Fossil Frenzy : Allosaurus anax the true name of Saurophaganax? New scientific paper released!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @SlayerseriesAU
    @SlayerseriesAU 22 дні тому +3

    great job merry Christmas

  • @YutyRannuz
    @YutyRannuz 20 днів тому +4

    I'm not gonna jump the gun just yet, I want to see more studies. I'm still on the boat that Saurophaganax is valid

  • @mistyjames810
    @mistyjames810 24 дні тому +3

    Merry Christmas to you all! 🎄🦖🦕🎅🎄☃️🎁

  • @jthomas8263
    @jthomas8263 22 дні тому +2

    The New Subspecies of Aurochs that lived during the Latest Pleistocene, Mesolithic and Iron Age was Found in Southern Siberia, Central Asia, Northern India, Northern Pakistan, and East Asia was described by Zheng and Colleagues, and They named It "Bos primigenius sinensis," also known as the "East-Eurasian Aurochs."

  • @teos_world
    @teos_world 24 дні тому +5

    This is a nice Christmas present for all the allosaurus fans 😂. From what I am reading there is still other large allosaurid material to be examined, correct? A 40 ft., 8 ton allosaurus may be a longshot but I’ll keep dreaming haha

    • @CulzParanormalStudio
      @CulzParanormalStudio  24 дні тому +3

      Yeah the Allosaurus anax material does seem to be quite large, based on the paper. The estimations (in the paper) put it around 1,000 kg above the largest Allosaurus fragilis (NY), and around (if not bigger) than Acrocanthosaurus. So still a big Allosaurus wondering around the Morrison, just under a new name. There is still some material I am wondering how (if) it'll be referred. So it'll definitely be a story to follow.
      Merry Christmas!

    • @teos_world
      @teos_world 24 дні тому +1

      @ great video & merry Christmas !!

    • @CulzParanormalStudio
      @CulzParanormalStudio  24 дні тому

      Thank you! Hope you have a great holiday!

  • @bruhmingo
    @bruhmingo 23 дні тому +2

    I believe in allosaurus supremacy, so this is great news for me.

  • @panoskarydis7947
    @panoskarydis7947 22 дні тому +3

    Well, if the holotype specimen (the dorsal neural arch) of Saurophaganax maximus* gets identified as a theropod (either an allosaurid or carcharodontosaurid) dinosaur (but not a sauropod), I hope they will find more complete speciments (neotypes) in Oklahoma, compare it with the holotype & put the genus* back valid next year (2025) or so.
    It will be a wonderful discovery (just like with the discovery of Allosaurus anax), right👍😉🦖🌌

  • @leaguerpaleontology23
    @leaguerpaleontology23 20 днів тому

    Megatheropod dinosaurs size comparison
    Weight= size
    1. Tyrannosaurus rex: 12.4m & 10.5t
    2. Giganotosaurus: 13.5m & 10.2t
    3. Mcraeencies: 12m & 9.2t
    4. Spinosaurus: 14.7m & 8.3t
    5. Carcharodontosaurus: 12.8m & 8.2t
    6. Mapusaurus: 12.7m & 7.9t
    7. Sauroniops: 12.6m & 7.5t
    8. Tyrannotitan: 11.8m & 7.5t
    9. Bahariasaurus: 13.4m & 7.1t
    10. Deinocheirus: 11.7m & 7.1t
    11. Allosaurus: 12.8m & 6.6t
    12. Taurovenator: 11.8m & 6.3t
    13. Acrocanthosaurus: 11.5m & 6.2t
    14. Zhuchengtyrannus: 11.2m & 5.8t
    15. Titanovenator: 11.3m & 5.7t
    16. Meraxes gigas: 11.4m & 5.6t
    17. Therizinosaurus: 10m & 5.54t
    18. Sigilmassasaurus: 12.7m & 5.5t
    19. Suchomimus: 12.4m & 5.4t
    20. Tarbosaurus: 11m & 5.4t
    21. Torvosaurus: 11.5m & 5.2t
    22. Epanterias: 11.5m & 5t
    23. Chilantaisaurus: 11.4m & 4.8t
    24. Siats meekerorum: 11.3m & 4.7t
    25. Megalosaurus: 11.3m & 4.6t
    26. Protathlitis: 11.8m & 4.4t
    27. Monstrovenator: 10.6m & 4.4t
    28. Daspletosaurus: 10.1m & 4.1t

  • @MrWanapon
    @MrWanapon 21 день тому +1

    Saurophaganax's name means "lord of lizard-eaters," and that does not suit a plant-eating sauropod. Saurophaganax is the giant cousin of Allosaurus! So keep Saurophaganax instead of Allosaurus Ananx

    • @jasonpeacock9735
      @jasonpeacock9735 20 днів тому +1

      That’s not how it works

    • @MrWanapon
      @MrWanapon 20 днів тому

      @@jasonpeacock9735 I say it dose!

    • @MrWanapon
      @MrWanapon 20 днів тому

      @@jasonpeacock9735 How would you know, I don't even know you.

    • @jasonpeacock9735
      @jasonpeacock9735 20 днів тому +1

      @@MrWanapon because there are rules for taxonomy. Whether you know me or not, those rules exist.

    • @MrWanapon
      @MrWanapon 20 днів тому

      @jasonpeacock9735 that's just words and words are not enough! I am a man of action and action is better than words so if you want to convince me then why don't you go out there and find the rest of the bone and see if this is the truth or everything that paper said is a lie.

  • @Mr.Polymonstrum901
    @Mr.Polymonstrum901 24 дні тому +3

    Allosaurus “Anax” sounds so wrong.

    • @bruhmingo
      @bruhmingo 23 дні тому +1

      Why?

    • @Bengalvoaurus
      @Bengalvoaurus 23 дні тому

      Nope

    • @Jackson-xl7sv
      @Jackson-xl7sv 13 днів тому

      More wrong than sauro-phag-anax? The name with a giant slur right in the middle when you pronounce it correctly?