Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

A Case for Conspiracy with Dr. Cyril H. Wecht

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 чер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @SixthFloorMuseum
    @SixthFloorMuseum  4 роки тому +498

    Anyone using hate speech in the comments will be banned immediately. Keep it civil.

    • @michaelivey1087
      @michaelivey1087 4 роки тому +51

      @JuanJulio Jamirez They just dont want any ideas or talk that contradicts the WC or any of the other govt "investigations." In my humble opinion.

    • @richiebcarric31
      @richiebcarric31 4 роки тому +201

      Define Hate speech...is that someone who strongly disagrees with something or someone??? Is it not true that Hate ,Racist , Homophobic or misogynist are banners thrown at people to shut them up,people who express critical opinion?? So what problem does the 6th Floor have with critical opinion....

    • @summer-west
      @summer-west 4 роки тому +9

      Mellow out man. See what you've done to Snaggle Toothed?

    • @michaelivey1087
      @michaelivey1087 4 роки тому +22

      Snaggle Toothed Spoken like a true democRAT! Can't figure out what you are trying to say! Confused? Yes you are!

    • @Bitterrootbackroads
      @Bitterrootbackroads 4 роки тому +102

      Define hate speech. Is it simply something you disagree with?

  • @kennethwallace1494
    @kennethwallace1494 25 днів тому +9

    Thank you Cyril for your amazing research through the years, so sad to hear of his passing at 93, the debates he had concerning the kennedy assassination, were some of the best ever, he will be sorely missed.

  • @FloydMaxwell
    @FloydMaxwell 2 роки тому +28

    Mr. Wecht was 86 years old when this was filmed. Love his fire. Gets right to it. Good stuff.

  • @keithashley6298
    @keithashley6298 2 роки тому +13

    I would like to thank Stephen Fagin for all these ‘Living History’ programmes, they are magnificent, Bravo Sir.

  • @jefferykaighin7039
    @jefferykaighin7039 2 роки тому +92

    I've watched this video at least 3 times and i have learned more from Dr Wecht in one hour than I did in 30 years of reading. I enjoy listening to intelligent professionals and he is 2nd to none! Thank you Dr Wecht!

    • @carlmcdonald8744
      @carlmcdonald8744 Рік тому +1

      couple of points. His alignment is not accurate as to how they were actually sitting. The were not even with each other. Connally was in fact sitting on what is called a jump seat that sat lower than Kennedy as well as more to the interior. Video taken of them in parade route shows this. Second, even forgetting if the single bullet had hit Kennedy, what is the explanation of all of Connally wounds. Sounds like he is saying that each of Connally's wounds had to be from separate bullets. How could that be? No one has ever mentioned hearing six shots and according to Wecht, that is how many shots there would have to have been. Two hit Kennedy, three hit Connally, and the one that missed. And has anyone showed paths of the bullets that hit Connally and where could have they came from without hitting Kennedy, who according to Wecht, was sitting directly behind Connally. It only stand to reason for Connally to have gotten hit, Kennedy would have too.

    • @djf750
      @djf750 Рік тому +1

      Wecht is an attention seeking KOOK

    • @davidarbuckle7236
      @davidarbuckle7236 2 місяці тому

      @@carlmcdonald8744 Connally is sitting right of JFK. JFK is hit (according to WR) in the back at the 3rd vertebrae.(bullet is moving from right to left) Connally is hit in the right armpit. The bullet has to travel upward to exit above Adam's apple and then make a hard right turn to hit Connally in the rib at his right armpit and then shatter his right wrist. Of course, there were more bullets. The Bodies are not the only evidence. There is the witness testimony of Nurse Phyllis Hall who claimed over 10 years ago that she SAW A BULLET in Trauma Room #1. And of course, Dr. Shaw claimed after 4 hours of surgery on Connally that the bullet that hit him was still in his LEFT THIGH at the time of his remarks. That would mean it could NOT BE #399.

    • @davidarbuckle7236
      @davidarbuckle7236 2 місяці тому

      @@djf750 "Attention seeking Kook," Says every WR Apologist who thinks they can explain the Forensic Evidence when they absolutely are not qualified to do so.

    • @djf750
      @djf750 2 місяці тому

      @@davidarbuckle7236 wecht didn't even know how they were sitting in the car as explained in previous comment.
      There was no conspiracy, all EVIDENCE points right to Oswald and Oswald ALONE.
      We go by evidence, NOT motives.

  • @brokenarrow8003
    @brokenarrow8003 6 років тому +500

    Congratulations to the 6th floor museum for finally giving "conspiracy theory" researchers the chance to present. Dr. Wecht is one of the best. His passion stems from a deep anger at what was done to our country. If he's a loon we need a lot more loons. Our country is at danger of being unlawfully manipulated today, just as it was in 1963.

    • @pathealey277
      @pathealey277 5 років тому +28

      No. You are late to the party. This is an ongoing problem. It is real. And it is happening NOW

    • @marksesl
      @marksesl 5 років тому +17

      He IS a loon, and the last thing we need is more like him.

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 5 років тому +48

      Sorry the loons are those with their head buried in the sand that refuse to acknowledge the obvious conspiracy! A 100 times over too in every aspect-Grassy Knoll-Dealey Plaza-Parkland Hospital-Bethesda Hospital. Every single witness who either was adamant or implied would have to be beyond a reasonable doubt wrong.... Too ridiculous for words, since many of those witnesses were experts in their field and corroborated!

    • @donaldleavy4379
      @donaldleavy4379 5 років тому +23

      Broken Arrow it is fbeing unlawfully manipulated as we speak.. it has been since the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.. 11/22/63 is when we lost the last Man that was gonna. Trash the dark Government...

    • @patrickvirgo7860
      @patrickvirgo7860 5 років тому +2

      Pascal

  • @markdiorio468
    @markdiorio468 5 років тому +328

    I love it when Dr. Weght gets pissed and starts cursing. Such a passionate man. Thank you for all your work, doc.

    • @kurtgreenwood5441
      @kurtgreenwood5441 5 років тому +6

      An angry dude with no manners whatsoever that curses when people aren't following and believing his lies alright ;-)
      Was he in the autopsy room in Dallas?
      No
      Have a nice one!

    • @theajones6080
      @theajones6080 4 роки тому +18

      @@kurtgreenwood5441 you're stupidity is funny!

    • @kurtgreenwood5441
      @kurtgreenwood5441 4 роки тому +5

      @@theajones6080 Coming from a person that has 4 teeth left and that cleans floor in a McDonald as a living, now that's funny! ;-)
      No school, no brain ...

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 4 роки тому +12

      @@kurtgreenwood5441 -That's a good name for a smarmy Conspiracy Denier-Donald Troll!

    • @bradleysmall2230
      @bradleysmall2230 4 роки тому +20

      @@kurtgreenwood5441 there was no autopsy in dallas you troll- at least on kennedy

  • @butterflygirl2285
    @butterflygirl2285 2 роки тому +26

    Mr. Wecht is so intelligent, but hilarious the way he expresses himself. He is a national treasure.

  • @jessecoder5967
    @jessecoder5967 2 роки тому +20

    Haven't seen the doctor for a long time. It's good to know that he's still on the case.

  • @edmerritt8610
    @edmerritt8610 3 роки тому +338

    This guy is a National Treasure! His passion is unmatched!

  • @BG-qo8ol
    @BG-qo8ol 2 роки тому +265

    He nailed it when he said , When you screw up in America , you BS your way out of it.

    • @terry4137
      @terry4137 2 роки тому +4

      All countries do! Smfh

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 2 роки тому +11

      Yeah America has no Monopoly on bulshit.

    • @jdorritie
      @jdorritie 2 роки тому +4

      Maybe the problem is "countries" in the first place.

