Limit at infinity of factorial and exponential function

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 85

  • @josephmartos
    @josephmartos 7 місяців тому +3

    Your way of explaining this was so beautiful :)

  • @KahlieNiven
    @KahlieNiven 7 місяців тому +3

    Great video to teach how to formalize an intuition.

  • @Arkapravo
    @Arkapravo 8 місяців тому +4

    Cool method! You are a great teacher.

  • @ECela-yw9sq
    @ECela-yw9sq 11 місяців тому +10

    Love your chalks and your math, keep up with the good work!

  • @MekibebGebre
    @MekibebGebre 11 місяців тому +8

    Your teaching is excellent and I tell you to make videos about formal proof of limits and continuity involving radicals and denominator

    • @PrimeNewtons
      @PrimeNewtons  11 місяців тому +3

      I already have those videos. Thanks

    • @Orillians
      @Orillians 11 місяців тому

      BRO UR TOO GOOD AT TEACING MAN. @@PrimeNewtons

  • @TheMasterGreen
    @TheMasterGreen 6 місяців тому +1

    correct me if I am wrong but isn't it obvious that the numerator is clearly greater than the denominator when n --> inf therefore implying that it approaches +infinity? Or am I wrong?

  • @ThetrueIdiot6969
    @ThetrueIdiot6969 11 місяців тому +3

    i wonder why these educational videos get no views, even a stupid game play video can get higher view( those videos aren't fun or educational at all ) your content deserves more views

  • @nothingbutmathproofs7150
    @nothingbutmathproofs7150 3 місяці тому +1

    Sweet method. I really liked it.

  • @davidbrisbane7206
    @davidbrisbane7206 9 місяців тому

    Note ... 6^n/3^n < n!/3^n, where n > = 9.
    Now lim (6^n)/(3^n), as n goes to infinity = limit 2^n, as n goes to infinity, and this limit is infinite, hence the limit ( n!/3^), as n goes to infinity is also infinity .

  • @steftetane
    @steftetane 11 місяців тому +3

    Thanks for another great math video. What about the limit of n!/n^n ?

    • @hydroarx
      @hydroarx 11 місяців тому +11

      n^n = n×n×n×n×n×...
      Whereas
      n! = n×(n-1)×(n-2)×(n-3)×...
      n^n is clearly bigger
      So this limit approaches 0

  • @avi6n
    @avi6n 9 місяців тому

    Incredibly helpful, thank you 🙏

  • @italixgaming915
    @italixgaming915 11 місяців тому +1

    To make your proof perfectly clean, you should write that you consider the case n>5 otherwise the part you're deleting doesn't exist.
    Anyway, you don't need to develop everything.
    Let's call a(n)=n!/3^n.
    You have: a(n+1)/a(n)=[(n+1)!/n!].[3^n/3^(n+1)]=(n+1)/3.
    So a(n) is a rising series.
    You can also say that a(n+1)=a(n).(n+1)/3 => a(n+1)-a(n)=a(n)/3 and since a(n) is rising, so does a(n+1)-a(n).
    But by the definition of the limit, a series can't converge if the difference between its consecutive values becomes greater and greater. So the series diverges. And since it's rising, its limit must be +inf.
    Last method, even quicker:
    The answer was on your tee-shirt from the beginning.

  • @brunoporcu3207
    @brunoporcu3207 10 місяців тому

    Sorry, I dont understand the equal. If I delete that terms it shouldn't just be major?
    Thank you so much

  • @weslinpenacamacho1075
    @weslinpenacamacho1075 10 місяців тому

    I really like this exercise, thanks

  • @cliffordabrahamonyedikachi8175
    @cliffordabrahamonyedikachi8175 9 місяців тому +2

    You are doing well.

  • @isidorolorenzo802
    @isidorolorenzo802 10 місяців тому +1

    Just a smooth remark, my dear friend. It's a matter of notation: as infinity is not a number (except in the dual space), you can't stand a limit equal to infinity but tending to infinity. 😏👍

    • @joaomane4831
      @joaomane4831 21 день тому

      This is wrong. A limit can be equal to Infinity, that's the whole concept of a limit. Now the function itself or the sequence, must be approaching infinity and not be equal to Infinity due to the reasons you stated.

  • @GreenMeansGOF
    @GreenMeansGOF 6 місяців тому

    I usually use Stirling’s formula for these kinds if problems but this is better, especially if we have to prove the limit by definition.

