Columbian Exposition of 1893 | The Art of Historical Manipulation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 156

  • @RegnaSaturna
    @RegnaSaturna 9 місяців тому +32

    After watching the said Mind Unveiled video about a year ago, i was hoping someone would take it further and do some serious disecting on photographs of worlds fairs from around that time period. I think i found that someone now. You have a unique talent to present material in a calm and organised way without making some big conclusions upfront. Only food for thought to make up our own minds without being told what 's right and what's not. I hope you will keep doing more of these presentations in the future. This is the way to discover the hidden truth about our history without being too dogmatic about it. Well done sir and thank you!

  • @XFactor369
    @XFactor369 3 місяці тому +3

    Excellent job! Bravo 👏

  • @JustMe-te8cz
    @JustMe-te8cz Місяць тому

    I have a friend who is a master illustrator. Some of his artwork looks so real as to be indistinguishable from a photograph.

  • @hayno7066
    @hayno7066 9 місяців тому +3

    THINK I MAY HAVE SPOTTED A ‘BINGO’ MOMENT. 25:14 LOOK AT THE DATE ON THE BRIDGE TO THE RIGHT OF THE LAMPS IN ALL 3 - TELL ME THAT DOESN’T SAY 1492!!!

    • @Kuhariko
      @Kuhariko 8 місяців тому +2

      Think that is the whole COLUMBUS part of the exposition u know ?

    • @dunnbag
      @dunnbag 8 місяців тому

      🤔

    • @Lion0fJudah.
      @Lion0fJudah. 8 місяців тому

      Definitely says “1492”. Our timeline supposedly has been altered like we aren’t really in 2024 there are discrepancies with the Gregorian calendar and others. Some say we are off by 1000 years pictures of old buildings with dates etched in them with Roman numerals provide a solid case.

    • @systemakhaosu810
      @systemakhaosu810 8 місяців тому +5

      The whole theme of the expo was the 400th anniversary of Columbus's 1492 voyage.
      And just because something has a year carved or painted on it doesn't mean they built it then. I have stone chisels and could go carve Const. 2047 on the side of city hall, or 1522AD on the corner of a McDonald's, that doesn't magically edit when they were built

  • @robshank1983
    @robshank1983 9 місяців тому +3

    Can fix up your….THICK neck 😂😂😂👏👏👏👏👏yes!

  • @pagerhoads1531
    @pagerhoads1531 9 місяців тому +1

    Liked 👍 and shared 😊 and subscribed ✍

  • @donaldrodriguez8134
    @donaldrodriguez8134 6 місяців тому +5

    Hey Bro, Zoom in on the bridge where you have the 3 different side by sides, Does the Bridge have a Year Stamp of 1498 by the light pole ?????🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

  • @omarelric
    @omarelric Місяць тому +4

    Fun interesting factoids:
    Pynchon's "against the day" novel, a fiction involving time travel, begins at this fair.
    Chrono trigger, the videogame, also begins in a very similar setting.
    The fair imagery implies masonic limestone imagery similar to what you'd see in bioshock infinite's floating limestone islands or the Laputa myth from Gulliver's travels.

  • @mikescholz6429
    @mikescholz6429 Місяць тому +2

    If you really want to blow your own mind… try taking a cheap set of colored pencils to a black and white photo.

  • @oldworldex
    @oldworldex 4 місяці тому +7

    This is excellent!

  • @thewatcher2253
    @thewatcher2253 5 місяців тому +8

    Wonderful information and this gives me validation that I'm not crazy.

  • @carsyncruz
    @carsyncruz 5 місяців тому +6

    man this is great work! I actually went searching for worlds fair construction photos on google and your video popped up. I was thinking some of the buildings or photos look like you have elements of original structures, like the ornate fixtures and main structures then totally illustrated parts of the images and or buildings that look like a drawing of a portion of these structure to make the construction time believable. Anyway, thanks for taking the time to do this. i'll explore your channel and see what else you have.

