It's possible to be right for the wrong reasons. This is the principle underpinning almost all analysts who focus on tech. It's especially true when your strategy is buy-and-hold. Most big and medium-sized tech is destined for success because tech is destined for success. "I don't want to say logarithmic..." she said. Uh, yeah, because you mean exponential. And even exponential is incorrect. Basically, this woman is right--demand for memory and storage of all types will be greater over time--but she is a little confused about why. But, guys, it's Schwab. I don't know about you, but I watch Schwab interviews for a laugh. Nineteen times out of twenty, both the interviewer and interviewee are WAY in over their heads. Usually, the interviewer is the least informed.
The pie is big enough for both NVDA and AVGO.
Its going to replace workers thats the BIG SAVINGS
It's possible to be right for the wrong reasons. This is the principle underpinning almost all analysts who focus on tech. It's especially true when your strategy is buy-and-hold. Most big and medium-sized tech is destined for success because tech is destined for success. "I don't want to say logarithmic..." she said. Uh, yeah, because you mean exponential. And even exponential is incorrect. Basically, this woman is right--demand for memory and storage of all types will be greater over time--but she is a little confused about why. But, guys, it's Schwab. I don't know about you, but I watch Schwab interviews for a laugh. Nineteen times out of twenty, both the interviewer and interviewee are WAY in over their heads. Usually, the interviewer is the least informed.
Let me guess, you are smarter than everyone else🤣😂🤣
jensen is god 💚🖤📈🇺🇸
That's a mod on wallstreetbets
Garbage analysis
Nope. AI will replace people, it's already happening
The woman talking is a complete ignorant.
She isn't ignorant, just incompetent...