    • @kimburnersackmann8829
      @kimburnersackmann8829 2 роки тому +2

      @@bobbytookalook rummy

    • @julianciahaconsulting8663
      @julianciahaconsulting8663 2 роки тому +9

      up here in Canada when you screw up you just deny everything no matter how damming and conclusive the evidence is...just deny deny deny....never resign...just keep on doing that until the news focus shifts to a new story and then you are off the hook

  • @lisadellaratta495
    @lisadellaratta495 2 роки тому +25

    I really enjoy watching this video a few times a year. I was at Dealy Plaza earlier this year and the 6th Floor Museum was sold out the day I was there but I was blessed enough to come upon Robert Groden and his lovely wife!!! I bought his book for my father who was 21 when JFK was assassinated and served 3 tours in Vietnam and has a passion for the JFK assassination. What an amazing story he has! Nice to hear you mention him in this video. He and I even spoke about you and your work on the subject. Thank you for your knowledge and videos. I hope my generation (I'm 48) appreciates you and the others that have given up so much to kept this story alive. It is still so relevant today and we can not forget to keep searching for the truth.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      Groden happily opining away in his lie-filled book that Tippit, a respected and decorated police officer who gave his life in the cause of his duty, was himself a conspirator and accessory to murder and treason, without a shred of evidence and utterly uncaring how much pain and distress his words would cause Tippit's widow and children, was obscene, irresponsible and beneath contempt.

    • @lebeautymarq8834
      @lebeautymarq8834 2 роки тому

      @@aaronz7056 Quit trying to fool people with the fake outrage Mr Z. You’re the same guy who said that you found victims deaths hilarious and firmly stated that Oswald pulled the trigger with his cheek!

  • @sherryirbvin7448
    @sherryirbvin7448 2 роки тому +12

    Love this man. Honest and loyal as we all should have been...

  • @andrewcharley1893
    @andrewcharley1893 4 роки тому +75

    Thank you to the sixth floor museum for allowing this alternative presentation.

    • @johnrogan9420
      @johnrogan9420 3 роки тому +1

      Lol

    • @jacobjones5269
      @jacobjones5269 3 роки тому +3

      Well, considering he’s the only one out of dozens of expert forensic pathologists who believes this nonsense, I’d say “alternative” is not the correct terminology..

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 2 роки тому +8

      @@jacobjones5269 If you believe the HSCA Panel over Wecht there are no words for your gullibility. Wecht completely destroys the Warren Report. and The HSCA,which was even worse. Listen to the Presentation.

    • @jacobjones5269
      @jacobjones5269 2 роки тому +2

      @@vernpascal1531
      I’ve listened to Dr Hecht plenty of times.. The problem still remains, he’s the only expert involved in any panel to disagree with the official position.. One out of dozens..
      You can believe whatever you want, Vern.. Think how you want, follow any agenda you like… But don’t tell me how to think, because I’m fairly certain I know how to think.. lol.. And if it’s been 60 years and he’s still riding alone, then there’s a reason, trust me..

    • @jacobjones5269
      @jacobjones5269 2 роки тому +3

      @k martin
      There were 9 alone on the WC.. Over a dozen I believe on the HSCA.. And then there’s the Clark and Ramsay panels.. Plus others over the years..
      It’s in the public record, go find it.. I stand by what I said..

  • @picadillycreativeservices8235
    @picadillycreativeservices8235 3 роки тому +46

    The first time I saw dr. Wecht was in The Men That Killed Kennedy in 1988. Such a strong and powerful presentation back then. Now, 33 years later, still as convincing as ever. Thank you SFM for hosting him and allowing non-official voices to your stage.

  • @r.c.miller6161
    @r.c.miller6161 2 роки тому +22

    This fine, brilliant, truth-seeking man is a National Treasure.

  • @irataylor7102
    @irataylor7102 11 місяців тому +6

    a great prestation by a professional that says what he believes and sticks to many of us beliefs, We lived 85 miles South east of Dallas, My Grandfather had been diagnosed with T. he went to a hospital in Dallas on November 19th of 1963 , called my Mom and told her to come get him, he would not say why on the phone but told her he would explain when she picked him up. the next evening at dinner my Mom ask him if it would be ok to tell us why he was at home, he nodded and she told us that he had heard two interns talking in the break room about someone was going to shoot JFK in downtown Dallas , one had said oh like that depository, My Mom convinced him to tell the police what he had heard, but said he was scared but he did on Saturday 11/23/63. the deputy took his statement and told him they would pass it on to Dallas Police. we never heard another word whether they did or what.

  • @Garymayo
    @Garymayo 6 років тому +118

    Watched this again, and I dearly love and respect the work of Dr, Wecht and I wish him many years of good health in the future. Thank you Dr. Wecht.

  • @rickemmons7300
    @rickemmons7300 4 роки тому +356

    Mr. Wecht about 2 years ago, sent me an autographed photo of himself, because by request I wanted a signed picture from such a courageous knowlegeable pathologist that has established real truths concerning the murder of JFK. I honor the man and wish him well, always. Peace.

    • @general_burkhalter
      @general_burkhalter 4 роки тому +9

      LMAO what a pathetic loser you are.

    • @MooseCall
      @MooseCall 2 роки тому +25

      @@general_burkhalter You're projecting.

    • @OCRay1
      @OCRay1 2 роки тому +23

      @@general_burkhalter
      You are garbage. I’m positive though, that in your personal life you are well aware of this already from hearing something all those lines on a regular basis. Some sound advice - shut your mouth.

    • @pauldack5129
      @pauldack5129 2 роки тому

      0

    • @SearchBucket2
      @SearchBucket2 2 роки тому +6

      Funny how the other nine pathologists disagreed? And those since?
      Cyril Wecht has "dined out" on his conspiracy nonsense for 50 years. In that respect he's been smart. His "logic" is flawed because he doesn't seem to appreciate the nuances. However, a lone dissenting voice ALWAYS gets the most media attention, whether it be JFK stuff or Climate Change. The truth is boring; people want sensation.
      As a footnote have you ever wondered why Ronald Reagan's failed assassination didn't attract all this conspiracy twaddle? It didn't because it failed and a profound outcome was avoided. That's key to conspiracy thinking.

  • @balerjohnson3099
    @balerjohnson3099 2 роки тому +15

    Dr. Cyril H. Wecht has been a voice of reason and science for decades with regard to the Kennedy assassination ..I remember him from when I was a kid and very interested in the subject . Dr Wecht is now 90 years old and has done us all a great service .

  • @RK-ml2ns
    @RK-ml2ns 3 роки тому +23

    Dr Wecht is a pragmatic man, he deals with facts not theories.

  • @jeffsmith1798
    @jeffsmith1798 3 роки тому +162

    This talk is amazing. Dr. Wecht’s passion for the truth is inspiring.

    • @peterfraser9070
      @peterfraser9070 2 роки тому +2

      Watch this lying devious windbag get owned by the truth: @

    • @peterfraser9070
      @peterfraser9070 2 роки тому +4

      he's got a psychological need for conspiracy: @

    • @devinwatson4594
      @devinwatson4594 2 роки тому +2

      His passion for the truth is only bested by my own

    • @peterfraser9070
      @peterfraser9070 2 роки тому +3

      @@devinwatson4594 you mean your passion for conspiracy theories cuz they're more fun and in your heart u don't care about the truth; you're too lazy to read the reliable info.

    • @ElectricalExistence
      @ElectricalExistence 2 роки тому +1

      This boomer didnt find the truth. His theory isnt even offically accepted lol.

  • @svenben9868
    @svenben9868 2 роки тому +9

    I love watching speeches from Dr. Wech. He is so animated and relatable with how he talks, the words he chooses to use while describing other wise complicated scenes. Very entertaining with his slightly off base humor. I wish otger speakers spoke like the Dr.

  • @johnnycash1365
    @johnnycash1365 2 роки тому +27

    I just want to know how Oswald went from being the worst shot in the world by missing, not just the target, but the whole frigging car, which is the size of a small boat, at it's closest point, to being the best shot in the world by getting a head shot at the furthest point away!?