  • @stuffedbeagle
    @stuffedbeagle 9 місяців тому +21

    Well done Jedi, WE GOT ONE THAT CAN SEE!!!...Thanx Bunches for shouting out our collaboration video on this subject...LUV BEAGS & Mind Unveiled

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  9 місяців тому +4

      Much appreciated and your presentation with Campbell - Autodidactic was incredibly interesting too. Your archive of altered imagery is a permanent fixture in my collection now. I'm merely building onto many researchers foundational work, such as yours, that have discussed this type of historical manipulation. Thank you again for the comment and your work in this area.

    • @stuffedbeagle
      @stuffedbeagle 9 місяців тому +3

      That's AWESOME! Stand on our shoulders and help the people SEE! Once you have the eyes to see these manipulations...you will see them over and over. My personal collection is getting out of hand. Keep the good work coming and I will keep an eye out for more of your research...again Thank You!...LUV BEAGS 🐶@@LatentLexicon

  • @willembont4790
    @willembont4790 6 місяців тому +5

    Liked and subscribed.
    Thanks for sharing your insight. Great work.

  • @enzocompanbadillo5365
    @enzocompanbadillo5365 8 місяців тому +4

    If the buildings were found and not built for the fair, why do they look so xixth century-ish?

    • @vashman01
      @vashman01 2 місяці тому

      Better question is where is the evidence these things existed before the fair? Where are the municipal maps? Where are the eye witness accounts? If we did not build them, then they would seem like fantastical structures that would surely catch the attention of the general public for as long as we have known about them. Why is there no general accounts for them spread throughout the US and the world? This is one of the worst conspiracy theories I have ever seen and way too many people buy into it.

  • @patriciabicking1628
    @patriciabicking1628 21 день тому +1

    Thank you, I've been looking for someone who could see what I see. Very well done, and looking forward to more. 😊

  • @rogermiller2159
    @rogermiller2159 11 місяців тому +3

    Grafic arts was changing rapidly in this era. The work force was brush and pencil as entering the new trade of photography.
    Awkward yes. All those people in the trade pulling back the advancement of the new technology.

  • @imthebusdriver0018
    @imthebusdriver0018 Місяць тому +3

    Very well done my friend. I look forward to watching more of this series. This is even more proof that history has been manipulated and maybe even completely fabricated.

  • @furripupau
    @furripupau 5 місяців тому +3

    While this is very interesting, I'm thinking that a lot of frustration could be be easily overcome by simply looking up the definition of the word "illustration". I would say that manipulation of photographs *when intended for print* should be more or less taken for granted when viewing any material published in this era. This is not at all surprising, the technological syntax of the time pretty much required it. If you wanted to *illustrate* something with a photograph, and you wanted it to be *clear* when printed, it was going to be retouched.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  5 місяців тому +1

      I used to take these documents for granted. Which is more or less assuming that these images, publications, illustrations etc. represent truth without question or very little proof.
      I'm merely asking questions now. From the sheer amount of books collected over several years, taking these historical documents for granted is a space I can no longer linger in.
      Appreciate the comment.

    • @furripupau
      @furripupau 5 місяців тому +2

      @@LatentLexicon As a researcher and a collector of antique photos, it never really stood out to me. You'd see a photo and you'd see it was retouched, and that was it. There are even retouched negatives in my collection. The intent was usually not to deceive, but rather to make the images more realistic, or in any event more clear. If you wanted to increase contrast locally in an image, make a blurry edge more crisp, highlight details that the camera "missed" then the image had to be doctored in some way. Gentler techniques like dodging and burning (which we generally just accept as part of the photographic process and not the same as doctoring an image) were either not possible, or didn't produce a strong enough effect to make up for low quality of early halftone printing.
      I rarely see retouching on actual photographic prints (ie. on albumen, etc.) from the era, although it was done too sometimes.
      However, I did enjoy this video. I think most people can spot a retouched photo, but they do not know how it was done or why. I also wonder if, in their own era, the retouching was so obvious to the general public. I think that would be a very interesting subject to explore.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  5 місяців тому +3

      This is one aspect I do enjoy about these presentations and that is the thoughtful and interesting comments. I tend to learn more from comments like this as they provide more threads to pull and offer additional perspectives.
      It is safe to say that the second last sentence is precisely where I was situated. Picking out obvious alterations in the images, yet not knowing how or why.
      I wonder as well if this type of retouching was obvious to the general public - it is an excellent point and would be suitable for this series to explore.
      Do you have any of your collected negatives or images online for browsing? Would love to take a look.

