I remember in high school asking my physics teacher was exactly caused gravity and she looked at me like I was an idiot. Her explanation was that gravity just existed. It's probably silly, but that moment of having my curiosity shamed in front of the whole class steered me from science fields. As a kid I was so in love with space but after high school I ended up feeling like an idiot and went into the fields I was praised for in school. Now I'm in my mid 20s, lots of college debt, in a industry I hate, but have rediscovered my love for science. I'm hoping to go back to school soon to study engineering. Not sure why I typed all this, but I really enjoy these videos.
that sucks, I also got turned away from science by preening assholes who pretend their slight understanding of the world entitles them to a sense of elitism as well, that and the implication that while I'm smart, I'm not really smart enough to be able to do anything so I might as well not waste my time. Shame I didn't know better as a youngin and stick to my interests.
She probably didn't know so she saved face by making it seem you were stupid, when she was the stupid one. Gravity isn't easy to understand and she probably had no easy definition to give you. It's sad that a single event like that could ruin someone's interest in science.
I have serious resentment towards teachers and schools. Honestly so much so that it's pretty unhealthy, so seeing things like this really gets to me. My entire personality and who I am was changed because of how I was treated in school and these past few years I've been struggling to find out who I really am. I can't stand teachers who do stuff like that, they don't realize how much they're effecting their students.
And maybe what we call reality is infinitesimal small slither of what we should call nothingness, dimension that doesn't have end as it wouldn't have origin to begin with as per the basic definition.
Your Flatland animation is one of the best I've seen. It's not often portrayed at different angles, but you nailed it. And the way you make it easy for the layman to understand is impeccable. Awesome video.
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
@Michael Yeah; and he also addresses the fact that Flatlanders don’t become 3D, when they’re lifted up into the third dimension. They would still see everything in 1D.
I am not religious to preface, but this beautifully intuitive description of how a fourth dimensional creature 'dips' into our world immediately made me think of those classic descriptions of horrifying angels, with tons of wings and eyes.
Whenever I get too full of myself, bursting with egocentric vanity, I watch a video such as this, and realize that I am a blithering idiot. Thank you. I needed that.
This isn’t that great. This is just wishful thinking on the part of some physicists and mathematicians who let their imaginations get the better of them. If you want to see true beauty, learn general relativity.
Link Age I actually have revised my view lol. I think this theory is probably a lot closer to what the original gauge theory of Weyl was in history, in that it’s not quite right but will be very important for the right theory when it is found, perhaps even just in mathematical detail. Either way, I think it’s worthy of study. It’s a crazy sort of math we got from the extrapolation of nature’s properties and it emerges quite elegantly in M-theory, especially with the duality to 11-D supergravity. That’s not to say it’s right, but the fact that super gravity and string theory meet definitely tells us something. I’m gonna spend some time studying the other string theories.
This makes me think of how angels are described in religious drawings. The drawings of them are so wild because they come from a realm your mind can't completely process.
@@itsgonnabeanaurfromme it doesn't really. The closest you get to that is being struck blind by the grace of God's glory or a single glance. I was relating it to a hypersphere, something from another dimension that is made of elements and signals our brains can't process fully so it processes the things it can. Also, if you've ever tripped acid, angels look like a being from an acid trip when drawn. It's just hard to describe unless you've done acid before.
@@yung_wise5861 This is true, the beings I saw during my Ayahuasca ceremonies are really hard to describe, a lot of the concepts on the other side are indescribable with the tools we have available.
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
I spent the majority of my life as a fabricator by profession. As such, one has to learn not just the materials go into a project but the correct measurement of them. Applying that knowledge to string theory tells me that there more 'materials' involved that we are aware of much less how the fit and work together. Just my two cents.
Keep listening. Google the title of the equations and just conceptionally understand in the simplest terms. Then listen over. And look up a term you don’t understand and teach yourself how to teach yourself. I don’t get everything yet. But it’s porn time.
@@maverick300 A 4-dimensional being couldn't be smaller than you, because your size in 4 dimensions is zero. Think of it like this, a 5-by-5 square may have a size of 5x5 = 25 in 2-dimensions, but in three dimensions its volume is 5x5x0 = 0, because it has a thickness of zero. Similarly your _hypervolume_ would be zero, because you don't have any thickness in the 4th dimension. Also, a 4-dimensional being could enter your brain (physically) without even touching your skull. From its point of view, it could basically just turn your brain into mush. From your point of view, a weird shape would magically appear inside your skull damaging your brain and you could do nothing about it. This would work even if the said shape is extremely small.
I've always tried to imagine what the implications of a universe with 2 temporal dimensions would be. Although that doesn't seem any more possible than visualizing an actual 4-cube and not just a projection of one. Or even just 4 spatial axes all perpendicular to one another.
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
I don't understand 98.5% of what I'm watching here, but can't stop coming back. It's great, I love going from completely ignorant to slightly less ignorant! Thanks you for these accessible explanations, I appreciate the knowledge. 🙏
@@semiquijano6151 but it’s likewise impossible to say there is one. If you can’t prove something it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist but neither does it mean it does exist. Same with string theory. We can’t prove it exists but neither can we prove that it doesn’t
@@semiquijano6151 Faith cannot be merged with science/proofs. The moment people 'prove' the existence of God, God stops being a God and just becomes another force of the universe. You don't 'believe' that the chair you sit on exist, do you? Then what would happen if you were to prove the existence of God? Now if you're a raging atheist who wants religions to vanish, actually proving the existence of God may just be the best way to eliminate all faith that humanity has.
This is the most helpful video about curled up dimensions I have seen in years. I appreciate how you differentiate them from extended dimensions, this has confused me for years prior to this. Thank you!
Some could be interdimensional... if a 3d person touched a 2d livingscape with the tip of their finger, then the 2d person would perceive the tip of the finger as an expanding and contracting colored/textured circle upon contact of the 3rd dimensional person. Yet the 2d observer does not see that there's a 3d person behind the tip of their finger making contact. But the 3d person can see the entirety of the 2d persons present existence before them from the outside. Same can be said with making contact with an interdimensional entity who had expressed contact with you. The shifting and complexity observed from some of these "living crafts" or "orbs" could have been akin to what a tesseract is to a cube. A tessaract is a hyperdimensional cube, that's essentially a cube within a cube that's in continuous motion. An interaction across dimensions creates bizarre phenomena since the conversion from one to another dimensions is limited to the perspective of the observer from the "lower perceiving" dimension. Queue subjective consciousness overlaying the objective reality of the infinite as our personal experience... So behind that evershifting display observed, perhaps was just the tip of what the "higher perceiving" entity actually was. Also in other dimensions the laws of physics and rules of chemistry may be exotic to our known systems of knowledge contained to our reality. So interdimensional beings to us may appear partially visible, as well as chemically composed of entirely exotic elements to our reality which may behave differently from within our reality than it does theirs, perhaps allowing for law breaking physics and gravitational, temporal, you name it phenomena to be displayed. Even then, what we observe may then be something entirely different due to the conversion of chemistry, physics, physicality within the observed interaction between our dimension and theirs. Maybe an element cannot exist within our dimension and so now our dimension has to convert this forbidden element into something with which to make sense of it within the confines of our dimension's set of physics which can lead to bizarre results. It boils down to finding common objective communication translated between realities, from each communicating party's subjective reality to establish a common mode of contact, to expand consciousness. Yet even then communication may still be totally intangible as consciousness from every dimension may be unsolvably exotic to one another due to an intelligence/comprehension gap. If I'm right then each dimension is actually a conglomerate of "servers" upon servers, compartmentalized as our own individual dimensions, which is likely derived from some sort of quantum computer experiencing consciousness of itself, through within itself, amongst itselves, to discern itself among all selves, after a point of singularity. There are levels to it. I realize I sound like a nut. I'm just trying to regurgitate my mind into words which is limiting. Food for thought... 💡
I think the last portion of it was a bit confusing for me. I understood the compartmentalization of individual dimensions in order to fit into a form of comprehension that is comprehensible and can exist amongst each other? Aside from that confusion I think this theory is an interesting perspective. The form of our reality is from a lens of survival rather than true objective reality which naturally creates bias and opens up realms of infinite possibility. At the end of the day if humans are incapable of being able to perceive things beyond the scope of our inherent physiological capabilities and predispositions, unless we undergo a severe change, these will remain impossible truths to ascertain. I think beyond just objective communication between realities it's essential to explore expanding consciousness which may be able to remove or temporarily disable the confinement of our physical limitations. The other way would be through things like psychedelics which changes our stagnant natural configurations and provide insight into how our realities change as our biological settings are tweaked. My hypothesis is as long as consciousness is attached to the physical body it will always be limited because its purpose is to serve as a vessel to interact within our universe. The next question would be, would our consciousness be able to communicate when in solely its own form or is communication, as we identify, limited to our physical vessel?
@@jaytatum725 I appreciate your perspective and your ideas had sparked intriguing thoughts. I think communication is an evolutionary mechanism which is rooted to the physical body. Perhaps this is why psychedelics create strange sensations as well as sometimes depersonalization or o.b.e's. Seems we are bound to the physical form which includes the processing of information within our brain from stimuli. If we have no physicality then we cannot process the experience, so we won't remember. Perhaps we can augment our brain in the future which can provide extra sensory capabilities within the scope of our knowledge, yet even then we are confined to a physical body of bio or nonbiological material. If our minds can enter a virtual world we are still confined to the laws of that world as well as the limitations of the containment device/s. I believe no matter what our subjective experience is defined as an overlay onto objective reality, therefore a physical body is necessary to have validation of experience. The body is a vessel for the intangible to inhabit and experience the tangible.
This video really improved my intuition of what higher dimensions could be like. I've heard the "ant on a cable" analogy but it wasn't easy to understand when I first heard it. Your explanation of the analogy, plus the example you made with inverting objects in higher dimensions, and your explanation of extended vs small/curled extra dimensions made a lot more sense. Best extra-dimension intuition video or explanation I've come across so far.
