Thank you so much po, medyo lumilinaw na po sakin pano gumawa ng ncp, baka po pwede mag request kung pano po mas mabilis magamit si nanda. Medyo nahihilo pa po ako sa difference ni Risk for and Deficient, parang lahat sila magkakapareho, parang lahat applicable 🥺
Hi po, we were given a case scenario. Pano po gagawin namin sa objective data? Ung given lang po ba sa case scenario which is the temperature only or mag assume pa po kami ng vital signs?
@@markvanocayatautho269 Meron po syang “Related Factors”. Pwede ka po gumamit. Usually ang “Related to” is the cause. For example: Yung pasyente mo is nagtatae. Pag check mo Wala pa naman syang dehydration, at ok naman yung mga electrolytes nya. Pero nag tatae sya, so pwede sya ma RISK for deficient fluid volume and Risk for Electrolyte Imbalance. Example: Risk for Deficient fluid volume related to active fluid volume loss as evidence by loose watery stool. Risk for Electrolyte imbalance related to deficient fluid volume AEB active fluid volume loss (LBM) Like if mababa ang water sa katawan. Kasama din yan ang mga electrolytes. You can actually have a “related to” when it comes to “ RISK FOR” diagnosis
Ganda mag paliwanag sobrang ganda 100000/10 ka sAken:)))
Salamat bossing
Thank you so much po!
Salamat po for watching Nurse ❤
Thank you po so much😊
Pwde po ba paturo how to make drug study sana manotice thank you 😊
Thank you so much po, medyo lumilinaw na po sakin pano gumawa ng ncp, baka po pwede mag request kung pano po mas mabilis magamit si nanda. Medyo nahihilo pa po ako sa difference ni Risk for and Deficient, parang lahat sila magkakapareho, parang lahat applicable 🥺
nurse rsety pwede kayo nalang po maging ci ko huhu mas gets ko po kayo magturo/explain kesa sakanya😭
hi! curious lang po if sa paggawa ng mga expected outcomes need or required po ba lagi may short term and long term goals? or kahit hindi naman po?
Hi po, we were given a case scenario. Pano po gagawin namin sa objective data? Ung given lang po ba sa case scenario which is the temperature only or mag assume pa po kami ng vital signs?
pwede nyo po sabihin yung vs is pending pa
hi po, where to get the pdf ng NANDA na u have? is it for free? huhu
Helloo po anatomy and physiology po sanaaa plsss huhu🥹
Pano po risk NDx?
Nurse, meron pong “Risk for” sa NANDA. Hanapin nyo lang po then use the same technique kung paano ko po ginawa yung Nursing Diagnoses.
Nurse @@restythenurse totoo po ba na walang related to? as evidenced by lang?
@@markvanocayatautho269 Meron po syang “Related Factors”. Pwede ka po gumamit.
Usually ang “Related to” is the cause.
For example:
Yung pasyente mo is nagtatae. Pag check mo Wala pa naman syang dehydration, at ok naman yung mga electrolytes nya. Pero nag tatae sya, so pwede sya ma RISK for deficient fluid volume and Risk for Electrolyte Imbalance.
Example:
Risk for Deficient fluid volume related to active fluid volume loss as evidence by loose watery stool.
Risk for Electrolyte imbalance related to deficient fluid volume AEB active fluid volume loss (LBM)
Like if mababa ang water sa katawan. Kasama din yan ang mga electrolytes.
You can actually have a “related to” when it comes to “ RISK FOR” diagnosis