  • @IstariAzul777
    @IstariAzul777 6 днів тому

    I’d love you to have a look at photos from the Nashville fair; specifically the pyramid that was next to Parthenon. It’s very visible n looks very old in photos yet I’d omitted from
    The official Illustrations

  • @TheLastOilMan
    @TheLastOilMan 9 місяців тому +9

    My dad was a a wedding photographer in the 60’s . He retouched photographs in the dark room . He was an amateur . Imagine what the pros could do !

  • @LBo...
    @LBo... 11 місяців тому +14

    Will definitely be looking forward for more of this series. 👍

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  11 місяців тому +5

      Excellent to hear and appreciate the comment! Already working on the first episode of this series. I'll post an update once I set a timeline to be finished.

    • @-newuser-707
      @-newuser-707 5 місяців тому

      @@LatentLexicon Sorry to jump in here, but considering yours is for me the best researched of these channels, I couldn't help wondering what you think of the statue featured in the 1893 Columbian Exposition Chicago. You know, the figure with both its arms raised, on a plinth in the water? It strikes me as out of place, almost looking like a CG model, replete with signature limitations of what we call rigging. Of course, we have evidence of its existence dating back a while, but still, if ever a candidate for an example of iconoclastic additions to these structures existed, this would be it. It's clearly not on par with its surroundings.

    • @-newuser-707
      @-newuser-707 5 місяців тому

      ​@@LatentLexicon I also noticed in some of the images, statues on crenels appear to look procedural, as do flags, and other details. I can't account for these images appearing in books dated from the early 20th century, but from what I've seen online, in these "truther" videos, question marks abound. Could there be some kind of clandestine gatekeeping movement which churns out 3D GC renderings of buildings which never existed? Don't get me wrong. Classical style buildings really do exist in odd places, signifying established misdirection and counterfeit history, which needs to be addressed. But then why would truth channels promote modern fakery if not to stem the flow of truth, producing yet another misdirection?

  • @futurescapeart
    @futurescapeart 4 місяці тому +2

    HOLY **** … @21:00 … I sure get it @LatentLexicon , right away .. the imagery is full from corner to corner w/ the signatures of retouching, it jumps off the screen … I had to pause & testify 😅 .. excellent presentation approach here , where theres smoke theres fire

  • @Mummaearth
    @Mummaearth Місяць тому

    i have some quite old books that demonstrate this - including one using Queen Vicorias name and displaying the 'great castles' in britain - one of them clearly has cows added ........... on the front lawn

  • @toddd.9433
    @toddd.9433 22 дні тому

    Brother.. You are the only person that noticed the photo shopping of "legit old pictures" in legit old books..

  • @river_of_jordan
    @river_of_jordan 7 місяців тому +5

    How are their full grown trees in these photos? I’m a landscaper and we can never plant trees that big. Not to say they couldn’t haul large trees in (or they built around them), but most trees are small when you plant.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  7 місяців тому +3

      Just did a recent episode on the landscaping elements of this exposition and would be interested to hear your thoughts.

    • @pointzerotwo
      @pointzerotwo 3 місяці тому +1

      Brand new trees as large as Sequoias can easily be "planted" in paintings.

  • @dunnbag
    @dunnbag 8 місяців тому +4

    Anyone else see 1492 marked on the bridge? - 26:26

    • @mrstoofficial
      @mrstoofficial 5 місяців тому

      The year Columbus came to America!

    • @pointzerotwo
      @pointzerotwo 3 місяці тому +1

      To tie together the fictions of Columbia and Columbus. If you remember 1492 was all about Columbus.

  • @lakryth8741
    @lakryth8741 9 місяців тому +12

    Love finding a good researcher such as yourself. Unbiased and compelling insight.

