Thrasher and the Gadgets are ran instead of Frontline Base because they're Lights and can be discarded for Solider on the off-chance you brick. They're also bodies in themselves which help you extend, the Gadgets have synergy with Unauthorized Reactivation and Thrasher can help Orbital not be a total brick. You emphasized the importance of Union Hangar and I found that playing Set Rotation helps you accomplish that. The other field spell is Trickstar Light Stage. If you draw the Light Stage you just add Corobane and use it for a free extender or discard with Soldier, and the Light Stage is great going second. The only time it ever bricks is if you draw both Set Rotation and Light Stage, which is highly unlikely. I also recommend Avramax for the Extra Deck, Borrelsword and Accesscode don't do anything on your opponent's turn and Avramax is already a huge wall who could be summoned just off of I:P and Union Carrier. If you've reached the stage where you manage to have an I:P and an ABC on board, and the ABC resolves to get you materials, you're likely winning next turn without the help of Borrelsword or Accesscode.
@@DillonChichester Corobane and Light Stage are never bricks, they both do something. The only brick is Set Rotation and Light Stage, which doesn't come up often. Its a lot more consistent than opening Frontline Base with less than two Unions.
@@thecorbeauxking7342 Yes, except my point is that its a suboptimal package. Ur running 3-4 more cards for a 1 card increase in ur hangar targets. While most of the package is "useful" even when drawn, its still suboptimal. Rather than compromising the power of the deck for a minor consistency boost, its best to stick with a smaller package, even if slightly weaker. Because you already have the 80% chance of hitting hangar (give or take), adding the rotation adds minimal increase in hitting the hangar because of diminishing returns. It's strictly suboptimal building for the extra 2-5% of hangar chance (depends on how you calculate it). In a deck with this much consistency, it's not worth it.
@@DillonChichester I forgot to mention, I'm not playing Thrasher or the Gadgets, that small Set Rotation package replaces those. Regarding the consistency, ABC is that kind of deck where its Hangar, Unauthorized or bust. Once you draw those its full combo, so I see Set Rotation as another way to get to the combo.
I love you, Cali! I actually am excited to give this deck a shot once Blazing drops and seeing this profile will give me so many ideas on how its going to be.
Yo man I had auto-generated subtitles on and it said "Calories effect" instead of "Calis effect" as you were talking about your diet, I thought that was hilarious. 😂 Keep up the grind...for your vids as well as for your diet. Stay stronk my guy.
hey cali. i still have my abc's back when i build them from scratch around 2018 when a assault core was at 1 bc of firewall, never game them up or traded them, i still have the build from then in it bc i never got the chance upgrade em (either money to buy singles or trade with people). your the reason i got into competitive yugioh and why i have abc's, its my favorite old school deck next to cyber dragons, thank you for what you did back then and what your doing now, its helped me out a lot and ill keep my abc deck and use it to honor you whenever i duel, whether i win or lose, thank you for another amazing deck profile and combo tutorial.
Bruh I just found your channel...I have to say the vibe is perfect and you speak at an unbelievably perfect pace, I don’t even have to rewind to understand a combo. Definitely joining this community
While frontline base is cool, the reasons to still play gadgets over it: They are light monsters, so discard fodder for galaxy soldier. Platinum gadget floats into them, so if they punishment/strike/torrential it, you can special summon one of them to follow. They are level 4, so still setup for r4nk, like number 60 which can give you abc access if yout opponent lancea you.
Great deck profile! Do you think it’s worth making an ABC deck at this current time? Anyone can answer this for me. I have been thinking about making this deck, and I would like some thoughts/opinions about this.
At the second to last combo you equipped the B to the C on the field under I:P for the play on your opponents turn, but still sent it to the graveyard and activated its effect. Just for clarification in case the extra search off the B would come up.
For the 2nd combo, wouldn't it be more ideal to summon Carrier to the EMZ and put I:P in the main? It would avoid getting cheesed by Cyber Dragons like you mentioned earlier
I've been thinking about theoretical ABC support, I think a Cresecendo, A Galatea (but a fusion that requires 2 light machine unions) and a Shaddoll fusion for the deck would do so much.