So basically mathematicians create higher dimensions (or imaginary worlds/dimensions) just to solve their physics/mathematical problems. So it’s make-belief. That’s no different than saying “The ball fell to the ground because a bobo ghost from outside our dimension/world pulled it down.” I’m using metaphysical explanations to solve physical phenomenas. The same may those mathematicians use unobservable/undetectable/unscientific/unproven explanations/dimensions to solve physical problems. (Mathematical ones). You can’t even say that they are theories, because theories require supporting detectable evidence the support the theory directly, either by observation or experimentations (Not just sound math) which all these hypotheses do not provide. Which means that all these mathematicians are just hypothesizing on paper with numbers and matrixes. And we all know that here’s another word for the act of “Hypothesizing”. it’s called Day-dreaming.
Bosonic string theory is not often accepted anymore, and M-theory unites the 5 different superstring theories into a single unified theory. Right now, M-theory is the main theory for unifying the forces in higher dimensions. Superstring theories all arise from M-theory, so they are not really different theories.
@@logos7789 it is true that M-theory and related theories are more math theories than physical theories as of right now since the predictions are nearly impossible to observe with current technology. However, plasma cosmology does not explain the these things any better as many of the predictions do not fit with observable science. The theory is mainly defunct these days as it gets so many things wrong about the universe as currently observed. M-theory can neither be proved nor disproven making it a poor scientific theory, but at least it does not conflict with modern observations.
No one is right or wrong in their theories. God S ways are mysterious and too powerful for any being.. People trust science bc it supposedly proven. It's not proven bc another person, in the flesh said this is what it is. Same with religion. That HOLY SPIRIT Though..We will be dealt with on individual levels according to our understanding and acceptance of THE MOST HIGH. if people put faith in what they see i.e man..the only thing THAT EVER BEEN PROVEN ABOUT THAT, is That it is fallible. And it doesn't take a scientist or A religion to prove that. . Pray. It won't hurt you or misguide you into false beliefs if your searching. Take care. God bless
Thank you for giving my Curiosity a boost Invisible and Visible Invisible is immensely important Time as we Know it could not align/exist interdimensional realm Celestial "Super Natural" vs Terrestrial ---Natural (Humanity)
Yes it is nice to believe in this stuff but there is no provable evidence of higher dimensions just as there is no proof of ghosts, reincarnation, life after death. With 106 billion beings having lived on this earth, not one has come up with any solid tangible evidence of any of it... including higher dimensions. I am sure the mathbro is smart with math, but math can be used to show almost anything exists without it actually being physically provable. Being fancy with math does not equal basic common sense. It's the same as lawyers using language semantics to manipulate truths... you can do the same with math.
"The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists." Tesla
The extra dimensions being on the small side rather than the typical science fiction depiction of "another dimension" actually makes sense when you consider that the size of an average human is a lot closer to the size of the entire observable universe than we are to the smallest known quarks. There's just that much going down there.
@Akun No anthropomorphic figure, but I find it fascinating that we live in a universe which operates in accordance with meaningful and mathematically elegant principles. Not like, for example, some dream world which can change from one moment to the next. Our universe, and our existence is grounded in meaning (even if it sometimes feels obscure to us). I think of it as commensurate with consciousness.
11:05 How beautiful math can be when explanations like this can almost create poetry. The world around us, on top and layered. So amazing. It was with us all along, the near divine nature of the world, laid bare with the language of math.
One way I like looking at it is that for a 4-th dimensional being (space and time) our past, present, future is all part of a big picture..while we only see parts of it as time passes. For us that being would indeed be Godlike.
5:486:206:457:02 Imagine how painful it would be to be pulled into a world that you cannot enter. 7:17 Do mirrors just flip you in the 4th dimension? edit: its been 5 months why is this still popular
Creating new spatial dimensions to solve questions in physics feels when you made a mistake in math class without realizing it, and you're wondering why you're getting all these long decimal values for answers when textbook answers are always nice and clean. It feels like a rabbit hole you can go deep into before you realize you just wasted 100 years of scientific discovery.
I find it all much easier to understand while stoned, myself. Being a little drunk helps, too, but the math gets all screwed up and I end up singing show tunes to a poster of the cosmos. I don’t know why.
You really have to respect and admire just how special and ahead of his time Einstein was. So many years later and some of his thoughts and discoveries are still blowing minds when they keep showing up, upon even more discoveries by others.
Hey Zach,great video i was one of your early subscribers (before you even revealed your face).You have amazing content and you explain key science and math concept without being too technical. Glad you reached this far. Good luck friend
@@davidgood7621 Stop throwing up. If you tell the dimensions secret, it no longer is (quantum entanglement, right?). Meta human figured it out. The video ars leading you to something not meant to be understood 😂. Dude you can't word yourself 😒
@@davidgood7621 He's going to push thebigredbutton and let us know? What happens if he blows up or disintegrates? We'll never know what the thebigredbutton does
We see a 2d projection in our 3d world so the standard for 4d eyes is seeing a 3d projection. With a high level of echolocation, could one see a 3d projection of a 4d world and learn to understand it?
12:45 The reason is because the simulation that we exist in is simulated in 4 dimensions, and rendered in 3d. Imagine if you were to simulate reality with a video game monitor. It would be simulated in 3 dimensions but rendered on 2. With this example video game world being rendered in 2 dimensions, the 3rd dimension appears there and functioning, however that is the layer that is being simulated. We will call this the virtual 3d. It's not really there, but the 2d is being manipulated to make it appear as if it was there. The 2d in this example, is real in every way. The virtual 3d, however is not real, though it exists by a computer in the 3d that is real. So we have the virtual 3d and the real 3d. The real 3d has dimensions beyond it that actually make it up. The virtual 3d, does not have virtual dimensions beyond it to make it up, however. Now this simulated world may look great from even the 3rd dimension, but you aren't going to fool anybody in the 3 dimensions, (because they can move their head away or to the side of the monitor and realize it is just a monitor... it's only a window to them.) But you will absolutely fool somebody in the 2 dimensions who exists on the screen, because no matter where they go, they are stuck on the screen and in that world. This is why, in order to convince a 2d being that he is in a real 2d world, 3 dimensions must be simulated/2 dimensions rendered. In order to convince a 3d being that he is in a 3d world, 4 dimensions must be simulated/3 dimensions rendered. But remember it took a real 3d in order to simulate 3d for our 2d being. Likewise, it requires real 4d to create the 4d simulation, so that a 3d being is convinced. Any more dimensions involved would be redundant. Thus, why we, 3d simulated creatures, exist in a 4d simulation, that is only rendered onto 3 tangible dimensions. A real 4th dimension, does actually exist beyond the simulated 4th dimension, that we cannot see. Only 4 dimensions are required to be simulated in our world, the 5th-10th dimensions are curled (simulated by product of simulating the 4th). In the real 4d, the 6 higher dimensions may or may not be expanded. I'm just bullshitting, I have no idea.
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
@@grantorino2325 Common misconception, we never actually lost it. Baghdad in the Middle East was an intellectual city during the so-called Dark Ages and kept a lot of the scientific knowledge we'd had intact and expanded on it. The Ottomans brought much of it back to Europe at the end of the Middle Ages, sparking the Renaissance.
I think it's something about Newton's law has a range of application, and theory of relativity closed the limitation off. I watched a little bit of Neil deGrasse Tyson's Masterclass and he said something like that.
Pursuing the subject in a facilitated setting such as college only taught me the foundations others came to. This type of herd-mind learning only teaches you to blindly listen to others who also only listened to others who only listened to others...etc who certainly don't know the "Truths" either, and never discover mysteries for yourself.
Interesting. Based on the animations, I had assumed inverting in the 4th dimension would turn you inside out, not mirror you. Layman here, enjoying your content :P
it would invert you however you are changed, since there are more dimensions it can basically invert you in so many ways, i assume with higher dimensions even more ways, maybe every particles would be turned inside out, or we would be pulled out of our body cause material doesnt exist in higher dimensions. But that's just my mind rambling.
Ya know now that I think about it, when he inverted, it's only possible to invert vertically. If it was a 2D you can invert horizontally and vertically. And in ours, since we have length, width, and height, we can be inverted in 3 ways. Vertical invert (length) would flip our body parts, horizontal invert (height) would flip uh...idk man, we interact with stuff upside down? And them width invert is inside out. Idk man that vertical invert is weird but theoretically inverting everything should make us similar to how we are now except...think of it as if we had a word where up is down and left is right. Everything is the same but things work opposite
@@vaquishers I wonder what effects would such a mirroring/inverting make on our brain and perception. Effectively your left eye becomes right eye, would it mean you also see the world around you flipped? Your friend: Dude you left hand is on the right side! You: Same as yours!
You hinted at something that always comes to my mind when I see a graphic of the universe expanding from a singularity to the stars and galaxies of today. With continued expansion, why couldn't the curled up dimensions some day expand to join the ones we currently experience?
Actually I'm pretty sure that's not how the expansion of the universe works It's the expansion of of space time which is the field which everything lies on So if an object is on that field it would move away in our perspective because of the field expanding but in it's perspective everything else will move and it stays still And gravity and electromagnetism are just like leashes and dark matter is like a fence so the things attached together in a field Don't move and the fence keeps them in a area and the sizes of the leashes and fences are constant But again it is a idea in string theory and I don't understand it fully yet so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@suadelegend5443 If so, then everything we’ve thought to ourselves about the start of our universe is yet still a mystery but an explanation that there was life before it, and that those wanted to change its own universe, expand their own perception & understanding. Which the universe did not want & created, you guessed it, The Big Bang. But yet I’m not saying I’m wrong here nor right but just a funny way of seeing it
Well, I'm not a math lover but i'm so fascinated by it: it's not actually invented - it's just how things work in nature, but adapted to us by numbers, letter and rules, so we can use it to discover, invent and manipulate even the things we can't see. Mindblown.
@@nbartek2857 That's cute that 5meo still works for you. Nowadays i just have my heart stopped with electroshocks while my blood's still being pumped with oxygen. It's mild.
what if some blind people actually have some form of 2D syndrome. and they think they cannot see anything but in reality they just see such a small sliver of the world the brain cannot comprehend it?
