FINALLY!! you are the first person I have found who actually does proper well explained comparisons! So much better than digitalrev and all of these other camera review channels! you have earned a SUB from me, I'm looking forward to seeing more from you in future! Keep up the good work!
I just moved away from Seattle and seeing the shots from Golden Gardens makes me miss it so bad! The Olympics are so perfect when you can actually see them this time of year. Great comparison, thanks for the video!
Best online comparison/review on YT bar none! Thank you so much for taking the time to share your results, I was very close to buying the canon but have decided to purchase the Tamron instead, with that little difference I can't justify the extra expense. Thanks Again!!
I'll go with Tamron, wayy cheaper + image stabilization, and a bit brighter in low light!! I mean are you kidding, it's worth the $$...... Great review by the way.
Great review. Right now these lenses are on sale. The delta is $600 (1800 vs. 1200). I got the Canon because 1) better optics 2) better built quality 3) better compatibility - my 5D3 can correct vignetting, chromatic aberration, and distortion automatically on the Canon 4) Canon has higher QA than Tamron - some copies of Tamrons lenses are bad! I never shoot video so IS is less important to me. I am happy with the Canon.
That's by far the highest quality comparison video I've ever seen! The problem is I was at a loss on which lens to get between the L f/4 and 2.8 Canons. Now it's up between three.
Excellent review. I just switched to Canon after 25 years of using Nikon, and have been in a dilemma over lenses, and written reviews just weren't helping much...this helped greatly. Thank you!
For most people, it probably doesn't. However, if you're shooting in an environment where you need to be discreet, like on a film set (where a "blimp" might be required), or if you're shooting timid wildlife, or a quiet moment at a wedding, etc... it can be important. Also, if you shoot video and use AF (which is somewhat rare), you don't want the noise of the lens to be recorded on the sound channel...
Matthew, that was a well-balanced review. In fact, I believe this is one of the better ones I was able to find on this subject. So please post more man!
Hi Matthew. The production quality of your review is stunning and the content very informative. With out a doubt the best review I've seen on the these lenses. Thanks and I look forward to more reviews.
I really like the effort you put in the comparison. YOU EVEN COVERED THE CHROMATIC ABERRATION + you explained it really well. Keep up the good work. This is what the internet needs.
Hi Thomas, This is a point well taken, and, of course, also why I provide the RAW files for you to compare for yourself (sharpened or otherwise). I compare the RAW files because I want to show the images in their most-different forms; sharpening and increases in contrast may close the gap between two lenses, even if applied equally to both, and that defeats the purpose of the comparison.
So happy I came across this video. So often video reviews are just 10 minutes of badly produced wittering opinions, but yours is informative, to the point and brilliantly conveyed! Was looking into buying a second-hand Canon 24-70 L mk1, but after watching your video and doing some more side by side comparison, the Tamron is starting to look like the winner! Same money for higher specs and a 6 year warranty, how bad!
Great review Matt, and thank you for spending the time to do the focal length calculations. It's a bit scary to me that you ran into these quality control issues with the very expensive Canon lens. For the price I would expect thorough performance testing of each unit before it leaves the factory. It would have been interesting to compare the two serial number Tamron lenses against each other, although I would guess the performance to be similar.
An EXCELLENT video review! Ive always wondered how the AF motor sounded, and now I know - a comparison that no video ive seen, actually shows. Very thorough and detailed. Subbed!
What an excellent, content-rich, and educational video! Thank you for creating this - you are brilliant, and earned a new subscriber! I've always like the Tamron ;) so now I'm glad to see the gear-lust I sometimes have may just be in my head...
This video is a great help as I'm in the market for a new lens. The Tamron 24-70 2.8 will be my 1st non Canon lens purchase for my 70D (currently I own all STM Canon products 50 1.8, 24 2.8, 18-55 and 55-250 Kit lens). The Tamron will be used for weddings. The extra money saved will allow me to start a savings for my future 5D mk3
He's probably not going with the 17-55mm 2.8 because he is saving up for a 5D MK III which is a full frame camera and the 17-55mm is only meant for crop sensor. Once he goes full frame that 17-55mm will be useless.