  • @aguyontheinternet8436
    @aguyontheinternet8436 11 місяців тому +7

    I mean, imagine the fraction n!/(3^n). What does it equal, who knows, just needs to be greater than 0. Now look at the fraction when you increase n by 1
    (n!)/(3^n) * (n+1)(3)
    So for any n>3, this function will grow larger, making the limit infinity as n gets larger and larger.
    Edit: watching the video, that was the exact thing you took advantage of

  • @AbouTaim-Lille
    @AbouTaim-Lille 8 місяців тому

    The factorial function is stronger than any power function a^x ,a>1.
    It can be shown if we calculate the limit of I(n) = x(n)/x(n+1),were x(n) = n!/a^n, a>1.
    We have : I(n) = (n!/ a^n )/ (n+1)!/a^n+1 = n!/(n+1)!. a = a/n+1 -->0 when n-->∞. Which makes it easy to see that x(n) is strongly decreasing even for the large values of a.
    To be honest the product a^n. n! is compared with n^n.

  • @nicolas.montero4941
    @nicolas.montero4941 4 місяці тому

    you are the man

  • @kanizfatema6907
    @kanizfatema6907 11 місяців тому

    Sir , kindly make a full course on limit and calculas😢😢😢😢

  • @John-uo5tm
    @John-uo5tm 4 місяці тому

    Cool limit! For some real fun, replace the 3 with n. 😊

  • @davidcarras4743
    @davidcarras4743 11 місяців тому

    Another great video!

  • @مسعودکشاورز-ب2ص
    @مسعودکشاورز-ب2ص 6 місяців тому

    very very nice.

  • @vishalmishra3046
    @vishalmishra3046 8 днів тому

    You're multiplying an ever increasing large number to the numerator but matching it with just multiplying a 3 to the denominator. So, there is no limit to how big the numerator grows while denominator is just 3 more times of the previous denominator. So the result has to grow into positive infinity with no other choice.

  • @michaelstahl1515
    @michaelstahl1515 8 місяців тому

    Nice proof , really !

  • @saidnajarro
    @saidnajarro 6 місяців тому

    I love you!

  • @wes9627
    @wes9627 9 місяців тому

    Stirling's approximation states that ln(n!) is approximately equal to n*ln(n)-n
    Thus, ln(n!/3^n) is approximately n*ln(n)-n-n*ln3=n[ln(n)-1-ln3], which tends to ∞ as n→∞
    Therefore n!/3^n→∞ as n→∞

    • @timetraveller2818
      @timetraveller2818 9 місяців тому

      a neater answer would be to probably to prove Stirling's approximation and then write just as you would say but this is also beautifully elegant
      Edit:Just realized that I didn't write to prove.

  • @ayanahmed5114
    @ayanahmed5114 11 місяців тому

    is the factorial function differentiable

    • @davidg5898
      @davidg5898 11 місяців тому +4

      It is not. Only continuous functions are differentiable. The factorial function fails that test because it is only defined for integers (non-negative integers, specifically).
      You can do a bit of mathemagic to come up with something akin to what you're asking by taking the derivative of the gamma function (a continuous version of the factorial function) and evaluating it at integer values.

  • @guest2649
    @guest2649 4 місяці тому

    i just thought of it like
    3^n = 3*3*3..
    while as
    n! = 1*2*3*4*5..
    So as only 2 products are less than the 3^n product, n! would take over 3^n quite fast

  • @cameroncurtis7261
    @cameroncurtis7261 11 місяців тому +38

    Always remember, the only thing bigger than a factorial is another factorial 😅

    • @Cubowave
      @Cubowave 11 місяців тому +17

      Tetration: 👁️

    • @juergenilse3259
      @juergenilse3259 11 місяців тому +2

      I beg to differ: I think, the "ackermann function" is growing much faster than simple factorial ...
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ackermann_function
      😇

    • @btb2954
      @btb2954 11 місяців тому

      x^x

    • @taito404
      @taito404 11 місяців тому +4

      ​@@Cubowave Pentation🗿

    • @Cubowave
      @Cubowave 11 місяців тому +3

      @@taito404 septation: (idk if that exists)

  • @samyaksharma2550
    @samyaksharma2550 11 місяців тому

    ratio test is saviour

  • @roddos
    @roddos 8 місяців тому

    Great.

  • @dpmike32819
    @dpmike32819 11 місяців тому

    What about using the ratio test

    • @PrimeNewtons
      @PrimeNewtons  11 місяців тому +1

      Sadly, the topic this student was dealing with was limits. So I couldn't even mention Ratio test.