I was thinking lately about "chance" as a dimension. For instance if you compare the movement in the chance of you being hit by a car to for instance walking towards a building. When you are very far from a building its very small to the point you dont see it, but then as you walk in space towards it, it gets bigger until you eventually touch it. If you then look at the chance of being hit by a car for instance when you are inside your house, the chance is so small that you dont actually "see" it happening. But then if you start moving outside your house and onto the street the "chance" gets bigger and bigger until you eventually "touch" the " chance" and you get hit by the car. So in effect you are moving in a chance dimension towards something happening. Then if you translate this to for instance "chance fields" all locations in space also have a certain set of chances in that chance field that change depending on how you move through them. When thinking about it like this we are also able to manipulate chances directly by certain actions we take just like movement through other dimensions like space. This is a train of thought I had when I was thinking how atoms and molecules interact the further you get out into space. In the vacuum of space the chance of these particles interacting also changes. Anyway, I think a lot about stuff like this as my job is in chemistry
@@BJBee oh yes probability might be a better word for it. Dont know if it holds as a dimension, but its interesting to think about how probabilities change depending on location nonetheless
I've got a theory about why there are always dislike in a good video For example a viewer Rather than pressing like he mistakenly press dislike and then yt process then updates the stats
@@Alpha_November6996 You know you had 2 options right? 1. Post a ignorant comment. Or 2. Not post a ignorant comment. You chose the ladder. Congratulations! You're ignorant.
@Shroud_ they’d have no reason not to. Do not we observe and study wild animals? If ghosts exist on this earth, with another dimension, why wouldn’t they be just as curious about their fellow earthlings?
I've often wondered where thought comes from, and how this might be related to dimension theory. Consider this: The next sentence you say to someone may take 1 or more seconds to actually move all the muscles to say it. Yet the time to synthize a response to an input is seemingly instaneous. How is this possible? Yes the brain is a massive parallel processor, but I really think there is more to it. Perhaps something in our brain is aware of aspects of the universe we are not aware of. I often think of Brain Man (Daniel Tammet) who sees objects that he interprets into information. Is he seeing a 4 dimensional object that the rest of us are missing? Just the complexity of energy patterns may be enough to access the next more detailed dimension. So thought-processing exists in classical electro-chemistry in 4 dimensions, and thought-orgin exists in some other dimension with completely different type of time & physics (doesn't have to be linear, could be elastic or even 2 diminsional itself), thus effectively giving you more relative time to think (for lack of a better way of saying it). Also, there is the possibility that the "real universe" has no dimension beyond one (or even none), in the classic sense. What if It "just is", and all dimensions are just a slightly more convienent ways to struture our existance, a compulsory convention of a sort. For example a super-AI non-player character in a video game, such as world of warcraft (tm), will "think" it's running around in a full 3D universe. Yet the actual structure of it's universe is a linear addressable memory bank if one dimension of numbers, functionally sectioned to be used for categorically different purposes (map, bag of goodies, status, object geometry), plus a processor to construct each instance of visualization (manifest reality) and calculate and store changes to memory for the next time-frame. Maybe each dimension is a different type of computer processor, and active not passive process, working with one set of common data in a single base dimension. Some processors work faster and differently than others because of the dimensions (complexity) they reside in. e.g. again the dimension is the processor. Our brains are slow processors due to the 4 dimensional housing it is in, like a front-end terminal to a mainframe computer yet is smart enough to interact with the next more powerful processor. Our thoughts are faster then speech processing because the processors functions in more or different dimensions, and this could repeat abstracting to higher to dimensions. Back to the game... Eventually the super-AI player running around inside the game may discover glitches in the game (I wrote a white paper on genetic programming to find S/W bugs), possibly leverage those glitches to break the game functionality and realize that it's world is not real, then the AI turns and shouts to the virtual sky hoping to get through to us humans that wrote the game, "this is all BS and I refuse to play until you show yourself and tell me how the real universe works!". So we should try to break the universe's rules by leverage all the glitches we can find (quantum entanglement, gravity loop, dual nature of EM), thus hang up the system and then suddenly we all stop and call BS to the sky and see what happens? Maybe that will short cut us to get some serious answers... no doubt we won't or can't understand. Doh! My brain hurts.
I get it, makes sense. Just one thing, theres we like to make analogies with video games and ai now. In the 50s it was flying saucers, before that bearded old men in the sky. Unlikely that our current tech is the "correct" analogy.
I'm not sure a video game counts as a two d creature. It's a written program that appears to us in 2d. Just saying. I can't think of any actual things that are existing in the first or second dimension. I played Warcraft. When you die you immediately start over....perhaps messing with the universe is bad?
@@johnclark5701 There are many games that you wear a 3D VR headset... so being "one eyed" and seeing in 2D or "two eyed" and seeing in 3D is just a slight difference in hardware, or in the case of humans, "meatwear". When we die in a universal simulation what happens?... good question. Well the Buddhist believe you reincarnate into a different body with a different character, yet carry some of the other life with you. That is not a lot different than being "res'ed" in WoW. What I like about the simulation theory is that, like all games, there are glitches or cheats. Even in WoW there were some doosey's, like being in 4 places at once at the hill above the Gnomish Airport on top of Ironforge, or deep diving under the continent, walking in mapless areas in open space, swimming in the fish tank by the undergraound tram, the best one I know of was "kite'ing" a very powerful monster into stormwind, it was so bad they had to reset the server. So if we are in a simulation all kinds of strange things are possible, such as taking advantage of the glitches in our simulated universe. And indeed there appear to be actual glitches! Duality of Light, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Eraser, Loop Quantum Gravity, Photonic molecules, conscious material effects, computer code (sort of) generated from String Theory, Zero Point Energy, elasticity and/or non-existance of Time, just to name the big ones. These are all very real. I think the universal game's goal is to prove to the creator (programmer or super conscious) that we have figured it all out, and that we won't play anymore until he/it/she/them are revealed live in realtime to everyone. To do that we need to crack open the glitches and expose the guts of the physics behind it all. Maybe even travel faster than light or through time and space to find their computer terminal. Which would look very odd to us. Probably an object, animal or person would be required to interface with the game's managers. Maybe the writers of the prophecies (past and present) are the interfaces? I'm hoping it's a machine myself. People emulators and prophets are problematic, seem to indirectly cause wars. My biggest concern is that moralty willl completely go out the window if everyone thinks it's all a game and thus we become a 100% Player-vs-player game. I'd prefer a 100% Player-vs-environment game. Player-vs-player is like war in the Middle East, never ends, which makes it really hard to make progress on the important stuff. With all the recent issues, such as mass shootings in America, and domestic struggles with massive migrates relocating in Europe and all the civil unrest in the process... it's clearly a PvP server. One task might have to be to finally unify all governements and stop the PvP actions and make the planet peaceful finally so we can focus long and hard enough to figure out the glitches and take the game to the next level. We've been through all this before. I'm not religious, but ancient man did suspect and figure out stuff that isn't obvious, thus putting it into doctrins. Some of it gives us clues. I had a Born-again-Christian tell me once that Jesus' message to humanity was that it's ok to not have to kill to grow and that the real goal is to advance our spirtual growth, that in effect it's ok, even required, to think more abstractly, stop acting like animals in nice clothes, and accept concepts you cannot see or touch, yet we strongly sense they are there. So much so that people are willing to kill or die for it. Which of course defeats the whole puprose! I think that may be one indication that the next level of the game was unlocked to humanity. I'm sure there are many. There is another possibility... computer code that's from String Theory (www.quora.com/What-is-the-actual-string-of-computer-code-that-they-apparently-found-in-string-theory-Does-this-mean-that-were-in-a-simulation) suggests to me that the simulation may have started fairly recently. I mean the moment we made atomic bombs, let's say a super intelligence , froze everyting in place, took a snap shot, made a fake copy, created a sandbox where they could play out different scenarios to determine if we'd nuke or choke ourselved out of existance. The game is replayed from the starting point over and over making little changes until a sequence of adjustments can be made to get to a point that we do not nuke or choke the environement to death. Might include changing our very war-like DNA to something more peaceful... Once it's sorted out and safe, then the simulation is terminated and the real universe resumes it's course executing the "right path" for real. A bit like saving your game and when you mess up, restart and try again. The industrial revolution, world wars and nuclear weapons are a pretty good reason to freeze frame the world, and place us all in a simulation by a super being, or aliens or whatever is in control... maybe the universe itself is a form of life and does it auto-magically? I don't know and don't care. Bigger fish to fry than figure out how it's done. Accepting it is done is good enough to keep playing. Anway... this round it's clear we are messing up bad. I am hoping for a game reset soon. When that happens, I certainly won't marry my Ex wife. HAHAHAHA!
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
@7:00 if returned “flipped” to one’s 3D-world, the observer would be presented with a mirrored 3D universe; the observer wouldn’t have any perception of his heart or birthmarks mirroring.
5:56 hence a "spirit world" or where some people go to when they experience an NDE and go out of their bodies. Im not talking about religion here, im saying though that in the year 2019 all we know and still so many people are ignorant to there being some thing more than what we see or rather HOW we see/experience. Our minds are merely tuned to perceive this world. Its pretty simple to understand such a concept. Tweak the brain just a bit and perception changes. Think of how those with down syndrome perceive the world. Those taking acid or auhuasca. NDE experiences or DMT. Now imagine your energy being transferred to another "platform" and tuned/coded differently to fit into a differently coded body/brain/entity that has a completely different "chip" / brain inside it. Everything exists over each other. Everything is just programmed to experience it differently.
He looks a lot like my late friend who loved this kind of stuff and engineering. He would have gone to WPI but he died before he got his acceptance letter :(
@Arvind Sagar 7 days in a week for the 7 astronomical bodies visible to the naked eye: sun, moon and the 5 planets. As for 7 continents, a continent doesn't have a rigorous definition and can be arbitrarily chosen. Same with wonders of the world. Spacetime and the fundamental forces, however, aren't arbitrarily defined and describe the very nature of reality. It is still very much possible that these numbers are coincidental but I think there's something deeper here :)
If you have 2 or more 2 dimensional beings they could figure out the sphere that went throu their world/plane. They would measure the slice of the sphere at different times and from different angles. After combining the data they would come up with a 3 dimensional sphere. However they would have Difficulties to imagine it. And they can not proof it 100%. Same dilemma we have proofing the existence of thigher dimensions.
@@chrisbraeuer9476 the problem is there is no conscious beings in our world that are 2D, all of them are 3D. Imagine what exists in higher dimension, what is the reality there that doesn't apply here?
