Great description of the battle. However historians assume that Egypt would still have fallen if the Mongols had returned in far greater numbes. The bulk of their armies were occupied elsewhere.
It was Turkish military slaves, the Mamluks, coming from the Eurasian steppes, who were successful in stemming the deadly Mongol danger. Complete political, military, and, last but not least, economic power passed into the hands of this new Turkish ruling caste that regenerated itself anew each generation from the outside. It was seen as a sign of particular divine grace and providence that Turks had contained the Mongol avalanche. Turks knew the fighting techniques of their Mongol "cousins" from their common homeland in the steppes of Central Asia. The contemporary Syrian chronicler Abū Shāma rejoiced after the crucial battle of Ayn Jälūt in saying: "It is verily remarkable that the Tatars were broken and destroyed by their own kinsmen, the Turks." Paying his respect to the victorious sultan of Egypt, he continues in a couplet: The Tatars conquered the lands and there came to them From Egypt a Turk, unmindful of his life. In Syria he destroyed and scattered them. To everything there is a bane of its own kind. And the triumph of the Turks was compounded by the final expulsion of the Crusaders from the Holy Land; one should notice the wording of a panegyric for Sultan al-Ashraf Khalil after he had conquered, in 690/1291, Acre, the last Crusader stronghold: Praise be to God, the nation of the Cross has fallen; Through the Turks the religion of the chosen Arabs has triumphed. The Crusaders had allied themselves to the abominable Mongols, the "vile foe," and had constituted a constant humiliation to Islam for almost 200 years. These exploits immensely enhanced the religious prestige of the Mamluks. The popula- tion of Egypt and Syria gratefully acknowledged their achievements. The folk novel of al-Malik al-Zahir Baybars gives abundant testimony to the general feeling of owing the Mamluks, that is, the Turks, thanks for saving them from an imminent catastrophe.
The Crusades. Who is the devil and who is God? That made religious fanatics like your Excellency, who come out to boast about themselves, being good to themselves and evil to their friends, what's the difference between a devil and a devil, your Excellency, who both like to kill others? You took the trouble to type so long, you damn bastard, just to praise yourself and then curse others. Your Excellency, go look at the past, where the Mongols conquered various kingdoms in Persia and slaughtered all the citizens, leaving not even children. The rest were used as slaves for the Arabs to use as labor. Have you forgotten already? Just defeating the Mongols and retreating isn't considered a victory. It's just that the city was defended.🤔😁😄
Show the battle of the Spanish conquerors against the Aztecs, which took place in the Otumba Valley. Hernan Cortes and hundreds of conquistadors defeated many thousands of Aztecs in this battle. Because the Spaniards had gunpowder, steel and cavalry
@@winternights0506 LOL!!! He had around 600 Spanish troops, 500 soldiers and 100 sailors,16 horses plus 14 small cannon,that's not hundreds. However he also had around 30-40,000 native allies along with him. LOL!! Might want to give a little more credit to all those meso american allies.
@@Hillbilly001I wrote several hundred correctly, but not a thousand. Think for yourself how Tlaxcala, the allies of the Spaniards, could have 30 thousand warriors against the huge Aztec empire. It's impossible. Tlaxcala was just a village.
To the Aztecs, the Spaniards seemed like demons. For them, cavalry are centaurs, dogs are demons of hell, muskets and cannons are blows of spirits. because they have never seen it all. but still the Aztecs were brave and fought against the mystical army. You could write a poem about this story.
Anyone who loves historical fiction, you need to read Conn Iggulden's series based on Ghengis Khan and his descendants. Very well researched and written. If you like Bernard Cornwell's stuff then you will love Conn's work. I read proper history books as well.
Thank you for your great show. But Kutbughah didn’t kill himself. He tried to escape but Jamal he is one of the leaders Muslim saw Kutbughah when he tried to escape and then he killed Kutbughah.
@SacClass650 We those people whom believe the truth holy islam, monotheistic christianity and judaism and believe our laws of should and must be changed according to ultramodern world are the combination of progressive islamic world.
