New Zealand (Cooks Beach) Fire: Media claims "EV not to blame" | MGUY Australia
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
- MGUY has exclusive video of the early stages of the fire which contradicts the media position that the fire started "at the rear" of the building...
You can take a look and decide for yourself...
Newshub: m-g.uy/bxy
1News: m-g.uy/iy7
NZ Herald (first article): m-g.uy/rz7
NZ Herald (second article): m-g.uy/vhy
Waikato Times: m-g.uy/rmi
Send tips or stories to Instagram: / mguy.tv or email: simon@mguy.tv - thanks!
Follow MGUY on Instagram 📷 : / mguy.tv
Follow MGUY on Facebook: / mguytv
Contact MGUY: simon@mguy.tv - Авто та транспорт
Does anyone really think they will tell the truth ? Governments around this planet are intent on pushing forward with EV's regardless of personal loss or cost.
Its just like the vax, they lied and covered up all the personal loss and the cost which is todays inflation as well.
they will when people like simon start forcing them to tell the truth
@@psilocybemusashino one is going to do that though. Even when they rolled out poison and forced or coerced people into taking it regularly, they got away with it regardless. They still make those false claims about safety and efficacy and get away with it.
When only a few percent of the population is able to think for themselves and see through the propaganda, they’ll continue regardless. And those few percent will be seen as “conspiracy theorists” by the majority. Nothing will change.
They lied about Covid as well.At least they are consistant.
Thy have to. Comments missing again.
Local paper in New Zealand said the fire was caused by the EV - of course, huge pressure would then be placed on the local media to retract - NZ govt are strongly pushing EVs and won’t permit negative articles
Truth will prevail & it'll backfire on all the authorities trying to cover up these EV FIRES.
@@tokoloshimampara9932 Should have been sacked for preempting the results of the investigation.
We have a new government. They have axed the clean car scheme.
You do know that the new National Govt is anti EV, cancelled the EV rebate, rolled back polluting vehicle tax, Labour are not in Govt anymore. National are puppets of big oil and gas, so no pushing EV's
Won't Permit.
Reminds me of that reporter in 2020 , standing in front of a raging building fire, stating that the protests were "mostly peaceful". 1984 is a alive and thriving.
Yup.
You are correct about the media. I have noticed the same dishonest reporting in Canada. Not reporting information is as bad as lying.
Yes, half truths are also lies.
Could you share any particular stories you know of? I'm in Vancouver and back in September or October there was a large fire in a parkade downtown around Seymour and (can't recall) There was basically a media blackout, though surrounding businesses were closed for a period (can't recall how long) I only found out via a posting put up in our condo by someone who knew someone in the area, and the "coincidental" fire has EV written all over it.
Worse
Dishonest reporting? The media reported on what the fire investigation found. How is that being dishonest? Media in Canada doesn't report according to what will make consumers feel the best.
@@ascoop22 Reporting on a fire and then saying it's under investigation only tells half the story.
It's a dreadful state of affairs when (it appears) that a fire department has to adhere to the EV message.
like doctors had to say things were safe and now the excess death rate is soaring worldwide.
Suspect they did the same with the Luton Airport fire
@@TheZodiacz 53000 excess in uk and 103000 in usa...go figure
Similar to a (formerly) revered institution in the UK, the Lifeboat Service (RNLI), now having to toe the line quite literally, importing men of fighting age with beards from diverse nations across the English Channel in their rubber dinghies, to be accommodated in 4 star hotels before they are deployed to suppress the British people.
@@esecallum327,000 in the Philippines….official investigation started
Are all Western governments corrupt? This is concerning at different levels.
Yes, always have been. They're just taking the piss. And removing their masks.
All governments.
They have been for a long time. The British government lied through it's teeth about the Windscale reactor fire back in the 1950s.
Well of course . Always have been . Globalists have spotted that and are now attempting to finalise the agenda .
Thank the W.E.F. and Klaus Schwab.
Uncle Tony sent me.
Subscribed.
Here in America we have a saying:
"Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining."