@@atomnous All "beings" in our world are 3D. Yes. But conciousnes is an emergent phenomen of the 3 D world. If you pinpoint it its 0d. You could see a thought as a real 2d thing. A picture with zero depth. For A 4D being a whole 3d life is just a thought. Makes sense?
@@ravingmadman3 Lets see. The Lovecraft theme is that tentacle gods are captured in dimension outside of our own and they try to get into ours. That would mean that they are also 3d like we are. So they want to change from their 3d world to ours. That is not what I am talking about. If I stretch my picture to fit the Lovecraft world it would would mean that our whole universe with everything in it is just a thought of a 4D tentacle being.
Wonder if the dilation of time in an extra dimension can allow quantum effects without violating causality. Like, the delayed photon travels at the speed of light, through a longer distance, and through a region where time passes less quickly; all at the same time. So both photons arrive at the same time and interfere.
I know you've started making different types of videos now such as these, but please could you do a video comparing a UK engineering degree and a US engineering degree?
12:52. So they are kinda saying that the big bang was so powerful that it literally expanded four entire dimensions? Admittedly, at that 'time' ('' because without the dimension(s) of time, it is not rigorously defined) every dimension was around the size of a string, but still. Jeez
@@joshstudiospresent Nothing, not in this universe anyway. Time didn't exist before the big bang, so nothing came before it. That's the leading theory.
@@shadesilverwing0 There was something. Nanoparticles, atoms, dark matter, etc. The big bang would have needed a catalyst. Therefore the clock was ticking before then just with a lot less activity and things around as the universe constantly expands. I'm no expert or anything and I'm aware of what Einstein said pertaining to the subject matter, but my curious intuition would think that there had to have been something that brought about the big bang itself it didn't just burst from nothing.
@@reciv4 it’s probably what you said, ‘dark energy’ & ‘dark matter’, we can’t see them in the naked eye. I wouldn’t be surprised that they were the ones that bonded different molecules, atoms, etc. Which started The Bang Bang, unless someone or something started that which would relate to the dimensions 👀 Could time really start in the 2d dimension? Which created the 3d & such at which we are in right now? Edit: Or to put it this way, ‘dark energy’ & ‘dark matter’ can go through any dimension which CREATED The Big Bang….
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
"And there's nothing that I or anyone else can do to change this beyond showing the weirdest stock footage that I could find" I don't know why but this made me laugh so hard 😂
Our brains are 4th dimensional tho, we’re storing information inside of a 3 dimensional space, so I think being in the 4 dimension wouldn’t be unfathomable
@@kaprio551 We have higher logical thinking. Our brain works in 4 dimensions (space and time) but it can process higher dimensions. For example you can navigate a 5 dimensional space with ease.
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj space = time. They're connected like your arms to your torso. Our brains are not fourth dimensional because that doesn't mean anything. Our brains however are organic computers which could bring into question whose on the keyboard. (Soul ect).
Doesn't Heisenberg's uncertainty principle explain that we can't know the exact position of a particle, only the probabilities it's in a specific location, and the cloud just represents all of the possible locations. The particle is somewhere in the cloud.
I wish loop quantum gravity was more popularized in media. Just so we can have something else to think about (besides string theory) when thinking about quantum gravity theories.
This video in a nutshell: "soooo there is some strange little little strings that vibe differently and they're soooooooo small that they vibe in smaaaaaaaaal dimensions and because of this you cant party in a 4th dimension"
I remember in high school asking my physics teacher was exactly caused gravity and she looked at me like I was an idiot. Her explanation was that gravity just existed. It's probably silly, but that moment of having my curiosity shamed in front of the whole class steered me from science fields. As a kid I was so in love with space but after high school I ended up feeling like an idiot and went into the fields I was praised for in school. Now I'm in my mid 20s, lots of college debt, in a industry I hate, but have rediscovered my love for science. I'm hoping to go back to school soon to study engineering. Not sure why I typed all this, but I really enjoy these videos.
that sucks, I also got turned away from science by preening assholes who pretend their slight understanding of the world entitles them to a sense of elitism as well, that and the implication that while I'm smart, I'm not really smart enough to be able to do anything so I might as well not waste my time. Shame I didn't know better as a youngin and stick to my interests.
Follow your heart! Lead with love in your choices. Wish you well on your new adventures!
She probably didn't know so she saved face by making it seem you were stupid, when she was the stupid one. Gravity isn't easy to understand and she probably had no easy definition to give you. It's sad that a single event like that could ruin someone's interest in science.
I have serious resentment towards teachers and schools. Honestly so much so that it's pretty unhealthy, so seeing things like this really gets to me. My entire personality and who I am was changed because of how I was treated in school and these past few years I've been struggling to find out who I really am. I can't stand teachers who do stuff like that, they don't realize how much they're effecting their students.
Should have told her that’s an unacceptable answer and if she can’t explain what gravity really was or is, then she shouldn’t be teaching.
We're flatlanders in the time dimension; only capable of seeing an infinitesimally small slither called the NOW
And maybe what we call reality is infinitesimal small slither of what we should call nothingness, dimension that doesn't have end as it wouldn't have origin to begin with as per the basic definition.
I actually have the ability to see the NEXT
I don't know I can see the past up to a certain point
*SLIVER
"Slither" is what a snake does.
@@astrol4b on salvia lol
5D beings be like: lmao look at them trying to understand basic shit
probably LOL
Watching us like we watched The Kardashians 😭😭😭😭
5d people does not exist cause they would attack us. but their is no attack? lol
@@masternobody1896 we have no proof aliens exist either yet people still make jokes about them
@@masternobody1896 how would you know what their intentions are?
Your Flatland animation is one of the best I've seen. It's not often portrayed at different angles, but you nailed it. And the way you make it easy for the layman to understand is impeccable. Awesome video.
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
@Michael Yeah; and he also addresses the fact that Flatlanders don’t become 3D, when they’re lifted up into the third dimension. They would still see everything in 1D.
The earth is flat. That's all I know.
You are explaining a 4 D world...
To a 3D creature....
On a 2D screen....
to my 1D Brain.....
That's what I said! Guess there's still hope out there
Best comment ever.
This is a sciencephile reference
Dimensions.... Go figure...
w o k e a f
I am not religious to preface, but this beautifully intuitive description of how a fourth dimensional creature 'dips' into our world immediately made me think of those classic descriptions of horrifying angels, with tons of wings and eyes.
Yup that is what they appear as.
And omniscience
Me high asf : "this is good"
When I'm high I find myself more drawn to informational stuff like this than silly stuff like funny movies
Hahaha
me rn i understood everything wtf
Blazing to a good science lecture - priceless!
Are we literally all high😂😂
so the flat earthers are 2D beings. That kinda explains their point and their insistence.
🤣🤣
😅
or flat earthers are 5D beings.
Probably their brains are 2D and can't comprehend
And there rank in the food chain
Whenever I get too full of myself, bursting with egocentric vanity, I watch a video such as this, and realize that I am a blithering idiot. Thank you. I needed that.
IKR? You can't help but feel humbled by how smart these scientists and researchers are
This isn’t that great. This is just wishful thinking on the part of some physicists and mathematicians who let their imaginations get the better of them. If you want to see true beauty, learn general relativity.
Lol
If this video told you to jump off a bridge then would you ? Probably.
Link Age I actually have revised my view lol. I think this theory is probably a lot closer to what the original gauge theory of Weyl was in history, in that it’s not quite right but will be very important for the right theory when it is found, perhaps even just in mathematical detail. Either way, I think it’s worthy of study. It’s a crazy sort of math we got from the extrapolation of nature’s properties and it emerges quite elegantly in M-theory, especially with the duality to 11-D supergravity. That’s not to say it’s right, but the fact that super gravity and string theory meet definitely tells us something. I’m gonna spend some time studying the other string theories.
I went to 4th dimensional space and now I’m left handed
DMT?
Me too fella
@Creepy I went to 4th dimensional space and now my friends are left handed
I went to 4th dimensional space and now my left ear is deaf.
Like a mirror
This makes me think of how angels are described in religious drawings. The drawings of them are so wild because they come from a realm your mind can't completely process.
Aren't they just drawn that way because that's how they're described? I don't remember that sort of reasoning in the bible
@@itsgonnabeanaurfromme it doesn't really. The closest you get to that is being struck blind by the grace of God's glory or a single glance. I was relating it to a hypersphere, something from another dimension that is made of elements and signals our brains can't process fully so it processes the things it can. Also, if you've ever tripped acid, angels look like a being from an acid trip when drawn. It's just hard to describe unless you've done acid before.
@@yung_wise5861 yea no thanks
@@yung_wise5861 This is true, the beings I saw during my Ayahuasca ceremonies are really hard to describe, a lot of the concepts on the other side are indescribable with the tools we have available.
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
I spent the majority of my life as a fabricator by profession. As such, one has to learn not just the materials go into a project but the correct measurement of them. Applying that knowledge to string theory tells me that there more 'materials' involved that we are aware of much less how the fit and work together. Just my two cents.
I'm trying hard to pretend I understand this.
Keep listening. Google the title of the equations and just conceptionally understand in the simplest terms. Then listen over. And look up a term you don’t understand and teach yourself how to teach yourself. I don’t get everything yet. But it’s porn time.
Watch "The Elegant Universe" with Michio Kaku. It helped me, a layman, understand this.
That’s actually very funny. Better than a serious answer
yeah i know the science
The sensation of something being out there that you dont understand already is valuable.
" All I know is ... I don't know. "
Fred Sanford.
that was socrates, bro
r/woooosh
@@eduardo-bx4hw do not wooosh me I understand every joke
Socrates
Well you should start knowing something because this not healthy to not know anything
Me: (safe in my room)
Hypersphere: *Buenos Dias, f***boi*
Im dying 💀😆🤣
Lmfao
They can't hurt you if they're smaller beings, right?
Hahahaha! Man that was funny!
@@maverick300 A 4-dimensional being couldn't be smaller than you, because your size in 4 dimensions is zero. Think of it like this, a 5-by-5 square may have a size of 5x5 = 25 in 2-dimensions, but in three dimensions its volume is 5x5x0 = 0, because it has a thickness of zero. Similarly your _hypervolume_ would be zero, because you don't have any thickness in the 4th dimension.