Hello. Very thanks for your vidéo, Calie. But, your ABC deck doesn't have enough extender, not ? My personal opinion.. I have also se that we can play a Invoked Mechaba for special summon it when our Cyber D Nova was Nibiru ( 😭 ). I think that's a goog option for increase the negate after a nibiru ( initialy ABC alone ). You forgot to talk about the protection on ash that gives Gamma when we activetes a Union hangar 😉. So, that's some ideas. Have a Nice day.
Will you be making a Dragunity deck profile when the new support for the archetype drops in March? It seems very likely that at the very least this deck will be a powerful rouge contender.
The only handtrap that works better against Frontline Base than against Gadgets is Ghost Ogre. ALL other handtraps are either better against the Gadgets (Veiler, Impermanence...) or are equally ineffective against both (such as Ash Blossom, which just does nothing against the summoning effect. It can hit the special summon from the deck that the Gadgets have, but thats just a fail-safe anyway). The only full on negative of FB is that its not a body on the field itself and therewith lessens your overall probability of drawing monsters. And well, its a cont. spell and as such usually does not stay on the field past turn 1.
I have a really important question, Would Mekk-Knight Avramax be good with this deck, Insteas of Code talker? You can use I:P to make it not be destroyed by card effects and he can already not be tarteged. also He beats over any special summoned monster with his effect... its TOO STRONG
kali read the underworld goddess and masq again. masq specifically says use monsters you control as xyz material. underworld goddess would use an opponent's monster. we don't know the ruling yet
So are we going to just overlook the fact that hanger prevents the speacil summon of the monster you attach to another monster aka you attach b to a, b can't be speacil summoned for the rest of the turn
Hello i'am from México, thanks for u'r recipe, i play ABC deck, the "frontline base" Is a great extender card I had not seen it, i will go ti Buy 3 copies tomorrow. 🇲🇽
you guyssss. I have a question regarding ABC buster dragon second effect. So in EDOPRO I have nekroz of Unicore on the field to negate all monsters. But for some reason the AI is able to tribute ABC buster dragon and summon three pieces from banished onto the field. Can someone explain to me why this is possible or is this an OCG thing?
Hi, this is not legal. I;p masquerena specifically states using monsters you control, making you unable to summon the new link using an opponents monster, thanks!
Because apparently no one can read, I:P Masquerena does NOT work with Underworld Goddess. Last time I checked, I:P Masquerena says you can Link summon using *monsters you control*
@@thecalieffect Then please explain how it works. You are summoning a monster through the effect of I:P Masquerena, and I:P Masquerena specifies that you summon using materials that you control.
Nevermind I guess, looks like Konami used the power of "Konami Said So" so that it does work, regardless of what's written on the actual card. Awesome.
Sooo the only new card is the pot and the new link 5 ... This video is incredibly misleading. There’s no new support for abc. Just the expensive generic cards that are just good themselves.
You can not use the link 5 material from opponent monster if you use ip effect. Cause ip effects had a restriction that you can only use your monster control as a material for link summon. even the link 5 is effect that you can use your opp monster as a material. Thats why in ocg they dont use that link 5 card. If would be busted if ip doesn't have that restriction.XD
Yes you can summon the link 5 by using ip effect but all of the material must be on your own. you cant use your opp because ip effect "you can link summon a monster during opp MP using your monster you control as a material" thats why you can link it but no materials from the enemy. I guess the ocg rulings are different from tcg.XD
As much as I adore ABC, it’s a deck that’s too slow for this meta. I play Cyber ABC but yea the deck to me needs a way to search the field spell. But this build is quite nice 👍🏾
*Vader breathez heavy* I just had ah epiphany... y dont we have ah floodgate card d@ sayz monsterz from tha extra deck can only be summoned in tha extra monster zone??? *Vader breathez heavy*
Cali, I hate to be that guy, but this video is kinda very clickbaity, there's only 2 cards in this deck out of Blazing Vortex. That is not the definiton of "insane support". Come on man, at least be honest about it.