The fact that the news has to repeatedly lie about it, when it’s obviously a battery fire, tells you just how bad the situation really is
The media now does not reort the facts but rather alternate facts. The question is why
At some point you have to stop and ask: "Just what is it that EV's are supposed to be saving us from?" There is one question that never gets asked that would expose the "climate crisis" for the scam that it is, which is "What percentage of the atmosphere is CO2?" The answer, never given in plain language, is that CO2 is currently around 420 parts per million, (google it) increased, they tell us, from 280 ppm in 1850. That's a difference of 140 ppm, or in terms more readily understood by the layman, the composition of the atmosphere has changed by 0.014% (14 thousandths of 1%) in the last 170 years. LESS THAN 1 THOUSANDTH OF 1% PER DECADE! How much closer to "zero" do they think it's possible to get? How gullible do you have to be to believe that this rate of change is causing extreme weather events, which have always happened and always will? Their claim is that this tiny amount "traps heat". ALL gasses dissipate heat and even if CO2 is an exception, the suggestion that a total of 0.042% can overwhelm the capacity of the remaining 99.958% to dissipate that heat is abject nonsense. CO2 DOES NOT control the global temperature, there is no "climate crisis". Wind farms, solar panels, heat pumps, EV's.. None of these measures are necessary, nor will they have the slightest effect on the weather. Eye-watering sums of money have already been wasted on this futile exercise. Time to wake up, stop throwing our money at these boondoggles and squandering the world's resources on projects that cannot possibly succeed as there never was a problem to begin with. There is no need to save the planet from a minuscule increase in the gas on which all life depends, but it does need to be rescued from idiot politicians and media mouthpieces that push this garbage.
Great comment . I agree with every word . What puzzles me is why so many people are taken in by it .... Brainwashing by the media ????
Great post, couldn't agree with you more, we have to get this message out.
Thanks for posting this matter. I’ve been saying the same thing for years now. Big money grab, that’s the “Green” part of this nonsense 👍
Spot on mate! Well said. Carbon is the basis for all life on Earth; more C02 in the atmosphere (as we've had many, many times in past eons) would be beneficial to plants, animals, and humans. There is NO scientific evidence that C02 causes global warming, in fact it's the other way around: C02 levels rise AFTER temperature rises. It's not a cause, it's an effect; C02 no more causes temperatures to rise than wet streets cause rain!
@@cliffordcullen1687 Add in the huge power grab, especially by unelected people, and the picture gets very clear. At least to those of us with more than one brain cell functioning!
They just mistakenly thought the garage is a kitchen and the car is a toaster with a license plate.
It is simply, just have to disconnect from reality completely.
Yes, and the front of the house is the side facing the paddock, not the side with the driveway facing the access road.
Toaster 😂😅😂
Disconnected from reality seems to be the message.!!? If that's the level of there argument. RUN.
When the government pulls the old sovereign citizen and states it’s not a motorcar but a travelling fire
We have actually had 4 incidents like this in NZ in the last 6 months
But media is very quiet about it.
Damn! It is getting harder to pull the wool over the public's eyes with all these cell phones with cameras around! UTG sent me over for your video, thanks for posting it.
These bastards should be charged for their lies.
Speakers for *The Message* are only considered "lying" when they tell the truth.
You have to PROVE they are lying, which you can't.
@@ffjsbprove they aren’t lying if you can.
@@alleyoop5185 I'm not the one trying to make the claim Son, so that's on you. Guess you never heard of Occam's razor...
Don’t blame the EV, don’t blame the vaccine, don’t blame HAMAS, don’t look for the truth, the “message” is much, much better for you.
Exactly, right on don't be a 'conspiracy theorist' I'd rather be labeled a conspiracy nut than a gullible fool that believes everything they see on the news.
@@craco77 they could care less about crazy theory’s and lies, the truth on the other hand is way too dangerous to be left “unattended” in public.
Ignorance is Bliss!!! ???
Here in the UK we have the Biased Broadcasting Corporation constantly treating Hamas in the same way that they treat Ukraine. i.e. As the friggin' victims. To paraphrase someone else, once our liberal woke do-gooders have empowered these stone-age reprobates, the first thing the newly empowered will do is remove all "woke rights". In fact they will most likely just remove the wokes - so not all bad I suppose.
@@industrialathlete6096 There's a hell of a lot of blissful people around these days.
Agree with you. Same thing happened to an EV in my son's neighborhood. Check out House fire in Nocatee fl 2023. Several articles on line about this. Also several articles about 21 EV battery fires associated with Hurricane Ian in 2022. The state has warned us that saltwater and lithium ion batteries do not mix well and a fire can result. So, now along with all the other preps for a hurricane, EVs are supposed to be moved somewhere that will not flood and that is impossible to predict. Another concern is driving an EV on an evacuation route because they do not have charging stations! Thanks for all your hard work, love your channel.
This channel is brilliant. No hysteria. No hype. Just irrefutable facts calmly presented. This content is nothing less than a public service. Now, wouldn't it be interesting to be able to interview the Cook's Beach homeowners? They would know for certain where their hybrid was parked and whether it was charging at the time of the "incident". I wouldn't be surprised if they've been subjected to coaching (thumb screws?) as to how to properly respond to media inquiries.