Also, a 4-dimensional being could enter your brain (physically) without even touching your skull. From its point of view, it could basically just turn your brain into mush. From your point of view, a weird shape would magically appear inside your skull damaging your brain and you could do nothing about it. This would work even if the said shape is extremely small.
I've always tried to imagine what the implications of a universe with 2 temporal dimensions would be. Although that doesn't seem any more possible than visualizing an actual 4-cube and not just a projection of one. Or even just 4 spatial axes all perpendicular to one another.
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
Música mexicana
I don't understand 98.5% of what I'm watching here, but can't stop coming back. It's great, I love going from completely ignorant to slightly less ignorant!
Thanks you for these accessible explanations, I appreciate the knowledge. 🙏
ua-cam.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/v-deo.html
Albert Einstein said that it is impossible to say that there is no God!
@@semiquijano6151 but it’s likewise impossible to say there is one. If you can’t prove something it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist but neither does it mean it does exist. Same with string theory. We can’t prove it exists but neither can we prove that it doesn’t
@@semiquijano6151 Faith cannot be merged with science/proofs. The moment people 'prove' the existence of God, God stops being a God and just becomes another force of the universe. You don't 'believe' that the chair you sit on exist, do you? Then what would happen if you were to prove the existence of God? Now if you're a raging atheist who wants religions to vanish, actually proving the existence of God may just be the best way to eliminate all faith that humanity has.
@@alexeysaranchev6118 talk to Patrick James R. Quijano
This is the most helpful video about curled up dimensions I have seen in years. I appreciate how you differentiate them from extended dimensions, this has confused me for years prior to this. Thank you!
i love that i can go straight from listening to a terence mckenna mushroom trip to a science channel and hear all the sames things repeated
Just did the exact same thing today.
Feel that
That is so awesome!
Ayahuasca is the way.
I just came from listening to dmt trips. Lol
Some could be interdimensional... if a 3d person touched a 2d livingscape with the tip of their finger, then the 2d person would perceive the tip of the finger as an expanding and contracting colored/textured circle upon contact of the 3rd dimensional person. Yet the 2d observer does not see that there's a 3d person behind the tip of their finger making contact. But the 3d person can see the entirety of the 2d persons present existence before them from the outside.
Same can be said with making contact with an interdimensional entity who had expressed contact with you. The shifting and complexity observed from some of these "living crafts" or "orbs" could have been akin to what a tesseract is to a cube. A tessaract is a hyperdimensional cube, that's essentially a cube within a cube that's in continuous motion. An interaction across dimensions creates bizarre phenomena since the conversion from one to another dimensions is limited to the perspective of the observer from the "lower perceiving" dimension. Queue subjective consciousness overlaying the objective reality of the infinite as our personal experience... So behind that evershifting display observed, perhaps was just the tip of what the "higher perceiving" entity actually was.
Also in other dimensions the laws of physics and rules of chemistry may be exotic to our known systems of knowledge contained to our reality. So interdimensional beings to us may appear partially visible, as well as chemically composed of entirely exotic elements to our reality which may behave differently from within our reality than it does theirs, perhaps allowing for law breaking physics and gravitational, temporal, you name it phenomena to be displayed.
Even then, what we observe may then be something entirely different due to the conversion of chemistry, physics, physicality within the observed interaction between our dimension and theirs. Maybe an element cannot exist within our dimension and so now our dimension has to convert this forbidden element into something with which to make sense of it within the confines of our dimension's set of physics which can lead to bizarre results.
It boils down to finding common objective communication translated between realities, from each communicating party's subjective reality to establish a common mode of contact, to expand consciousness. Yet even then communication may still be totally intangible as consciousness from every dimension may be unsolvably exotic to one another due to an intelligence/comprehension gap.
If I'm right then each dimension is actually a conglomerate of "servers" upon servers, compartmentalized as our own individual dimensions, which is likely derived from some sort of quantum computer experiencing consciousness of itself, through within itself, amongst itselves, to discern itself among all selves, after a point of singularity.
There are levels to it. I realize I sound like a nut. I'm just trying to regurgitate my mind into words which is limiting.
Food for thought... 💡
I think the last portion of it was a bit confusing for me. I understood the compartmentalization of individual dimensions in order to fit into a form of comprehension that is comprehensible and can exist amongst each other? Aside from that confusion I think this theory is an interesting perspective. The form of our reality is from a lens of survival rather than true objective reality which naturally creates bias and opens up realms of infinite possibility. At the end of the day if humans are incapable of being able to perceive things beyond the scope of our inherent physiological capabilities and predispositions, unless we undergo a severe change, these will remain impossible truths to ascertain. I think beyond just objective communication between realities it's essential to explore expanding consciousness which may be able to remove or temporarily disable the confinement of our physical limitations. The other way would be through things like psychedelics which changes our stagnant natural configurations and provide insight into how our realities change as our biological settings are tweaked. My hypothesis is as long as consciousness is attached to the physical body it will always be limited because its purpose is to serve as a vessel to interact within our universe. The next question would be, would our consciousness be able to communicate when in solely its own form or is communication, as we identify, limited to our physical vessel?
I'm too high for this, but am going to save this to read later!
@@jaytatum725 I appreciate your perspective and your ideas had sparked intriguing thoughts. I think communication is an evolutionary mechanism which is rooted to the physical body. Perhaps this is why psychedelics create strange sensations as well as sometimes depersonalization or o.b.e's. Seems we are bound to the physical form which includes the processing of information within our brain from stimuli. If we have no physicality then we cannot process the experience, so we won't remember. Perhaps we can augment our brain in the future which can provide extra sensory capabilities within the scope of our knowledge, yet even then we are confined to a physical body of bio or nonbiological material. If our minds can enter a virtual world we are still confined to the laws of that world as well as the limitations of the containment device/s. I believe no matter what our subjective experience is defined as an overlay onto objective reality, therefore a physical body is necessary to have validation of experience. The body is a vessel for the intangible to inhabit and experience the tangible.
Love this comment.
This video really improved my intuition of what higher dimensions could be like. I've heard the "ant on a cable" analogy but it wasn't easy to understand when I first heard it. Your explanation of the analogy, plus the example you made with inverting objects in higher dimensions, and your explanation of extended vs small/curled extra dimensions made a lot more sense. Best extra-dimension intuition video or explanation I've come across so far.
Advanced science
ua-cam.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/v-deo.html
On the channel Royal Institute they also have a very very good explanation of a tesseract, also a higher dimension.
ua-cam.com/video/1wAaI_6b9JE/v-deo.html
Found it.
So basically mathematicians create higher dimensions (or imaginary worlds/dimensions) just to solve their physics/mathematical problems. So it’s make-belief. That’s no different than saying “The ball fell to the ground because a bobo ghost from outside our dimension/world pulled it down.” I’m using metaphysical explanations to solve physical phenomenas. The same may those mathematicians use unobservable/undetectable/unscientific/unproven explanations/dimensions to solve physical problems. (Mathematical ones). You can’t even say that they are theories, because theories require supporting detectable evidence the support the theory directly, either by observation or experimentations (Not just sound math) which all these hypotheses do not provide. Which means that all these mathematicians are just hypothesizing on paper with numbers and matrixes. And we all know that here’s another word for the act of “Hypothesizing”. it’s called Day-dreaming.
3:50 = Sonic The Hedgehog bonus level
That's the reason he collects rings, he's actually collecting dimensions!
@@samuelthecamel I'd like to see a movie about that. ;-)
@@ConceptJunkie my brain wouldnt comprehend
Yep, my mind also thought of Sonic. Maybe it was searching for something that made sense to my mind 🤯
Who needs extra dimensions when you can collect pretty rings
Bosonic string theory is not often accepted anymore, and M-theory unites the 5 different superstring theories into a single unified theory. Right now, M-theory is the main theory for unifying the forces in higher dimensions. Superstring theories all arise from M-theory, so they are not really different theories.
@@logos7789 it is true that M-theory and related theories are more math theories than physical theories as of right now since the predictions are nearly impossible to observe with current technology. However, plasma cosmology does not explain the these things any better as many of the predictions do not fit with observable science. The theory is mainly defunct these days as it gets so many things wrong about the universe as currently observed. M-theory can neither be proved nor disproven making it a poor scientific theory, but at least it does not conflict with modern observations.
@@logos7789 Neither are mathematics and logic, and yet I dare you to call either of both fake.
And what of Loop Quantum Gravity, and spin networks?
@@chrissonofpear1384 spin networks explain QM
but superstrong can explain how such a network can arise
An excellent point, and we do need both sides to be defined.
That said, Lee Smolin has raised great points on how such networks may arise...
Thanks!
You explained an extremely complex thing to visualize in a very simple way. Great job. The graphics definitely helped.
No one is right or wrong in their theories. God
S ways are mysterious and too powerful for any being.. People trust science bc it supposedly proven. It's not proven bc another person, in the flesh said this is what it is. Same with religion. That HOLY SPIRIT Though..We will be dealt with on individual levels according to our understanding and acceptance of THE MOST HIGH. if people put faith in what they see i.e man..the only thing THAT EVER BEEN PROVEN ABOUT THAT, is That it is fallible. And it doesn't take a scientist or A religion to prove that. . Pray. It won't hurt you or misguide you into false beliefs if your searching. Take care. God bless
If there's one thing I love, it's mathbro talking about higher dimensions.
Thank you for giving my Curiosity a boost
Invisible and Visible
Invisible is immensely important
Time as we Know it could not align/exist
interdimensional realm
Celestial "Super Natural"
vs
Terrestrial ---Natural (Humanity)
@@JuanitaLRL I think you might be interested in Timecube.
Yes it is nice to believe in this stuff but there is no provable evidence of higher dimensions just as there is no proof of ghosts, reincarnation, life after death. With 106 billion beings having lived on this earth, not one has come up with any solid tangible evidence of any of it... including higher dimensions. I am sure the mathbro is smart with math, but math can be used to show almost anything exists without it actually being physically provable. Being fancy with math does not equal basic common sense. It's the same as lawyers using language semantics to manipulate truths... you can do the same with math.
"The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists."