Disliked for misinformation.. title should be Mongols vs Egyptian NOT mamluks, the whole army were Egyptians, I see alot of Turks claim this battle but turks were not wining any battle vs Mongols, Egyptians were the only ones victorious vs Mongols, stop the cringe and give credit where credit is due.. Turks want to claim everything as their own, its cringe..
This was a time period before nationalism where nation-states were run by ruling dynasties and their nobility. The Mamelukes were made up of a mix of soldiers from all over the Islamic world including Egypt. I would recommend reading a book about the subject before crying about Turks lol
Outstanding cinematics as always. Cheers from Tennessee
It is always tennesee
@yossefahmed4591 Yeah and your point is?
Baibars used the Mongol’s tactics to defeat the Mongols. Genius!
Great video. Keep it up.
Great description of the battle. However historians assume that Egypt would still have fallen if the Mongols had returned in far greater numbes. The bulk of their armies were occupied elsewhere.
This battle also saved Europe
And Africa 🌍 😅
No, mogols attacked Europe again but retreated again, not intrested in conquer it.
Not really lol, Europe wasn’t suitable for hit and run mongol tactics
@Shadow83.reconnaissance forces of Mongol reach east Europ
@@sinanmahmood3916 true 👍
Also desameted the population of Hungary 🇭🇺
Great video quality, narrative @ 10:08 sums it up.
Thanks for your content. Battle of Avarayr next please)
It was Turkish military slaves, the Mamluks, coming from the Eurasian steppes, who were successful in stemming the deadly Mongol danger. Complete political, military, and, last but not least, economic power passed into the hands of this new Turkish ruling caste that regenerated itself anew each generation from the outside. It was seen as a sign of particular divine grace and providence that Turks had contained the Mongol avalanche. Turks knew the fighting techniques of their Mongol "cousins" from their common homeland in the steppes of Central Asia. The contemporary Syrian chronicler Abū Shāma rejoiced after the crucial battle of Ayn Jälūt in saying: "It is verily remarkable that the Tatars were broken and destroyed by their own kinsmen, the Turks." Paying his respect to the victorious sultan of Egypt, he continues in a couplet:
The Tatars conquered the lands and there came to them From Egypt a Turk, unmindful of his life. In Syria he destroyed and scattered them. To everything there is a bane of its own kind.
And the triumph of the Turks was compounded by the final expulsion of the Crusaders from the Holy Land; one should notice the wording of a panegyric for Sultan al-Ashraf Khalil after he had conquered, in 690/1291, Acre, the last Crusader stronghold:
Praise be to God, the nation of the Cross has fallen; Through the Turks the religion of the chosen Arabs has triumphed.
The Crusaders had allied themselves to the abominable Mongols, the "vile foe," and had constituted a constant humiliation to Islam for almost 200 years. These exploits immensely enhanced the religious prestige of the Mamluks. The popula- tion of Egypt and Syria gratefully acknowledged their achievements. The folk novel of al-Malik al-Zahir Baybars gives abundant testimony to the general feeling of owing the Mamluks, that is, the Turks, thanks for saving them from an imminent catastrophe.
Turkish gives the uninitiated the impression of the modern Turks of Turkey. I think it is better and more accurate to use Turkic.
The Crusades. Who is the devil and who is God? That made religious fanatics like your Excellency, who come out to boast about themselves, being good to themselves and evil to their friends, what's the difference between a devil and a devil, your Excellency, who both like to kill others? You took the trouble to type so long, you damn bastard, just to praise yourself and then curse others. Your Excellency, go look at the past, where the Mongols conquered various kingdoms in Persia and slaughtered all the citizens, leaving not even children. The rest were used as slaves for the Arabs to use as labor. Have you forgotten already? Just defeating the Mongols and retreating isn't considered a victory. It's just that the city was defended.🤔😁😄
Teşekkur abi, Allah rehamt eyelsin on all of the Shaheeds 🤲🏻. 🇸🇦❤️ 🇹🇷 ☪️ ☝🏻.