Na the 18-55 and 55-250 STM,s both came with the camera, but T T got it correct... In planning to get a 5D mk3, I gotta think ahead when buying lenses... I now need lenses that a work on both cameras for the most part.
Matt, thanks a lot for the review. I'm in the market for a standard zoom and was weighing if spending the extra $$$ would be worth the slight sharpness with Canon. As it is, I'm on a budget so Tamron should suit me fine! As others have mentioned, fantastic review!
Hi Bruno, Thanks! A vignetting test is a simple enough thing to add in next time... I wasn't sure how many people really care about that. It seems that so many people add a vignette in post these days anyway... :) I'll add in something brief next time, though. - Matthew
Great review and love the comment "sharpness does not equal a great photo" plus the $800.00 savings. Well, you make me lean towards the Tamron and with the savings a vacation to use it.
Great video Matthew. Superuseful, you just sold me the Tamron. At my level, the differences with the Canon don't justify the current 1000€ difference in the price tag. Thanks!
you nailed it when you said if someone offers you the choice to take between the two lenses, you'll take the canon but if you must buy with your own money, then its tamrom. thanks, bri
Hi Matthew, this is an amazing video comparison. Definitely one of the best even being 4-1/2 years old haha. Great work! I just ordered this Tamron 24-70 (not the new G2) and I already have done plenty of research and I know what to expect. But I'm still enjoying browsing videos like this. Makes the anticipation all the more exciting while the lens is in route lol. Also I aspire to be as knowledgeable as you are when it comes to truly understanding photography to this extent. You inspire me, pal. Thank you, and keep up the great work. You just gained a new sub... Cheers Greg
Hey Gregory, Glad you enjoyed it! I've just finished shooting for the new videos with the Sigma ART, Tamron G2, and the same Canon, along with a Canon f/4L IS. The videos will be coming over the next month or so. - Matthew
Hey, thanks for the reply! That sounds great. I'll definitely be on the lookout for those to be uploaded. Your work is really in a class of its own. I truly value it! Keep it up. Greg
I bought the Tamron 24-70. 6 years warranty is not bad at all. It would still be under warranty if I decided to sell it because Canon made an image stabilized version in the next few years. I notice vignetting wide open on the Tamron, but it doesn't bother me much (on Canon 6D). Would be interesting to see if Sigma offers a similar lens with an "Art" logo.
Very good and informative video. Very well explained and to the point. I think I'm going to go with the Tamron specifically because of the image stabilization.
You are without doubt the best reviewer on youtube with great comparisons and calm manner. Will you be testing the new Tamron 24-70 G2?? Also,don't suppose you will test any Fugi stuff !!
In general, I don't think that ANY APS-C can match a good full-frame sensor in low light... noise is always going to be a concern. There are also some difficulties with Fuji and using flash equipment, though they're not a huge concern, and more options are becoming available for Fuji. I don't find it to be an issue when I shoot RAW, but some people claim that Fuji's X sensors cause "waxy" skin tones. You can Google that and see if you agree. That said, many of Fuji's lenses are really excellent, and there are enough large aperture primes to be able to get nice shallow depth of field and plenty of sharpness. Autofocus and general speed are great. I've never shot Fuji video, so I can't really comment there. And, of course, no full-frame Canon can match the Fuji for its size and weight and general portability.
I've found the XT2 can match my 6D in good light and is a joy to use, but i can't get the same level of performance in low light and actually find the EVF a disadvantage compared to OVF and the dynamic range is way inferior in low light, maybe i'm doing something wrong. I've been through the waxy tone problem and found i could get rid of it by dropping sharpness to -1or2 and noise reduction by -4.
Please provide your videos without the loud looped music. Excellent content totally distracted with music that contributes nothing but distraction. If people want to listen to music they can access other sources. Your content is quite detailed and should have minimal or no distraction music. Thank you.
