Are Two Heads Better than One? | Light Tank M2A2/A3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
  • Even with their twin turret layouts and machine gun armament of only machine guns, the M2A2 and M2A3 reflected a persistent effort by the US Army to modernize its armored force.
    Despite being outdated by the outbreak of World War 2, the M2A2 and M2A3 tanks provided excellent chassis and components for future tanks. By using them, American combined arms doctrine was modernized, and tank crews were trained for overseas service. As the US Army worked towards developing an effective tank, the M2A2 and M2A3 tanks were useful stepping stones.
    Join this channel to get access to exclusive perks:
    / @tanksencyclopediayt
    If you liked this video, please consider donating on Patreon or Paypal!
    Patreon: / tankartfund
    Paypal: www.paypal.com...
    Article: tanks-encyclop...
    Sources:
    Alex, Dan. “Tank Mark VIII (International / Liberty).” Military Factory, 3 August 2017, www.militaryfa.... Accessed 29 August 2022.
    Branch, Ben. “For Sale: A 16.7 Litre Guiberson Radial Diesel T-1020 Tank Engine.” Silodrome, 25 April 2020, silodrome.com/....
    Citino, Robert. “The Louisiana Maneuvers.” The National WWII Museum New Orleans, 11 July 2017, www.nationalww.... Accessed 24 July 2022.
    Connors, Chris. “Light Tank M2.” AFV Database, 26 January 2022, afvdb.50megs.co.... Accessed 1 June 2022.
    Ellis, Chris, and Peter Chamberlain. AFV/Weapons Profiles 4: Light Tanks M1-M5. Edited by Duncan Crow, Profile Publications Ltd., 1972.
    Geiger, Lance. “Lafayette Pool: Texas Tanker.” UA-cam, 12 August 2022, • Lafayette Pool: Texas ... . Accessed 3 September 2022.
    Hunnicutt, Richard Pearce. Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank. vol. 1, Echo Point Books and Media, 2015.
    Jackson, David D. “Continental Motors in World War Two.” The American Automobile Industry in World War Two, 3 November 2020, usautoindustry.... Accessed 2 June 2022.
    Maloney, Bill. “williammaloney.com.” Patton Museum - Other Exhibits / 03 Continental W670 Radial Tank Engine, 29 November 2010, www.williammalo.... Accessed 3 June 2022.
    Matthews, Jeff. “Remembering the Louisiana Maneuvers.” Town Talk, 29 July 2016, www.thetowntal.... Accessed 24 July 2022.
    Pasholok, Yuri. “Combat Car T4: Christie Style.” Tank Archives, 24 December 2016, www.tankarchive.... Accessed 29 August 2022.
    Pasholok, Yuri. “Light Tank M2: Two-Headed Light.” Tank Archives, 18 December 2016, www.tankarchive.... Accessed 1 June 2022.
    Pasholok, Yuri. “Light Tanks T1E4 and T2E1: Experiments on an Ideal Platform.” Tank Archives, 2017, www.tankarchive.... Accessed 29 August 2022.
    Pasholok, Yuri. “M2A2 Tanks in the Antarctic.” Tank Archives, 23 March 2015, www.tankarchive.... Accessed 24 July 2022.
    Slaughter, Jamie. “M1919 Machine Gun.” Recoil, 6 March 2017, www.recoilweb..... Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Stern, Dean. “The Ma Deuce: Breaking Down the Browning M2.” Sonoran Desert Institute, 20 May 2021, www.sdi.edu/th.... Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Zambrano, Mike. “TSHA | Pool, Lafayette Green.” Texas State Historical Association, 15 September 2021, www.tshaonline.... Accessed 4 September 2022.
    Reddit: / tankencyclopedia
    TE Shop: www.tanks-encyc...
    Our website: www.tanks-encyc...
    Gaming News Website: www.tanks-encyc...
    Facebook: / tanksencyclopedia
    Twitter: / tanksenc
    Discord: / discord
    Email: tanks.encyclopedia@gmail.com
    An article by Chris J
    Narrated by Mechakeller
    Edited by ‪@Kooledits203‬
    Sound edited by Mechakeller

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @Boskov01
    @Boskov01 Рік тому +30

    I will say that, in War Thunder, the M2A2 is an underrated low-tier tank. It's a great early game tank that you can use to rush the objectives thanks to its high top speed and small size. It may only have machine guns for its weapons but when equipped with strictly armor-piercing rounds, it can prove devastating against other light tanks. I find it's best used as a hit-and-run harasser. The biggest problem aside from its low caliber weapon, is that its largest caliber weapon has a very limited firing arc so if an enemy comes up on the wrong side, you need to be able to maneuver and turn quickly to avoid getting taken out. It's got a good safe place in my Tier 1 US Loadout because of this.

