1/4 Secrets of the Mona Lisa
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 січ 2016
- Playlist : • 1/4 Secrets of the Mon...
First broadcast: Dec 2015.
The Mona Lisa: bewitching, seductive, world famous. In the minds of millions, she is the ultimate work of art. Yet behind the enigmatic smile, she remains a mystery, fuelling endless speculation and theories.
But is that all about to change? Is the world's most famous painting finally giving up its secrets?
Presented by Andrew Graham-Dixon, this landmark film uses new evidence to investigate the truth behind her identity and where she lived. It decodes centuries-old documents and uses state-of-the-art technology that could unlock the long-hidden truths of history's most iconic work of art.
I do not understand why people would care who sat for the portrait or why Leonardo chose to use a certain person. The really interesting thing is how he painted the picture; how many layers, how many glazes? what did his pallet look like? How might the colors have looked when the painting was new? Those are the mysteries I'd like answered.
Good questions, well thought out.
Robert, the mystery will be 'solved' at the end of the Documentary. I got your point and I do agree with you
I think it’s also interesting to know the story behind of the painting, bc there’s so much more than just the methodical stuff….
Answers That Shall Never Be TOLD - Hence All The BS Filler Of Guesses & Theories - Even The Presenter Is Misleading With The "SCRIPT" He's Been GIVEN - TOLD To Say! 🤦🤦🤦
I believe your opinion comes precisely from the fact that you do not know the truth of this painting as I know it. And especially from the relationship the painter had with the model. Because it’s not an order as we’ve been led to believe until now.
THEY SHOULD DO A MOVIE OF THE MONA LISA!!
ah , sometimes i wish i had a time machine to go and see what happened :)
Maybe Leonardo was enamoured by his father’s neighbour, Lisa, who married another man and simply painted her image and carried it to his death, like a photo...
it is the fame that made it famous: like you are expected to think Shakespeare is great because people say it is, not because you know it is great.
damien park The name Shakespeare was just a name until you've experienced his work, and then it's difficult to argue the substance is magnificent and a work of genius. When I went to the Met in NY, I saw Van Gogh paintings for example and experienced it. Then I understood why it's famous
It's also very old
@@Moishe555 2
Thank you as usual, dear @Art Documentaries. What without you ? Happy New Year, my friend !!!!!
Bravo!
4:37 A small face "anonymous" down right corner.
Layonardo?
Love you Andrew Graham Dixon! Love your shows and I got your books too! ❤
Very educational and great video.I painted the Mona Lisa but I was getting into it too much so I stopped. I have it in one of my latest videos. I may continue at it later on or do one better. I never had lessons and very little experience experimenting in oil painting. it is very challenging and requires focus and patients. the trouble is the more you make it the way you like the more you get drawn in like an obsession or passion and you get too involved so you have to break away at a certain point.
In art school there was a theory that it was Leonardo himself. The feminine version of himself.
What's your favorite piece of art? Modern or historic, famous or un famous?
@@realestateunplugged6129 my is historic / classical
@@ondra_rx732 Good choice.
@@realestateunplugged6129 thank you
@@ondra_rx732 👍😁
😊 she's ma Queen, don't care what haters thinks. She's beautiful
Became they say Mona Lisa is a timeless beauty ?
I also think that “Mona Lisa”is a masterpiece that embodies the idea of "human love". The reasons are as follows.
I believe that the work integrates at least four loving models: Lisa del Giocondo (Lisa Maria de Gherardini), Gian Giacomo Caprotti (Salai), the Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ (Salvator Mundi). If you look closely, you can see the initials of each of these four people in the painting.
The actual models are Riza and Salai. The right half of the body is Sarai and the left half is Riza. The letter 'LV' in the right eye means Leonardo, while the letter 'B' in the left eye probably means the 'B' of Bartolomeo, Riza's husband.
The two bridges also indicate the Virgin Mary's initials (M), and the 'L2' on the bridge probably refers to 'Luke 2 of the Gospel according to Luke'.