I have attended a photo session at Adorama, and a presenter was using Tamron 24-70mm F2.8 VC. After this session, I looked at other people's opinion about this lens inUA-cam. I found your presentation of Canon vs Nikon. Your presentation material are excellent and as well as your talking. But your photo material are all landscaping photos. As far as I know, F2.8 and 70-100mm zone are good for portrait . why you did not mention about portrait? Please explain. Thanks
I enjoyed your review. I have the Tamron 24-70 f2.8. However I've been thinking about the Canon 24-70 f2.8L II. From your review you made me feel better about owning the Tamron. Maybe I will save $2400.00 and buy something else. Thanks again.
Thanks Matthew. I'm concerned about focusing speed/accuracy in low light, so I was hoping to get your opinion on that seeing as you've probably logged more hours with it since your original review... I shoot weddings w/ the 5D mk 3.
Hi Matthew! I agree . . . your reviews have been far better than most I've seen too. Believe me when I say, . . . I have watched A TON of videos (just over 2,000+ videos in two years time so far, not to mention professional workshops as well) on every piece of gear, accessories, software, techniques, creativity and style to determine WHAT to buy and HOW to narrow my creative business interests. It's helped me to make the best decision for my starting budget and business goals. Just trying to make the most of my investment by building a solid foundation of tools, skills and experience. Great technical and exacting comparisons to the nitty gritty details!!! Loved it! Considering I'm just getting started, it matters considerably to understand WHY I'm buying certain tools, and HOW it will help me achieve my goals. THANKS AGAIN! This has helped me so much! I really appreciate the work you have put into your video content. I'm a former automotive seat CADD Designer/Detailer/Draftwoman and Illustrator & Graphic Artist, so I can really appreciate your finite analysis approach in your review. I live and work in Sumner, Washington, so perhaps I'll run into you somewhere along the way to talk photography! ;-) Keep up the great job!
Thank you so much for helping me make this big decision. I really appreciate your hard work and time. I subscribed and will be back for more. Thanks again!
very well done review,u should do vids like this more often loved the 35 and 2470 versions. Question, people claim that the tamron is wider than the canon (dosnt quite reach the 200mil) did u notice something like that? greetings
I found a website that say : The 5D3 can store data for up to 40 different lenses if you load it into your 5D3. do you know if there is data for the Tamron that can be stored in the 5d3?
Thanks to this awesome video - I went with the tamron. The price difference is just too big to justify the canon. Using the lens on an APS-C body (canon 650d) but ill be going full frame in the future
Thank you for the video, you've just help me make my decision and save myself a lot of money. I would love to have the Canon but the Tamron seem to be pretty good for the price and I can get a factory refurbish one for £550.
Great comparison, but what still interests me as an event photographer is the autofocus accuracy and speed. In my opinios, this is much more relevant for an event photographer. Also, the IS is not really a feature that an event photographer would need, since i dont shoot still targets. So if the light gets low, thats mostly the part of the wedding where people start to dance. at this point i need 1/100, even if my lens allows for longer exposure time, because the people move too fast.
Great video. Eventually I may end up buying one. It would make great addition to 50 1.4, 70-300 and 16-35. Maybe even replace 50 1.4? Would be able to provide more higher zoom range than 16-35, whilst 16-35 would be perfect for lower. Or would it be too much of same range lenses?
Still enjoying my tamron 27-40 VC! In the lab, Canon might be a bit sharper. In real life though, the VC in the tamron is what gives it the edge. The Canon is theoretically shrper (in the lab), in real world VC matters more
FINALLY!! you are the first person I have found who actually does proper well explained comparisons! So much better than digitalrev and all of these other camera review channels! you have earned a SUB from me, I'm looking forward to seeing more from you in future! Keep up the good work!
You have to check out Christopher Frost Photography too, my favorite lens reviewer on youtube.
@@Xzizia92 And Abbott, Dustin
I just moved away from Seattle and seeing the shots from Golden Gardens makes me miss it so bad! The Olympics are so perfect when you can actually see them this time of year. Great comparison, thanks for the video!
Love this review. I tested both and the difference wasn't enough to warrant the price of the Canon. I bought the Tamron, as well as the Tamron 70-200.
The best lens comparison video I've seen on UA-cam...thanks.
