Here is PROOF that orthodox claims are untethered to reality...7 months of full-time work to chip out a couple of cubic inches of softer-than granite stone cannot rationally be applied to what we have actually seen. And the bird? How long did the bird take? Where are the flint tools used by the Egyptians (and the South Americans) that you believe accomplished these mysteries? This simply does not hold up to explain these accomplishments. Some of the 40,000 vessels (all made prior to the first pyramid...and NEVER AGAIN AFTERWARDS...are far beyond this process to achieve. But hey...believe what you want.
She proved how impossible it is to achieve the precision we can see and measure. Her failure is quoted as a success by those who do not know the actual accomplishments of the stone vessels ALL OF WHICH, WITH NO EXCEPTIONS, were provably made BEFORE the fourth dynasty credited with making them. Real engineers scoff at her demonstration...and the ignorance that allows it to be confused with what was actually accomplished, by means that are still not understoood.
@@machinebeard1639 wtf do u mean some one that has done it there whole life were u around when that 2000+ year old vase was made noo! the results speak for them self's this was done with machining tech like a lathe we know this bc of the markings that we can see when we put in a MRI scan plz do research before putting your opinions on others mate i am not calling u out. i just hope u can understand that this is not how they made such vases in the past. there have been many wars and many different people have taken others tech over thousands of years that is why we do not see the tech that allowed for such things to be created and is also why we don't have people that make things out of granite anymore, its because the tech that they did use to make things that we struggle to recreate with even the most sophisticated lathes we have to day was either destroyed or lost over time probably because who ever stole it probably did-int know how to use it or even power it soooooooooooooooo yeeeeeee mane we dont know every thing shocker is-int it
Great work Olga. This clearly shows that even Neolithic cultures could shape their world and create beautiful and functional art without the help of power tools, laser guns or aliens.
Here from Dr. Miano's World of Antiquity channel! This was a stunning visual experience! Such beautiful stone, and the vase was done incredibly well, for probably not having ever done such a thing with this kind of tools before! Thank you for sharing the journey with us. 😊 ❤❤
Beautiful work! Thank you for this excellent video. I would be very interested to see the results of a precision analysis of the dimensions and proportions of this beautiful, modern replica.
So 7.5 months at 8 hours per day About 5 months if you worked 12 hours a day and if someone else specialized in making the leather bindings and tools it would save you half the time so 2.5 months, now consider she was unfamiliar with these processes and probably slower than someone who done it everyday so let's say she's 25 percent slower now were down to 6 weeks and if you started with a smaller stone closer to finished piece maybe 4 weeks
That is very nice work, but is that bird not from the Roman period of Egypt? With your method I can't see how you can get the accuracy and symmetry to level of predynastic stone vase.
@@Eyes_Open Her 'next project' started over 3 years ago... Either it's taken her over 3 years (so far) with not enough of a result to show, or she's failed. She streamed over 2000 hours of it, and that stream finished 2 years ago. I suggest you open your eyes to just how difficult it is to make objects from materials like that.
@@UA-camHandlesSuckBalls The rest of us understand the challenge. Stone is not magical. Do you suspect that someone teaching themself how to do it will instantly match the ancient knowledge?
@@Eyes_Open Address the point. You replied "She is choosing diorite for next project" in response to "months will become years and just melt away", well it's *already been* years now showing the person you replied to was more correct than you. Where is this diorite vase? There seems to be a false dichotomy you are insisting on where "It's either bronze chisels or magic and aliens". Open your eyes to how ridiculous that sounds. It is obvious that ancient knowledge was more advanced than you are willing to accept.
Great respect for Olga's tenacity. But what she's proven is not HOW it was made but that it could ALSO be made like this. Sort of like painting Mona Lisa with a toothpick or building Eiffel tower using blind people. Certainly possible. But.... Nope.
Yes, 7 months to make one vase? And its not even remotely as good as the best examples from ancient sites. And there were thousands of them found, and presumably a lot more that are destroyed, or still to be found. Someone was very busy in the old days.