I think the winding road is a mirror letter, indicating the initials (S) of Jesus Christ (Salvator Mundi). Incidentally, if you look at this part of the picture in the mirror, you can see something like a "chalice".
In other words, the painting is a fusion of two models, Sarai and Riza, who were surrounded by real love, superimposed on the symbols of charity, Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary respectively.
I love how they ate speaking different languages to each other without issue
u hav to uplode full video
If they show other artist love like Leonardo they’ll be other amazing art works to fantasize about
The character we see in the famous portrait at the Louvre is not that of Lisa Gherardini, but that of Isabella of Aragon and Sforza, the daughter of King Alfonso II of Aragon of Naples. Isabella married her cousin Gian Galeazzo Sforza, the heir to the Duchy of Milan, to consolidate ties between the Kingdom of Naples and the Duchy of Milan. Leonardo da Vinci was at that time in service at the court of Ludovico Sforza of Milan, the uncle of Gian Galeazzo who was exercising the regency there. Isabella's young husband disappeared at the age of 25 without having been able to exercise power, it is said, assassinated on the orders of his uncle. The German historian Maike Vogt-Luerssen tells us that after her widowhood, Isabella and Leonardo formed a secret couple and had 5 children. So it is the portrait of his beloved that Leonardo da Vinci made, which explains why he took it to Amboise in France and kept it until the end of his life. There was therefore an emotional connection with Isabella that did not exist with Mona Lisa, whose portrait was just a commission. The research that I myself have done on the landscape indicates that it is based on an authentic place, which would confirm Maike Vogt-Luerssen's theory, as it undoubtedly pays tribute to the family origins of Isabella of Aragon. It seems obvious to me that the identity of the character in this portrait has been confused between an order actually received, that of the silk merchant's wife, and the portrait of Leonardo's companion, which is the one we see today at the Louvre and which he always kept with him, as when we keep a family photo today. All of this is probably well known by the so-called connoisseurs of Leonardo da Vinci, who do not want to recognize it, because they have spent their entire lives defending a version that they know is now outdated. As Mark Twain said, "It is easier to deceive people than to convince them that they have been deceived".
Me of the very richest people i know, rent a property. Blows my mind too.
Take a shot every time somebody says exTROOOOdenry.
John Petersen - Lol
Brilliant programme - just pull you up on one thing - The renaissance had been happening in Northern Europe for over a hundered years before Giorgio Vasari was even born so it is hardly a claim that is backed up by evidence to claim that it started in Italy. (Evidence: Robert Campin; Rogier van der Weyden; Jacques Daret; Jan van Eyck; et al which were all producing renaissance work in the early to mid 1400's.)
In fact, Giorgio Vasari's book basically slagged off the paintings of the north and people have been taken in by it ever since. The reality is that if his book had been objective, everybody would know that the renaissance started in the north and the Italian catch-up would be called the 'southern renaissance'.
Arguably, the first "Renaissance" painter was Giotto, whose life spanned the year 1300, He was preceded by the sculptor, Nicola Pisano, whose son Giovanni was his contemporary. Vasari gives Giotto as the first painter of the Renaissance. And this would be very hard to argue with, if you see the Renaissance in terms of a Rebirth of the Classical.
Renaissance architecture began in Florence, and was the direct result of architects, in particular Brunelleschi, travel to Rome to look at Classical remains.
The Early 1400s in Florence produced Masaccio, Fra Angelico, Uttrillo, Donatello, and Ghiberto.
So, it really was not a case of the Renaissance beginning in the North and Italy "catching up".
If the Renaissance is to be considered the Rebirth of the Classical, then it most definitely began in Florence, in art.
THe development of oil painting, and carrying to such heights as were achieved in Northern Europe was a slow growth out of the Gothic, stylistically, and made possible by the perfecting of the art of oil painting. Northern Europe did not have a Classical past to which they returned. They had a glorious Gothic past which had not yet reached its full realisation in architecture when Brunelleschi built the purely Classical church of San LOrenzo, and Michelozzo built the Medici Riccardi Palace.
