Das ist das was die Autowelt noch nicht verstanden hat, wer einen Hybriden kauft, oder ein E-Auto, da ist nicht wichtig wie schnell das Auto in was für einer Zeit von 0 auf 100 ist, es zählt der Verbrauch, aber solange die Menschen eingeschränkt Denken, wird es eingeschränkte Autos geben. Ich habe noch nie auf meinem Corolla 180 Km/h stehen gehabt, wenn ich das möchte, dann kauf ich mir nen Sportwagen.
This is absolutely ok regarding consumption. Those highway runs are anyway 3-4 times a year long trips but out of 35.000 km per year remaining 25.000 are done mostly short trips. I can not afford diesel cause of the short trips which would kill the engine but this hybrid fits in my profile. I can live with filling 3 times for 1500km trip and at 9 liters per 100km.
It's very loud at higher revs or at higher speeds. Corolla has no sound insulation whatsoever, there's a lot of wind noise and tire roll, it's the loudest compact car on the market.
I wish Toyota would sell this in North America, but they don't and won't, because they think everyone here only wants SUVs and crossovers. This is virtually the same length as the Corolla Sedan/Saloon, but it's way more practical and I think it looks much better. And the Corolla hatchback is badly designed, unfortunately. Just another example of how people in Europe have a much better selection of cars to choose from. I'm jealous.
@@wojciechdolata5476 Nope. Diesel is diesel) I am Corolla Hybrid owner. Up to 5.0l with speed up to 100kmh. But on highways, thay eating fuel like a boss)))
Not at all, pretty standard for a petrol in midsized car. It is actually worse than their 1,5 non hybrid 92kW. So unless you need to slowdown and accelerate reguralry during your highway drive, it is no so efficient. In the city trafic it would have been a different story.
@@adamek9750 Some optimization here and there and it adds up to the result. Aero, tyre rolling resistance, low viscosity engine oils etc. Interestingly enough the 2.0 Hybrid was more efficient on this channel at highway speed. I believe that it has different gearing optimized more towards highspeed due the power reserve. And also water cooled heat exchanger for exhaust manifold. Therefore it does not need to enrich the fuel in order to cool down the exhaust at high load.
Hybrid is okay hut after 120km/h on highway. The consumption is too high. You can drive 1.0 tsi better. The same problem also sith kia niro hybrid high consumption highway
It shows, that those real world tests aren't of any use, if you want to compare cars. The Mazda 6 was tested about four times and every time the consumption differed.
@@fwebe2871 I have Corolla hybrid 19" I know at 1,8 takes about 5l on 100kmh, and about 6-6,5 120kmh/ This is wrong test. Real consumprion test on polish channel 1001cars
Easy explanation for this from a Yaris hybrid owner. At 100 kph, it's more efficient for the engine to run at a higher rpm and load and charge up the battery at the same time. Once the battery is charged, it'll sit around 4 l/100 km more or less. At 120 kph, the engine can run at maximum efficiency without charging the battery, so it doesn't. Hence the similar figures.
@@CheesemanGT It seems like you haven't fully grasped how the hybrid system works in Toyota vehicles. With the Atkinson cycle engine, it achieves the highest efficiency at certain RPMs. For the 1.8-liter engine, this is around 1400 RPM. It's at these RPMs that you can achieve the best fuel economy. When driving at low speeds, the engine always operates at these RPMs. It uses some of the energy to turn the wheels and the rest to charge the battery. At high speeds, the battery usually doesn't charge beyond 50%, and all of the engine's energy goes directly to the wheels. The most economical speed is typically around 50-80 km/h, depending on the engine and aerodynamics. At this speed, the engine operates at its most efficient RPM, around 1400, and the car likely won't use electric power. With my Corolla, I managed to achieve a minimum fuel consumption of 2.9 liters per 100 kilometers. I recorded a video on my channel when I bought the car, precisely to check the fuel consumption. The channel's author simply forgot to reset the average fuel consumption, so the fuel consumption didn't increase much. Or they measured it while going downhill or over a short distance. At speeds of 100 and 120 km/h, the fuel consumption will differ by at least 1 liter.
@@gvs9015 It is combined performance of petrol and electric motor. Petrol engine alone is just uner 100 Hp, so when you deplete your battery, that's your power :-)
@@gvs9015I had once a Mercedes C180 with 2.0 petrol engine, naturally aspirated with 129 HP. It was going easy over 200 kmh. So, again, 140 HP just on paper.