She's doing this to prove something, so there's a reason for her to dedicate this much time (seven months and a half, days a week, with five to hour work days.) So they're assuming that the people who made vases like this way back when, had that much dedication. Interesting.
I think you underestimate what a person can get done when they aren't watching youtube and stuff all day...lol. Also, I suspect that a craftsman back then would have all of this equipment already made and would know how to use it better/more efficiently. They also probably picked blocks that were already somewhat shaped like what they planned to make. The block she started with probably would have just been rounded off into a standard vase. She spent a LOT of time just getting it down to where the craftsman probably would have started at by selecting the right piece of stone.
Granite is stone. The Limestone of the original piece she is replicating is 3.5 on the Mohs hardness scale, and the Marble she is using is also 3.5. Granite is 7, so it's twice as hard as either. There are many granite vases from ancient Egypt that are very precisely carved which would be very hard if not impossible to do by hand.
@@al2207 They're a similar hardness, and mohs scale has nothing to do with grinding, polishing, chiseling, etc stone. It's a guide for the hardness of gemstones.
so you had your vase measured and it matched the precision of .001-.003 on the material was igneous rock ? this could explain some works but not all of them.
Some ancient artifacts were possibly hand made with simple tools, but there are many examples in tool marks left on artifacts themselves which suggest power tools. Also over cuts which in the slower process of hand milling would make no sense. The facts that much harder materials were used... Granite and Diorite. The Schist disk for instance...
The Egyptians of the Pyramid Age didn't need to use stone tools, as they had iron ones. Howard Vyse found an iron plate deep in the masonry of the Great Pyramid and iron is mentioned frequently in the Pyramid Texts. Iron tools of the 5th Dynasty have also been found.
I was watching an uncharted X video that said that what you’re doing is impossible. He said that you have to have laths and power tools in order to do this. I guess you showed him. Congratulations and I hope you make another one thank you
Not if the piece is limestone.... granite or diorite? yeah more likely. But the evidence for power tools is not just the materials used, it's in tool marks themselves. Everything from tube bore holes and circular saw cuts including over cuts which with hand tools wouldn't happen because you'd immediately stop once you reached the end of your cut.
@@Atoyota She did it with a granite that was the same hardness as the ones uncharted ex was talking about. which absolutely proves him, unchartedx wrong
@@rc6614 I’d like to see her pound out a diorite box. Similar to those in the serepium Sharp interior corners etc… But again there remains evidence of tool marks and over cuts Stuff hand tools could not or would not do. No worker would intentionally over cut when working with hand powered tools. It just wouldn’t happen. And yet the evidence of just that is on exhibit in the Egyptian museum. Circular saw tool marks exist as well.
The point is she is just one little Russian woman. Just think what generations of skilled craftsmen with all thier tricks of the trade and knowledge could accomplish. They figured out a way to do it without using laser beams or magic or advice from aliens.
@@rc6614 No doubt some of this is possible from what she did, but not all of it. That's my assertion. Before the Younger Dryas, all sorts of flora/fauna existed (13k years ago). Man (You and I) has been in it's stage of evolution (physical/intellectual) for at least 40k years. Probably much longer.... Our civilization has since at least Gobekli Tepe, been capable of megalithic constructions. Not only does the evidence exist in Gaza, but all over the world. You deniers are like ostriches with your heads in the ground.
This does not “prove” anything. There were over 40,000 found. With machine-precision within 1 thousandth of an inch (check UnchartedX latest videos using scanning software to analyse one) There are even some with the thickness of a playing card which is impossible to create by hand. Yes, this is a good albeit highly laborious indication of one being replicated over the course of 7 months, but by no means does this “prove” without doubt how the other more precise, thinner, larger and more perfect vases were made. Do you really think the black granite 100 ton Serapeum boxes made to precision within 1-micron were made with such crude tools? Whatever advanced tools made the Serapeum boxes made the vases. There’s clear evidences of scoop marks, machined cut marks and machined tube drills, used to machine numerous +200 ton granite blocks with precision rivalling what our own computers can produce today. No hand made crude tools on the land can account for the laser-like precision within 1 thousandth of an inch and within 1 micron that many artefacts display as evidenced by modern machine scanning tools.