  • @richardwindle5004
    @richardwindle5004 3 місяці тому

    I never knew of the false reality that was presented in the world's fair chicago..have you ever wondered were al the hitching post are in photos from gilded age?

  • @megatoneamps
    @megatoneamps 9 місяців тому +7

    WOW! nice work, let's go deep

  • @pinkkitten_nails
    @pinkkitten_nails 27 днів тому

    The art of historical manipulation is used constantly now

  • @thomassearle6334
    @thomassearle6334 Місяць тому +2

    amazing video. thanks for the content

  • @DavidA.-bv8xy
    @DavidA.-bv8xy 9 місяців тому +5

    There's Jarid Booster. He goes beyond the World's Fairs and shows this architecture was worldwide.

    • @jmc8076
      @jmc8076 8 місяців тому +1

      Also Lucius Aurelian. Good story of his great grandfather.

  • @-newuser-707
    @-newuser-707 5 місяців тому +2

    The first impression I had upon seeing these images, is that the entire thing is modern invention, CGI renderings of models, passed through various digital imaging filters to mimic authenticity. Of course, cynical types should always leave wiggle room, and so, considering classical buildings standing in places where they ought not, according to the mainstream narrative, a coverup of sorts really did take place. Do channels like these hope to expose things, or provide a new level of gatekeeping and misdirection?

    • @mitchellchannel5265
      @mitchellchannel5265 Місяць тому

      Pretty sure this channel just wants to expose the truth to anyone who will listen, idk about any others though

    • @-newuser-707
      @-newuser-707 Місяць тому

      @@mitchellchannel5265 Yeah, but... use of the word Tartarian doesn't sit right, and some of the images might be doctored, plus we know that UA-cam only promotes channels that carry some form of falsehood.

    • @eijitoh6252
      @eijitoh6252 11 днів тому

      You maybe right. They let you see this because it's already done and nothing us can do about it. It's a form of karmic thing. They confess of the things they've done so they have less karma. Example is the CIA confessing they killed JFK but only after so many years have passed. ​@@-newuser-707

  • @pagerhoads1531
    @pagerhoads1531 9 місяців тому +5

    My mom knew about those old buildings and old pictures because she had a bunch of pictures like that and I would ask her when I was little are these pictures or are they cartoons and she said they were both and I was like how can they be both and she said because they want you to believe a certain story about them, I was too young to understand back in the 70s and 80s ,and she used to talk about those old buildings being demolished and get angry about it, she used to live in Boston and Cincinnati, and she knew why buildings had windows and doors in the basement and hidden tunnels etc ,she was always talking about floods from the 1900s and going and visiting old buildings with my great grandmother and taking me with them before I started kindergarten, I didn't understand any of that back then but I do now, and about giants, my other great grandfather from my dad's side told me about giants when I was little but I thought he was just telling me stories, little did I know he was telling the truth because I found lots of pictures of giants while doing research, unless those are fake too but actually I have some film photoge of some so I know some of them giants were real, great video 👍

  • @jimmyBside
    @jimmyBside 10 місяців тому +8

    Hey LL…2min in and love it already. Subbed before I started. Quite a library, you’ve been busy. Fantastic. You, LA, OWE, MLB are cracking out some content. Keep ‘em coming. What a community. Bit by bit. Little by little. It’s coming together. Well, just amusing at this point really. Speaking of OWE…did I pick up a little “a boot”? Big fan of Canada 🇨🇦, ya know. 🍻🏛

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  10 місяців тому +2

      Excellent to hear and thank you for the comment. I appreciate the acknowledgment with other larger creators in this community. As you mentioned, little by little the veil is being lifted. I don't have definite answers, however, there are genuine anomalies here.
      You picked up an accent eh? I don't know what you're talking aboot 😉

  • @Market_Theory
    @Market_Theory 9 місяців тому +7

    Wow this video blew me away and gave me a new set of eyes for these pictures… thank you great work

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  9 місяців тому +3

      Excellent to hear and that is the goal - Giving you the tools to test and decipher for yourself.