It was the rear of the property and the car was indeed parked outside the garage, at the rear on the road side.
You you say ‘irrefutable facts’ on a video that is speculation.
Irrefutable fact? Ha ha what a clown
When you are involved in a cult, the truth doesn't matter.
But which "cult" are iyou talking about?
The Climate cult.@@billchristie2120
The Climate cult.@@billchristie2120
Corruption charges against the fire deot need to be brought immediately
deot?? WTF? Are you suggesting FENZ is corrupt? If you are a qualified fire invesigator your views might be helpful.
In the mean time I'd suggest that media reports are often 'inaccurate' at best.
@@stevelloyd5785if Fire Dept lied they should be jailed as lies regarding fire is dangerous.
😂😂😂
Well unfurling- bring charges before an investigation is complete? Is that really such a good idea?
Anyone now buying an EV must be nuts! If they are stupid enough to buy one, then best park it well away from anything you value in your life. I’ve noticed that people are not parking beside EV’s in carparks if they can avoid it now, so, slowly but surely the truth is getting out there about how dangerous these things are!
The video also shows that the car is in the garage which contradicts the email you received saying that the car was parked outside and not plugged in for recharging.
I came here via Uncle Tony. Thanks for exposing this.
The problem that's happening in a "free" country!
@@mechanic2121 I bet you would sell your grandmother for 10 cents.
@@mechanic2121 from the evidence I've seen Simon is spot on with his conclusions. He has presented pretty solid evidence in every video I've seen so far. What evidence do you have that he is lying. How about presenting some instead of just making unsubstantiated assertions that support your narrative.
@@hjkr7528 are you blind????? That was one of the first things I noticed was flames coming from under the battery compartment of the car.
@@hjkr7528 And we can clearly see the fire started at the front of the house, so why are they lying by saying it was at the back of the house? There can be only one reason, it's an attempted cover up.
@@hjkr7528 Exactly, That's what I said
Government lie? Say it isn't so!
It offends me that they think we are idiots and will believe their lies without thought.
Umm like 75 percent of the world does believe their lies without thought, look at presidents Biden, or the COVID shot if you didn't take it people would fight you, glad to see you with us 25 percenters lol
Certainly looks like it started out front to me. It seems as though in both the UK and New Zealand and possibly Australia they are more then willing to make false official reports as to not say it was an EV. Any official filling a false report should be prosecuted.
Just as bad in the UK, even worse maybe, look at the Luton airport fire, 1500 cars destroyed but it only made news for a couple of days!! same for London bus fires, old news next day!
I must admit, you're a very unbiased "say it like it is" type of guy. It's a brave stance and I admire your principle on this.
You think this guy is unbiased?
@@whatadag3748Truth does bother most people. Even when you have photographic evidence they still will go with a lie.
@@mechanic2121 CNN facts ? 🤣🤣🤣
@@mechanic2121 - awww, isn't it sweet that you've just opened a UA-cam account to shill for the government. Your overlords must be so proud.
@@mechanic2121 "Mostly" 'Peaceful'?! Protest(s)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great respect for you and your channel. Truth must be told,
@@johnchapman7719 My EV weighs less than most SUVs, and Pickup trucks. We must of course ban them also.
@@johnchapman7719 I think I may have misread your initial comment about the 'large increase in weight over ICE cars'. Did you mean increase in weight OF ICE cars'? In which case I fully agree with you that many cars have a weight problem, whether ICE or EV.
A quick list, My 1956 Morris Traveller 830kgs. My 1955 Humber Hawk 1360Kgs. A Discovery Sport 1787kgs, A Toyota LAndcruiser 2900kgs.
My EV LEAF 1640kgs , the nearest equivalent was a 2018 Pulsar at 1265Kg
Tesla Model 3, 1655kgs. All kerb weights.
As you can see the 4x4 Discovery is heavier than my EV , as are I suspect most SUVs. Even the kerb weights of small commercials, vans and pickups, have increased. together with their load capacity.
At the Hospital where my son works the new multistory car park was built for current overweight cars, but like you I also wonder about older structures.
The ‘truth’ being baseless speculation?
Mguy, excellent genuine "journalistic" work. A very basic demonstration of "evidence" to start a conversation in the right direction. Great video!
Who are these people that tell the lies???? seems to be second nature to lie now, never was in my days, media and government and all related need removing! How much have we been fed over the years?
It was the same with the vessel shipping EVs in Amsterdam a couple of months ago. Media reported that it was an EV fire. Then they were silenced and changed their story. It was not supposed to be a EV fire, yet everyone could see a large hole in the hull where the fire had melted the steel.