I can't believe people take this as proof of how they made the symmetrically perfect stone vases, which could not be achieved using these methods. You could see how the done drill was wobbling about, which would give inaccuracies. And really, of you want to present this as something you've achieved using only the methods you've shown, you'd have to film the whole process Because you don't show any of the serious work being achieved, you skip by all major work and then claim you've done it. Hey maybe you have, but unless you show the entire process, you rely on people having either faith, which comes from a strong desire for confirmation bias. And as i said, neither the original or the one made 'made' here are of totally different, substandard pieces when compared to the exquisite classical vases, who's prefect proportions that can be defined by precise mathematical equations, and who's walls are uninformally, to a couple of thousands of an inch, as thin as thin card. So thin they're translucent. The above, comparatively crude bird bowls and these very early vases machined to perfection are not remotely in the same ballpar. Of course, those seeking their reassuring confirmation bias will eagerly accept this as proof of their belief in their indoctrinated perception. Academia always hangs on to their prescribed views for far too long, before they'll accept anything new, unless that is, it's a brand new vaccine, or the brand new idea that women can have penises too 🤔 🙄
@@Eyes_Open Do please explain. It's beyond ridiculous to believe such rudimentary tools and methods are capable of the precision pieces. To think it can be, just shows a lack of understanding of precision engineering. They did achieve some amazing work with such tools, but the precision pieces aren't a part of that at all. I think you're perception of confirmation bias, is someone who doesn't believe nonsense, based on century old interpretations. It looks like our civilisation's advancement is purely based on technology, not intelligence 😉
@@martinsanders5418 You started with an unsupported assumption and use it as a reference for all further discussion. There are no proven precision artifacts. There are only claims.
@@Eyes_Open That's ridiculous, and you know it. The only way you don't see the evidence for precision artifacts, is if you refuse to look. I won't waste my time
The point of this exercise was to 'prove' something. She simply didn't. The burden of truth is hers to prove, not mine to prove otherwise. If you take this as proof of something, you definitely do fall under confirmation bias. What you saw was a few clips, not proof of any process. It doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Of course if she uploaded an unedited film of the process, for her peers to examine, that'd be a different matter. If she satisfied that, the only criticism is that it is nowhere near the precision or symmetry, and cannot be defined by a clear exact mathematical ratio, that we find on the earliest examples of vases. Then you've got the 100 ton basalt boxes, with walks and angles cut with extreme precision that just can't be achieved by any humans, then or now. Nobody can claim that they're sawn, because the saw can't work the interior of the box. A box made of one of the hardest forms of rock. I can accept that the dynastic Egyptians achieved some amazing feats with their rudimentary tool sets, and they can work some very hard stone in some cases, but there are many examples where these tools just can't physically be possible in some spaces, and when you see them emulate these already ancient, inherited, pieces of work. The dynastic Egyptians were successful civilisations, then usurped by the then successful Romans. So how did they lose this knowledge of this highly valued techniques, if not for them disappeqring at some point prior to they discovered the sites. The ancient Egyptians always claimed their culture and civilisations were legacy based. What do you think they actually meant by that? I don't claim to have all the answers, there are many mysteries. Mainstream Eyptologists and historians can't stand mystery, and so, come up with the most half arsed theories, to account for things that they clearly should be puzzled and intrigued by. There you go, I wasted my time after all 🙄
Kinda demonstrates how unlikely these tools are to account for either the scale or the delicacy of what we can see. 7 and a half months. Working hours: 5 days a week for 6-8 hours (with breaks). to crudely shape SOFT LIMESTONE. Now try that on granite, or even harder stone, to see how useless that process is for what was accomplished. What better proof do you need to refute orthodox claims?