    • @markschroeder738
      @markschroeder738 2 роки тому +3

      Yes, great point. The Tague bullet missed the entire car! I think it was a sound decoy.

    • @craigstanley3680
      @craigstanley3680 2 роки тому +4

      The first shot hit the street light sign almost directly below the 6th floor window. And if you don’t believe the video evidence of the hole in the sign light frame then it was nothing but good old “buck fever”. Have you ever had a huge deer or moose walk into your rifle sights?

    • @paulphillips684
      @paulphillips684 2 роки тому +3

      Exactly. And to think he apparently shot at General Walker sitting at a desk by the window and missed! Unbelievable

    • @craigstanley3680
      @craigstanley3680 2 роки тому +2

      @@paulphillips684 The shot fired at Walker hit the window framing and splintered.

    • @russe11pau1
      @russe11pau1 9 місяців тому +2

      The fact that it took 3 shots should tell you Oswald wasn't an expert marksman, otherwise it would have been one and done.

  • @patmelton43
    @patmelton43 3 роки тому +216

    Got to love this man's energy and passion. Exactly the way I feel.

    • @linanicolia1363
      @linanicolia1363 3 роки тому

      Unable to adjust to the changing of the times ? resists on promoting inaccurate versions of the past ? the opinion of one man is just that. What was in it for him ?

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 2 роки тому +7

      @@linanicolia1363 The opinion of most of the world Hullo! Hullo!

    • @sandranorman5469
      @sandranorman5469 2 роки тому +10

      He was the first medical professional to say that Kennedy did not get a proper autopsy. Bless his heart 💜.

    • @TELEVISIONARCHIVES
      @TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 роки тому +2

      Cyril H. Wecht is always chasing Conspicarys

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 2 роки тому +9

      @@TELEVISIONARCHIVES No the evidence screams conspiracy in all major aspects. If nutjob Oswald did this on his on there would be no question about the ballistics,forensics, Chain Of Possession... the fundamental evidence doesn't add up or was tampered with to add up.

  • @alechamid235
    @alechamid235 6 років тому +145

    I could listen to this doctor all day long.

    • @johnorosz7477
      @johnorosz7477 3 роки тому +8

      Hard to believe that the great man retained his razor sharp intellect and passion at the age of 86

    • @saksoskunk
      @saksoskunk 2 роки тому +3

      Bro I see you just blatantly plagiarizing comments out here

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому +1

      Poor u.

    • @KRIPP548
      @KRIPP548 2 роки тому

      @@goodgood9955 A.I. comments all abound. LOL

    • @kujo5998
      @kujo5998 2 роки тому +1

      @Alec Hamid Thats scary.. You REALLY dont see thru ANY of his BS? Claiming the docs “didn’t notice a bullet hole in his neck?” Thats not what happened. They had been told he had a tracheotomy..
      This guy is lying POS..

  • @frederickallegri3993
    @frederickallegri3993 2 роки тому +3

    Dr. Wecht is a VERY CAPTIVATIING Speaker. I really Enjoyed what he had to say.

  • @lindadepew7652
    @lindadepew7652 2 роки тому +6

    I have so much respect for Dr. Wecht. His honesty on autopsy reports is beyond reproach. I'm glad we have such a man with so much integrity!!

    • @rockintetster
      @rockintetster Рік тому

      Then you respect renegade lunacy. Please educate yourself properly on the JFK assassination and disregard this colossal blowhard.

    • @matthewosburn
      @matthewosburn Рік тому

      he is a liar and a fraud. Seriously go look at the Warren Commission report. pp88: "Lt. Col Pierre Finck, chief of the wound ballistics pathology for armed forces institute of pathology who has had extensive experience in over 400 cases illustrated the characteristics of the bullet wound" There is NO mention of this man anywhere in this presentation. Wecht is a total quack....but you are free to live in a room full of mirrors if you want.

  • @tommyg2966
    @tommyg2966 6 років тому +75

    Cyril Wecht. .... it's good to see you haven't lost your passion . The first time I heard you speak on the Kennedy debacle was in my living room. You were regaling my father preparing for your congressional testimony against the findings of the Warren Commission. I was fascinated with your logic and how animated you became about the acoustical proof of multiple shooters. Little did I know how much you would influence me later in life ......

  • @squareleg5757
    @squareleg5757 5 років тому +63

    First Class. Thank you, Sixth Floor Museum and Doctor Wecht.

  • @boTCavalry
    @boTCavalry Рік тому +4

    Had to weave through 3 warnings to get here.
    Stunned that the Sixth floor invited him.

  • @montydaniels1054
    @montydaniels1054 Рік тому +1

    Nice to see that the 6th floor allowed Dr Wecht to speak. What I like about Dr Wecht is, he always gives his audience logical truth about the medical side of the assassination. No one can say anything bad about him, No One.... Thanks for having Dr Wecht as a speaker...

  • @filmnoir50
    @filmnoir50 5 років тому +95

    Bless this brilliant man! He's so vital and speaks with the same level of passion, after all these years. I have such respect for him and his work to expose the truth about this heinous crime.

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 4 роки тому +4

      Amen! None so blind as those who don't want to see,hear, or think!

    • @jameslayne2985
      @jameslayne2985 3 роки тому

      @@vernpascal1531 I'm sure you don't see the irony of your statement.

  • @edrowland4614
    @edrowland4614 3 роки тому +31

    Fantastic, very well done. Factual and honest. He knows more than almost anyone about this subject and he deals with facts, evidence and the truth.

    • @scod9746
      @scod9746 2 роки тому +1

      Yes this video needs to be viewed more times than the videos that push the official theory that makes less and less sense over time as more and more evidence becomes public. Sad how many true stories have been lost because they were suppressed.

  • @timothydrumm2846
    @timothydrumm2846 10 місяців тому +2

    We may never know all the details....but so thankful that Dr. Wecht is active in search of answers!

  • @RCButterfly
    @RCButterfly 2 роки тому +1

    I could listen to Dr. Wecht talk all night long. He is very eloquent and methodical in his reasoning and his expertise is unmatched. The only other person I can think of who has a similar manner is the late great Jim Marrs. RIP Mr. Marrs!

  • @daddysgirl5049
    @daddysgirl5049 2 роки тому +17

    Huge respect for Dr. Wecht.

  • @moggridge1
    @moggridge1 5 років тому +71

    I feel that whether one agrees with "the sweary Doc", or not, his presentation is riveting.
    Kudos to the museum for having him lecture.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому +2

      I disagree with the doc, but I have to agree with you.

    • @butterflygirl2285
      @butterflygirl2285 2 роки тому

      @@goodgood9955 Out of curiosity what is your theory on the Kennedy assassination? Thanks.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому +1

      @@butterflygirl2285 WC made some errors and autopsy was a disaster, but now I agree with the WC that it was Oswald alone. I did think it was a conspiracy at one time, then I actually read the report as well as Case Closed and Reclaiming History, as well as websites dedicated to borh the conspiracy theory and lone assassin theory. I have Jim Marr's Crossfire, though I've read only bits of it.

    • @insertnamehere313
      @insertnamehere313 2 роки тому

      @@goodgood9955 The House Select Committee says and I quote" The House Select Committee finds evidence of a limited conspiracy in the assassinationofJFK" but there's no conspiracy people say also Oswald didn't fire a single shot according to the 3 separate different pariphine/nitrate tests on his face,neck,arms and hands that expert's say was impossible for as many shots Oswald allegedly fired and the time he had after firing those shots and the WC says in volume 1 of the WC report that the commission can alter,change testimony and evidence of witnesses to clarify witnesses testimony as it see fits and that should be illegal like it is in any other court case in America and by law doesn't hold prejudice or exceptions just for the murder of a president that allowes you to be above the laws and constitutional laws and rights.