  • @PedroSouza-jy8cy
    @PedroSouza-jy8cy 2 місяці тому +5

    What a GREAT video. The discipline it takes to go through this info and relay it to the people, WOWWWWW!!! Thanks so much, I Troy appreciate and I hope many will understand and realize what is truly unfolding before their eyes. Binging all videos now because I gotta immerse myself in this occult knowledge💯Much appreciated again my friend. Never stop!!!

  • @larrymenconi5287
    @larrymenconi5287 Місяць тому +1

    This was so good I just hit subscribe immediately, love this subject, and have never seen this kind of breakdown, amazing job , these lies and cover up narratives have to be broken and brought to light , I’m in , thanks for the hard work and education on this subject , I never knew this was even possible on this level , and now I see it everywhere

  • @joshkaye13
    @joshkaye13 3 місяці тому

    what are they hiding?!

  • @brianbarnett6751
    @brianbarnett6751 8 місяців тому +3

    the flags in one and two image are on the left but the third is on the right so the wind was blowing in two direction? so many differences

  • @inexpertxennial6067
    @inexpertxennial6067 13 днів тому

    I knew people that had actully went. I knew people's family members that had worked there. I saw personal photos. But I am supposed to believe some random internet guy over them?

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  13 днів тому

      Could the same thing not be said in return - why trust the claims you have made?
      Regardless, within this video is zero indication that you should "trust" or follow what is said. In fact, there are several instances where I invite the viewer to decide for themselves. These are simply findings viewed through a particular lense and asking questions along the way.
      Now, we have a unique position here where you have stated that you have personal connections with this fair. Even personal photographs which is quite a statement considering cameras were not widely available at this time and there have been indications within these documents that photography was reserved primarily for promoters, publishers, and news outlets or journals. You also knew other family members who worked there which sounds very interesting.
      I'm keen on getting information and acquiring anything possible from this event. So could you elaborate on any details relating to this event? These connections? Where did they work? Do you have access to those personal photos - I would love to see them if you could email me.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  11 днів тому

      * Crickets *

  • @pamelacondick9746
    @pamelacondick9746 Місяць тому +1

    What a great teacher you are! So we’ll-organized with you explaining the groundwork - I feel like I’ve attended a course for weeks! Subbed!

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  28 днів тому

      Very kind - appreciate the comment and glad you enjoyed the episode.

  • @DARWINZOO
    @DARWINZOO 2 місяці тому +1

    Ditto. Liked ❤ & Subscribed❤

  • @hayno7066
    @hayno7066 9 місяців тому +3

    Now you know why they were called Graphic Artists!

  • @AdviceForLife-t5d
    @AdviceForLife-t5d 2 місяці тому +2

    You have blown the lid way off. Everyday i get up and question everything and i am have a melt down with what am finding! Something is very wrong with everything. And i am struggling to cope with it. all.

  • @JohnDoe-qr2cp
    @JohnDoe-qr2cp 10 місяців тому +6

    Great introduction and can't wait for the series. Would you recommend the book quoted at the end? After diving into, and still wandering around in, the rabbit holes of food and agriculture - specifically the false narratives that it represents - I have come to realise just how far we have strayed from what could be descibed as "natural". Thus "Listen to the Land Speak" seems to fit perfectly. Thank you.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  10 місяців тому +5

      "Our ancestors lived in a unique and complex society that was inspired by nature and centred upon esteemed poets, seers, monks, healers and wise women, all of whom were deeply connected to the land around them. This relationship to the cycles of the natural world - from which we are increasingly dissociated - was the animating force in their lives."
      That is a small snippet of the inside cover and felt it suited your comment. Yes, I would definitely recommend the read. Incredibly interesting. Thank you for watching!

    • @JohnDoe-qr2cp
      @JohnDoe-qr2cp 10 місяців тому +2

      @@LatentLexicon Great quote! Thank you.

  • @Rajamak
    @Rajamak 9 місяців тому +5

    Very well researched and presented.

  • @JosePlata
    @JosePlata 3 місяці тому

    Photo or image... learn the difference.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  3 місяці тому

      Enlighten me.