They lied about the Luton airport fire as well, the video evidence did indicate it was a diesel hybrid that started it but apart from that there must have been many EV's and Hybrids in the car park and as the fire spread the extreme temperatures generated from the ignited batteries are what caused the collapse of the car park.
Maybe it was a sports car. Sports cars are pretty hot.
Just imagine the wall thickness of these ships and it MELTED with this type of fire I don’t believe an ice car would do the same damage
@@cda4662 It would have been put out quickly with onboard fire equipment.
Petrol and diesel fires don't combust at high enough temperatures to melt through heavy plate steel or reinforced concrete. Just more media cover for the corrupt.
Your analysis Simon is on video evidence 100% accurate! Super Sleuth Simon! 😎👍🏼🤣
You are doing gods work. The same bs is happening in the uk. Keep spreading the message. The uk stand with you.
UTG sent me here, like I stated on his site. We had a house fire do to an iPad starting a fire on our couch while charging.
I live not far away and feel you are on the money .. I cannot give names but yes media done a U turn and blamed "social media" for the misinformation ..
Props to you, fella.
The dangers of batteries being charged have long been known. For example, in the radio control hobby there are fire proof containers that are highly recommended for use while charging batteries.
There is risk even when not being charged. Commercial airlines prohibit batteries in checked baggage, after some tragic accidents were traced to lithium battery fires (if I recall correctly, laptop computers).
I have been a cop for 30 years and served as a fire marshal here in the United States for about 10 years, before retiring. I would say from that 4 second clip it is impossible to make a 100 percent decision on this matter. But to give you a quick education on tracing fires you always follow the least burnt to the most burnt area and then look for a heat source. The vehicle appears less burnt than the structure (Look at the top of the garage opening, may have been in the truss area of the roof and walked itself to the door opening, fire needs to breath). From this picture I would probably be looking inside the garage for a point of origin. Again, I would speak to the homeowner, witnesses, and look at any video. I would speak with fire personal and find out what they observed upon their arrival. There is a lot to investigating a fire. Now I hate EV cars and the fact that the government is pushing them on us. But I would have to agree with the investigator on this matter. It appears it started to the rear of the vehicle. But this is what I see in one picture. I would also like to add that the corruption isn't where the rubber meets the road (beat cops & fire fighters) 99% of the time. It is usually the officials that are nothing more than politicians pushing an agenda. Just my two cents on a picture and my own opinion.
I'm tending with you, I think the videos are not conclusive enough in this instance.
I am NOT a fan of EVs as a volunteer firefighter and road crash rescue unit. My fire brigade is a bush brigade without BA or structure gear, but we respond to road crashes on the highway, and any fires of any origin.
Our half face respirator cartridges are toast after a normal ICE fire. There is NO way we are going anywhere near an EV fire if it happens on our patch.
It will be called in as HAZMAT, and all we will do is stay upwind and protect exposures if possible.
We are not equipped to handle EV fires beyond that
Look at the high wind at 5:49
It's hard to see from the cell phone clip but it looks like the vehicle is either partially inside the garage or fully so. I bow to your superior knowledge about the fire looking like it started towards the rear of the vehicle or even behind it, which would be somewhere in the garage itself, but this does not explain the statement put out that it started to the rear of the property which is clearly not the case.
But why would they say the car was not parked in the garage, when it clearly was inside that very garage?
I hate to point this out but wood & plastic (which is what this building is wrapped in) burns better than metal meaning that the car would suffer less at the start than the materials around it.
Hi Simon and G'day to all in Australia.
We have the same lies over here in UK; instant denial if an EV is involved in a fire. Keep up the good work!
The video seems to contradict the Fire Investigator .... it appears the car was in a garage or carport?
We know the fire officials are more reliable than eyewitnesses to a fire, or video shot before the fire brigade showed up. It must be that people are wrong, and the authorities have all the right answers. forget the question, just listen to the answers.
and if u pause it you can clearly see the charging plug in the car. open and shut case
The hybrid was not in the Garage. It was parked outside and not plugged in.
@@ralphtaylor7720 paused at 5:14 you can clearly see the charger hanging out of the car. clearly...i have 75in tv and i can see it for sure
@@ralphtaylor7720sorry that looked in the garage and the fire on both sides. Not sure what you were looking at
Good video. Because the batteries are so prone to failure due to manufacturing quality, overheating and susceptible to damage, the fires will only get worse over time. It may even get comical watching media and gov'ts cover it up, but not be able to, including ebikes.