  • @paulablevins6357
    @paulablevins6357 2 роки тому +86

    Love Dr Wecht! And I stand 100% behind him that the Warren commission is nothing but flash & bang, straight up BS! The Drs passion hits home for me, as does his colorful language. He is one of the (few) GOOD guys. A true blue Patriot.

    • @peterfraser9070
      @peterfraser9070 2 роки тому

      But you haven't even read the WR, so you don't have a clue what it really says.

    • @williamwhitten7820
      @williamwhitten7820 2 роки тому +2

      @@peterfraser9070, How do you know that Paula didn't read the Warren Report? I read the report, it is simply fiction, just like Wecht says. I had to read it at the Ontario Library in Ontario California when I was young. They didn't allow it to be checked out, so I had to go in and read it on sight there. It took me a week and a half, taking notes.
      If you really believe that Humes and Boswell had any idea of what they were doing you are kidding yourself.

    • @peterfraser9070
      @peterfraser9070 2 роки тому

      @@williamwhitten7820 Even if the autopsy was incomplete o badly-done, that's a far cry from being a 'cover-up' for a conspiracy. The X-rays and photos were ok, and prove his back entry wound was absolutely above the front exit wound, and they also prove he was hit once from behind in the upper back of the head and the exit was right top of his head. The Parkland doctors agreed with those autopsy results and Z Film also shows the same head wound. Criticism of the Single Bullet Conclusion and claims of '2nd shooters' are total bs with no credibility to them. Wecht knowingly misrepresent the WR findings, which of course were not 'fiction' but fact.

    • @williamwhitten7820
      @williamwhitten7820 2 роки тому +1

      @@peterfraser9070, There is no reason to argue with you Mr.Fraser. I have studied the JFK assassination for more than 50 years. I am absolutely positive that Kennedy was killed in a coup d'etat on November 22, 1963. Look up Col Fletcher Prouty on UA-cam. Pay attention to his information. I don't need to argue with you, the facts of the case speak for themselves.
      Do not address me here again.

    • @peterfraser9070
      @peterfraser9070 2 роки тому

      @@williamwhitten7820 Well, over 50 years of believing in conspiracy doesn't make it true. I think you've been lied to and you continue to believe the bs. It seems to be more about a grudge against the government than anything, which ironically is at least partly why Oswald probably did it. But, as you say, there is no reason to argue. Let's agree to disagree.

  • @julianciahaconsulting8663
    @julianciahaconsulting8663 2 роки тому +117

    Just the fact that the Warren Commission turned down Jack Ruby's offer to talk to them twice is enough to throw a great stain on the credibility on their investigation. Like how could you not want to hear what Ruby had to say? unbelievable.

    • @adamredfield
      @adamredfield 2 роки тому +7

      @Julian Ciaha The Warren Commission DID interview Ruby, more than once in fact. One of these was a polygraph exam, which Ruby insisted on.

    • @gritslogan1565
      @gritslogan1565 2 роки тому +6

      So true. Ruby and Oswald knew each other and were seen together in ruby's club. Ruby silenced Oswald to insure the lone nut theory that was planned by the assassins.

    • @adamredfield
      @adamredfield 2 роки тому +6

      @@gritslogan1565 Zero credible evidence to support that. And, to repeat, the WC DID interview Ruby. More than once.

    • @ascott4606
      @ascott4606 2 роки тому +10

      I think that you need to look into who steered the Warren commission. (Jfk sacked the guy for a bloody good reason) America sat back and watched its own government murder a sitting president. The fact that files where sealed for 50 years should be a slight clue what happened! Incidentally the fbi where trying to get information about the corona virus facts and figures buried for 50 years should be ringing the same warning bells! huge hint, there's a bloody big difference between dying from covid and dying with covid after being "tested" after death. With a 60k bonus going to the hospital and doctors ⅞ of the covid deaths are bs.

    • @adamredfield
      @adamredfield 2 роки тому +3

      @@ascott4606 I assume you are referring to Allen Dulles. He didn’t “steer” the commission but he was on it and LBJ never should have included him on the commission. Still, that has nothing to do with Oswald’s obvious guilt. As for some files being sealed for 50 years, well it is way past 50 years now and nothing in those now unsealed files have provided evidence to contradict Oswald’s obvious guilt. Nor does anything you wrote about Covid change Oswald’s obvious guilt.

  • @davidsanderson5918
    @davidsanderson5918 3 роки тому +67

    LOVE this man's PASSION when the presentation gets going. He reminds me of George Carlin!! He is right to be outraged given his expertise and we should be outraged too.
    People keep secrets if their life is endangered should they not.

    • @FUNKINETIK
      @FUNKINETIK 3 роки тому +6

      Passion all the way, you only get that with honesty and integrity.

    • @eameece
      @eameece 2 роки тому

      you can be passionately wrong, like Oswald was when he was lying at the police station. Carlin did not pretend to be fully accurate in what he said; comedy involves exaggeration.

    • @Autshot20
      @Autshot20 2 роки тому

      @@eameece Oswald was lying? About what exactly? The WC provides no motive. No one was ever found who could confirm Oswald ever spoke badly of JFK. So if the motive was that he wanted to make a name for himself, why spend two days denying it? If he was lying at the police station when he said he was just a patsy, then he did it and if he did it because of wanting to become known, why wouldn't he take credit for it?

    • @eameece
      @eameece 2 роки тому

      @@Autshot20 criminals are liars. Mr. Epstein said on the frontline doc, that Oswald lies mainly about his ownership of the rifle. Of course every time he denied the charges and said he was a patsy, he lied. He denied the charges to keep attention on himself. Certainly that denial worked better to be known than taking credit for his deed. We're still talking about him, aren't we? His motive was to strike out at and bring down USA capitalism and kill a chief enemy of his hero Castro, which JFK was. His occupation was guerilla fighter for Castro; he wanted to impress him. That's why he went to Mexico to apply to go to Cuba and showed his background as an activist, spy and fighter. That's all written down. He gave the militant salute at the police station. Motive is not enough basis for knowing who killed Kennedy. The facts, and science, are what matters. It is an open and shut case. Oswald did it, and there's no evidence of any conspiracy. Remember too he only decided to kill JFK after seeing a day and a half before that he would pass right under him, and he went to Marina's and Ruth's house to get his rifle Thursday night, and Marina refused to move back with him that night, so he decided to take the rifle and do it the next day. It was a quick decision he made, and he needed no help to do the crime.

    • @eameece
      @eameece 2 роки тому

      @@Autshot20 Oswald certainly knew he was guilty, as the pattern of his lies showed, according to the police as told on the Frontline doc. He left so many clues including pictures of himself with the rifle and leaving so much evidence behind that it's as if he wanted to get caught. After shooting the policeman he knew he was dead meat. He just played innocent as a stunt to get attention and play a game with the police to make them prove the case, which they did. Most criminals make the authorities prove their case; that's the normal pattern, according to the Dallas police as testified on the Frontline doc.

  • @tombalaam56
    @tombalaam56 3 роки тому +13

    Dr Wecht is a brilliant man - intelligent, skillful and incredibly passionate. I listened to this lecture and discussion absolutely enthralled. How anyone can seriously still believe the findings of the Warren Commission after watching this, is astonishing, and all I can say is, they are utterly deluded. Thank you Dr Wecht, a brilliant man.

    • @kevinlewis9151
      @kevinlewis9151 2 роки тому +1

      The believe because they made it so long with so much fluff knowing no one had time to truly read it. They wasted our money and lied to us just like government always does.

  • @Lucas.formanek
    @Lucas.formanek 2 місяці тому +1

    one of the most beautiful, informative and independent interviews i´ve watched from SixthFloorMuseum. very well spent time listening and watching this episode. thanks Stephen and Dr. Wecht, enjoyed every moment of it. :)

  • @HammerLex77
    @HammerLex77 2 роки тому +3

    My son and I are planning to visit Dallas in 2023.
    I’ll be keeping everything crossed that he will be there. I would dearly love to shake his hand and thank him for his research and passion surrounding the JFK assassination.