A Card that increases the chances of opening you most important cards to 80% Another card that allows you to break boards by linking off and because it's game mechanics cannot be responded to. What else do you want as insane support? 🤔
![TheCaliEffect [King Of Games]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/DBbenGGk9RwpaipF-kBNlohvE1RVVX1Q-Aess7fsPvRX1IuAPBY3HwCuNa7ne4PltvyiRgjPmVo=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
Thrasher and the Gadgets are ran instead of Frontline Base because they're Lights and can be discarded for Solider on the off-chance you brick. They're also bodies in themselves which help you extend, the Gadgets have synergy with Unauthorized Reactivation and Thrasher can help Orbital not be a total brick.
You emphasized the importance of Union Hangar and I found that playing Set Rotation helps you accomplish that. The other field spell is Trickstar Light Stage. If you draw the Light Stage you just add Corobane and use it for a free extender or discard with Soldier, and the Light Stage is great going second. The only time it ever bricks is if you draw both Set Rotation and Light Stage, which is highly unlikely.
I also recommend Avramax for the Extra Deck, Borrelsword and Accesscode don't do anything on your opponent's turn and Avramax is already a huge wall who could be summoned just off of I:P and Union Carrier. If you've reached the stage where you manage to have an I:P and an ABC on board, and the ABC resolves to get you materials, you're likely winning next turn without the help of Borrelsword or Accesscode.
Ahhh yes, let me run 5 more bricks on the off chance that I brick... why didn’t I think of that?
@@DillonChichester Corobane and Light Stage are never bricks, they both do something. The only brick is Set Rotation and Light Stage, which doesn't come up often. Its a lot more consistent than opening Frontline Base with less than two Unions.
@@thecorbeauxking7342 Yes, except my point is that its a suboptimal package. Ur running 3-4 more cards for a 1 card increase in ur hangar targets. While most of the package is "useful" even when drawn, its still suboptimal. Rather than compromising the power of the deck for a minor consistency boost, its best to stick with a smaller package, even if slightly weaker. Because you already have the 80% chance of hitting hangar (give or take), adding the rotation adds minimal increase in hitting the hangar because of diminishing returns. It's strictly suboptimal building for the extra 2-5% of hangar chance (depends on how you calculate it). In a deck with this much consistency, it's not worth it.
@@DillonChichester I forgot to mention, I'm not playing Thrasher or the Gadgets, that small Set Rotation package replaces those.
Regarding the consistency, ABC is that kind of deck where its Hangar, Unauthorized or bust. Once you draw those its full combo, so I see Set Rotation as another way to get to the combo.
@@thecorbeauxking7342 I get you, I think set rotation to light stage is really good, you can also play 2 gadget since they do not conflict
Bro Nutella is definitely a "you better be caught with it!"
S+ tier
Peanut Butter is an "Oh no baby what are you doing?"
I just want to take a moment to appreciate that ABC is the 1st deck to have a COMPETITIVELY VIABLE Link 5 monster
Its not the first, unchained use this link 5 too
@@PauloSouza-lr3wm They do?!
Anyone else think the link 5 will help make Gouki a thing again?
@@belcher8006 How?
Ya but it's still a bad deck good for locals thou
Deck list:
3x A-Assault Core
3x B-Buster drake
3x C-Crush Wyvern
2x Union Driver
1x Heavy Mech Support Armor
3x Galaxy Soldier
1x Photon Orbital
3x Psy-Frame Gear Gamma
1x Psy-Frame gear driver
3x Ash Blossom and Joyous Spring
3x Ghost Belle and Haunted Mansion
2x Skull Meister
3x Union Hanger
1x Terraforming
3x Unauthorized Reactivation
3x Pot of Disparity (or pot of desires)
3x Forbidden Droplet (can switch for more handtraps or more extenders)
2x Frontline Base
-Extra Deck-
1x Saros Eresh Kurnugias
1x Apollousa, Bow of the Goddess
1x Borrelsword Dragon
1x Accesscode Talker
1x Knightmare Unicorn
1x Union carrier
1x I:P Masquerena
1x Knightmare Cerperus
1x Knightmare Phoenix
1x Psy-Frame Lord Lambda
1x Cyber Dragon Nova
1x Cyber Dragon Infinity
3x ABC - Dragon Buster
Was looking for this at 2am xD have to watch it tomorrow xD
ABC was the first deck I ever purchased. I remember buying the booster pack. Had those cards no one ever uses in it like Frontline base lol
I love you, Cali! I actually am excited to give this deck a shot once Blazing drops and seeing this profile will give me so many ideas on how its going to be.