    • @moogle_k
      @moogle_k 2 місяці тому +1

      ​​​@@LatentLexiconI think he's just referring to the difference in definition between the words "image" and "photo". From Google;
      "Image - Any visual object modified or altered by a computer or an imaginary object created using a computer. "
      "Photo or photograph - Anything taken by a camera, digital camera, or photocopier"
      "The term "image" is often used in fields such as graphic design, art, and advertising to refer to visual content in general. On the other hand, a photo is a specific type of image created by capturing light on a photosensitive surface, such as film or a digital sensor."
      You've shown excellent examples of images that were made well before computers. Images created by men have unfortunately been used to manipulate others for a very long time.

  • @Comakino
    @Comakino 9 місяців тому +4

    Excellent in-depth video. The organisers of this exhibition seem to have been aware that the future would have many questions about how this thing was organised on such an epic scale in so short a time, and seem to have intentionally muddied the waters rather than attempt to explain it.

  • @samex9909
    @samex9909 9 місяців тому +4

    Exceptional work please continue. links for research based info is necesary

  • @donovanphillips4973
    @donovanphillips4973 Місяць тому +1

    Awesome

  • @jameslockwood1958
    @jameslockwood1958 11 місяців тому +2

    Ah so they didn't burn down, because they never existed to begin with.

  • @joeblow2659
    @joeblow2659 9 місяців тому +5

    Very well done.

  • @CMMac-yi2cf
    @CMMac-yi2cf 9 місяців тому +5

    very intriguing, love your work!

  • @kippnashleymiller3752
    @kippnashleymiller3752 8 місяців тому +2

    Yes we’ve been hoodwinked. I’ve been subscribed to Mind Unveiled for a bit now and have enjoyed them. I subscribed to your channel as well because of your presentation, research, awareness, etc…
    It can be mind numbing when a person realizes just how much our history has been manipulated or all together fabricated.
    Looking forward to viewing more of your work.

  • @I0goose0I
    @I0goose0I 6 місяців тому +3

    Awesome research, and I downloaded to further look over what's there. I noticed 27:22 the flags are flying in different directions, and that's on a number of other photos from this fair and others. Just one extra irregularity that's constant. Thanx for sharing and your channel is awesome.

    • @pointzerotwo
      @pointzerotwo 3 місяці тому

      Because the flags are drawn in, and they were purposely drawn in for only some to conclude the fiction.

  • @youaremylight555
    @youaremylight555 Місяць тому

    This is about Corea. This is about Choseon. and this is all about the reason why we all suffer under the system nowadays…

  • @katiecoollady
    @katiecoollady 9 місяців тому +4

    Once you see it you can't unsee it...

  • @kronologist
    @kronologist 10 місяців тому +3

    Great video. Great channel. More shenanigans pls, I insist..

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  10 місяців тому +4

      Thank you! Now what did I do with those shenanigans...

  • @DARWINZOO
    @DARWINZOO 2 місяці тому

    HIT LIKE! ARE YOU WATCHING THIS? You ❤ it

  • @Artemisarrowzz
    @Artemisarrowzz 11 місяців тому +4

    I want at something to this, at least, from what I have been able to catch in other parts of the world.
    We are told that the little I in old dates are, in fact, a 1. However, from around like 1735 and back, when you catch the og script of dates on rock, or wall, they are NOT a 1, they are an i. The most blatant example of this is an inscription around the co-cathedral in the city of Alicante, Spain. According to the local historians (who don't actually know what is written there, but let's suppose they are correct) the people of the city who graduated from collage in another city would engrave their title and name on the wall of the cathedral, because it was seen as a symbol of pride among their peers as only the rich could go and do so (as Alicante didn't have an university).
    Only one of those inscriptions has a surviving date in normal numbers (not what we have been told, is roman numerals), but who knows if the others did have them too at one point. However, it DOESN'T say "1702" it says EXTREMELY CLEARLY "i702". There are photos online, check them out. It's not on the "main" side, but on the back. You'll see what I mean.
    What in the actual world is going on, man? Did the apocalypse happen and our ancestors forgot? Why would it say "i" as in "Jesus", why insert a whole millennium of history? I've seen others use a j, others an x, in old church facades, buildings and tiles, since south Spain was at one point something akin the center of ceramics.
    They, of course, remove this as soon as they can in "restorations" or even paint over them.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  11 місяців тому +2

      I've come across this line of thinking and would have to do much more research on it to come to any reasonable conclusion. It certainly is interesting though and am sure there may be documents I have collected that have these details. Maybe a future video topic, appreciate the comment!