Best online comparison/review on YT bar none! Thank you so much for taking the time to share your results, I was very close to buying the canon but have decided to purchase the Tamron instead, with that little difference I can't justify the extra expense. Thanks Again!!
I'll go with Tamron, wayy cheaper + image stabilization, and a bit brighter in low light!! I mean are you kidding, it's worth the $$...... Great review by the way.
Great review. Right now these lenses are on sale. The delta is $600 (1800 vs. 1200). I got the Canon because 1) better optics 2) better built quality 3) better compatibility - my 5D3 can correct vignetting, chromatic aberration, and distortion automatically on the Canon 4) Canon has higher QA than Tamron - some copies of Tamrons lenses are bad! I never shoot video so IS is less important to me. I am happy with the Canon.
That's by far the highest quality comparison video I've ever seen! The problem is I was at a loss on which lens to get between the L f/4 and 2.8 Canons. Now it's up between three.
Excellent production and the comparison was clearly defined by the methodology. I like the style and structure of your approach.
The last sentence in the review put it in crystal clear view, everything just snapped into place. Thanks, I'm going with the Tamron. Awesome review.
Excellent review. I just switched to Canon after 25 years of using Nikon, and have been in a dilemma over lenses, and written reviews just weren't helping much...this helped greatly. Thank you!
For most people, it probably doesn't. However, if you're shooting in an environment where you need to be discreet, like on a film set (where a "blimp" might be required), or if you're shooting timid wildlife, or a quiet moment at a wedding, etc... it can be important. Also, if you shoot video and use AF (which is somewhat rare), you don't want the noise of the lens to be recorded on the sound channel...
I don't really used to comment on videos, but this comparison is just excellent. I doubt I've ever seen a so high quality work in this topic before.
Matthew, that was a well-balanced review. In fact, I believe this is one of the better ones I was able to find on this subject. So please post more man!
Hi Matthew. The production quality of your review is stunning and the content very informative. With out a doubt the best review I've seen on the these lenses. Thanks and I look forward to more reviews.
I really like the effort you put in the comparison. YOU EVEN COVERED THE CHROMATIC ABERRATION + you explained it really well. Keep up the good work. This is what the internet needs.
Hi Thomas,
This is a point well taken, and, of course, also why I provide the RAW files for you to compare for yourself (sharpened or otherwise). I compare the RAW files because I want to show the images in their most-different forms; sharpening and increases in contrast may close the gap between two lenses, even if applied equally to both, and that defeats the purpose of the comparison.
So happy I came across this video. So often video reviews are just 10 minutes of badly produced wittering opinions, but yours is informative, to the point and brilliantly conveyed!
Was looking into buying a second-hand Canon 24-70 L mk1, but after watching your video and doing some more side by side comparison, the Tamron is starting to look like the winner! Same money for higher specs and a 6 year warranty, how bad!
Great review Matt, and thank you for spending the time to do the focal length calculations. It's a bit scary to me that you ran into these quality control issues with the very expensive Canon lens. For the price I would expect thorough performance testing of each unit before it leaves the factory. It would have been interesting to compare the two serial number Tamron lenses against each other, although I would guess the performance to be similar.
Extraordinary great review video. One of the best I have seen on youtube so far.
Great example shots too! Keep on like this!
An EXCELLENT video review! Ive always wondered how the AF motor sounded, and now I know - a comparison that no video ive seen, actually shows. Very thorough and detailed. Subbed!
Thank you SOOO so much! It's so hard to find good reviews. Especially as a 'beginner' this really helped me decide what type of lens to go with.
What an excellent, content-rich, and educational video! Thank you for creating this - you are brilliant, and earned a new subscriber! I've always like the Tamron ;) so now I'm glad to see the gear-lust I sometimes have may just be in my head...
one of the best video comparison of 24 70. congrats
Thank you for your prompt response Matthew. I have never considered making videos with photoshop.
Awesome Comparison mate, very well put together and seemed unbiased. Best lens video I've seen so far.
Hey Matt! I love your style and way of presenting the information. Very clear and to the point. Keep up the great work!