Yo man I had auto-generated subtitles on and it said "Calories effect" instead of "Calis effect" as you were talking about your diet, I thought that was hilarious. 😂 Keep up the grind...for your vids as well as for your diet. Stay stronk my guy.
hey cali. i still have my abc's back when i build them from scratch around 2018 when a assault core was at 1 bc of firewall, never game them up or traded them, i still have the build from then in it bc i never got the chance upgrade em (either money to buy singles or trade with people). your the reason i got into competitive yugioh and why i have abc's, its my favorite old school deck next to cyber dragons, thank you for what you did back then and what your doing now, its helped me out a lot and ill keep my abc deck and use it to honor you whenever i duel, whether i win or lose, thank you for another amazing deck profile and combo tutorial.
Bruh I just found your channel...I have to say the vibe is perfect and you speak at an unbelievably perfect pace, I don’t even have to rewind to understand a combo. Definitely joining this community
Me: See’s Cali post a video. Don’t have time to watch now...
Also me: video opened liked and saved for later already know it’s good!
Let’s goo. I tried the other abc profile on ygo pro and it destroys. The combos you showed work soo well!
While frontline base is cool, the reasons to still play gadgets over it:
They are light monsters, so discard fodder for galaxy soldier.
Platinum gadget floats into them, so if they punishment/strike/torrential it, you can special summon one of them to follow.
They are level 4, so still setup for r4nk, like number 60 which can give you abc access if yout opponent lancea you.
Glad I am not the only to play frontline base. That card is spice.
finally someone who understand the potential of heavy mech support armor
Great deck profile! Do you think it’s worth making an ABC deck at this current time? Anyone can answer this for me. I have been thinking about making this deck, and I would like some thoughts/opinions about this.
Was about to sell my ABC deck too until I saw this video. Thanks Cali
love your channel and your attitude! keep it up man ,you got my full support
God man i don’t even remember the last time I’ve seen frontline base! Godly knowledge of the game
At the second to last combo you equipped the B to the C on the field under I:P for the play on your opponents turn, but still sent it to the graveyard and activated its effect.
Just for clarification in case the extra search off the B would come up.
For the 2nd combo, wouldn't it be more ideal to summon Carrier to the EMZ and put I:P in the main? It would avoid getting cheesed by Cyber Dragons like you mentioned earlier
Fortunately Cyber Dragon isn't really big right now, but yes, you could.
I've been thinking about theoretical ABC support, I think a Cresecendo, A Galatea (but a fusion that requires 2 light machine unions) and a Shaddoll fusion for the deck would do so much.
Nice would like to see abc deck become a top deck plus you can get a fair few of the core if you get 3 of the newish kaiba structure
Hello.
Very thanks for your vidéo, Calie.
But, your ABC deck doesn't have enough extender, not ? My personal opinion..
I have also se that we can play a Invoked Mechaba for special summon it when our Cyber D Nova was Nibiru ( 😭 ). I think that's a goog option for increase the negate after a nibiru ( initialy ABC alone ).
You forgot to talk about the protection on ash that gives Gamma when we activetes a Union hangar 😉.
So, that's some ideas.
Have a Nice day.
Shiniest deck profile i've seen i had to wear sunglasses throughout the whole video 😎
Will you be making a Dragunity deck profile when the new support for the archetype drops in March? It seems very likely that at the very least this deck will be a powerful rouge contender.
Those secret rares ABC look awesome.
@TheCaliEffect
what sleeves are these that you use on your extras deck??
Okay.... Going in my favorites for future deck Building.
Hey there, CaliEffect. What sleeves do you use for your cards? Also, do you double sleeve your Yugioh Collection?
Best profile yet, love the trap sides. Torrential has always been too good in abc !