And look at the quality at 9:15 That is like millimeter scale precision and compare it to 1000th of an inch precision (0.0254mm) I dont think anybody is denying that one can shape stones with primitive tools and hard work. That would be ridiculous.
it’s easy… i’ll tell you, i just figured it out. It’s paint/glaze. It’s over a medium that is over a mold. figure it out from here is easy, the heat source for curing is around the lids opening, that’s why they are always flat…
Hundreds of books and articles, countless words spoken about this, only Olga Vdovina has demonstrated and proven how this was done. Thank You Olga.
Here is PROOF that orthodox claims are untethered to reality...7 months of full-time work to chip out a couple of cubic inches of softer-than granite stone cannot rationally be applied to what we have actually seen. And the bird? How long did the bird take? Where are the flint tools used by the Egyptians (and the South Americans) that you believe accomplished these mysteries? This simply does not hold up to explain these accomplishments. Some of the 40,000 vessels (all made prior to the first pyramid...and NEVER AGAIN AFTERWARDS...are far beyond this process to achieve. But hey...believe what you want.
She proved how impossible it is to achieve the precision we can see and measure. Her failure is quoted as a success by those who do not know the actual accomplishments of the stone vessels ALL OF WHICH, WITH NO EXCEPTIONS, were provably made BEFORE the fourth dynasty credited with making them. Real engineers scoff at her demonstration...and the ignorance that allows it to be confused with what was actually accomplished, by means that are still not understoood.
It's a youtube video with many cuts , she got a hammer and grinder under the table...lol...this just shows it can't be done😂
@@michael4250 Her first attempt wasn't as good as someone who had done it their whole life? No way.
@@machinebeard1639 wtf do u mean some one that has done it there whole life were u around when that 2000+ year old vase was made noo! the results speak for them self's this was done with machining tech like a lathe we know this bc of the markings that we can see when we put in a MRI scan plz do research before putting your opinions on others mate i am not calling u out. i just hope u can understand that this is not how they made such vases in the past. there have been many wars and many different people have taken others tech over thousands of years that is why we do not see the tech that allowed for such things to be created and is also why we don't have people that make things out of granite anymore, its because the tech that they did use to make things that we struggle to recreate with even the most sophisticated lathes we have to day was either destroyed or lost over time probably because who ever stole it probably did-int know how to use it or even power it soooooooooooooooo yeeeeeee mane we dont know every thing shocker is-int it
Great work Olga. This clearly shows that even Neolithic cultures could shape their world and create beautiful and functional art without the help of power tools, laser guns or aliens.
Incredible. Hard work, patience, craftsmanship, and love of art. Something conspiracy theorist always ignore.
Imhotep would be proud of Olga's enginuity and experimentation.
10 / 10 well done
Here from Dr. Miano's World of Antiquity channel! This was a stunning visual experience! Such beautiful stone, and the vase was done incredibly well, for probably not having ever done such a thing with this kind of tools before! Thank you for sharing the journey with us. 😊
❤❤
Excellent work! Best of luck!
非常了不起的作品，让人倾佩的艺术家👍
Bravo!!!! I clap my hands and bow down to you
Very intelligent woman. Bravo!
Wonderful amazing work, thanks for teaching me aubout patience, stones and bones, art, talent and craftmanship.
Thank you olga,fascinating
Beautiful work!
Thank you for this excellent video.
I would be very interested to see the results of a precision analysis of the dimensions and proportions of this beautiful, modern replica.
You have done a really good job but still the old thing looked much more beautiful.
It's really quite easy, just remove anything that doesn't look like a bird.
So 7.5 months at 8 hours per day
About 5 months if you worked 12 hours a day and if someone else specialized in making the leather bindings and tools it would save you half the time so 2.5 months, now consider she was unfamiliar with these processes and probably slower than someone who done it everyday so let's say she's 25 percent slower now were down to 6 weeks and if you started with a smaller stone closer to finished piece maybe 4 weeks
Thank You very much
That is very nice work, but is that bird not from the Roman period of Egypt? With your method I can't see how you can get the accuracy and symmetry to level of predynastic stone vase.
