cameras.
She will be dusty though, and have a lot of UV/heat damage from spending so long in the sun.... would love to see one in a museum when we return to the moon
@@UNSCPILOT Sorry, the laughing emoji was meant to clarify I was joking.
We will get there on a blue moon day.
Beautiful Camera. 100MP is 1/5 the resolution of the human eye. Unless they are mine…. I have SVGA in the left and VGA in the right.
😂 same
Better than CGA and EGA!
Boss is a Chinese named Tao Wang, also owner for DJI .
i have mine both hooked up on DisplayPort 1.2
What you talkin about, Willis? 100MPX exceeds the human eye by a LOT!
I had a friend who's an advance amateur. He was shooting with his 35 camera for quite some time. Then he tried a Hasselblad. He was impressed with the increase of the picture quality it gave him. He jumped in feet first into medium format.
Then he tried a 4x5 view camera. Again he was impressed with the improvement of picture quality. He moved quickly to 8x10 and worked with that for a few years. He was doing direct printing from the negative. His girlfriend had did a couple of books. They took off for a few weeks to take photos of county fairs around a few states. It was going to be for her next book.
what great writing 😊
@@Javier-jv3ugWhen you're obsessed with high-end cameras but you're also 9½ years old 😂
Still love the shutter sound of the H4D we used before. That click sounds like business.
Agree
На секунду показалось что это Горин смотрит на меня чилящего в холодильнике)
Finally !!.... After 15 years in the business
countless hours, sleepless nights, the hard work the blood, sweat and tears, the grind, All put in to afford ...
A Hassalblad branded camera strap !
😂
Hey but you got the strap!
An entire strap?
And DJI technology help
Hardly like that, they are expensive compared to say Nikon, but not by a gigantic difference at feature parity. I've played with several - just not my jam. Very nicely made but not practical or particularly usable in general. I used to be a Nikon guy, but after using and owning all sorts of cameras by all brands, what do I use by FAR the most? Sony. I'll take Sony over anything else every day of the week, and twice on Sunday. Most of all because of the picture quality, or rather the versatility, by which I mean that a Sony is more likely to take very consistently good pictures regardless of circumstances. Nikon is great in a studio set up, Canon will capture magic in nature, but Sony is so close it's near impossible to tell at both of those AND all the junk in between. I don't love Sony menus, and it'll disable or change settings on it's damn own without warning. BUT they work always and take good pictures. I'll live with the menu system and self changing settings.
Holy trail of perfection
Yeah, but $8199 ! I would love to get the back to put my ELM and all my lenses back into service! Time to upgrade my computer system for this one!
Cheaper than new car! Plus consider it a babe magnet. 😅
Gaddeemm! 'Affordable' indeed 👀
The mirrorless part is new, the interchangeable backs have been around basically as long as Hasselblad has been making 120mm cameras.
I used this style Mayima back in the day, the clarity on this style camera for either brand was just astounding.
I’ve wanted the Hasselblad x1d since the first one was shown at Photo Expo in NYC . Then the 907 when it was first introduced. Can’t afford them but love them!
Always loved the systems like Olympus OM that let you use any component whether it’s vintage or modern
Wow cant wait for the next dji product
Dji really has done a good job this time
Masterpiece
It is now my top of the list
As soon i hit some jackpot 🎉😂
"How much does it cost?" "Yes :)"
Yeah, Hasselblad made the cameras that they took to the moon. Not cheap.
@@Chirishman6 so did Nikon to be fair
@@SamRielly Did the Nikon ever make it down to the surface? IIRC on Apollo 15 it was mounted in the rendezvous window. Not a knock on Nikon, their cameras made a tremendous difference in photojournalism in that same period of history but my recollection is that Hasselblads took pretty much all of the famous and influential handheld still photo moon shots like the Apollo 8 Earthrise photo etc
@@SamRielly i had a look through the USRA Lunar Planetary Institute site’s Apollo Atlas and browsed by camera and for 35mm Nikon I can only find orbital shots and shots of things inside of the capsule and only for Apollo 17. Which isn’t nothing, but also does not appear to include anything actually shot while on the surface of the moon. I think it may have seen much more use during later missions like Skylab IIRC
@@Chirishman6 You know, you could be right. I have a nikkor 50mm 1.4 from the 60's that I could have sworn was used on the moon. It may have just been in space from the same time period
Wow😮... That's beautiful 😍 ❤
Hasselblad does take dreamingly amazing photos
That sound soothes me 😊😊
Can we tell Sony to start making "Actual" 645, 6x6, and 6x7 sensors again?
Why? So I can have a crappier GFX? 😂
You've got a few mill to drop on that? Big sensor = big money.
With all the yummy color bandings…😂😂
@@noth606I’m sure you’re exaggerating, but wouldn’t cost much more than the GFX if Sony made it
First of all, it would be rather difficult to make it, and it would weigh a lot(likely to be heavier than you can carry(and just remember that you would require bigger and heavier lenses to give coverage over the whole sensor). Another reason is that nobody would have enough kidneys to pay for that
It gives you the option to ‘crank the mirror and shutter’ This is revolutionary! Digital backs have been around for decades!
Yes, sure - what makes this one revolutionary is that you can attach the digital back to hasselblads film cameras. Even to those multiple decades old. You get one of the best sensors and software, but with the look of old film cameras. Thats what makes this camera great. Sad almost no one can actually afford it reasonably.
Absolutely beautiful, my friend 🫡🥀
I think I’d get familiar with those buttons before starting the video 😀
Luv those antiques converts to modern life
Its sub par to Canon or Sony dslrs, this is a novelty camera. Dont go thinking its medium format is some magic, it has its draw backs.
Elaborate
Thanks for elaborating on your statement.