    • @WildBillCox13
      @WildBillCox13 Рік тому +6

      M2A4 was a seal clubber in low tier WoT.

    • @AnthonyLopez-lb2bd
      @AnthonyLopez-lb2bd Рік тому +2

      and a pretty decent anti air

    • @axeavier
      @axeavier Рік тому +3

      Sure but vehicles in WT and their performance isn't representative how it's like in real life

    • @Boskov01
      @Boskov01 Рік тому +3

      @@axeavier fully aware of that. Just saying that it’s a fun tank to use in a video game.

    • @Boskov01
      @Boskov01 Рік тому +2

      @@WildBillCox13 a seal clubber?

  • @kurt5490
    @kurt5490 Рік тому +22

    Training tank was the best use. Next best use would be as an indirect fire weapon carrier. M3 75mm howitzer carrier was already an existing design. Maybe make it an open top design like the m37 to reduce cost and potentially increase ammo capacity.

  • @executivedirector7467
    @executivedirector7467 Рік тому +8

    It's not noteworthy that in 1932 all the Us Army's tanks were either of WW1 vintage or some non-serious design. That was true of almost every army in the world at that time.

    • @Slim_Ch4rles
      @Slim_Ch4rles Рік тому

      Contextually I think it was necessary to give an idea about what was being fielded by the US at the time prior to the 1940's. He should have rephrased that point though, since what you say is correct

  • @LmgWarThunder
    @LmgWarThunder Рік тому +13

    i'll be honest sometimes I don't check in because I'm not usually a fan of the narration, but whoever this is, they did an amazing job, and if it's one of those robot voices, it's almost indistinguishable from just a really good narrator

  • @billestew7535
    @billestew7535 Рік тому +21

    I wonder if a turretless machine gun armed m2a3 would have made a good recce vehicle

    • @wolfehoffmann2697
      @wolfehoffmann2697 Рік тому

      Unlikely to be honest. Sometimes Recce units have to engage enemy recce units. The recce unit that doesn't have a cannon of any sort is going to get slaughtered. This is why you see the big move toward autocannons that lasts well into the modern day.

    • @CZ350tuner
      @CZ350tuner Рік тому +2

      The British used turretless M3 & M5 tanks for artillery observation post, in Italy, during WW2.

    • @enema6222
      @enema6222 Рік тому

      ​@@wolfehoffmann2697or the new self-propelled gub of the US army ( or light tank as also known) where ita gonna support recon and light infantry, it has a 105mm cannon.

  • @SinfulHistory
    @SinfulHistory Рік тому +34

    I also made a Video on this tank but wow you guys just do it so much better, great video as always!

  • @merafirewing6591
    @merafirewing6591 Рік тому +5

    Based thumbnail.

  • @kawaiiarchive357
    @kawaiiarchive357 Рік тому +4

    The M2A2 makes a decent Anti Aircraft vehicle in War Thunder.

  • @Mestari1Gaming
    @Mestari1Gaming Рік тому +2

    Loved to use this tank in Heroes and Generals!

  • @jackdarbyshire5888
    @jackdarbyshire5888 Рік тому +5

    Thats a lot of different numbers and letters to keep track off wouldn't you agree 🤔😉

  • @CZ350tuner
    @CZ350tuner Рік тому +4

    With its extravagance of machine guns, the M2 "Mae West" looks like to perfect AFV for dealing with a Zombie apocalypse.

  • @thepart3jotarokujo453
    @thepart3jotarokujo453 Рік тому +9

    Ah the heros and generals special the m2a2

    • @VioletMarbitz
      @VioletMarbitz Рік тому +1

      I miss when heroes and generals was good and had new content

    • @thepart3jotarokujo453
      @thepart3jotarokujo453 Рік тому +1

      Yeah hopefully part 2 will be good when it comes out in a few years

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 Рік тому +13

    Excellent, data dense, content. Thanks for posting.