  • @Jeffrey.Seelman
    @Jeffrey.Seelman 5 років тому +223

    Thank You so much for caring Dr. Wecht. You are a true patriot.

    • @51Dss
      @51Dss 4 роки тому +1

      @Shane Brennan you're the perv

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +4

      If he cared he would admit he wrong about his theory but that would be bad business for his speaking tours

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +2

      @@51Dss you notice when he gets to the big lies he gets real loud like were supoose to believe his bullshit because he gets loud the moderator knows hes full if it but he has to be politically correct

    • @qanommonsense2753
      @qanommonsense2753 4 роки тому +3

      @@randyharris3175 I will give him credit for his effort. But even he is operating with insufficient information to reach the truth of the matter. If he had known about the bullet hole in the windshield immediately before Kennedy grabbed his throat then he would of realized that the first wound to the throat came through the windshield and hit Kennedy in the throat making a small entry bullet wound above the necktie knot. That bullet, exited through his back by the shoulder blade leaving the posterior bullet hole by the right shoulder blade shown here at 45.12. At least part of the emergency room responders had to be a part of the coverup. The conspirators had to be sure Kennedy died, and the participating doctors had to attempt to make sure the injuries were consistent with the head shot. The wound in the throat was out of the narrative, and had to be disguised by performing an tracheostemy on what was obviously already a dead man.

    • @qanommonsense2753
      @qanommonsense2753 4 роки тому +5

      @@randyharris3175 You apparently have not fully investigated this case or; you know of what Dr Wecht says is true and makes logical deductions and your job is to minimize and confuse what is being revealed here.

  • @BabyBoomerChannel
    @BabyBoomerChannel 3 роки тому +59

    Thank you for posting this. The Dr has been a vocal proponent of the truth and it’s so important his full discussion be captured for posterity.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому +2

      Unfortunately he is not in possession of truth.

    • @djf750
      @djf750 2 роки тому +1

      the guy is an egotistical KOOK. He doesn't even know how JFK and Connolly were seated in the car.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому +1

      @@djf750 he knows, but lies about it. He is probably a Marxist. It suits his ideology if people think there is a 'they' behind the scenes controlling everything. So, the solution is for the people to rise up and overthrow the government and the 'enabling' system so that his ilk can take over.

  • @anthonyvaughan6470
    @anthonyvaughan6470 2 роки тому +1

    WORTH WATCHING TO THE END !

  • @ericbaker9688
    @ericbaker9688 2 роки тому +4

    Boy I bet he has some personal stories that would put you on your heels for hours. Always fun and a pleasure to watch this guy rather you believe in his theories or not..

  • @justanotherperson584
    @justanotherperson584 3 роки тому +30

    This is us!!! He is the best. Thank you so much for informing me. Your brilliant, good job standing your ground. I love his passion and the Warren sham gets him all fired up and I love that.

  • @grahamt33
    @grahamt33 3 роки тому +251

    Hard to believe that the great man retained his razor sharp intellect and passion at the age of 86

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому +6

      "the great man"
      He was a lying piece of shit .... The wounds ballistic community accepts the SBT .... NOW KNOWN AS THE SINGLE BULLET FACT !
      Wecht repeats all the old worm eaten notions that most critical thinkers have disgarded decades ago .... AS A BULLET SLOWS GOING THROUGH 2 PEOPLE IT CAN RETAIN ENOUGH VELOCITY TO BREAK BONES BUT NOT DEFORM THE BULLET ....
      PRETTY SIMPLE CONCEPT UNLESS YOUR AGENDA AND LIVILIHOOD DEPENDS UPON A CON-SPIRACY IN JFK'S DEATH PRIOR TO LOOKING AT ANY EVIDENCE ....
      DINGDINGDING$$$

    • @grahamt33
      @grahamt33 3 роки тому +13

      @@thomaslowery2380 You are, of course, entitled to your view. Would you please cite just 1 published source for your view, together with that person's professional qualifications ? Of course there is more than bullet deformation to the "magic bullet" thesis and that is it's trajectory through Kennedy and Connolly. Again, please cite a published source for that view together with that authors professional qualifications. Lastly, please cite a published source explaining how that completely pristine bullet was found on Connolly's hospital stretcher. Thank you very much and I await, with interest, your reply....

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому

      @@grahamt33 "please cite"
      Wikipedia is another good source , as is TWCR (The Warren Commission Report) .... They HSCA The House Select Committee on Assassinations ....

    • @grahamt33
      @grahamt33 3 роки тому +2

      @Thomas Lowery will you please send your reply direct to me below -I can only read part when I click the bell icon. Thank you

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому +2

      @@grahamt33
      "trajectory thru JFK/GovJC"
      PBS Nova , Dale Myers, TWCR, Dr. John K. Lattimer, The HSCA, Dr. John Nichols and many more have verified The SBTheorys tract thru both men .... That's a no-brainer slamdunk !

  • @jimmyrice598
    @jimmyrice598 5 місяців тому +1

    I was in the sixth-grade and my teacher Dr. Keith Driver at Shorewood elementary school announced that "President Kennedy had been shot" I asked what happened and Mr. Driver just shook his head, we began to cry!

  • @davidarbuckle7236
    @davidarbuckle7236 Рік тому +1

    Such a great man. So glad he was there to make the real evidence clear to us laymen who wanted desperately to know the truth.

  • @colleenmonfross4283
    @colleenmonfross4283 2 роки тому +22

    Love Dr. Wecht! Finally, someone with some damn sense!

  • @bgmeadows6085
    @bgmeadows6085 6 років тому +41

    Wow! Dr. Wecht is 86 and going strong. Like many of the other commenters, I admire Dr. Wecht's enthusiasm, passion, and sincerity. I was raised to "respect women and old people," as such, I can't bring myself to criticize or speak disparagingly of Dr. Wecht.

    • @adriannewton6688
      @adriannewton6688 6 років тому +4

      Wow, what a nothing burger statement. I'm pretty sure Dr Wecht can hold his own and is more than willing to enter into discussion based on mutual respect. I'm sure he can cope with critism when backed up by facts.
      It seems obvious from your statement that you hold a bardbed tongue, so best not out yourself as nothing but a mouthpiece.

    • @fk8118
      @fk8118 5 років тому +1

      BG Meadows Amen

    • @carlkolchak4437
      @carlkolchak4437 4 роки тому +1

      @@adriannewton6688 Amen

  • @hlshancken9219
    @hlshancken9219 2 роки тому +3

    The most important about the doctor in the context of this subject and the conclusions that he draws is that he went to the Soviet Union in 1973. He is a very skillful and clever man

  • @brianpress3337
    @brianpress3337 2 роки тому +52

    I love Dr Wecht s passion in disecting the whole Kennedy Assassination, from the rediculous Warren Commission s version of what happened, to the so called reason Jack Ruby had for killing L. H. Oswald.
    Dr. Wecht goes straight for the jugular vein, laying everything out on the table in exposing how weak The Warren Commission s conclusion is or was in their estimation. 👍

    • @Dubtee
      @Dubtee 2 роки тому +2

      Damn this is one hell of a thread.
      Might I add, I can't understand what the man is talking about because he just keeps yelling about other nonsense.

    • @diegoverdegiglio3678
      @diegoverdegiglio3678 2 роки тому

      "ridiculous Warren Commission's version of what happened"? But is a joke? You really believe this?

    • @vickijohnson6125
      @vickijohnson6125 2 роки тому +2

      Dr Wecht is a true patriot!

    • @diegoverdegiglio3678
      @diegoverdegiglio3678 2 роки тому

      @@vickijohnson6125 😆😆😅😅🤣🤣😂😂

  • @jenniferlove4791
    @jenniferlove4791 5 років тому +30

    I am LIVING for Wecht’s passion...my Lord...we should ALL be this passionate about something!