I am driving it for about two weeks now, 557km total city/open road drive, still breaking in the engine. 4,2 l/100km average, 3-4l/100km suburban. 57% EV drive, total 17 h 34 min driving time. Couldn't be happier with a car. It is dead silent regarding car rattles, squeaks and noises even with extreme temperatures these days in south Europe (+35-40°C outside, probably 50-60 inside before I turn on the AC). Comfortable on rough terrain, gear changing is imperceptible, very easy to drive, electric boot with virtual pedal (extremely useful when my hands are full of loads, this should be the standard on any car), climate control and more via the app that actually works... This is definitely not a car for non-stop highways, but for city and suburban driving. Although I tried the test sedan variant with the same engine on the highway and the car met all my expectations there as well. It accelerates well enough to do overtakings safely, not at all as noisy at high speeds as some write, everyone feel comfortable in the car, reaches 130km/h quite quickly, the feeling of driving speed is lower than it actually is, comes with tons of modern useful driving assist tech included. Also no dpf/gpf/diesel/turbine headaches if you mainly drive city/short distances. Here in Croatia it also comes with 10 years or 150k km warranty on everything. I would say, a car for pleasant cruises and driving according to regulations. Really enjoy driving it.
Love the voice over description
nose over
Das ist das was die Autowelt noch nicht verstanden hat, wer einen Hybriden kauft, oder ein E-Auto, da ist nicht wichtig wie schnell das Auto in was für einer Zeit von 0 auf 100 ist, es zählt der Verbrauch, aber solange die Menschen eingeschränkt Denken, wird es eingeschränkte Autos geben. Ich habe noch nie auf meinem Corolla 180 Km/h stehen gehabt, wenn ich das möchte, dann kauf ich mir nen Sportwagen.
Thank you for testing, it help me to decide between 122 and 140 ps
Which is better?
This is absolutely ok regarding consumption. Those highway runs are anyway 3-4 times a year long trips but out of 35.000 km per year remaining 25.000 are done mostly short trips. I can not afford diesel cause of the short trips which would kill the engine but this hybrid fits in my profile. I can live with filling 3 times for 1500km trip and at 9 liters per 100km.
Very detailed! Thank You!
Consumption changes universe 160 vs 180
Recenty my uber drive is Corolla like this generation the isolation is awful actually no isolation
consumption are bad everywhere
@@Mr11ESSE111 Compared to what? A real world average of about 5l/100km is very good for a petrol family break.
@@JeanV1986 if you drive it slowly with not so much gears shift using but for autobahn and similar are not good
Hi. Wie ist denn die Lautstärke im Auto? Ist er laut? Ist der Motor sehr präsent?
It's very loud at higher revs or at higher speeds. Corolla has no sound insulation whatsoever, there's a lot of wind noise and tire roll, it's the loudest compact car on the market.
I've heard insulation is poor
It’s fine, I’ve got one.
@@sic22lOwn one? I do and I disagree with you.
@@georgemorley1029 One is not statistically relevant.
I wish Toyota would sell this in North America, but they don't and won't, because they think everyone here only wants SUVs and crossovers. This is virtually the same length as the Corolla Sedan/Saloon, but it's way more practical and I think it looks much better. And the Corolla hatchback is badly designed, unfortunately. Just another example of how people in Europe have a much better selection of cars to choose from. I'm jealous.
nice car, yes, you are right. no SUV for me tanks. one good point to live in Europe.
Brilliant car i have one 62mpg
Not bad fuel consumption but on the highway it’s still better a diesel engine.
Depende que diesel, yo nunca probe un diesel tan eficiente como mi corolla
On the highway engine 1,5 VVTi is also better too
bc 1l of diesel contains more energy - in most places you have to pay higher taxes for diesel
@@wojciechdolata5476 Nope. Diesel is diesel) I am Corolla Hybrid owner. Up to 5.0l with speed up to 100kmh. But on highways, thay eating fuel like a boss)))
@@GaryBullDoga 120 me gasta un 5 el mio
A 140-150 si que gastan mucho, pero es ilegal
30 mpg at 100mph is awesome
Not at all, pretty standard for a petrol in midsized car. It is actually worse than their 1,5 non hybrid 92kW. So unless you need to slowdown and accelerate reguralry during your highway drive, it is no so efficient. In the city trafic it would have been a different story.
@@Ariskot007 I have a Euro Trip with my Corolla 1.8 hybrid. Real avg consuption with 22.000km about 6l with higways and germany autobahns
@@Ariskot007oh new cars must be really efficient now
@@adamek9750 Some optimization here and there and it adds up to the result. Aero, tyre rolling resistance, low viscosity engine oils etc. Interestingly enough the 2.0 Hybrid was more efficient on this channel at highway speed. I believe that it has different gearing optimized more towards highspeed due the power reserve. And also water cooled heat exchanger for exhaust manifold. Therefore it does not need to enrich the fuel in order to cool down the exhaust at high load.
