That is what I am wondering as well! Been researching so much West Asia resolution. The topicality is really strinct this time as internal armed conflict essentially only refers to three countries.
In your transitioning away from counter terrosim contention, you stated counter terrosim is a good contention because it is a harmful and expensive strategy, but my partner and I are finding no evidence to support this but is saying CT is good. Also, we did not find any evidence stating the cost of GPC that would make CT seem more expensive. Do you think there is more evidence to say that CT is a worse strategy than GPC?
Thanm you! I am not including the cards because that discourages independent research by students. My goal is to give you a starting point, not place you at the destination.
OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH! Do you mind adding some rebuttals to this or adding into the document that you made? I usually premake some of my rebuttals and I having a hard time with this topic! It would really help me understand which way to go with my rebuttals.
Unfortunately I think that extends beyond the time I'm able to spend on a free resource plus I worry about doing too much work for students, so while I appreciate that you would trust me to help you on that, I'll have to decline.
I just can't seem to find the Bernstein evidence that you used in your con example case. "But Bernstein 20 notes that the U.S. strategy of GPC includes expanding nuclear, conventional, and cyber military capabilities to achieve a strategic advantage, prompting Russia to do the same." Do you have the link to the article/study/pdf? Thanks
Are you planning on making one for the West Asia resolution? This one explained the topic amazingly
That is what I am wondering as well! Been researching so much West Asia resolution. The topicality is really strinct this time as internal armed conflict essentially only refers to three countries.
Yep, here is a link for it! ua-cam.com/video/offZ0Ba9tts/v-deo.html
You're the goat! When's the lecture for Jan coming out if there is one?
Hey thanks! And here is a link to it: ua-cam.com/video/offZ0Ba9tts/v-deo.html
Thank you so much!! My debate coach used this same slideshow during our lecture, but I forgot most of what he said, your video was really helpful!
aff: 1. bad thing-gpc-solved. 2. problem-gpc solve-prevented.
neg: 1. good thing-gpc trade-off-bad. 2. problem now-caused by gpc-impact
could you provide the link for O’brien and Tully 21 evidence in your affirmative case? I have looked for the card everywhere and can’t find it! thx.
Really grateful I found this video, thanks!!!
This is Highkey a rly good topic analysis
Thank you!!! I appreciate the kind words.
@Alfred Lewis, Jr. Pro: Tech Innovation and Transitioning away from counter terror
Con: Grey Zone and Nuclear Deterrence
In your transitioning away from counter terrosim contention, you stated counter terrosim is a good contention because it is a harmful and expensive strategy, but my partner and I are finding no evidence to support this but is saying CT is good. Also, we did not find any evidence stating the cost of GPC that would make CT seem more expensive. Do you think there is more evidence to say that CT is a worse strategy than GPC?
This video is really good thank you so much, but can you include the actual cards in the docs, if so that would make this even better!
Thanm you! I am not including the cards because that discourages independent research by students. My goal is to give you a starting point, not place you at the destination.
@curtaines on ig debate US has a great list of sources to check out.
OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH! Do you mind adding some rebuttals to this or adding into the document that you made? I usually premake some of my rebuttals and I having a hard time with this topic! It would really help me understand which way to go with my rebuttals.
Unfortunately I think that extends beyond the time I'm able to spend on a free resource plus I worry about doing too much work for students, so while I appreciate that you would trust me to help you on that, I'll have to decline.
@@jettsmith7 W take
this is such a good video i'm so glad i found your channel
i was really stressing about this topic and you broke it down so nicely
Do you have the sources on your sample cases
You did a great job here.
mate, do you mind putting timestamps?
For the major sections, sure!
@@jettsmith7 thx a lot mah g u saved me
Goat behaviour.
I just can't seem to find the Bernstein evidence that you used in your con example case. "But Bernstein 20 notes that the U.S. strategy of GPC includes expanding nuclear, conventional, and cyber military capabilities to achieve a strategic advantage, prompting Russia to do the same."
Do you have the link to the article/study/pdf? Thanks
ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2404537/8-weapons-of-mass-destruction-strategic-deterrence-and-great-power-competition/
Do you have a discord I can join or I’ll add you you’re amazing