Very nice and helpful review... I doubt the soft edges on the tamron at 2.8 will matter as who shoots landscapes that wide.
This review was made very professionally. Only thing I would have liked too see is that how they are working with video.
This video is a great help as I'm in the market for a new lens. The Tamron 24-70 2.8 will be my 1st non Canon lens purchase for my 70D (currently I own all STM Canon products 50 1.8, 24 2.8, 18-55 and 55-250 Kit lens). The Tamron will be used for weddings. The extra money saved will allow me to start a savings for my future 5D mk3
Why not go wih the EFS 17-55? It's made for crop and is basically the 24-70 of the crop sensor world
He's probably not going with the 17-55mm 2.8 because he is saving up for a 5D MK III which is a full frame camera and the 17-55mm is only meant for crop sensor. Once he goes full frame that 17-55mm will be useless.
EXACTLY gotta stop buying lenses that only work for one type of camera...Triple Tap we see eye to eye...thanks
Na the 18-55 and 55-250 STM,s both came with the camera, but T T got it correct... In planning to get a 5D mk3, I gotta think ahead when buying lenses... I now need lenses that a work on both cameras for the most part.
go with the new canon 24-105 F4 it comes out Oct 31
Matt, thanks a lot for the review. I'm in the market for a standard zoom and was weighing if spending the extra $$$ would be worth the slight sharpness with Canon. As it is, I'm on a budget so Tamron should suit me fine! As others have mentioned, fantastic review!
+skyknightmm Thanks! Glad you found it useful :)
very professional review! Too bad for me only pictures and no video samples. I need to decide between these for my NEX-EA0 camcorder.
Hi Bruno,
Thanks! A vignetting test is a simple enough thing to add in next time... I wasn't sure how many people really care about that. It seems that so many people add a vignette in post these days anyway...
:)
I'll add in something brief next time, though.
- Matthew
Fantastic comparison. I too am planning to go with the the Tamron, and saving the difference for another lens!
Excellent review done for average people,like me. Love the gallery illustration!!! Thanks Matt for taking the time to do this!
Great review and love the comment "sharpness does not equal a great photo" plus the $800.00 savings. Well, you make me lean towards the Tamron and with the savings a vacation to use it.
Great video Matthew. Superuseful, you just sold me the Tamron. At my level, the differences with the Canon don't justify the current 1000€ difference in the price tag. Thanks!
Great job bro
you nailed it when you said if someone offers you the choice to take between the two lenses, you'll take the canon but if you must buy with your own money, then its tamrom.
thanks, bri
A very well done video! A comparison of the bokeh would have been interesting, but still...
Hi Matthew, this is an amazing video comparison. Definitely one of the best even being 4-1/2 years old haha. Great work! I just ordered this Tamron 24-70 (not the new G2) and I already have done plenty of research and I know what to expect. But I'm still enjoying browsing videos like this. Makes the anticipation all the more exciting while the lens is in route lol. Also I aspire to be as knowledgeable as you are when it comes to truly understanding photography to this extent. You inspire me, pal. Thank you, and keep up the great work. You just gained a new sub... Cheers
Greg
Hey Gregory,
Glad you enjoyed it! I've just finished shooting for the new videos with the Sigma ART, Tamron G2, and the same Canon, along with a Canon f/4L IS. The videos will be coming over the next month or so.
- Matthew
Hey, thanks for the reply! That sounds great. I'll definitely be on the lookout for those to be uploaded. Your work is really in a class of its own. I truly value it! Keep it up.
Greg
One of the best reviews I have seen.... Thank you Matthew...
Thanks so much for this video! You explained the differences better than anyone else I've come across.
Cheers Mate, this video is really helpful ! Happy day to all .
Great work, mate. Very thorough break-down.
Great review - I'm sold on the Tamron. It's only $900 in SA, compared to $1550 for the Canon.
Your review was awesome!! You certainly got my thumbs up. Did you ever do a review on best lenses for video?
I bought the Tamron 24-70. 6 years warranty is not bad at all. It would still be under warranty if I decided to sell it because Canon made an image stabilized version in the next few years. I notice vignetting wide open on the Tamron, but it doesn't bother me much (on Canon 6D).