We had the same here, fire service said the Luton airport fire which destroyed the multi storey car park and the vehicles in it,, multi million pounds of damage. The Fire service and media all stated it started in a "Diesel Car". But video evidences shows a flamethrower (witnesses description) emanating form the left front of the vehicle. The vehicle in question was a landrover evoque, it was diesel, a hybrid diesel, where the lith batteries are front left, a vehicle involved in serial fires, all start in the front left. After the fire people found their EV's insurance rocketed over 60%, and despite already having policies some insurance companies refused to renew at any cost. The insurance companies worst hit are easily identified as their policies for ICE have also shot through the roof. Lots on you yoube check it out. Keep spreading the word on this.
You are spot on Simon.
If you stop the video around 5:03 and look at the shadows of the people, the sun is nearly overhead. Then look at the shadow of the garage just to the left of the girl in the green bikini, and the shadow of the car, which is just to her right, and the two shadows are in line. That car was INSIDE the garage without any doubt at all, so the claim that it wasn't in the garage has to cast doubt on the claim that it wasn't charging, and that the fire started at the back of the house. Something else to think about is that the house is only 150 metres from the fire station as the crow flies, and 300 metres from it by road, yet the house went from no sign of fire, as seen at 5:03, to blazing inferno, as seen at 1:41, in the time it took the firemen to get there.
The media saying the car wasn't even in the garage when you can see from the video that the car IS in the garage and that is the only part that is on fire at that time. How stupid does the government think the people are.
💯I believe you are so right 💯
To believe the "investigator" who wasn't there; and assume it was a bias on the part of the actual witensses that saw the car inside the garage charging and that it caught fire - you'd have to believe the car was outside; and it didn't burn in the garage - OK where is it then? I'm pretty sure the witnesses got it right the car burnt in the garage it was not outside.
Lets read the statements of the actual witnesses before we make an assessment, plus make a visit to the scene . Maybe even the residents of the house who probably know the reality, rather than a bunch of passers by on Tik Tok.
The car looked to be very much inside the garage when it was burning.
This NZ fire invesigator is going to look like Saddam Hussein s propaganda minister, the one who said there are no coalition tanks in Baghdad, just as an American tank drove into view behind him.
Video footage proves without doubt the car was on fire in the garage
@@doriangray6985I agree - also what the witnesses said - so how do they get this "investigator" to cloud it up and whatis the motive - the motive is they want to keep promoting EVs and thats sort of hard to do if cars are burning peoples homes down.
all media reports here are omitting the initial images of the car in garage on fire - all of them pretending it wasnt the ev
The rear of the car is clearly on fire. These EVs are dangerous. We've all seen the bus fires in the States. Good reporting.👍
The fire dept guy also said that the car was _not_ in the garage. It looks a lot like it was indeed inside the garage 🤔 🤔
Well, clearly that structure was a shed or a carport or a lean to. Anyone can tell that it's not a garage.
The answer is quite simple. They obviously drove the car into the garage after the garage caught fire. I'm guessing that they were still wet from swimming in the pool and that's why they were able to exit the car and walk away from the blaze without noticing the increase in temperature.
@@davidbrayshaw3529 🤣
There's a clear straight line of fire at the side of the car showing that it had to be inside the structure.
It was outside the garage
Oops you weren’t meant to see that angle… I think it was a toaster that was left on .. the cat freaked out and dragged it burning into the garage where it got jammed under the hybrid.. causing the very stable charging system to run amok !
NZ is usually a very safe place to charge most things .
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The only thing worth charging in NZ is the government with corruption and old Horse face should be top of the list.
Kia Ora Simon! It is comforting to see that people down under are as woke as we are in America.
Great work MGUY. Car buyers need to here the truth to make informed decisions about EVs that do not seem ready for mass adoption.
Adam of Mythbusters nailed it: "I reject your version of reality, and substitute my own."
Whatever country we live in the coverage of these issues are just not covered correctly.
Governments just don't want it out there because they have put all their eggs in one basket regarding alternative fuels.
Whoever controls the media controls the mind's of the people.
Without content like this we'd not have the option to be educated enough to decide for ourselves.
Thanks for another great segment.
Caught out yet again, trying to hide the truth!!! Yeah im sick of hearing promo ads for EVs and this is happening. Good old cell video catching them out again, another great video mate
The truth will always catch up with a lie. You've been caught out fellows, the car was obviously in the garage and on fire first! No matter what you say or want us to believe!
Obviously the car was not "outside" which the "investigator" said it was - video's showed the car was clearly on the inside of the garage. Once you catcha liar - you really need not listen to another thing they say. It is important to point out however that this is the exact kind of propoganda one puts out intentionally - as the "investigator" isn't suppose to present an opinion about if EVs or hybrids catch on fire much or not. An obective party doesn't state a bias, trying to sell his conclution.