    • @jsplicer9
      @jsplicer9 Рік тому +1

      Glad you enjoyed it! Be sure to check out the article for even more in depth info!

  • @tommygun333
    @tommygun333 Рік тому +5

    Excellent video guys!

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 Рік тому +9

    Standardization versus need. Dropped idler, single turret with dedicated gunner, were moves in the right direction. Commander in a one man turret is wrong. Especially in a scout tank, where the commander's job is to establish and maintain situational awareness, which he can't do while manning a gun. Ask Ex General de Gaulle. He knew.

  • @Jreth
    @Jreth Рік тому +11

    *BREAST-TACULAR* !

  • @kinger2005
    @kinger2005 Рік тому +4

    The monoboob reigns supreme

  • @lmyrski8385
    @lmyrski8385 Рік тому +16

    Pool had 12 "confirmed" tank kills. What made up the rest of his claims were not tanks, some may not have been AFVs, and the bulk of his claims are unconfirmed. A serious historian should take up this research and compare his claims to the records of German units. As in the air, overclaiming was a real thing. He should get credit for what he actually did, which I'm sure was substantial, but likely hardly close to what was claimed.

  • @TheRezro
    @TheRezro Рік тому +3

    It actually make sense to use two turrets in case of light infantry support vehicles as ambushes can be done from two sides at the same time. It was in fact original idea behind Russian Terminator, before it turn out into a joke. The main issue is that such vehicle itself is only moderately useful.

    • @matovicmmilan
      @matovicmmilan Рік тому

      You're here too?! I see that severe russophobia hasn't subsided even slightly?

  • @ChristopherBourseau
    @ChristopherBourseau 11 місяців тому

    Nice overview

  • @saitekx69
    @saitekx69 Рік тому

    Great video and my favorite narrator!

  • @public.public
    @public.public Рік тому

    Recoilless Rifle would have improved the tank's offensive capability.

  • @gusgone4527
    @gusgone4527 Рік тому +1

    The Dolly Parton tank.

  • @blackpowderriflehunter7573
    @blackpowderriflehunter7573 Рік тому +1

    It would have been useful in the Philippines.

  • @rochrich1223
    @rochrich1223 Рік тому +1

    Deploying weapon systems overseas always comes down to logistics. The many variants would need many sets of spare parts and transportation. With how hungry the Marines got on Guadalcanal, 7.5 tons of extra flour would have been a better choice than an extra M2.

  • @willardsmith4383
    @willardsmith4383 Рік тому +3

    I'm ashamed to admit that i clicked after seeing "booby tank". My inner 12 year old sense of humor showed itself lol.

  • @DEATH-THE-GOAT
    @DEATH-THE-GOAT Рік тому +5

    General Patton proves my point, it's not the tank, it's the tactic!
    _(With the right tactics a Panzer VI could win over a modern tank, in duell or at platoon level)_

    • @executivedirector7467
      @executivedirector7467 Рік тому +1

      A Tiger would have a hard time scratching the paint of a modern MBT.

    • @DEATH-THE-GOAT
      @DEATH-THE-GOAT Рік тому +1

      @@executivedirector7467 cats can both scratch behind the ear and lick it's butt.

    • @merafirewing6591
      @merafirewing6591 Рік тому +1

      ​@@executivedirector7467 you forgot modern tanks like their ww2 burthen, are weak on the sides.

    • @executivedirector7467
      @executivedirector7467 Рік тому +1

      @@merafirewing6591 I forgot nothing. Modern tanks are vastly better protected than WW2 tanks, and a modern crew would need to be asleep to allow any WW2 tank within firing range.

  • @sebastianthomsen2225
    @sebastianthomsen2225 Рік тому +3

    :)👍

  • @FrankRuiz66
    @FrankRuiz66 Рік тому +3

    Training tank for sure.. Deploying it like a Bradley would not have been a successful option. Under powered and under gunned

  • @patrickwentz8413
    @patrickwentz8413 Рік тому +5

    The tank would have been used as range targets by the Axis. Not a good tank.

    • @terraflow__bryanburdo4547
      @terraflow__bryanburdo4547 Рік тому +4

      The Pz I was also "not a good tank" but it was instrumental in burying France in a matter of weeks.