The only handtrap that works better against Frontline Base than against Gadgets is Ghost Ogre. ALL other handtraps are either better against the Gadgets (Veiler, Impermanence...) or are equally ineffective against both (such as Ash Blossom, which just does nothing against the summoning effect. It can hit the special summon from the deck that the Gadgets have, but thats just a fail-safe anyway). The only full on negative of FB is that its not a body on the field itself and therewith lessens your overall probability of drawing monsters. And well, its a cont. spell and as such usually does not stay on the field past turn 1.
Do you think i should sell my researcher because of Prank kid -adamancipator
I have a really important question, Would Mekk-Knight Avramax be good with this deck, Insteas of Code talker? You can use I:P to make it not be destroyed by card effects and he can already not be tarteged. also He beats over any special summoned monster with his effect... its TOO STRONG
I just busted this combo with my Venom deck by going second. I kaiju'd infinity and activated Dark Hole. He forfeit right there.
The puns never stop 😆 🤣 i love it!
Nice Deck, i play it with 1x Frontline 1x driver and less handtraps and run verte+Dragoon to Strong !
Nice looking cards bro
How many takes did you do with the refrigerator open
The Cali Effect King of Puns!🔥
Nutella is a good peanut butter substitute, but could be a fantastic complement too.
Frontline base is the greatest extender
So, we got union support, but do you support unions?
kali read the underworld goddess and masq again. masq specifically says use monsters you control as xyz material. underworld goddess would use an opponent's monster. we don't know the ruling yet
Might want to check on that yourself. You can use Masq for underworld Goddess
@@thecalieffect would be really awesome but i am not sure. definitvely wanna play this anyways
is it good to play set rotaion ?
Late to the party I know but with union carried banned what could I run instead??
Try to do a Tier List of Fusion, Synchro, XYZ, Pendulum and Link Decks.
So are we going to just overlook the fact that hanger prevents the speacil summon of the monster you attach to another monster aka you attach b to a, b can't be speacil summoned for the rest of the turn
We gonna ignore that Union Driver attached the monster not Hangar? 🤔
@@thecalieffect bro I thought you said hangers effect not drivers lol
if one b was equipped to the C how did you use it to link off with it?
Hello i'am from México, thanks for u'r recipe, i play ABC deck, the "frontline base" Is a great extender card I had not seen it, i will go ti Buy 3 copies tomorrow. 🇲🇽
Que tal bro, estado viendo y probando varias extenders y no lo has probado con photon santuary? Pruebalo queda muy bien
why do you play 3 galaxy soldiers instead of 2?
What sleeves are those?
0:06 checkmate cali
Has anyone tried a peanut butter and Nutella sandwich? Or would that be sacrilegious?
Sacrelicous
Wait !!! You don't fuse your nutella and peanut butter together ? That stuff is fire.
Feeling those raritys cuzz
you guyssss. I have a question regarding ABC buster dragon second effect.
So in EDOPRO I have nekroz of Unicore on the field to negate all monsters. But for some reason the AI is able to tribute ABC buster dragon and summon three pieces from banished onto the field. Can someone explain to me why this is possible or is this an OCG thing?
Yo, can I get an updated list?? Plz and thx!!
How the hell do you equip orbital, he's not a union monster, how's that work
I've been trying to find the BLVO cards in the videos until I saw them and my immediate thought was "Nope, $$$ cards".
I simply refuse to play front line base because my ABC deck is blinged out, no commons over here 🙅🏽♂️😤
I called my union representative and he hung up on me
From 600 to 640 just ridiculous i love it
Special summon special summon nova banish banish banish
Love that intro. Too stronk
You spilled my secret sauce with base
Diet: *Exists*
Nutella: Are you sure about that?
0:10 TheNutellaEffect
can you give a post legendary duelist season 2 blue eyes deck list?
Where is the Inzektor deck profile? Show it some love brother.
Too bad VWXYZ isn't that good and requires so many cards to get your big boys but the discarding effects kill the hand as well
You can't summon underworld goddess, because ip says link summon with your monsters including herself... It's pretty sad
You can, you check out distant coder who explains it
I just explained this in the video. 🤔
Can you do a crusadia dragon link deck profile
Nutella!? I judge you hard, Cali
Do an Exodia Deck profile!
