The Three Musketeers(1935) D'Artagnan vs. De Rochefort & Finale

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @jamesmarshall8836
    @jamesmarshall8836 5 років тому +7

    Cardinal Richelieu was played by Nigel De Brulier. This was his third of four portrayals of the Cardinal, 1921, 1929, 1935 & 1939.

  • @robertmcpherson1617
    @robertmcpherson1617 2 роки тому +1

    I like the fight here. It is by my favorite Hollywood fencing master, Fred Cavens.

  • @odysseusrex5908
    @odysseusrex5908 3 роки тому +1

    Does anybody know where I can find a full copy of this movie? The three clips here on UA-cam make it look very good, even though there is an obvious significant deviation in plot from the book.

  • @MikeDieffenbach
    @MikeDieffenbach 4 роки тому +1

    can you please post the whole movie

  • @giovannigallo1336
    @giovannigallo1336 3 роки тому +1

    Sono i miei preferiti, ma vorrei vederlo intero, e in lingua italiano se è possibbile grazie...

  • @isaacwaite3804
    @isaacwaite3804 7 років тому +2

    who played the queen?

  • @dragonpride6997
    @dragonpride6997 7 років тому +1

    Pardon me. Do you have the entire film? I'm looking for a scene from it

    • @swordfightsgalore2321
      @swordfightsgalore2321  7 років тому +1

      You can buy it on DVD like I did, I'm not going to upload full films, this channel is for sword fights only.

    • @louisborselio8608
      @louisborselio8608 4 роки тому

      The only DVD I can find is Region 2. Is that what you have?

  • @felipealvarado8372
    @felipealvarado8372 11 місяців тому

    TRADUZCAN AL ESPAÑOL
    PARA TODO
    MICHOACAN ES
    EL RUMBO
    ATTE
    FELIPE AALVARADO

  • @kaiserjager2754
    @kaiserjager2754 4 роки тому +3

    I think there is not one single trustfull film adaptation of 3 Musketeers. This is totally made up and does not ANYTHING to do with the book. Rochefort was never arrested, in epilogue of 3 Musketeers he and D'Artagnan become friend and they stay also in 20 ans apres, where D'Artagnan unwillingly kills him during city skirmish. Also, these cort rituals are totally exagerated. They wouldn't fit either to Louis XIV, and even less to much more modest court of Louis XIII

    • @PizzaTheHutt69
      @PizzaTheHutt69 4 роки тому +3

      Nice to see others have read the books by Dumas and recognize that. I suppose there's far too much information in them for a movie to do justice with.

    • @kenschwentker4446
      @kenschwentker4446 4 роки тому +6

      Totally agree that movies over time have strayed (some more, some less) from the books. I submit it is because, although the books are fascinating reading, many of the actions of the protagonists would make little sense to a movie audience, or would be distasteful to most. The first whole section of the book involves d'Artagnan and his three friends risking their lives in order to help the Queen of France cover up her illicit affair with an English nobleman, which would also be treason, because France was at war with England. Then the book runs off on the wild d'Artagnan/Milady affair, (even though d'Artagnan is also smitten with Constance, a married lady-in-waiting to the Queen) before sending our heroes off to war, where they find time in between campaigns to plot the demise of Milady. Movie audiences would sit there asking "What are they fighting for?" So screen writers took various liberties to give the four men some solid, moral reason for their actions, usually involving saving King Louis XIII from a very evil Cardinal who is trying to overthrow him.

    • @benoitpellet1657
      @benoitpellet1657 Рік тому +2

      @@kenschwentker4446Sadly you are right. The original novel made sense to then reading public in France, but for modern non-French audiences, the whole story would make little sense. It takes place during a particularly sensitive moment in the French Wars of Religion, when La Rochelle, a Protestant stronghold, was holding out against the Catholic king and Cardinal Richelieu. A good half of the book takes place during the siege of La Rochelle and the Musketeers are on the side of the Catholic King Louis XIII. Dumas invented a supposed affair between the Queen and Buckingham, an English noble who had promised assistance to La Rochelle. That is what gives much of the book its background.
      Mind you, Dumas was no stickler for historical accuracy either. He places the Musketeers and the « bad guys » like Rochefort and Milady at the center of actual historical events but claims that the books’ main characters took a direct hand in such events. It’s a great book, of course, but as Dumas himself said: « There is no point in raping History if you do not produce a child. ». His d’Artaignan books are the children he produced by such violations of History.

    • @EloyCruz-e4k
      @EloyCruz-e4k Місяць тому +1

      Bueno , Rochefort si fue arrestado pero por Mazarino , recuerdas en Veinte años despues que D Artagnan platica con el en la bastilla si mal no recuerdo y ledice que fue arrestado x treparse a la estatia de Enrique IV ? Y le pide que hable bien de el al cardenal mazarino a ver si pueden liberarlo...ya despues lo rescatan se une a la fronda y es donde D Artagnan lo mata como tu bien explicaste..