What did Florence gain from the North, by way of painting? . In the late 1300s a style of painting known as "International Gothic" and in the mid 1400s, the use of oils for panel paintings.
It was this development of a previously known, but little exploited technique that was influential.
When ever you look at moualisas yes it follows you
This is so interesting but the music is so creepy
Recordo de Monalisa hoje esta avaliado em quase 1 bilhão de dolares .
UNIT in world
Moving car reading a text... got dizzy
i have seen a drama title Leornado....less talking about Mona Lisa but more about another lady.......and the paint is without a face for many years! could it be Leornado was selecting certain images for the face?
Reminds me of the painting in titanic 😊
👌meraviglia
Her parents must be so proud 😂
💙
I think that the painting is an idealized version of Leonardo's mother, Caterina di Meo Lippi.
And Leonardo was looked like his mother.
House is Italy .
Family in Italy.
Monalisa is one women italian.
Intriguingandinformativeicould have watchedtwomore hoursoftheinvestigationandthe discoveries
My Grandma is so pretty. I'm the last Lisa. I don't know who to trust. Everyone's against me for no reason. I have to tell.
What happened to real human civilization created with a gap in city life between east and west or was it children were separate from early age to different civilization to see if the parent know their real children and vice versa among vast different in wealth and life style because no way human with the same level of intelligent and passion yet result in vastly different cities design and level of scientific activities
Most likely it was banking key or something because Italian was the founder of world banking system used to study human substance and fathom the depth the human soul and life true definition as compare to all other kind of species sharing earth
Too All Rhose Whose The #Artist Have Choosen ForHis 💕💕💕 Love And #Choosen #Ones
Is it possibly that Teresa guadagni direct descendants from Mona Lisa ?
Nguoi ve ra buc qua do tai sao phan duoi moi trong di hom lam sao de tao ra dept hon khong 2 ben Hong cua mat khong duoc on trong khong duoc hoan my bat thuong nhung ky thu se biet
She's everywoman😘
LEAH NARDO
MOANA'LISSA
BELL-ISSA MO
💚😎🤔😲💚
#Monalisa
It Only Remains In The Public Eye Because It Is Purposley Pushed ffs! 🤦
This is a PORTRAIT of Leonard Da Vinci's MOTHER
Was Leonardo Devinci a Saint or angels and that was only way shown through all of the invention could had made him rich but not manufactured
No eyebrows?really?!
I remember reading a while back that the Mona Lisa DID originally have eyelashes and eyebrows, but faded over the years
No basis. Do all these guys lived with da-Vinci? Everything is just speculations and theories.
Misleading account!
Nisam mislila da cu biti ovdje
@Paolo Rodriguez no you don't 😃
Let me swallow it's pride.]
The real Mona Lisa had to be either Jesus or goddess of some divinity and not mortal
His mother?
That's why he kept her with him.
Sounds More Acceptable Than The BS These Idiots Spew! 🧐🤣.
Maybe Leonardo Was Really A Woman Called Leah Nardo And It Was A Self Portrait? 🤔😲💚
Are you listening Kardashians?
HAH- Uses the score from Michael Bay's Transformers. lmao facepalm...
how could this painting be worth 1 billion dollars , it looks so average , i would say $200.
i don't care who drew it
Knowledge is the reason it worth a billion dollar.
Shit trolling.
Mona Lisa was the devil in human form. In exchange for Leonardo's soul, a self portrait of the devil had to be painted. The devil would grant Leonardo artistic talents and fame that would last until the end of time. Leonardo was also a distant relative of Jesus Christ. It gets deeper. Believe me.
Braedon Merletti do u have any link i can read about this?
Yes please share the link
You're right. She's actually marry in the Bible. God and the so called devil.
😂😂😂😂😂
U know nothing stfu. Go back to bed and starve. Monalisa was a victim and all her kids. Keep it straight. God knows everything. He's here now. We're saved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Horrible documentry
Indeed, bunch of jokers
Huh?
Says where proof of the true betrays is at 60 measure out 120 three points Canada three points make a stand