Wait, so, no aliens required?
Bravo, l intérieur c est pareil ?
Good effort
Try andesite, porphyry or basalt next time. Months will become years and just melt away.
She is choosing diorite for next project.
@@Eyes_Open Her 'next project' started over 3 years ago...
Either it's taken her over 3 years (so far) with not enough of a result to show, or she's failed. She streamed over 2000 hours of it, and that stream finished 2 years ago. I suggest you open your eyes to just how difficult it is to make objects from materials like that.
@@UA-camHandlesSuckBalls The rest of us understand the challenge. Stone is not magical. Do you suspect that someone teaching themself how to do it will instantly match the ancient knowledge?
@@Eyes_Open Address the point. You replied "She is choosing diorite for next project" in response to "months will become years and just melt away", well it's *already been* years now showing the person you replied to was more correct than you. Where is this diorite vase?
There seems to be a false dichotomy you are insisting on where "It's either bronze chisels or magic and aliens". Open your eyes to how ridiculous that sounds. It is obvious that ancient knowledge was more advanced than you are willing to accept.
Tenacious work, no doubt. How was the undercut inside visible at 7:54 accomplished?
Just before your timestamp you can see she's using a wider piece of stone to burrow into the sides.
Took a literal year
Great respect for Olga's tenacity. But what she's proven is not HOW it was made but that it could ALSO be made like this. Sort of like painting Mona Lisa with a toothpick or building Eiffel tower using blind people. Certainly possible. But.... Nope.
Yes, 7 months to make one vase? And its not even remotely as good as the best examples from ancient sites. And there were thousands of them found, and presumably a lot more that are destroyed, or still to be found. Someone was very busy in the old days.
Now make one out of granite lol nice work
who payed you for this enormous work, half a year?
We currently do not have contact with this colleague, and are therefore unable to get a reply for you. We apologise.
Alot of editing. Who knows what was cut out
I am sure you'd like the unedited 5000 hour 4k video, right? I wonder why that wasnt uploaded 🥲
@michaelmurray6577 F oath I would. Who wouldn't. Did you do it? Don't think. Go play your video games tosser
@@michaelmurray6577 f oath, who wouldn't. Did you record it? Nope. Go back to your games clown
She's doing this to prove something, so there's a reason for her to dedicate this much time (seven months and a half, days a week, with five to hour work days.) So they're assuming that the people who made vases like this way back when, had that much dedication. Interesting.
I think you underestimate what a person can get done when they aren't watching youtube and stuff all day...lol. Also, I suspect that a craftsman back then would have all of this equipment already made and would know how to use it better/more efficiently. They also probably picked blocks that were already somewhat shaped like what they planned to make. The block she started with probably would have just been rounded off into a standard vase. She spent a LOT of time just getting it down to where the craftsman probably would have started at by selecting the right piece of stone.
Is this stone, or is this granite? Or are they the same thing?
Granite is a type of stone, sir.
both are rock but granite is way more rigid and solid than marble
Granite is stone. The Limestone of the original piece she is replicating is 3.5 on the Mohs hardness scale, and the Marble she is using is also 3.5. Granite is 7, so it's twice as hard as either. There are many granite vases from ancient Egypt that are very precisely carved which would be very hard if not impossible to do by hand.
lot of work but you should use real limestone breccia to demonstrate a real test
Is the marble breccia not a harder stone?
@@Eyes_Open no, marble is only 3 on Mohs sale
@@al2207 But we are comparing limestone breccia to marble breccia. I think they are at least quite similar hardness.
@@Eyes_Open agree, they should be similar hardness
@@al2207 They're a similar hardness, and mohs scale has nothing to do with grinding, polishing, chiseling, etc stone. It's a guide for the hardness of gemstones.
so you had your vase measured and it matched the precision of .001-.003 on the material was igneous rock ? this could explain some works but not all of them.