That's a gorgoeus camera. Loved your work in star trek: strange new worlds too.
This is for sure my dream setup. It doesn’t even have to be 100mbpx, but the 500cm with digital back
I know very little about photography... But have always admired the quality of Engineering in all Cameras... This looks stunning.. and no doubt will function perfectly for years.
Expansiv? Yes!
Worth the money? Yes!!
The best of the digital and analog world.
I worked with a Mamyia 645 and a Yashica 124 MAT and still with the Yashica going out for a shoot is so relaxing and brings you down to earth😊
Stunning!!! Price and Looks.
Given that my hobbies are playing guitar, photography, and collecting watches. The price tag on this thing is fairly reasonable. It's all about perspective.
Buying stuff isn’t a hobby. The act of photographing is a hobby, buying gear isn’t. As as for watches, neither wearing watches nor buying watches is a hobby. That’s just being a collector of watches.
Guitar isn't an expensive hobby, far from it.
Cool Hasselblad makes digital backs now. I remember back when you had to get a Phase One digital back for the same price as a car.
All of my Hasselblad Zeiss lenses came with performance data, including distortion. I do not see this with the new Fuji lenses.
My mouth is watering for this! Check this on my next trip to B& H
DJI have outdone themselves
This has to be a joke
nope it's for real, look it up@@ilovedagreenday
@@ilovedagreenday I was shocked too, but they acquired majority in stock back in 2017. Which is why the name was added to the drones and other products.
I am pretty sure dji isn't involved with the engineering, otherwise it would have been much more powerful.
@@shang-hsienyang1284 will have to look into it but it is possibility they weren’t involved here
I had something like that when i was a kid. You had all these little disky thingies you could put in it and pull down on this springy lever thingy and if you held it up toward the light you could cycle through a cartoon. I loved it so much I kept it til the dog got ahold of it and ate it. Then I replaced it with a Lite Brite and an Etch-a-Sketch. Those were the days bruh!
Gorgeous
Perfect gear to take when i am traveling back in time
A beautiful camera that I can't afford, $8k; watching Tony struggle to remove the digital back; priceless.
This is Epitome of Cameras ❤
Beautiful, please remember the 151mp Phase One IQ4. That’s the world’s best digital.
Carl Zeiss lenses?
beauty really is in the eye of the beholder
If "Pretencious" was a camera brand
Oh I want that digital analogue combo!
The camera that was used to take photos on the first moon mission of NASA was a Hasselblad ❤
...and nowadays they use Nikon. Since most people will be fine with taking pictures on earth moon-capabilities are pretty overrated imho.
Yep and the cameras still on the moon.
I used to take pictures 32 years ago... amazing model machine as this one not a digital but old school and also was a Mamiya 675 120mm
$8,000+ for a camera that doesn't shoot video and requires the purchase of assessories. More outrageous than beautiful.
Of all the cameras in the world thats the one i want most esp with a old hasselblad like in the video with it . Such a Beautiful and inspirimg camera to use
Beauty
It's simply stunning 😮, yeh it's expensive as hell but so are supercars ❤️❤️❤️
Close friend of mine has a 501CM he brings to events regularly. I've gotten to use it on a couple occasions. A bit disorienting at first but it's so much fun.
Ohhhh 😮
I have been using this brand for decades it professional ,it's what clients wants..quality
This is just being pretencious
Glad to see Philip Schofield diversifying! Behind the camera this time ;-)
Still not worth the $1000000 they’ll charge you for it
That leaf shutter sound ❤
Am I the only one who thinks it looks crappy?
Perfect!
They use them on the moon for the Apollo missions.(well similar model with stunning quality as well) thats why we can enjoy a really good quality pictures of those missions.
I've always loved the sound of 'Blad'
Way too beautiful 😮
Honestly 8200 isnt too bad for professional photographers. The legit dudes who make mad money
It's a work tool and tax deductable, plus depreciation at around 30% p/year makes it affordable to nearly any working pro who has their taxes done properly.
That's art.
GORGEOUS!!!
Gorgeous??? You are living in the past i think...please look a little better at what exists because your hasseblade who has been sleeping for a long time in front of what the Japanese are doing thanks to whom photography has evolved
Stunning 🤩
That's my lifesavings right there in ur hands at that very moment even though I want it so badly
F**k! That is yet, by far, the sexiest digital 'nostalgia" camera. I have ever seen. I used to take photos with the crank system and look down at the viewfinder. I am drooling...
Wow!! So cool, thanks for sharing!! 🙌🏼
I used to use my friend's 500c and thought that the handling was a bit awkward. It is a well made mechanical device though.
Nah I've seen dynamic range like this on lots of full frame cameras
Can you go from it to palladium process prints?
BYUTIFUL 😮😮😮❤❤❤
Yeah bet it super, I know I'd love to have one... 😢 ❤❤
Not a photographer but I’m keen to understand who this is market at. Is it pro photographers, hobbyists or collectors?
Mostly hobbyists I think.
Stunning 🥰😍
Overpriced files are huge these cameras are only for the rich. I just wish you tubers wouldn't waste their time on reviewing expensive cameras like this .
Is it a film camera or a digital camera?
Damn thing sounds incredible
Definitely get one❤
Looks like a yacht ✨
What about the rolling shutter problem with the 500C?
Taking off that digital back seems like a hasselblad.
One of my dreams!
I’m feeling it.❤
Its one of those lovely toys that wind up on the shelf.
Why didn't you edit the fumbling around in trying to remove the back?
That is not a camera that is a work of art
Those are like cameras that existed before DSLRs. Like older film cameras o.o
Beautiful as i am always.❤.
Who is this beautiful man!
Does it shoot square format raw?
So how much $$ is a Mac or PC with sufficient computing power to handle 100+ megapixel image files?