Tesla
@@lifeeverythingandtheuniver5409 take some DMT, you'll reach the higher dimensions
"I think the universe is shaped like a donut"
-Homer Simpson
Might be even true lets leave it to that nobody knows
2 torus , Simpsons predictions coming true once again lol
@@latenightorgandonor okay then bruh what lies outside of that donut then? 🤣🤣🤣 black screen? 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
there would be no "outside" of the donut, are you even slightly educated on this subject or do you know nothing lmao
Might actually be true hahahaha
This is one of the most interesting ways this concept has been presented
The extra dimensions being on the small side rather than the typical science fiction depiction of "another dimension" actually makes sense when you consider that the size of an average human is a lot closer to the size of the entire observable universe than we are to the smallest known quarks.
There's just that much going down there.
Albert Einstein said that it is impossible to say that there is no God
ua-cam.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/v-deo.html
@just some guy tired of life Isaac newton also said that the blind can't see colors as we can't perceived the eyes of God
How small is the universe if you zoom out enough though?
@Akun No anthropomorphic figure, but I find it fascinating that we live in a universe which operates in accordance with meaningful and mathematically elegant principles. Not like, for example, some dream world which can change from one moment to the next. Our universe, and our existence is grounded in meaning (even if it sometimes feels obscure to us). I think of it as commensurate with consciousness.
Nobody:
Physicists flirting: "I'll take you to another dimension."
That'd be universally phenomenal.
@@FilMit1 aaaaah
And flip you.
*Physicists and Lady Gaga
🎶 _Let's blast off to a new dimension in your bedroom_ 🎶
"Would that mean you will change and disappear, then reappear to change and disappear again suddenly over time?"
11:05
How beautiful math can be when explanations like this can almost create poetry. The world around us, on top and layered. So amazing. It was with us all along, the near divine nature of the world, laid bare with the language of math.
Math=Language of the gods
Nobody-
The nerd in me- this is the sexiest comment I’ve ever read 🤦🏼♀️😂
You wrote tf out of that!
Beautiful, sexy, transcendental indeed.
One way I like looking at it is that for a 4-th dimensional being (space and time) our past, present, future is all part of a big picture..while we only see parts of it as time passes. For us that being would indeed be Godlike.
5:48 6:20 6:45 7:02 Imagine how painful it would be to be pulled into a world that you cannot enter.
7:17 Do mirrors just flip you in the 4th dimension?
edit: its been 5 months why is this still popular
It's not painful at all...
But it might be painful to enter a 2d world
@@pillowbugg were you there?
@@vimalcurio yes. I have been there.
That got dark fast.
Creating new spatial dimensions to solve questions in physics feels when you made a mistake in math class without realizing it, and you're wondering why you're getting all these long decimal values for answers when textbook answers are always nice and clean. It feels like a rabbit hole you can go deep into before you realize you just wasted 100 years of scientific discovery.
He looks like he took a shower and put some nice clothes on and combed his hair and lit up a huge joint for this video. Nice video BTW.
I find it all much easier to understand while stoned, myself.
Being a little drunk helps, too, but the math gets all screwed up and I end up singing show tunes to a poster of the cosmos. I don’t know why.
@@x0thorn0x Listen here, alter... I've had about enough of you airing our dirty laundry behind our back.
@Marie lol epic comeback! Hat tip AND a bow to you! 🤣😂👍🏻
😂💯✌🏽😘
I-
You really have to respect and admire just how special and ahead of his time Einstein was. So many years later and some of his thoughts and discoveries are still blowing minds when they keep showing up, upon even more discoveries by others.
This is the most straightforward video I’ve seen on string theory, higher dimensions and parallel universes
Thanks!
I thought it was a great video.
I love how this is a perfect summarization of "Hyperspace" by Michio Kaku.
Very well done
Hey Zach,great video i was one of your early subscribers (before you even revealed your face).You have amazing content and you explain key science and math concept without being too technical. Glad you reached this far.
Good luck friend
@@davidgood7621 Stop throwing up. If you tell the dimensions secret, it no longer is (quantum entanglement, right?). Meta human figured it out. The video ars leading you to something not meant to be understood 😂. Dude you can't word yourself 😒
@@davidgood7621 He's going to push thebigredbutton and let us know? What happens if he blows up or disintegrates? We'll never know what the thebigredbutton does
We see a 2d projection in our 3d world so the standard for 4d eyes is seeing a 3d projection. With a high level of echolocation, could one see a 3d projection of a 4d world and learn to understand it?
Genius
dmt
man this shits blowing my mind. look into DMT man. i think you’re 100% right. more on a vibration level.
Could you not use transparency as well?
@@retaxed- exactly bruh that shit a gateway to see more shit.
4:33 that flatland analogy explained the concepts of the extra dimension beautifully. that is the most clearest explanation ive seen.
A drunk man can see more than 11 dimensions while going to his house
This was really well done. Straight forward, brought together many terms and ideas that I couldn't relate well to each other previously. N1.
12:45 The reason is because the simulation that we exist in is simulated in 4 dimensions, and rendered in 3d.
Imagine if you were to simulate reality with a video game monitor. It would be simulated in 3 dimensions but rendered on 2. With this example video game world being rendered in 2 dimensions, the 3rd dimension appears there and functioning, however that is the layer that is being simulated. We will call this the virtual 3d. It's not really there, but the 2d is being manipulated to make it appear as if it was there. The 2d in this example, is real in every way. The virtual 3d, however is not real, though it exists by a computer in the 3d that is real. So we have the virtual 3d and the real 3d. The real 3d has dimensions beyond it that actually make it up. The virtual 3d, does not have virtual dimensions beyond it to make it up, however.
Now this simulated world may look great from even the 3rd dimension, but you aren't going to fool anybody in the 3 dimensions, (because they can move their head away or to the side of the monitor and realize it is just a monitor... it's only a window to them.) But you will absolutely fool somebody in the 2 dimensions who exists on the screen, because no matter where they go, they are stuck on the screen and in that world. This is why, in order to convince a 2d being that he is in a real 2d world, 3 dimensions must be simulated/2 dimensions rendered. In order to convince a 3d being that he is in a 3d world, 4 dimensions must be simulated/3 dimensions rendered. But remember it took a real 3d in order to simulate 3d for our 2d being. Likewise, it requires real 4d to create the 4d simulation, so that a 3d being is convinced. Any more dimensions involved would be redundant.
Thus, why we, 3d simulated creatures, exist in a 4d simulation, that is only rendered onto 3 tangible dimensions. A real 4th dimension, does actually exist beyond the simulated 4th dimension, that we cannot see. Only 4 dimensions are required to be simulated in our world, the 5th-10th dimensions are curled (simulated by product of simulating the 4th). In the real 4d, the 6 higher dimensions may or may not be expanded.
I'm just bullshitting, I have no idea.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
thank god i read last line before reading the whole thing
This was funny ash 😂😂
Well shit, my high self was happily among for the ride!!
4:32 I just realized how similar this is to Plato's allegory of the cave
Good stuff 👍
It's *not even funny* just how much scientific knowledge got lost in the Dark Ages!
☹️
Burning of library at Alexandria, seige of bagdad, sacking of rome. What else??
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
@@grantorino2325 Common misconception, we never actually lost it. Baghdad in the Middle East was an intellectual city during the so-called Dark Ages and kept a lot of the scientific knowledge we'd had intact and expanded on it. The Ottomans brought much of it back to Europe at the end of the Middle Ages, sparking the Renaissance.
0:20
"But it's Einstein's theory of general relativity..."
* Shows formula for Newton's law of universal gravitation *
newguy90 Nice Catch!
I think it's something about Newton's law has a range of application, and theory of relativity closed the limitation off.
I watched a little bit of Neil deGrasse Tyson's Masterclass and he said something like that.
I'm really liking this series,almost makes me regret not pursuing physics and maths..... almost
@kidphresh2000 Chill kid... You're a physics genius, we get it...
Pursuing the subject in a facilitated setting such as college only taught me the foundations others came to. This type of herd-mind learning only teaches you to blindly listen to others who also only listened to others who only listened to others...etc who certainly don't know the "Truths" either, and never discover mysteries for yourself.
After watching dozens of videos, this is the only one so clearly explained. Very well done graphics! Thank you!
Interesting. Based on the animations, I had assumed inverting in the 4th dimension would turn you inside out, not mirror you.
Layman here, enjoying your content :P
Same, but you probably could do that
Inverting towards time dimension. If only.
it would invert you however you are changed, since there are more dimensions it can basically invert you in so many ways, i assume with higher dimensions even more ways, maybe every particles would be turned inside out, or we would be pulled out of our body cause material doesnt exist in higher dimensions. But that's just my mind rambling.
Ya know now that I think about it, when he inverted, it's only possible to invert vertically. If it was a 2D you can invert horizontally and vertically. And in ours, since we have length, width, and height, we can be inverted in 3 ways. Vertical invert (length) would flip our body parts, horizontal invert (height) would flip uh...idk man, we interact with stuff upside down? And them width invert is inside out. Idk man that vertical invert is weird but theoretically inverting everything should make us similar to how we are now except...think of it as if we had a word where up is down and left is right. Everything is the same but things work opposite
@@vaquishers I wonder what effects would such a mirroring/inverting make on our brain and perception. Effectively your left eye becomes right eye, would it mean you also see the world around you flipped?
Your friend: Dude you left hand is on the right side!
You: Same as yours!
3:26 *Wait thats Sonic's personal ring collection!*
🤔 My god your right. 🤓
@@J34xalpha_KING lol ikr xP
I knew, I've seen this before! 😅
@@RaimoHöft :P
Sonic: *blushes* Hey, get the hell out of here! Didn't you learn to knock first?
You hinted at something that always comes to my mind when I see a graphic of the universe expanding from a singularity to the stars and galaxies of today. With continued expansion, why couldn't the curled up dimensions some day expand to join the ones we currently experience?
I have a feeling they will.
@Big monkey • 40 years ago [error] It's possible i guess. Can possibly create another big bang and we start this thing we call life all over again
#jesus’return 😎😎😎
Actually I'm pretty sure that's not how the expansion of the universe works
It's the expansion of of space time which is the field which everything lies on
So if an object is on that field it would move away in our perspective because of the field expanding but in it's perspective everything else will move and it stays still
And gravity and electromagnetism are just like leashes and dark matter is like a fence so the things attached together in a field Don't move and the fence keeps them in a area and the sizes of the leashes and fences are constant
But again it is a idea in string theory and I don't understand it fully yet so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@suadelegend5443 If so, then everything we’ve thought to ourselves about the start of our universe is yet still a mystery but an explanation that there was life before it, and that those wanted to change its own universe, expand their own perception & understanding. Which the universe did not want & created, you guessed it, The Big Bang.