    • @loudini2695
      @loudini2695 5 років тому +2

      I'm this passionate about making love to a beautiful woman 😘

    • @TELEVISIONARCHIVES
      @TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 роки тому +2

      He might be passionate but that doesn't make it right. Lots of crazy people talk this way

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 2 роки тому

      @@TELEVISIONARCHIVES No one is more qualified than Dr. Wecht to opine. Read his upcoming book...should be a doozy!

    • @TELEVISIONARCHIVES
      @TELEVISIONARCHIVES 2 роки тому

      @@vernpascal1531 LOL

    • @starlingballet6082
      @starlingballet6082 2 роки тому

      @@TELEVISIONARCHIVES
      SOUNDS INTOXICATED OR HIGH ON SOMETHING TO ME OR MANIC (?) JUST SAYI!N...U R RIGHT!!

  • @danielrichardcaprani9960
    @danielrichardcaprani9960 3 роки тому +10

    Dr Wecht, your passion and love for the truth, is way beyond the understanding of most people today, thank you for keeping it real. 🇬🇧🇺🇲🇬🇧💥

    • @FUNKINETIK
      @FUNKINETIK 3 роки тому +1

      But we understand. So much admiration for this man.

  • @marilynmcfann295
    @marilynmcfann295 2 роки тому +1

    The truth prevails. Wow-! His enthusiasm is awesome-!

  • @rhg3rd
    @rhg3rd 2 роки тому +6

    Huge respect for Dr. Wecht. What a life he has led.

  • @astridschlegel6884
    @astridschlegel6884 3 роки тому +50

    What an impressive man. The don't come any better than this. I'm on total awe of him

  • @paulaharrisbaca4851
    @paulaharrisbaca4851 7 років тому +46

    He's so enthusiastic, he comes across as a little goofy, but I LOVE DIS GUY!! I just love the enthusiasm and the style. I only hope I can be as excited about anything when I am his age.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 4 роки тому +1

      Do you also love Vincent Bugliosi?

    • @robertmoir-vj1kq
      @robertmoir-vj1kq 4 роки тому

      when you are my age Paula Harris Baca

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 3 роки тому +1

      @@goodgood9955 C'Mon Now Bugliosi is the opposite of Dr. Wecht. I can never forgive him for Reclaiming History.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 3 роки тому +1

      @@vernpascal1531 Most probably because you've never read it.

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому

      Paula Harris Baca
      "a little goofy"
      No he's alot Goofy .... He got wrong the following but not limited to :
      * SBT SINGLE BULLET THEORY
      MBT MAGIC BULLET THEORY
      SBF SINGLE BULLET FACT
      * THE HEAD SNAP
      * WHO WAS COMPLICIT IN THE ASSASSINATION
      * WHAT DIRECTION THE SHOTS CAME FROM
      * BLEW HIS REPUTATION DURING THE MENENDEZ BROTHERS RETRIAL BY REVERSING HIS PREVIOUS STAND ON PHYSICS
      * HE STAYED TOO LONG IN THE CRITICAL ASSASSINATION COMMUNITY AND HAD TO BE TOSSED INTO THE DUST BINS OF HISTORY
      * THE LIST HERE IS ALMOST ENDLESS ENDLESS THERE IS NO END ....
      * TO BE ANNOUNCED
      * TBA
      * TBA
      *
      *

  • @generationxpletive4622
    @generationxpletive4622 2 роки тому +4

    Just read Mark Shaws 3rd and final book, and he puts everything together along with Dorothy Kilgalen, M. Monroe and Bobby.. And while the two women were murdered for different reasons, Well, you'll see! and WOW! Dr. Wecht is SO DIFFERENT in a relaxed mode vs testifying!! Love this man!!

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому

      Kilgallen was not murdered. That's paranoid rubbish that makes no sense on any level.

    • @laurahill2959
      @laurahill2959 Рік тому +1

      MORE than one shooter remember??

  • @chrisgreene2623
    @chrisgreene2623 2 роки тому +3

    What a hell of a mind at his age, and the passion. If not a competent surgeon he could easily have also been a decent lawyer.

  • @vi841
    @vi841 4 роки тому +47

    Amazing break down!! I love Dr Cyril Wecht!!!! I watch everything he is on..a hero for sure and almost magical with his knowledge!! 🙏🙋‍♀️👏👏👏

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому

      Then you have a very poor knowledge of this event.

    • @flaviuteodorescu4916
      @flaviuteodorescu4916 2 роки тому

      good then... what is your point of view on this topic? I really would like to know

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому

      @@flaviuteodorescu4916 CW was one of 9 forensic pathologists on the HSCA. All other 8 agreed with the single bullet theory and that the head shot came from the rear and nothing from the grassy knoll, as per the WC report. This man believes so religiously in the conspiracy theory that he goes against his scientific training. His postulate is: if it's 'possible' then it MUST have happened that way. Sure, it's possible that there another gunman was involved BUT there is NO evidence for it. Regards.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 2 роки тому

      Magical for sure. He conjures up things which don't exist. E.g. the grassy knoll gunman that didn't hit anything and the throat exit bullet that did not hit GovCon but also didn't hit anything else in the limousine.

  • @CommercialZone2014
    @CommercialZone2014 5 років тому +125

    I love his passion. Bless you Dr. Wecht.

    • @gargould7186
      @gargould7186 4 роки тому

      He better take it easy, slow it down you're gonna give me a heart attack!!!

  • @maxthefacts
    @maxthefacts 2 роки тому +6

    Many thanks to all for this presentation. This man is a marvel. A national treasure.

  • @richardfinlayson1524
    @richardfinlayson1524 2 роки тому +1

    This subject deserves this sort of passion.

  • @maureensmith7829
    @maureensmith7829 4 роки тому +19

    I live in Piitsburgh and Dr. Cyril Wecht is one of the most knowledgeable, intelligent, hard working person ive ever seen. Ive had the pleasure of attending one of his lectures. The man is brilliant. I rarely vote Democrat. But him, always. I vote him the most interesting man alive. His integrity is unquestionable.

    • @general_burkhalter
      @general_burkhalter 4 роки тому +3

      He has no integrity, he's been lying about the Kennedy assassination for 50+ years now.

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому +2

      @@general_burkhalter "lying"
      You can say that again .... Wecht wouldn't know an assassin even if he got bit in the balls by one .... Crankpot on drugs .... Sounds like to me ....

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому +1

      Maureen Smith
      "His integrity is unquestionable"
      Really ?
      So pray tell do explain :
      The main thesis of his objections to the Warren Commission Report was that JFK's head couldn't go back and to the left if he was hit from behind "physically impossible he would scream and rant" ....
      Fast forward to the Menendes retrial, when pressed, couldn't weasel out, with his professional reputation and standing at stake as an expert witness, he stated just the opposite of what he been writing about and ranting about at lectures :
      "Unfortunately (for him) Newtonian physics is of little value when determining which way a body will fall when hit by a bullet"
      A 180 degree reversal of his stated position for 30 years previous ....
      Now that's a 24 karat phony ....
      "Integrity"
      You must be joking , Dr Wecht is the modern day equivalent of a carnival barker selling fake remedies out of a bottle
      Although he sells whatever people want to hear, even the poison of conspiracy ....
      The darling of conspiracy theories and theorists ....
      What possible excuse that you didn't read about this one which destroyed his credibility ....
      The answer is you had your head so far up the rear end of the conspiracy that it apparently didn't dawn on you that the man was a complete flake ....l

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому

      Maureen Smith
      "Hard working"
      He has been working hard salting away all that money from hapless Americans who buy into his bullsh*te .... Cares nothing about the truth, is willing to exonerate the guilty in order to incriminate the innocent ....
      Evil man in all respects !