Would be interesting to see if Sigma offers a similar lens with an "Art" logo.
Christian Degas They never announced that they will release such a lens. What I meant is that Canon may eventually do it in the next few years.
"Those of you who are less caffeinated at that time in the morning might do better" HA HA!
WOW! Great video. I learned a lot more than just about the 2 lenses. One of the most detailed comparison videos I've seen youtube. Thanks a lot.
Superb review and illustration ... helped me make my decision on this exact lens thanks!
Very good and informative video. Very well explained and to the point. I think I'm going to go with the Tamron specifically because of the image stabilization.
Awesomely done comparison video! Thank you very much for taking the time to put this together and sharing.
One of the best review done thus far. Thanks
You are without doubt the best reviewer on youtube with great comparisons and calm manner. Will you be testing the new Tamron 24-70 G2?? Also,don't suppose you will test any Fugi stuff !!
Steve Moore Thanks, Steve. I'll be getting the G2 in a few weeks. Probably no Fuji stuff soon :-)
I'll look forward to the G2,could help make up my mind between Canon and Fugi, thanks, Steve.
In your opinion,can Fugi (XT2)match Canon (Full Frame)for weddings etc ??
In general, I don't think that ANY APS-C can match a good full-frame sensor in low light... noise is always going to be a concern. There are also some difficulties with Fuji and using flash equipment, though they're not a huge concern, and more options are becoming available for Fuji. I don't find it to be an issue when I shoot RAW, but some people claim that Fuji's X sensors cause "waxy" skin tones. You can Google that and see if you agree.
That said, many of Fuji's lenses are really excellent, and there are enough large aperture primes to be able to get nice shallow depth of field and plenty of sharpness. Autofocus and general speed are great. I've never shot Fuji video, so I can't really comment there.
And, of course, no full-frame Canon can match the Fuji for its size and weight and general portability.
I've found the XT2 can match my 6D in good light and is a joy to use, but i can't get the same level of performance in low light and actually find the EVF a disadvantage compared to OVF and the dynamic range is way inferior in low light, maybe i'm doing something wrong. I've been through the waxy tone problem and found i could get rid of it by dropping sharpness to -1or2 and noise reduction by -4.
Please provide your videos without the loud looped music. Excellent content totally distracted with music that contributes nothing but distraction. If people want to listen to music they can access other sources. Your content is quite detailed and should have minimal or no distraction music. Thank you.
I love your explanations and comparisons. I would love to see more! Thanks.
I have attended a photo session at Adorama, and a presenter was using Tamron 24-70mm F2.8 VC. After this session, I looked at other people's opinion about this lens inUA-cam. I found your presentation of Canon vs Nikon. Your presentation material are excellent and as well as your talking. But your photo material are all landscaping photos. As far as I know, F2.8 and 70-100mm zone are good for portrait . why you did not mention about portrait? Please explain. Thanks
I like the way you compare this two lens. Excellent pictures from the beach.
Thanks :) For software, I used Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Camera Raw.
Very nicely explained and a very practical conclusion. Thanks !
I enjoyed your review. I have the Tamron 24-70 f2.8. However I've been thinking about the Canon 24-70 f2.8L II. From your review you made me feel better about owning the Tamron. Maybe I will save $2400.00 and buy something else. Thanks again.
Great job! Thanks you very much for doing this!
very good review matthew.. hope you have tome to compare the old 24-70 mki to the new tamron.. keep it up and good luck!
Really high quality comparison. Much appreciated.
I'm seeing more detail in the Canon pics at all settings. Not sure if this is down to sharpness or better resolution.
Best instructional video I've seen in a long time!
I found your style of review and information quite useful. I have subscribed to your channel ! :)
Awesome presentation with grade A production value.
Thanks Matthew. I'm concerned about focusing speed/accuracy in low light, so I was hoping to get your opinion on that seeing as you've probably logged more hours with it since your original review...
I shoot weddings w/ the 5D mk 3.