  • @anghme28ang11
    @anghme28ang11 23 дні тому

    6:49 why is the inequality like so, why can it be equal to

  • @juergenilse3259
    @juergenilse3259 11 місяців тому

    I would look at the cases wit n>6:
    n!/3^n=(1*2*3*3*5*6)/3^6*product(i)/product(3) i=7 to n
    Let C=(1*2*3*4*5*6)/3^6
    n!/3^n=C*product(i)/product(3) i=7 to n > C*product(6)/product(3) i=7 to n =
    C*product(6/3) i=7 to n = C*(6/3)^n = C*2^n
    So lim(n!/3^n) > lim(C*2^n) = C*li(2^n) = infinity
    As you can see, lim(n!/3^n) diverges at least as fast as C*lim(2^n) with some constant C>0. In the video, it was shown, that lim(n!/3^n) diverges faster than lim(1/27*n), but in fact, it diverges not only faster than a linear term, it diverges even faster than an exponential term with base larger than 1.

  • @bogusawsroda3747
    @bogusawsroda3747 9 місяців тому

    1:10 nice man

  • @dpmike32819
    @dpmike32819 11 місяців тому

    What about the ratio test? Easier

  • @bradfoster6092
    @bradfoster6092 11 місяців тому

    Hell yea!

  • @colina64
    @colina64 11 місяців тому

    COOL

  • @WillBillDillPickle
    @WillBillDillPickle 7 місяців тому +1

    Who else is here from O'leary's Infinite Series Sheet?

    • @mathbrah
      @mathbrah 7 місяців тому +1

      me lol

  • @vp_arth
    @vp_arth 9 місяців тому

    That limit is just 2 * (3/3) * (4/3) * (5/3) * infinite serie of more than one members

  • @chendingbang1536
    @chendingbang1536 11 місяців тому

    stirling approximation!

  • @anghme28ang11
    @anghme28ang11 23 дні тому

    Also doesnt diverge not mean infinity

  • @jam9339
    @jam9339 11 місяців тому

    ♾️

  • @FrancisHealy-w9f
    @FrancisHealy-w9f 11 місяців тому +1

    This is so obvious. How could this take more than ten seconds? Let fsubn(n) = (n/3) * fsubn-1). This clearly diverges as n gets big.

  • @ivandeneriev7500
    @ivandeneriev7500 11 місяців тому

    X!=840 how to solve (not graphically)

    • @rubixmc7320
      @rubixmc7320 11 місяців тому

      Use the gamma function. It is an integral, so you’ll need to look it up. Γ(n) = (n-1)! So just solve Γ(n+1) = 840

    • @Yougottacryforthis
      @Yougottacryforthis 10 місяців тому

      No solution

  • @koenigtiger6550
    @koenigtiger6550 4 місяці тому

    Ну это очень простая задача.
    Я её решил за несколько секунд в уме.

  • @swampfolk2526
    @swampfolk2526 9 місяців тому

    Ну вообще этот предел очевиден без просмотра видео. Факториал каждым следующим N домножает на N предыдущий результат, а знаменатель каждое следующее N домножается на 3. очевидно что при бесконечности множитель будет последний как бесконечность деленная на 3, что есть бесконечность. Т.е. предел бесконечный очевидно.

  • @maciejterakowski9062
    @maciejterakowski9062 8 місяців тому

    I need 3 sec. to find the result

  • @ubiraceelihimas
    @ubiraceelihimas 8 місяців тому

    esta muito rápido sem explicar

  • @dmihovilovic
    @dmihovilovic 9 місяців тому

    This looks too complicated.....n! is n(n-1)(n-2)....*1, therefore for a very large n,, n! will look like n^n. Then n!/3^n = n^n/3^n = (n/3)^n that tends to infinity when n tends to infinity.

  • @arolimarcellinus8541
    @arolimarcellinus8541 8 місяців тому

    why lots of limit problems need to assume that HS student passed their analysis class?? No one ever take mathematical analysis, but those limits problems force us to use it if we cannot use L'Hospital.
    Limit problems is the source of why students hate math. Because math teacher doesn't even teach analysis properly, especially in inequalities. Can you imagine how many students in the class that can make the inequality postulate (n!)/3^n >= (1*2*n)/(3*3*3)?? I can bet my 100 bucks it will be less than 10 in regular classes.

  • @alfredopi8699
    @alfredopi8699 9 місяців тому

    SI può ottenere lo stesso risultato più velocemente sostituendo n! con la Formula di Stirling valida per "n grande"

  • @mathbrah
    @mathbrah 7 місяців тому +1

    Who else is here from O'leary's Infinite Series Sheet?