To believe this fool investigator - you'd have to believe the fire started in the house and they drove the car into the garage to burn down with the house.
You are spot on! I was a jury member in a court case where the top state judge threw out very expensive evidence from an expert the company being held accountable had hired as he said the person giving it was clearly trying to present an opinion, not relate facts. He said that undermined everything he said and on that alone, he could not find him to be a creditable expert. The judge was brilliant and grilled the guy and during his questioning, even gave him the heads up and said " I asked what you found, not what your hypothesis is which you seem to have no factual evidence to base it on". Guy continued with his narrative and the Chief Justice just canned him big time.
This "investigator" would have had to appear in endless court cases without doubt and would not be prone to giving opinions just what he saw and his investigation revealed. Clearly he was told from up above what to say and not what to.
@@glumpy10 He was probably told not to damage the long term importance of net zero technology for the good of humanity
Go visit Spec Savers bro. Pause the video and you'll clearly see the car's shadow in front of the garage.
@@_MrMen_ do you have something more specific?
@@_MrMen_ I will be interested to see the link; but you may want to consider; that any intense light source can cast a shadow; so an intense fire can do that; and it would not demonstrate that the car was out of the garage. At the moment; I'd still depend on the eye witness statements who indicated the vehicle was being charged inside the garage. Even if it was part out or all out if it caught on fire and set the house on fire - the matter of concern remains the safety of EV batteries - the average age of an EV is 1.5 years; the average age of other cars is 12 years. The real problem with EVs is one need do nothing to damage the car or do anything wrong.. the cells themselves can grow deposits called dendrites and those can initiate a fire in a lithium cell at any time.; even when the car has been "turned off" because EVs do not fully turn off they stay on partly.
They say EV insurance is only 20% higher but I put a Tesla S long range into Allianz and it came out at $3,019.56 per year.
That’s a hefty premium.
I put a model 3 in budgetdirect and it came out as we can not offer you insurance on this vehicle
I hope you have the common sense to have an outdoor charger or a charger installed in a separate garage several metres from your house.
I suspect in future insurance companies will charge a premium for EV owners for house insurance especially for an internal garage.
@@user-jm3mo6sb6vcuz it's so cheap... Might as well tell all of us deplorables to get un poor.. but glad you have plenty of money
Yo...UTG sent us....keep up the good work bro...👍😁
You are one of a small - but growing - group of trusted presenters who try to keep us informed of the facts around the sinister pressure to go electric. Others in thus group are John Cadogan in ‘Stralia - who should be elected as World President - plus Geoff (Buys cars) and the Mac Master in England. Please keep up the good work, especially when - as in this case - the visual Evidence contradicts the current political party line..!
Well done Simon,yet another fire which raises more questions,not only about the cause, but questions the suspicious way accounts change. I fear one day there could be a catastrophic event on a large ferry or in the Eurotunnel with massive loss of life. .We all need clear ,honest and transparent reporting on these issues.
You are thinking correctly about this EV danger , the closed in places where many people are, will be the really dangerous places to hang around or drive through soon with fire starting EVs parked or charging. One of the main electrical problems with EVs is the charge rate which is in the hundreds of amps. The fast movement of electrons creates lots of heat on any day. But in a very confined space like a battery is much more dangerous. I have a lovable nice muscle car, a 1972 Chevy Monte Carlo e/w a 454 big block engine, which I care for and baby some, lol.
I start it periodically and drive it some. Two years ago, I went to start it and the lead acid battery literally blow up into many pieces. It was not an old battery, and nothing was different that I was doing...than any other time that I started the car. There was a sudden fire ball, but that did not start a big fire , thank God, as I have other muscles cars in there too. I was not happy, there are some many pieces that I can't take the battery back for an exchange. The same but much smaller lithium battery is in your cell phone that you hold up next to your face and hair. These cell phones self-explode also, just because they can. Be warned and safe people.
There are very powerful political forces that can and will attempt to silence any negative news of EVs going full Ronson. They are too invested in EV Nirvana.
There are discrepancies in the FENZ statements VS the video
1- I can say it did not start in the Garage
2- Car was parked outside the Garage at the time
3- It looks like the fire started at the rear of the property
….
The video evidence seems to completely contradict the FENZ statements
The fire in the video is burning Within and Limited to the Garage
The vehicles appear to be Inside the Garage.
….
Therefore, inference from the video would indicate the fire clearly started inside the Garage, where cars were located.
…..
The reported property loss was 4.6m, which involved 2 structures.