Some ancient artifacts were possibly hand made with simple tools, but there are many examples in tool marks left on artifacts themselves which suggest power tools. Also over cuts which in the slower process of hand milling would make no sense.
The facts that much harder materials were used... Granite and Diorite. The Schist disk for instance...
The Egyptians of the Pyramid Age didn't need to use stone tools, as they had iron ones. Howard Vyse found an iron plate deep in the masonry of the Great Pyramid and iron is mentioned frequently in the Pyramid Texts. Iron tools of the 5th Dynasty have also been found.
I need help
Hope you got it at some point in the last year
Now do it with granite. THEN you can prove something.
1,000 hours?
Who's going to cook my dinner and clean the house while she's doing this?
you who else!
I was watching an uncharted X video that said that what you’re doing is impossible. He said that you have to have laths and power tools in order to do this. I guess you showed him. Congratulations and I hope you make another one thank you
Not if the piece is limestone.... granite or diorite? yeah more likely.
But the evidence for power tools is not just the materials used, it's in tool marks themselves. Everything from tube bore holes and circular saw cuts including over cuts which with hand tools wouldn't happen because you'd immediately stop once you reached the end of your cut.
@@Atoyota She did it with a granite that was the same hardness as the ones uncharted ex was talking about. which absolutely proves him, unchartedx wrong
@@rc6614 I’d like to see her pound out a diorite box. Similar to those in the serepium
Sharp interior corners etc…
But again there remains evidence of tool marks and over cuts
Stuff hand tools could not or would not do. No worker would intentionally over cut when working with hand powered tools. It just wouldn’t happen. And yet the evidence of just that is on exhibit in the Egyptian museum. Circular saw tool marks exist as well.
The point is she is just one little Russian woman. Just think what generations of skilled craftsmen with all thier tricks of the trade and knowledge could accomplish. They figured out a way to do it without using laser beams or magic or advice from aliens.
@@rc6614 No doubt some of this is possible from what she did, but not all of it.
That's my assertion.
Before the Younger Dryas, all sorts of flora/fauna existed (13k years ago). Man (You and I) has been in it's stage of evolution (physical/intellectual) for at least 40k years.
Probably much longer....
Our civilization has since at least Gobekli Tepe, been capable of megalithic constructions.
Not only does the evidence exist in Gaza, but all over the world.
You deniers are like ostriches with your heads in the ground.
This does not “prove” anything. There were over 40,000 found. With machine-precision within 1 thousandth of an inch (check UnchartedX latest videos using scanning software to analyse one) There are even some with the thickness of a playing card which is impossible to create by hand.
Yes, this is a good albeit highly laborious indication of one being replicated over the course of 7 months, but by no means does this “prove” without doubt how the other more precise, thinner, larger and more perfect vases were made.
Do you really think the black granite 100 ton Serapeum boxes made to precision within 1-micron were made with such crude tools? Whatever advanced tools made the Serapeum boxes made the vases.
There’s clear evidences of scoop marks, machined cut marks and machined tube drills, used to machine numerous +200 ton granite blocks with precision rivalling what our own computers can produce today.
No hand made crude tools on the land can account for the laser-like precision within 1 thousandth of an inch and within 1 micron that many artefacts display as evidenced by modern machine scanning tools.
"Believers" are unswayed by facts...so only independant research are actually testing things.
@ Keiran Kainth sounds like you have fully consumed your portion of LAHT cool-aid.
I can't believe people take this as proof of how they made the symmetrically perfect stone vases, which could not be achieved using these methods.
You could see how the done drill was wobbling about, which would give inaccuracies.
And really, of you want to present this as something you've achieved using only the methods you've shown, you'd have to film the whole process
Because you don't show any of the serious work being achieved, you skip by all major work and then claim you've done it.
Hey maybe you have, but unless you show the entire process, you rely on people having either faith, which comes from a strong desire for confirmation bias.