    • @kenamaro3942
      @kenamaro3942 2 роки тому

      @@thomaslowery2380 ... don't you have a prescription to fill ?

  • @fifteenbyfive
    @fifteenbyfive 6 років тому +44

    Thank you Dr. Wecht

  • @jakefeisel7348
    @jakefeisel7348 2 роки тому +22

    Thank you for keeping the doctor's evidence and investigations in the forefront, there is other evidence that is out there that reveals the number of shooters as well as evidence of several missed shots.

  • @PinkFloyd28394
    @PinkFloyd28394 4 місяці тому +1

    Wasn’t the jump seat that the Governor was sitting in away from the door? So he wasn’t that close to the side like Kennedy.
    I absolutely love this! I share this video with everyone!

  • @Rocky-xx2zg
    @Rocky-xx2zg 3 роки тому +82

    Yes, The US Republic died on the Streets of Dallas on 11/22/1963

    • @longhairwhocares
      @longhairwhocares 3 роки тому +2

      I hear you, but consider this idea: it was never alive in the first place. I strongly urge you to have a look at the book "The Framers' Coup" by Michael Klarman. His thesis is basically that the US Constitution was an intentionally anti-democratic document from the outset, a right-wing reaction to the imperfect, flawed, but much more democratic Articles of Confederation. This book for me sorted out a lot of confusion I had about things like the JFK killing. Take a look at it! It's shocking.

    • @Rocky-xx2zg
      @Rocky-xx2zg 3 роки тому +3

      @@longhairwhocares I will. After all these years, the Murder left too many questions. Not pleased with the US Constitution? Which Country has a better 'Constitution' ? North Korea, Iran, China, ????

    • @whatsthebigfndeal
      @whatsthebigfndeal 3 роки тому +6

      I would suggest it died in 1913

    • @jimwednt1229
      @jimwednt1229 3 роки тому +2

      @@longhairwhocares , there was no "right wing" back in the 1700s . Right wing and left wing are a modern contrivance to describe the division of delegates in a meeting hall. Reps. Sat to the right of the isle and dems. Sat to the left . Lol
      The framers of the constitution knew only what they thought was right and what was wrong.
      They were mindful of historical records of failed governments, democracies falling into tyrannical rule and they set about to seperate the powers of the government to be .
      Morality was a basis of the constitution's strength. Christians inspired by a righteous cause received divine intervention which was the u.s.constitution .
      The framers themselves admitted they were confounded as what to write until after prayer for guidance.
      From the outset, secret combinations, or secret societies have sought to undermine the Republic. Freedom to choose for one's self , is what America 🇺🇸 offers .
      Secret combinations of powerful people offer only imposed rule and control . These groups are constantly chipping away at the Republic and infiltrating it .
      Good vs. Evil

    • @paulhatzenbuehler5661
      @paulhatzenbuehler5661 3 роки тому

      Yes, but don’t give up on hope!

  • @bobchamberlain4823
    @bobchamberlain4823 2 роки тому +33

    This fella is a legend, what a brave man, I salute you sir

    • @rexpositor6741
      @rexpositor6741 2 роки тому

      This is why he does it. Not for truth…but his own fame.

    • @bobchamberlain4823
      @bobchamberlain4823 2 роки тому +2

      Oh still watching cnn and the bbc are we?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @arneja
    @arneja 2 роки тому +5

    Man has a good memory. Remembers all the conversations word by word.

  • @homayounshirazi9550
    @homayounshirazi9550 2 роки тому +8

    I salute Dr. Wecht for his courage to come forward and to explain the improbability of "Single Bullet Theory." A notorious bullet that ziggs and zaggs to get both of these men. His passion for the truth is remarkable. He is a teacher to us all.

    • @goodgood9955
      @goodgood9955 Рік тому

      It did not zig or zag. Connelly sat 6 inches further in than JFK and below, AND he was turning after he heard the first shot. Prajectory works.

    • @carlmcdonald8744
      @carlmcdonald8744 Рік тому +1

      couple of points. His alignment is not accurate as to how they were actually sitting. The were not even with each other. Connally was in fact sitting on what is called a jump seat that sat lower than Kennedy as well as more to the interior. Video taken of them in parade route shows this. Second, even forgetting if the single bullet had hit Kennedy, what is the explanation of all of Connally wounds. Sounds like he is saying that each of Connally's wounds had to be from separate bullets. How could that be? No one has ever mentioned hearing six shots and according to Wecht, that is how many shots there would have to have been. Two hit Kennedy, three hit Connally, and the one that missed. And has anyone showed paths of the bullets that hit Connally and where could have they came from without hitting Kennedy, who according to Wecht, was sitting directly behind Connally. It only stand to reason for Connally to have gotten hit, Kennedy would have too.

  • @marmaly
    @marmaly 5 років тому +36

    I have always enjoyed listening to him. His passion for the subject has only grown over the years. The Q&A at the end is great.

  • @PtlRG1
    @PtlRG1 4 роки тому +47

    The good Doc speaks from the heart which also happens to be the truth. A great man

  • @sylvialeftin5094
    @sylvialeftin5094 2 роки тому

    AMAZING !!! Thank you!!

  • @njjeff201
    @njjeff201 16 днів тому

    Compelling information that we the citizens need to keep searching for the truth. And now that Mr. Wecht has passed it only makes us finding the truth more difficult. RIP Sir. Thank you for what you’ve done.

  • @dr.willyvan2116
    @dr.willyvan2116 4 роки тому +123

    Wecht is a combination of several Encyclopedia’s all in one gentleman.

    • @johnkru1295
      @johnkru1295 3 роки тому

      Getting old, like me. I believe his theory about the single bullet trajectory is wrong. Connelly was sitting low and to the right.

    • @greggates9823
      @greggates9823 3 роки тому

      @@johnkru1295 I'm

    • @nerradnosnhoj5122
      @nerradnosnhoj5122 3 роки тому

      several encyclopedias of dazzling crap

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 3 роки тому +4

      @@johnkru1295 The Single Bullet Theory is garbage..C'Mon.

  • @kingtriplebbb5347
    @kingtriplebbb5347 4 роки тому +27

    I'm so in tears 😢😪,thank God somebody remembers 🕵️‍♂️🕸💯

    • @brendarawlins9417
      @brendarawlins9417 3 роки тому +1

      I never believed when were the Warren commission came up with

    • @brendarawlins9417
      @brendarawlins9417 3 роки тому +1

      It was the biggest white wash in history and nobody in their right mind would have believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. Nothing would surprise me whether it be the FBI boba CIA or the secret service, but Lee Harvey Oswald was the Patsy and I think all three organisations were complicit. There was no other way to pull it off.
      Now there is an even bigger conspiracy.
      Did Trump lose by such a massive margin.
      Crooked voting machines, unfolded votes that look like they had come straight off a printing press. Observe is being thrown out and not allowed to observe the vote count. This 2 has been a gigantic conspiracy because the number of dead people on loan who have voted in this last election is truly outstanding and even the Supreme Court of the United States is not immune from criticism because it's simply sits there as impassive as Mount Rushmore and says, no need to investigate and nothing to see. 24k carat rolled gold lazy duplicitous judges.

    • @thomaslowery2380
      @thomaslowery2380 3 роки тому +2

      "I'm so in tears"
      Save your crocodile tears for someone who's worth the crying for .... If you believe anything this 24 karat phony has to say about the JFK Assassination read my post above .... Here's a man who puts profit above telling the truth in order to get to people what they want to hear by exonerating the guilty in order to incriminate the innocent .... So what do we have now in JFK's death after so many years of fruitless searching for an alternate history ? .... 2200 different conspiracy theories .... All mutually exclusive to one another and unless parallel universes were at work that day .... Conspiracy theorist proposed that JFK was killed by many different people, in many different way, all backef by many different entities, who all had many different agendas .... Not a very good way of defining history to say the least .... Cyril Wecht was one of the main driving forces behind The Great JFK Assassination Tragedy ConSpiracy Hoaxing that has now gone completely bankrupt by trivializing JFK's death into a political abstraction .... Unworthy of the man himself ....