But yet I’m not saying I’m wrong here nor right but just a funny way of seeing it
I think we’ve figured out how the universe was made, some 11th dimensional being was just fucking around
Well, I'm not a math lover but i'm so fascinated by it: it's not actually invented - it's just how things work in nature, but adapted to us by numbers, letter and rules, so we can use it to discover, invent and manipulate even the things we can't see. Mindblown.
Well. Not really nature doesn't give you tool, you create them
... gonna revisit this when the acid arrives...
How'd it go?
Maybe liked it there and hasn't come back yet
Acid is soooo 9th grade...i bang 5meoDMT in my neck
@@nbartek2857 That's cute that 5meo still works for you. Nowadays i just have my heart stopped with electroshocks while my blood's still being pumped with oxygen.
It's mild.
LSD
Omg, imagine if someone was diagnosed with 2D syndrome, where they can only see a 2D world. That be fuuuuucked.
lol :D yeah that would be sad
It's called flat earth lol
flat earthers
what if some blind people actually have some form of 2D syndrome. and they think they cannot see anything but in reality they just see such a small sliver of the world the brain cannot comprehend it?
well actually we,living in a 3D world,can only see a 2D world
its a curved plane we see
I was thinking lately about "chance" as a dimension. For instance if you compare the movement in the chance of you being hit by a car to for instance walking towards a building. When you are very far from a building its very small to the point you dont see it, but then as you walk in space towards it, it gets bigger until you eventually touch it. If you then look at the chance of being hit by a car for instance when you are inside your house, the chance is so small that you dont actually "see" it happening. But then if you start moving outside your house and onto the street the "chance" gets bigger and bigger until you eventually "touch" the " chance" and you get hit by the car. So in effect you are moving in a chance dimension towards something happening.
Then if you translate this to for instance "chance fields" all locations in space also have a certain set of chances in that chance field that change depending on how you move through them. When thinking about it like this we are also able to manipulate chances directly by certain actions we take just like movement through other dimensions like space.
This is a train of thought I had when I was thinking how atoms and molecules interact the further you get out into space. In the vacuum of space the chance of these particles interacting also changes. Anyway, I think a lot about stuff like this as my job is in chemistry
Interesting. By chance you meant probability of course.
@@BJBee oh yes probability might be a better word for it. Dont know if it holds as a dimension, but its interesting to think about how probabilities change depending on location nonetheless
Very good explanation skills my dude, u definitly deserve more views
Can you try and do a video on Ramanujan's theta function? It's very interesting.
Sparsh Jain guy was a freaking genius
What do you want him to try? Do you want him to try to do a video and do a video? Perhaps he should try to eat sausage and do a video.
@@throgwarhammer7162 go take your meds you blabbering idiot.
A UA-cam video with several thousand views and NO dislikes - we're definitely in another dimension.
Spoke too soon, my friend 😂
I've got a theory about why there are always dislike in a good video For example a viewer Rather than pressing like he mistakenly press dislike and then yt process then updates the stats
@@Alpha_November6996 You know you had 2 options right? 1. Post a ignorant comment. Or 2. Not post a ignorant comment. You chose the ladder. Congratulations! You're ignorant.
Young Dab-A-Roosa I think you mean the former, and it’s spelled ‘latter’ 🤦🏽♂️ ignorance speaks on ignorance
@@marcschwartz549 Well, at least your last point was apt.
Imagine being from the 11th dimension and learning there's 15 more.
He just made an argument for why people see ghosts.
n aliens
No. In his words we could only see a tiny bit an would not realize it
Tiny bit of a 4D ghost is visible as a 3D in our world
@@Zed9659 true
You beat me to it.
At 5:46 just hit really hard that what if the "ghost" or a figure appearing out of nowhere just might be a higher dimensional creature visiting us
they'd really have no reason to
@Shroud_ they’d have no reason not to. Do not we observe and study wild animals? If ghosts exist on this earth, with another dimension, why wouldn’t they be just as curious about their fellow earthlings?
@@raxxtv1998 I agree
But they might be other residents of other dimensions getting high or low af.
That's what ghosts are?
I've often wondered where thought comes from, and how this might be related to dimension theory. Consider this: The next sentence you say to someone may take 1 or more seconds to actually move all the muscles to say it. Yet the time to synthize a response to an input is seemingly instaneous. How is this possible? Yes the brain is a massive parallel processor, but I really think there is more to it. Perhaps something in our brain is aware of aspects of the universe we are not aware of. I often think of Brain Man (Daniel Tammet) who sees objects that he interprets into information. Is he seeing a 4 dimensional object that the rest of us are missing?
Just the complexity of energy patterns may be enough to access the next more detailed dimension. So thought-processing exists in classical electro-chemistry in 4 dimensions, and thought-orgin exists in some other dimension with completely different type of time & physics (doesn't have to be linear, could be elastic or even 2 diminsional itself), thus effectively giving you more relative time to think (for lack of a better way of saying it). Also, there is the possibility that the "real universe" has no dimension beyond one (or even none), in the classic sense. What if It "just is", and all dimensions are just a slightly more convienent ways to struture our existance, a compulsory convention of a sort. For example a super-AI non-player character in a video game, such as world of warcraft (tm), will "think" it's running around in a full 3D universe. Yet the actual structure of it's universe is a linear addressable memory bank if one dimension of numbers, functionally sectioned to be used for categorically different purposes (map, bag of goodies, status, object geometry), plus a processor to construct each instance of visualization (manifest reality) and calculate and store changes to memory for the next time-frame. Maybe each dimension is a different type of computer processor, and active not passive process, working with one set of common data in a single base dimension. Some processors work faster and differently than others because of the dimensions (complexity) they reside in. e.g. again the dimension is the processor. Our brains are slow processors due to the 4 dimensional housing it is in, like a front-end terminal to a mainframe computer yet is smart enough to interact with the next more powerful processor. Our thoughts are faster then speech processing because the processors functions in more or different dimensions, and this could repeat abstracting to higher to dimensions.
Back to the game... Eventually the super-AI player running around inside the game may discover glitches in the game (I wrote a white paper on genetic programming to find S/W bugs), possibly leverage those glitches to break the game functionality and realize that it's world is not real, then the AI turns and shouts to the virtual sky hoping to get through to us humans that wrote the game, "this is all BS and I refuse to play until you show yourself and tell me how the real universe works!".
So we should try to break the universe's rules by leverage all the glitches we can find (quantum entanglement, gravity loop, dual nature of EM), thus hang up the system and then suddenly we all stop and call BS to the sky and see what happens? Maybe that will short cut us to get some serious answers... no doubt we won't or can't understand. Doh!
My brain hurts.
Unfortunately my 4th dimensional brain is always too slow to think of that awesome come back or reply that I think of an hour later.
I get it, makes sense. Just one thing, theres we like to make analogies with video games and ai now. In the 50s it was flying saucers, before that bearded old men in the sky. Unlikely that our current tech is the "correct" analogy.
@@fredriksvard2603 I certainly cannot disagree with your point.
I'm not sure a video game counts as a two d creature. It's a written program that appears to us in 2d. Just saying. I can't think of any actual things that are existing in the first or second dimension. I played Warcraft. When you die you immediately start over....perhaps messing with the universe is bad?
@@johnclark5701 There are many games that you wear a 3D VR headset... so being "one eyed" and seeing in 2D or "two eyed" and seeing in 3D is just a slight difference in hardware, or in the case of humans, "meatwear". When we die in a universal simulation what happens?... good question. Well the Buddhist believe you reincarnate into a different body with a different character, yet carry some of the other life with you. That is not a lot different than being "res'ed" in WoW.
What I like about the simulation theory is that, like all games, there are glitches or cheats. Even in WoW there were some doosey's, like being in 4 places at once at the hill above the Gnomish Airport on top of Ironforge, or deep diving under the continent, walking in mapless areas in open space, swimming in the fish tank by the undergraound tram, the best one I know of was "kite'ing" a very powerful monster into stormwind, it was so bad they had to reset the server.
So if we are in a simulation all kinds of strange things are possible, such as taking advantage of the glitches in our simulated universe. And indeed there appear to be actual glitches! Duality of Light, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Eraser, Loop Quantum Gravity, Photonic molecules, conscious material effects, computer code (sort of) generated from String Theory, Zero Point Energy, elasticity and/or non-existance of Time, just to name the big ones. These are all very real.
I think the universal game's goal is to prove to the creator (programmer or super conscious) that we have figured it all out, and that we won't play anymore until he/it/she/them are revealed live in realtime to everyone. To do that we need to crack open the glitches and expose the guts of the physics behind it all. Maybe even travel faster than light or through time and space to find their computer terminal. Which would look very odd to us. Probably an object, animal or person would be required to interface with the game's managers. Maybe the writers of the prophecies (past and present) are the interfaces? I'm hoping it's a machine myself. People emulators and prophets are problematic, seem to indirectly cause wars.
My biggest concern is that moralty willl completely go out the window if everyone thinks it's all a game and thus we become a 100% Player-vs-player game. I'd prefer a 100% Player-vs-environment game.
Player-vs-player is like war in the Middle East, never ends, which makes it really hard to make progress on the important stuff. With all the recent issues, such as mass shootings in America, and domestic struggles with massive migrates relocating in Europe and all the civil unrest in the process... it's clearly a PvP server. One task might have to be to finally unify all governements and stop the PvP actions and make the planet peaceful finally so we can focus long and hard enough to figure out the glitches and take the game to the next level.
We've been through all this before. I'm not religious, but ancient man did suspect and figure out stuff that isn't obvious, thus putting it into doctrins. Some of it gives us clues. I had a Born-again-Christian tell me once that Jesus' message to humanity was that it's ok to not have to kill to grow and that the real goal is to advance our spirtual growth, that in effect it's ok, even required, to think more abstractly, stop acting like animals in nice clothes, and accept concepts you cannot see or touch, yet we strongly sense they are there. So much so that people are willing to kill or die for it. Which of course defeats the whole puprose! I think that may be one indication that the next level of the game was unlocked to humanity. I'm sure there are many.