Sense he didn't post a time stamp 11:05 for the deck profile for those who are here strictly for that.
It seems Konami wants us to use xyz fusion card.
Quick everyone buy out Nutella now
Thats what some redditors said about GameStop...
CALIIII, TAKE A LOOK IN THE TIME THIEF NUMERON. A ZEXAL WITH INFINITY MATERIALS 😍
lmao i was looking at profiles for this deck
Hi, this is not legal. I;p masquerena specifically states using monsters you control, making you unable to summon the new link using an opponents monster, thanks!
Yes, it is legal. -_-
you can't use gamma if you have monsters on the field so that last combo you showed where gamma and IP went into ap doesn't work.
Incorrectthere's a Lambda on the field
@@thecalieffect oh yeah, alright, didn't see that one
Because apparently no one can read, I:P Masquerena does NOT work with Underworld Goddess. Last time I checked, I:P Masquerena says you can Link summon using *monsters you control*
Looks like we found the guy that doesn't understand how cards work lol.
@@thecalieffect Then please explain how it works. You are summoning a monster through the effect of I:P Masquerena, and I:P Masquerena specifies that you summon using materials that you control.
This is if the gameplan is to use your opponent's monster as material during your opponent's turn
Nevermind I guess, looks like Konami used the power of "Konami Said So" so that it does work, regardless of what's written on the actual card. Awesome.
@@Patadude100 Its not "Konami said so" IP isn't restricting you to use only your monsters its simply stating the summon procedure.
Where is Galaxy-Eyes deck profile
I'm a sucker for any ABC deck. It's just toooo stonk.
Stronk?
Stonks?
@@lz9275 Stonks. AMC I mean ABC to the moon!!!!
Sooo the only new card is the pot and the new link 5 ... This video is incredibly misleading. There’s no new support for abc. Just the expensive generic cards that are just good themselves.
dont play front line, Thrasher or Gadget just use more hand traps unauthorized activation and union hanger are enough combo starters
Well... I got most of the stuff. I guess I can build it for fun.
Seems too casual. Where's the spicy tech option of having Dawn Knight in an ABC deck?
You can not use the link 5 material from opponent monster if you use ip effect. Cause ip effects had a restriction that you can only use your monster control as a material for link summon. even the link 5 is effect that you can use your opp monster as a material. Thats why in ocg they dont use that link 5 card. If would be busted if ip doesn't have that restriction.XD
Yes you can. It's amazing how many people don't know this.
Yes you can summon the link 5 by using ip effect but all of the material must be on your own. you cant use your opp because ip effect "you can link summon a monster during opp MP using your monster you control as a material" thats why you can link it but no materials from the enemy. I guess the ocg rulings are different from tcg.XD
@@jmdelara9565 That is incorrect on both parts. It is ruled in the OCG that you can Use IP to link summon using your opponents monster.
As much as I adore ABC, it’s a deck that’s too slow for this meta. I play Cyber ABC but yea the deck to me needs a way to search the field spell.
But this build is quite nice 👍🏾
How About we get terraforming back to 3?!
Im on a diet.... DONT JUDGE ME!
What a shame masquerena doesn't work for goddess
It does though
It’s as easy as ABC
*Vader breathez heavy* I just had ah epiphany... y dont we have ah floodgate card d@ sayz monsterz from tha extra deck can only be summoned in tha extra monster zone??? *Vader breathez heavy*
At 2:58 A cant add B....
A can add B
But there has to be a Target for A in Grave before it goes to the GY or not ?
Anyone count 43 cards or I’m trippin
Yo that nutella kinda bad though
Combo 1 wrong
Cali, I hate to be that guy, but this video is kinda very clickbaity, there's only 2 cards in this deck out of Blazing Vortex. That is not the definiton of "insane support". Come on man, at least be honest about it.
A Card that increases the chances of opening you most important cards to 80%
Another card that allows you to break boards by linking off and because it's game mechanics cannot be responded to.
What else do you want as insane support? 🤔
NIBIRU