    • @randibgood
      @randibgood 3 роки тому +1

      @@brendarawlins9417 Since you brought up all of this stolen election bullshit, I'm just going to give you some facts. The orange asshat lost. He is so hated in this country and was wanted to no longer be president by so many people, an unprecedented number of people came out to vote. And no, most of them didn't vote for him. As of 2/24/21 all of the court cases have been thrown out. No matter the outcome of his historic 2nd impeachment, he did incite the riot and attempted coup on 1/6/21. Just because his sycophantic Senate chose their party over their consciences, and didn't vote according to the evidence shown, he was still guilty of it and should actually be brought up on criminal charges. This ridiculous lie he has been spewing since 11/4/20 is as transparent as his empathy for the 500K+ citizens of this country who have perished because of his concern over the stock market instead of the people of this country he bled dry for 4 years. There was no widespread election fraud of any type. The only person guilty of conspiracy to commit election fraud was the grand lunatic himself. In case you missed it, he made a very IMPERFECT phone call to the secretary of state in Georgia. As I type this, there is a grand jury being assembled in Fulton County to finally bring him to account for one of his criminal acts. The only others who have been discovered connected with any type of election tampering or rigging of elections in the last 2 decades have all been REPUBLICANS. So all he has been doing is deflecting, projecting and trying to shift blame to the other side of the aisle. That's all he's done for the last 5 years, with the exception of the 308 times he played golf (1/20/17-12/30/20) which has cost the taxpayers of this country over $550,000 in guest cart rentals for the secret service alone, and doesn't include their accommodations for all of the overnight stays. With most of his golfing taking place at his properties, that translates in our money in his pockets. No wonder he didn't take the pittance of a salary the president makes. He's a joke and the vast majority of people in the United States can see through him and his constant lies and bullshit fantasies he espouses.

    • @chrisbrown8498
      @chrisbrown8498 3 роки тому

      So much information and suppositions...it becomes difficult to follow, but just in response to the 'single bullet theory', something here doesn't add up. Even besides the WC producing and accepting into record the 'bullet tests' which show no deformation of the 'bullet' that supposedly went through two chests and a wrist, striking multiple bones(???); there is the incongruency of the theory (single bullet) to begin with as presented here.
      On the next day, Bethesda is confronted with the 'exit' wound/hole in JFK's throat (facts are it entered the upper back and exited through the throat, therefore it was no longer in the President's body even from the time of the shooting), yet in response to not finding the exit wound nor the bullet and to the FBI coming forward with a bullet being found on or under 'a' stretcher, Bethesda tried to say that it must have fallen out by CPR efforts on the body ??? This was obviously before the 'single bullet' theory was proposed, but it adds nothing but more confusion to this presenter's narrative given that Bethesda made this statement before and because they failed to see the throat exit wound (after a tracheotomy was performed beforehand elsewhere).
      Was Connely brought in on a stretcher? Having the wounds he did, it is likely he was. And given that this 'found' bullet supposedly went through all it did, it may not have entered very deeply into Connely's thigh, and possibly could have fallen out. How serious was the wound on his thigh? Even in this presentation, which stretcher was the bullet found near is unclear, and he didn't address the extent of the thigh wound. If it could have been confirmed that it was found on the President's stretcher, then the whole 'shot sequence' comes into question.
      'Officially' and supposedly three shots were fired, and the first was a miss. That leaves the 'kill' shot (last) and the 'single bullet' that struck the two men. What point was there in the presenter's whole impossible 'CPR pushing the bullet out' theory, given the obvious confusion/incompetence at Bethesda and the timing of such a statement.
      This part of his presentation does nothing to support or deny any significant claim regarding a conspiracy, but apart from it, there remains significant questions regarding the 'found' bullet and its lack of deformation. In a case as significant as this, I would like to see a hundred bullets shot into selected targets each of ribs and cadaver wrists, to determine the extent or lack of deformation. It seems quite impossible for a bullet to not be deformed extensively after passing through what this bullet did.
      To all you who still care about this, good for you. It seems though that today, hardly anyone seems to really care about JFK or 911. Some even doubt the loyalty or patriotism of anyone who questions the incongruencies of these events as though trusting official government reports and findings is next to God (who they also seem to doubt). Justice for the dead in the form of the truth, is always patriotic.

  • @lousekoya1803
    @lousekoya1803 2 роки тому +1

    I love this man ! Thank you !

  • @sonofhawaii4227
    @sonofhawaii4227 10 днів тому

    Rest Peacefully Dr. Wecht. A man who NEVER held back and ALWAYS spoke out about all that he believed. The world was a much better place with Dr. Wecht in it. Godspeed sir

  • @datikit01
    @datikit01 3 роки тому +11

    Thanks to Stephen Fagin and and the sixth floor museum for this excellent interview! It's important to history that all viewpoints be presented.

    • @sole__doubt
      @sole__doubt 2 роки тому

      Really? Here I was under the impression that the true and accurate viewpoints are the only ones that matter.

  • @nodroglandboy4898
    @nodroglandboy4898 3 роки тому +12

    Well done Sir you are a credit to the rest of us.

  • @Madmen604
    @Madmen604 2 роки тому +2

    A lawyer AND a doctor AND a father.!

  • @davidcastanedajr.1268
    @davidcastanedajr.1268 2 роки тому +6

    That was very intense and thank you for that interview. So much information to digest as I’ve been watching and listening to different content on the internet. Keep up the good work and hopefully we will figure a way out of this fake reality we are in.

  • @barbj9785
    @barbj9785 3 роки тому +7

    God bless Dr. Wecht. He has the guts to tell the truth.

  • @kingtriplebbb5347
    @kingtriplebbb5347 4 роки тому +11

    Great 👍 Speech 👍👏 Professor /MD. Thanks for sharing the details 🤗

    • @Triplebuc50
      @Triplebuc50 2 роки тому +1

      I always doubted that Oswald Shot the President. When a Bullet goes in it is a Small wound, when it Exits it creates a larger wound, so if the Back of Kennedy's was a large Exit Would, from what direction did the Bullet come? NOT from BEHIND the President, very Simple, there was Another Shooter somewhere in the Front of the President Limo.

  • @karendelcher6256
    @karendelcher6256 2 роки тому

    You were great on coast to coast -have a wonderful thanksgiving -god bless -Cyril you are a wonderful human being -

  • @donnacorbett3568
    @donnacorbett3568 2 роки тому

    Love and admire your passion and your pursuit pf justice and truth kia ora from NZ

  • @ClifPayne
    @ClifPayne 3 роки тому +5

    Dr. Cyril H. Wecht is a national hero for not giving in to the pressure to believing the Warren Commission.

  • @YORK.BARBELL
    @YORK.BARBELL 2 роки тому +5

    THIS MAN IS AMAZING. BRILLIANT BEYOND BELIEF.

  • @marcryan1974
    @marcryan1974 2 роки тому

    Great stuff!

  • @phyllisneal8687
    @phyllisneal8687 2 роки тому

    THE BEST VID ON THIS SUBJECT I'V'E EVER SEEN!

  • @Tengobaila3
    @Tengobaila3 4 роки тому +10

    Thank God for Dr. Wecht!

  • @peter-johnb.newman6236
    @peter-johnb.newman6236 3 роки тому +13

    “It was the political truth.” ... excellent summation

  • @philipkane9393
    @philipkane9393 9 місяців тому +2

    CYRIL WECHT IS GREAT, AND IS AN ASTONISHING EXAMPLE OF A MAN HIS AGE----INCREDIBLE!

  • @porks8318
    @porks8318 Рік тому +4

    One of the greatest presentations by anyone, ever!