Hybrid is okay hut after 120km/h on highway. The consumption is too high. You can drive 1.0 tsi better. The same problem also sith kia niro hybrid high consumption highway
100kmh - 5.3L, 120kmh - 5.4L. What??? Awesome aerodynamic)))))) Joke
It shows, that those real world tests aren't of any use, if you want to compare cars.
The Mazda 6 was tested about four times and every time the consumption differed.
@@fwebe2871 I have Corolla hybrid 19" I know at 1,8 takes about 5l on 100kmh, and about 6-6,5 120kmh/ This is wrong test. Real consumprion test on polish channel 1001cars
Easy explanation for this from a Yaris hybrid owner. At 100 kph, it's more efficient for the engine to run at a higher rpm and load and charge up the battery at the same time. Once the battery is charged, it'll sit around 4 l/100 km more or less. At 120 kph, the engine can run at maximum efficiency without charging the battery, so it doesn't. Hence the similar figures.
@@CheesemanGT It seems like you haven't fully grasped how the hybrid system works in Toyota vehicles. With the Atkinson cycle engine, it achieves the highest efficiency at certain RPMs. For the 1.8-liter engine, this is around 1400 RPM. It's at these RPMs that you can achieve the best fuel economy. When driving at low speeds, the engine always operates at these RPMs. It uses some of the energy to turn the wheels and the rest to charge the battery. At high speeds, the battery usually doesn't charge beyond 50%, and all of the engine's energy goes directly to the wheels. The most economical speed is typically around 50-80 km/h, depending on the engine and aerodynamics. At this speed, the engine operates at its most efficient RPM, around 1400, and the car likely won't use electric power. With my Corolla, I managed to achieve a minimum fuel consumption of 2.9 liters per 100 kilometers. I recorded a video on my channel when I bought the car, precisely to check the fuel consumption. The channel's author simply forgot to reset the average fuel consumption, so the fuel consumption didn't increase much. Or they measured it while going downhill or over a short distance. At speeds of 100 and 120 km/h, the fuel consumption will differ by at least 1 liter.
Poor engine ….
Don't worry about the engine, those are extremely reliable.
😍👌🇮🇷
Dead after 160. 140 HP just on paper. You can get the same performance or even better from those 1,0 TSI or 1,0 Ecoboost.
Esos motores no aguantan ni la mitad del 1.8 toyota 😂
@@gvs9015 It is combined performance of petrol and electric motor. Petrol engine alone is just uner 100 Hp, so when you deplete your battery, that's your power :-)
@@Ariskot007 siempre tiene bateria, el sistema impide que se agote
Mucha gente no sabe ni como funcionan y se decidan a criticar sin saber
@@gvs9015I had once a Mercedes C180 with 2.0 petrol engine, naturally aspirated with 129 HP. It was going easy over 200 kmh. So, again, 140 HP just on paper.
@@Ariskot007True, petrol engine 98 HP if I remember corectly. At high speeds the electric is useless, only petrol helps.
really what is the point of this junk vehicle with such a high consumption and price too !! that ordinary 1,5 liter 125 hp consume much less
I am driving it for about two weeks now, 557km total city/open road drive, still breaking in the engine. 4,2 l/100km average, 3-4l/100km suburban. 57% EV drive, total 17 h 34 min driving time. Couldn't be happier with a car. It is dead silent regarding car rattles, squeaks and noises even with extreme temperatures these days in south Europe (+35-40°C outside, probably 50-60 inside before I turn on the AC). Comfortable on rough terrain, gear changing is imperceptible, very easy to drive, electric boot with virtual pedal (extremely useful when my hands are full of loads, this should be the standard on any car), climate control and more via the app that actually works... This is definitely not a car for non-stop highways, but for city and suburban driving. Although I tried the test sedan variant with the same engine on the highway and the car met all my expectations there as well. It accelerates well enough to do overtakings safely, not at all as noisy at high speeds as some write, everyone feel comfortable in the car, reaches 130km/h quite quickly, the feeling of driving speed is lower than it actually is, comes with tons of modern useful driving assist tech included. Also no dpf/gpf/diesel/turbine headaches if you mainly drive city/short distances. Here in Croatia it also comes with 10 years or 150k km warranty on everything. I would say, a car for pleasant cruises and driving according to regulations. Really enjoy driving it.
@@kkeretic city maybe fine because of electric use on open local roads maybe too if you dont go over 80-90kmh but for autobahn/highway its shit !!