The Mamluks were not only Turks, they were also Circassian Europeans
@@abdullahkamarovic The Bahriyya mamluks were Turkic; from the 1300s is when the Circassians came into the fray.
Great video. The Battle of the Camel would be interesting, it was the first battle fought between Muslims.
Also none as the fitnah 😅
Do the siege of acre 1291 mamluks vs knight templars next
Show the battle of the Spanish conquerors against the Aztecs, which took place in the Otumba Valley. Hernan Cortes and hundreds of conquistadors defeated many thousands of Aztecs in this battle. Because the Spaniards had gunpowder, steel and cavalry
@@winternights0506 LOL!!! He had around 600 Spanish troops, 500 soldiers and 100 sailors,16 horses plus 14 small cannon,that's not hundreds. However he also had around 30-40,000 native allies along with him. LOL!! Might want to give a little more credit to all those meso american allies.
@@Hillbilly001I wrote several hundred correctly, but not a thousand. Think for yourself how Tlaxcala, the allies of the Spaniards, could have 30 thousand warriors against the huge Aztec empire. It's impossible. Tlaxcala was just a village.
To the Aztecs, the Spaniards seemed like demons. For them, cavalry are centaurs, dogs are demons of hell, muskets and cannons are blows of spirits. because they have never seen it all. but still the Aztecs were brave and fought against the mystical army. You could write a poem about this story.
Great stuff
MAMLUKS we're truly a military war machine ☠️
We need them back
@العنزي-ر7ت ليش😭
Anyone who loves historical fiction, you need to read Conn Iggulden's series based on Ghengis Khan and his descendants. Very well researched and written. If you like Bernard Cornwell's stuff then you will love Conn's work. I read proper history books as well.
Based
Thank you
we need a whole series about the Mongol conquests and the reconquista
Good video
I just had one question were these battle recorded in such intricate details
Thank you for your great show. But Kutbughah didn’t kill himself. He tried to escape but Jamal he is one of the leaders Muslim saw Kutbughah when he tried to escape and then he killed Kutbughah.
For right For Islam for Allah Allah Akbar 🏴🏳️ 🇧🇩
If Quthuz loses, perhaps the Mongols will achieve the most extensive political institution.
They had already achieved that.
Which total war game is this?
Qutuz 🔥
after this battle,many decades Mongols convert islam
A battle that stopped the Mongols to become super ultimate bangers,😂
They were already "the bangers",.
They were already that.
8:55 Name of the creator who is greatest of all god of adam god of Moses god of Abraham God of Jesus the god of all we see or can't see Allah ☝️
Un video del emperador basilio 2
That battle was more about numbers on mamluk side, logistics and treason of Mongol muslim allies.
Heroes Baybars general originally turkish dynasty seljukids 7500 force joint to force mamluk help to muslim people
The progressive islamic world need this lion of Islam again! Allahu akbar!
The "progressive" Islamic world-sorry, what?
@SacClass650 We those people whom believe the truth holy islam, monotheistic christianity and judaism and believe our laws of should and must be changed according to ultramodern world are the combination of progressive islamic world.
@@syednafiunnoor2600 Respectfully, you sound like you need to touch grass
1st comment
Disliked for misinformation.. title should be Mongols vs Egyptian NOT mamluks, the whole army were Egyptians, I see alot of Turks claim this battle but turks were not wining any battle vs Mongols, Egyptians were the only ones victorious vs Mongols, stop the cringe and give credit where credit is due.. Turks want to claim everything as their own, its cringe..
You sound upset, have you tried going outside and touching Grass?
@@WarAndHistory.😂,🎉❤,.
This was a time period before nationalism where nation-states were run by ruling dynasties and their nobility. The Mamelukes were made up of a mix of soldiers from all over the Islamic world including Egypt. I would recommend reading a book about the subject before crying about Turks lol
Parwan, prelude to Khalka, Samara Bend, were won by turks.
Im sure your fun at parties
New movements of cavalry , while shooting . Gyroscopic motion . 📟🎬🩵🦾