Imagine what the insurance investigators thought after reviewing the damage and understanding the most likely cause was vehicle battery charging.
Eventually the insurance companies are no longer going to take this on the chin. They will have no other choice than to hold the vehicle manufacturers liable.
“If you know or have reason to know”
Further if the insurance company can prove deception on the part of the fire investigator (in this case FENZ), they could hold him/her liable as well.
….
As a Fire investigator, I would not put my fortune nor my future employment nor my reputation, in jeopardy for the sake of a Hegelian based, political ideal.
Excellent video thank you!
The fact that it’s necessary for the media to change their original version and the fire service to give an explanation that seems contrary to the video footage tells you everything you need to know …
More like Cooked Beach!
Bunch of cookers buying EV's!
Since the advent of EV’s everything else has become much more flammable.
Uncle Tony's Garage is sending me to watch your Video and Thank you for the Great Video
Same
The most amazing thing was 10 (mostly young) people standing around watching a fire without phones in their hands. 😂 Besides that, an interesting dive into a strange story.
Only one carrier covers Cooks Beach and its spotty at best.
I don’t think there were many pockets in what they were wearing.
@@murrayarmstrong499
Agree. The swim suits seemed to be doing double time containing the owners.
.@@murrayarmstrong499Photo credit to Phil Macavity.
Bikinis and phones aren't all that compatible, but someone caught the essential images, Fire, not girls, you pervert
"I can't comment on the cause, because the investigation is not yet completed, but I can say where it did not start and that was in the garage."
Is like saying:
"Unexplained deaths have increased sharply and we do not know why, but we do know they are not caused from the vaccine."
Everything is like a Saturday Night Live episode 20 years ago.
We don't know what caused it, but it's definitely not the thing that obviously did.
also importantly, the car can be seen to be "inside" the garage and not in front of the garage as stated by the official commentary.
This reminds me of the fire which destroyed a cargo ship recently. An eye-witness - a crew member actually on the scene - said that the fire had started in one of the electric vehicles being transported.
EVangelists were 'Fully Outraged', and the various official sources were quick to dismiss his account. The witness was 'only' a lowly crewman and 'only' from India, and thus swarthy and unreliable and probably prone to panic under pressure and obviously not earning enough money to be capable of telling us the truth about what he saw.
Really? REALLY? Wow. Someone should tell those various official sources that this is 2023, not 1523.
His statement was replaced by much rhubarb and speculation from 'more reliable sources' [to wit: well-paid, cool-headed guys in suits who had English as a first language] who weren't actually on the scene but who were sure that lithium batteries could not possibly have had anything to do with starting the fire.
News was then largely hushed up with nothing but vague mumbling and harrumphing until the media had stopped asking, "Well what DID start it, then?" and Joe Public had forgotten all about lithium batteries.
Almost the same thing happened when the multi-storey car park in Luton [England] was burned down. Cue instant denial from official sources with absolute certainty that lithium battery technology was not to blame.
And now this horrible incident in New Zealand. If an ICE car had been involved I might have accepted that it was deliberate arson (to end a financially onerous leasing arrangement or to commit simple insurance fraud - it happens quite a lot here in the UK), but it seems highly suspicious to me that yet another fire potentially connected to lithium batteries should have the authorities falling over themselves to manage the media and blame anything but an EV [I include hybrid vehicles in the EV category].
My Elli-sense it tingling and it's telling me that there's an agenda involved here.
Could you follow up the question to the firedepartment? Ask how they came to this conclusion while the available video evidence shows exactly the opposite ?
They will assure you that despite all the obvious evidence to the contrary, that E.Vs are 'safe and effective'.
Vee vill tell you vhat to think!
Yes, send them the video footage and ask them to confirm the fire started at the back of the house!
write to FENZ , include the link and call them Liars
the only difference between this and luton fire in UK is that you got report for free. In UK fire department asked for like £150 which should have be free.
Everything else is the same, fire was extinguished and immediately after that fire man said it was diesel without a single investigation
The Fire Chief at Luton said it was a diesel vehicle while the fire was still building. I find it hard to understand people who cannot see things for themselves but believe the garbage distributed by the MSM who in turn ask the government what to say.
Ole Uncle Tony sent me, great vid bud!
It's surprises me how 'just doing my job' and lying for an employer or whatever is just the norm now.
Yeah - fu@king sickening, eh??
It is obvious that we all see it as it is, defiantly the EV in the garage, you are spot on.
Ah….inconvenient truths really are a nuisance. Wonder where the fire dept bod got their info? Obviously didn’t speak to the witnesses or see that rather incriminating video clip. In fact, I hope that same officer addresses the issues you’ve raised. Great work. Keep it up.