Hi Matthew! I agree . . . your reviews have been far better than most I've seen too. Believe me when I say, . . . I have watched A TON of videos (just over 2,000+ videos in two years time so far, not to mention professional workshops as well) on every piece of gear, accessories, software, techniques, creativity and style to determine WHAT to buy and HOW to narrow my creative business interests. It's helped me to make the best decision for my starting budget and business goals. Just trying to make the most of my investment by building a solid foundation of tools, skills and experience. Great technical and exacting comparisons to the nitty gritty details!!! Loved it! Considering I'm just getting started, it matters considerably to understand WHY I'm buying certain tools, and HOW it will help me achieve my goals. THANKS AGAIN! This has helped me so much! I really appreciate the work you have put into your video content. I'm a former automotive seat CADD Designer/Detailer/Draftwoman and Illustrator & Graphic Artist, so I can really appreciate your finite analysis approach in your review. I live and work in Sumner, Washington, so perhaps I'll run into you somewhere along the way to talk photography! ;-) Keep up the great job!
REALLY great, thank you for doing this Matthew. I'm in the market for replacing my Canon 24-70 mk 1 so this was very helpful!
Super helpful review Matthew. Thank you!
Thank you so much for helping me make this big decision. I really appreciate your hard work and time. I subscribed and will be back for more. Thanks again!
the best comparison ever I've seen. thank you!
Photoshop CS6, mostly, for the animation and video editing. I use Camtasia for some stuff, too.
Both lens are just slightly les sharp then your review
Great one!
And also approved my decision to buy the Tamron
It's almost all done in Photoshop CS6, though with some of my videos, I also do parts in Camtasia.
Old video but it really help me to decide thank you bro
Best comparison out there
very well done review,u should do vids like this more often loved the 35 and 2470 versions.
Question, people claim that the tamron is wider than the canon (dosnt quite reach the 200mil) did u notice something like that?
greetings
Informative, eloquent, and the background music is pleasant! Thank you, I'll assume that the same results translate to Nikon as well!
I found a website that say : The 5D3 can store data for up to 40 different lenses if you load it into your 5D3.
do you know if there is data for the Tamron that can be stored in the 5d3?
Wow. Just. Wow. Love this review/comparison. *Extremely* helpful. Liked and subbed.
Excellent review, well balanced and thorough enough, thanks!
I like your reviews.....You tell it the way it is. Please make some more lens reviews.
Thanks to this awesome video - I went with the tamron. The price difference is just too big to justify the canon. Using the lens on an APS-C body (canon 650d) but ill be going full frame in the future
Best lens comparisson I've ever seen
Thank you for the video, you've just help me make my decision and save myself a lot of money. I would love to have the Canon but the Tamron seem to be pretty good for the price and I can get a factory refurbish one for £550.
Loved your presentation style. Subscribed!
You're the best at lens comparison!!! ❤❤❤ Thank you!
Great comparison, but what still interests me as an event photographer is the autofocus accuracy and speed. In my opinios, this is much more relevant for an event photographer. Also, the IS is not really a feature that an event photographer would need, since i dont shoot still targets. So if the light gets low, thats mostly the part of the wedding where people start to dance. at this point i need 1/100, even if my lens allows for longer exposure time, because the people move too fast.
Excellent comparison! Thanks
Great video. Eventually I may end up buying one. It would make great addition to 50 1.4, 70-300 and 16-35. Maybe even replace 50 1.4? Would be able to provide more higher zoom range than 16-35, whilst 16-35 would be perfect for lower. Or would it be too much of same range lenses?
Thanks so much Matthew. I appreciate your insight.
Very useful and well explained!
Still enjoying my tamron 27-40 VC!
In the lab, Canon might be a bit sharper. In real life though, the VC in the tamron is what gives it the edge. The Canon is theoretically shrper (in the lab), in real world VC matters more
Best review I've ever seen. Good job thank you very much. (liked and subscribed)
Thanks you very much, can u also show us a comparison between canon 18-200 and tamron 18-200 I bought recently as canon was expensive for my 500D.
Fantastic comparison video. Thanks, man. :)