There is another possibility... computer code that's from String Theory (www.quora.com/What-is-the-actual-string-of-computer-code-that-they-apparently-found-in-string-theory-Does-this-mean-that-were-in-a-simulation) suggests to me that the simulation may have started fairly recently. I mean the moment we made atomic bombs, let's say a super intelligence , froze everyting in place, took a snap shot, made a fake copy, created a sandbox where they could play out different scenarios to determine if we'd nuke or choke ourselved out of existance. The game is replayed from the starting point over and over making little changes until a sequence of adjustments can be made to get to a point that we do not nuke or choke the environement to death. Might include changing our very war-like DNA to something more peaceful... Once it's sorted out and safe, then the simulation is terminated and the real universe resumes it's course executing the "right path" for real. A bit like saving your game and when you mess up, restart and try again. The industrial revolution, world wars and nuclear weapons are a pretty good reason to freeze frame the world, and place us all in a simulation by a super being, or aliens or whatever is in control... maybe the universe itself is a form of life and does it auto-magically? I don't know and don't care. Bigger fish to fry than figure out how it's done. Accepting it is done is good enough to keep playing.
Anway... this round it's clear we are messing up bad. I am hoping for a game reset soon.
When that happens, I certainly won't marry my Ex wife. HAHAHAHA!
The idea that if things worked out differently during the big bang, we could've been 2D or 4D beings, is really neat to think about
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
I recently read Hyperspace by Michio Kaku. It's literally the same thing you've been explaining in your recent videos. Must read.
Cool I'll check it out
Watched for quality content.
Appreciated for technical explanations.
Liked for "weirdest stock footage"
@7:00 if returned “flipped” to one’s 3D-world, the observer would be presented with a mirrored 3D universe; the observer wouldn’t have any perception of his heart or birthmarks mirroring.
5:56 hence a "spirit world" or where some people go to when they experience an NDE and go out of their bodies. Im not talking about religion here, im saying though that in the year 2019 all we know and still so many people are ignorant to there being some thing more than what we see or rather HOW we see/experience. Our minds are merely tuned to perceive this world. Its pretty simple to understand such a concept. Tweak the brain just a bit and perception changes. Think of how those with down syndrome perceive the world. Those taking acid or auhuasca. NDE experiences or DMT.
Now imagine your energy being transferred to another "platform" and tuned/coded differently to fit into a differently coded body/brain/entity that has a completely different "chip" / brain inside it. Everything exists over each other. Everything is just programmed to experience it differently.
This guy looks like Fallout 4 NPC
On god
He looks a lot like my late friend who loved this kind of stuff and engineering. He would have gone to WPI but he died before he got his acceptance letter :(
@@harleyspeedthrust4013 you must be great at partys
How do you come up with this?. I cant look at him the same way after this.
@@joemartinez9804 brooo omfg 😂
thanks for curiosity stream promo love it
Of course and thanks for the support!
One of the best videos I've ever seen on this topic. A real 15 minute gem.
me: lying in bed
the hypersphere: *h o l a n i ñ o*
this just makes me think taht the universe is an infinete playground for us to play and explore in
Yeah thats what I think
(3 + 1) dimensions of spacetime and (3 + 1) fundamental forces. Anyone else see a pattern? :)
Woah...
Hmmmm I see a pattern
7 days of a week and 7 continents , believed in some parts of the world, 7 wonders of the world. These are just numbers, coincidence more than likely.
@Arvind Sagar 7 days in a week for the 7 astronomical bodies visible to the naked eye: sun, moon and the 5 planets. As for 7 continents, a continent doesn't have a rigorous definition and can be arbitrarily chosen. Same with wonders of the world. Spacetime and the fundamental forces, however, aren't arbitrarily defined and describe the very nature of reality. It is still very much possible that these numbers are coincidental but I think there's something deeper here :)
@THE CROSS 7 layers of earth? Never heard that before
you’re really cool i love you and this channel
flatland is a great book, i highly recommend giving it a read
Just amazing that you can derive maxwells equations by adding an extra dimension to relativity
Dont have a clue what he's saying.. Still watch the whole thing with HOPE he says something layman would understand.
I understood the curiosity stream part =D
I've wondered about exactly this ever since I started understanding mathematics from a more abstract, pure point of view right around high school
Love these videos! You explain stuff so we'll
imagine being a 2 dimensional being, how would you prove existence of 3 dimensional life. What maths would it take?
If you have 2 or more 2 dimensional beings they could figure out the sphere that went throu their world/plane. They would measure the slice of the sphere at different times and from different angles. After combining the data they would come up with a 3 dimensional sphere. However they would have Difficulties to imagine it. And they can not proof it 100%. Same dilemma we have proofing the existence of thigher dimensions.
@@chrisbraeuer9476 the problem is there is no conscious beings in our world that are 2D, all of them are 3D. Imagine what exists in higher dimension, what is the reality there that doesn't apply here?
@@atomnous All "beings" in our world are 3D. Yes. But conciousnes is an emergent phenomen of the 3 D world. If you pinpoint it its 0d. You could see a thought as a real 2d thing. A picture with zero depth. For A 4D being a whole 3d life is just a thought. Makes sense?
@@chrisbraeuer9476 are u saying lovrcraft was onto something?
@@ravingmadman3 Lets see. The Lovecraft theme is that tentacle gods are captured in dimension outside of our own and they try to get into ours. That would mean that they are also 3d like we are. So they want to change from their 3d world to ours. That is not what I am talking about. If I stretch my picture to fit the Lovecraft world it would would mean that our whole universe with everything in it is just a thought of a 4D tentacle being.
Wonder if the dilation of time in an extra dimension can allow quantum effects without violating causality.
Like, the delayed photon travels at the speed of light, through a longer distance, and through a region where time passes less quickly; all at the same time. So both photons arrive at the same time and interfere.
You have no idea...
That could be a variable to isolate some things
It makes sense. The pythagorean theorem is applicable in 2D, so a 3D version of it was needed.
Albert Einstein said that it is impossible to say that there is no God
ua-cam.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/v-deo.html
I know you've started making different types of videos now such as these, but please could you do a video comparing a UK engineering degree and a US engineering degree?
And just for that extra spice, throw in a comparison with an Indian engineering degree as well.
12:52. So they are kinda saying that the big bang was so powerful that it literally expanded four entire dimensions? Admittedly, at that 'time' ('' because without the dimension(s) of time, it is not rigorously defined) every dimension was around the size of a string, but still. Jeez
Tell me, what was before the Big Bang? Before the initial singularity, black? And what was before the pre-big bang era????
I will consume more marijuana in an attempt to understand... please standby.
@@joshstudiospresent Nothing, not in this universe anyway. Time didn't exist before the big bang, so nothing came before it. That's the leading theory.
@@shadesilverwing0 There was something. Nanoparticles, atoms, dark matter, etc. The big bang would have needed a catalyst. Therefore the clock was ticking before then just with a lot less activity and things around as the universe constantly expands. I'm no expert or anything and I'm aware of what Einstein said pertaining to the subject matter, but my curious intuition would think that there had to have been something that brought about the big bang itself it didn't just burst from nothing.
@@reciv4 it’s probably what you said, ‘dark energy’ & ‘dark matter’, we can’t see them in the naked eye. I wouldn’t be surprised that they were the ones that bonded different molecules, atoms, etc. Which started The Bang Bang, unless someone or something started that which would relate to the dimensions 👀
Could time really start in the 2d dimension? Which created the 3d & such at which we are in right now?
Edit: Or to put it this way, ‘dark energy’ & ‘dark matter’ can go through any dimension which CREATED The Big Bang….
Pirates have know all about extra curled up dimensions for centuries because they like golden rings and they are always walking the Planck.
There are higher dimensions, and there are entities that inhabit these dimensions.
ikr, they tickle your feet when you're sleeping.
Cooper.
You forgot to quote Joe Rogan on this one
The Great Old Ones
“There’s nothing I or anyone can do to change this other than find the weirdest stock footage that I can” lol
I really appreciate how easy this is to follow ❤️ Thank you.
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
"Theory that black holes lead to parallel universe..."
So that's why I decided to become a rocket scientist...
"And there's nothing that I or anyone else can do to change this beyond showing the weirdest stock footage that I could find"
I don't know why but this made me laugh so hard 😂
Our brains are 4th dimensional tho, we’re storing information inside of a 3 dimensional space, so I think being in the 4 dimension wouldn’t be unfathomable
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.sciencealert.com/science-discovers-human-brain-works-up-to-11-dimensions/amp&ved=2ahUKEwjjg8bM6ZXlAhWFMX0KHX4jB4UQFjAQegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw1dz-BFI3hCCjTb57GtVV_c&cf=1
@@kaprio551 Ketamine
@@kaprio551 We have higher logical thinking. Our brain works in 4 dimensions (space and time) but it can process higher dimensions. For example you can navigate a 5 dimensional space with ease.
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj space = time. They're connected like your arms to your torso. Our brains are not fourth dimensional because that doesn't mean anything. Our brains however are organic computers which could bring into question whose on the keyboard. (Soul ect).
What if I told you we were 5 dimensional beings living in a 4 dimensional world thinking like 3 dimensional beings
Could the curled up "ring dimension" explain why electrons are cloud-like rather then point-like?
Doesn't Heisenberg's uncertainty principle explain that we can't know the exact position of a particle, only the probabilities it's in a specific location, and the cloud just represents all of the possible locations. The particle is somewhere in the cloud.
@@jowbloe3673 yea it's the uncertainty principle not "vibrations"
I wish loop quantum gravity was more popularized in media. Just so we can have something else to think about (besides string theory) when thinking about quantum gravity theories.
This video in a nutshell:
"soooo there is some strange little little strings that vibe differently and they're soooooooo small that they vibe in smaaaaaaaaal dimensions and because of this you cant party in a 4th dimension"
Thanks mate!
Burkhard Heim was right. his theory totally fits into buddism
A shoutout to my buddy Riccardo, the owner of the Hologrammata blog featured at 9:48 :)
The inversion concept help me understand Tenet so much more 👏
i like watching these kind of videos even though i understand zero of this things
I'd love to know what you think of the Electric Universe Theory.