David the car was outside the garage.
The car is in shadow and inside or mostly inside a structure, be that a carport or garage. I also hope that the fire authority see this video and correct their statement "based on new evidence".
@@MotoGuzziMoto the car was not inside but backed right up to the garage, not a car port.
Came in from Uncle Tony's Garage. Good work sir!
Something to think about! Did the Fire Inspector not say that the car was NOT IN THE GARAGE while the video clip clearly shows the CAR IN THE GARAGE! In my mind, that's an outright lie, as per usual!!!
The investigation just started and they insisted no EVs were even damaged during the fire while there were pictures of completely burned EVs and videos of smoking EVs being pulled from the Vessels body.
yes but they weren't battery fires
Great video. We still need this three way chat video!
You know Geoff, it's just occurred to me what the next big neighbour disputes will be about here in the UK; when more people wake up to the fire risk of EV's, who the hell is going to want to have a next door neighbour on one of our 'crammed in' housing estates charging up an EV only 3 feet away from our own house?
The ariel picture clearly shows the way the wind is blowing. It therefore makes sense the fire could have started at the rear of the house as fire would have not spread toward the rear from the front, yet the rear is plainly on fire, so jury's out on this one for me.
Great concise reporting!
Mate, I’m enjoying your videos while I can. I suspect once Albo’s misinformation laws kick in, you might be forced offline. And that will be a great pity.
@HouseBellplump-zv5mw and Rumble
Don't forget Elon Musk's X, formerly Twitter, where free speech is still possible, and where videos are increasingly easy to post!
It definitely looks like it very well could have been started by a car being charged up, there is for sure a car in the garage so why would the fire department say there was no car in the garage? Why would they lie line that when there are witnesses, and video something fishy going on here for sure.
I'm sure they weren't aware of the video.
It's bendy truth.
The lies are pointless, so many witnesses and photographic evidence too.
@@cyruslupercal9493 the video shown here wasn't part of the early footage.
So they fabricated an story ignoring the plebs eye witness reports for political reasons.
Then this video shows up and shows that they were full of shit.
They rolled the dice and LOST!
Great video. Day after day we have to be told how EVs are the answer to everything. Your video clearly highlights a worrying attempt to divert the public's attention.
THICC!!
Those 🥝s were smoking hot!!
There was a house on fire??? I missed it.
Even if the EV didn’t catch fire, it’s mere presence makes the situation multiple-times worse 🤷🏻♂️
They need to push the EV agenda so they will have even more control over the citizenry. Your range will be lower. It’s cost prohibited and they can shut the car and monitor it more throughly. This can’t happen if you have 20 year old cars or older on the road. They need you in a newer ice or all electric car or no car at all eventually
They think we're bloody stupid .
Exactly the same, word for word with the Luton airport car park fire, eye witness reports and video show a hybrid battery fire but Chief fire officer states from the scene on the day that whatever caused the fire it was not a battery, it was a diesel vehicle. making such a statement on the day of the fire is totally against normal protocol, it is also interesting that the DVLA record Land Rover sport mild hybrid vehicles as "Diesel powered" no mention of electric or hybrid. NO CCTV has been released and no follow up report in the press, NOTHING TO SEE HERE.
# wool being pulled ! Well done you . The 'fire investigator' seems to have incriminated themselves with their own words. I smell a rat !
The rhetoric of the media in this incident mirrors exactly that of the UK media regarding the recent Luton Airport car park fire.
You seem to be absolutely correct in your findings of the fire starting with the EV while charging. Why does the fire service dispute this???
The car is obviously the point of ignition! Car is fully engulfed in flames along with the garage structure. Rest of house looks untouched at that moment.
I say again - 'if it walks like a duck...'
EVs burn at 1000 C same temp as Chernobyl's core when it was on fire. No wonder they are such a challenge to put out.
2500 degrees
2500 C
Free cremation in a high speed crash was Elon's EV Easter egg
Bit higher than that.
*2500 degrees, and most chemistries oxidise in decomposition, meaning that they produce their own oxygen. This makes them impossible to extinguish by conventional techniques.
Well the footage is pretty definitive evidence that the fire started in the garage. Also the car is on fire, so unless there was an unregulated power wall installed or BBQ supplies. I don't see how the investigation can possibly conclude the EV not responsible.
What ever you do, please don't you Dare doing your own research. Trust the Authority, at all times. Thank you.
On the video supplied by the neighbours shows the car in the garage. How can they say it was parked in the driveway. Keep digging Regards Ernst
Maybe the fire officer should have gone to Specsavers?