And as i said, neither the original or the one made 'made' here are of totally different, substandard pieces when compared to the exquisite classical vases, who's prefect proportions that can be defined by precise mathematical equations, and who's walls are uninformally, to a couple of thousands of an inch, as thin as thin card. So thin they're translucent.
The above, comparatively crude bird bowls and these very early vases machined to perfection are not remotely in the same ballpar.
Of course, those seeking their reassuring confirmation bias will eagerly accept this as proof of their belief in their indoctrinated perception.
Academia always hangs on to their prescribed views for far too long, before they'll accept anything new, unless that is, it's a brand new vaccine, or the brand new idea that women can have penises too 🤔 🙄
Amusing to see you talk about confirmation bias as you literally display it.
@@Eyes_Open Do please explain.
It's beyond ridiculous to believe such rudimentary tools and methods are capable of the precision pieces.
To think it can be, just shows a lack of understanding of precision engineering.
They did achieve some amazing work with such tools, but the precision pieces aren't a part of that at all.
I think you're perception of confirmation bias, is someone who doesn't believe nonsense, based on century old interpretations.
It looks like our civilisation's advancement is purely based on technology, not intelligence 😉
@@martinsanders5418 You started with an unsupported assumption and use it as a reference for all further discussion. There are no proven precision artifacts. There are only claims.
@@Eyes_Open That's ridiculous, and you know it.
The only way you don't see the evidence for precision artifacts, is if you refuse to look.
I won't waste my time
The point of this exercise was to 'prove' something. She simply didn't.
The burden of truth is hers to prove, not mine to prove otherwise.
If you take this as proof of something, you definitely do fall under confirmation bias. What you saw was a few clips, not proof of any process.
It doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Of course if she uploaded an unedited film of the process, for her peers to examine, that'd be a different matter.
If she satisfied that, the only criticism is that it is nowhere near the precision or symmetry, and cannot be defined by a clear exact mathematical ratio, that we find on the earliest examples of vases.
Then you've got the 100 ton basalt boxes, with walks and angles cut with extreme precision that just can't be achieved by any humans, then or now.
Nobody can claim that they're sawn, because the saw can't work the interior of the box. A box made of one of the hardest forms of rock.
I can accept that the dynastic Egyptians achieved some amazing feats with their rudimentary tool sets, and they can work some very hard stone in some cases, but there are many examples where these tools just can't physically be possible in some spaces, and when you see them emulate these already ancient, inherited, pieces of work.
The dynastic Egyptians were successful civilisations, then usurped by the then successful Romans.
So how did they lose this knowledge of this highly valued techniques, if not for them disappeqring at some point prior to they discovered the sites.
The ancient Egyptians always claimed their culture and civilisations were legacy based. What do you think they actually meant by that?
I don't claim to have all the answers, there are many mysteries. Mainstream Eyptologists and historians can't stand mystery, and so, come up with the most half arsed theories, to account for things that they clearly should be puzzled and intrigued by.
There you go, I wasted my time after all 🙄
Kinda demonstrates how unlikely these tools are to account for either the scale or the delicacy of what we can see. 7 and a half months. Working hours: 5 days a week for 6-8 hours (with breaks). to crudely shape SOFT LIMESTONE. Now try that on granite, or even harder stone, to see how useless that process is for what was accomplished. What better proof do you need to refute orthodox claims?
And look at the quality at 9:15
That is like millimeter scale precision and compare it to 1000th of an inch precision (0.0254mm)
I dont think anybody is denying that one can shape stones with primitive tools and hard work. That would be ridiculous.
Funny part it, they prob cheat in making this one, just look at 5:03 to 5:08
it’s easy… i’ll tell you, i just figured it out. It’s paint/glaze. It’s over a medium that is over a mold. figure it out from here is easy, the heat source for curing is around the lids opening, that’s why they are always flat…
I love Olga for doing this. Can't stand these high technology alien weirdos...
Not even close.
Her version is way better.
I don’t see her actually sculpting …..ANYTHING 🙄