    • @Artemisarrowzz
      @Artemisarrowzz 11 місяців тому +5

      @@LatentLexicon I would love to see those, and even form a study group because while cyber-security and computers are my thing, art and history are my passions.
      Mind if I share an hypothesis about what may have happened? I know there are alternative histories too, but the second they become so widespread without censorship, with videos up to 6 million view sometimes, like the Tartaria one as it is most often conceived, I know it's not true, not as the "mainstream" is. That, and Tartaria in spanish ancient is often associated with people with small hats on their heads and a preference for usury.
      But I'm willing to listen.
      Anyway, my hypothesis is this: The M in millennium, and all those texts who start with MDC, MDD, MDCC, MDCCI, I, J, X etc actually meant "Millennium Domini Deus", "Millennium Dominus Cristus/Xristus", "Millennium Domini Cristus Iesus/Iesus Cristos" or something akin to that (forgive me if it's not what we have been taught as proper latin, I'm going for what I believe is the approximation, since I speak spanish as my mother tounge).
      IF at some point something happened, say, the destruction of the true Roman Empire (remember that magically ALL empires up I think to Napoleon called themselves as such) then, after they have torn apart the spanish and french empire and perhaps under the guidance of the M lodges, disguised as the british crown (who had basically all the planet under their pocket, including China and India, and all those who coordinate religion) then they could have started calling our times not by "Millennium Domini" or "The thousand years of Christ", but simple as "Millennium.", especially after the French revolution.
      Thus, taking advantage of how many illiterate there were and to separate the people from God, or at least, their history and its association its Christianity they began to say that the M had nothing to do with religion or God, but that it meant simply a "1000", thus M800 goes from "the 800 year in God's Millennium" or "I800" to "1800".
      I believe that it is no coincidence so many empires fell between 1760-1860.

    • @UtahGmaw99
      @UtahGmaw99 11 місяців тому

      I am not an expert by far but I seem to remember, I'm 70, that latin and greek may have played a part in this as educated people, men at that time, were very fond of displaying their knowledge especialy young men. After all women could die if educated to much due to an over heated brain. Crazy right! But that was the belief for hundreds of years.

    • @realmattmi
      @realmattmi 5 місяців тому

      ​@@Artemisarrowzz
      There's something terribly wrong with the current timeline of the Roman empire. For starters, where did all these ancient ruling families go ?
      According to Wikipedia, the Orsini family is the oldest recorded Italian noble family, and their existence can only be traced back to 998.
      Problem here is that we're unable to bridge a 200-year period between the collapse of Roman governance in the 5th century and the return (or apparition) of widespread written records in the 7th and 8th centuries. That alone is just goofy.

  • @JosePlata
    @JosePlata 3 місяці тому +2

    The vanilla sky effect is usually what to look at first. Look for signs of the setting being unnaturally staged. Look at the people, or lack thereof. People out of place, their clothing, people on the beach in suits and no beach gear. Check the mode of transportation, horse and buggy and muddy streets among exquisite buildings is usually a sign that we are being manipulated.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  3 місяці тому

      This "vanilla sky" was usually done to isolate subjects. I have not seen substantial enough evidence to indicate this was done to hide anything. Unless you have tangible pieces of evidence beyond speculation/conjecture?
      The horse and buggy talking point is getting quite tiresome - When engines, particularly steam engines became widely used, the term "horsepower" was used to compare the output - How many horses that specific engine could replace or equate to. It is still used today and is used because they were the driving power of various industries. I suggest looking up draft horses, that were specifically bred for hauling and work. You may be surprised. These are not the feeble creatures that are commonly portrayed in this "horse and buggy" spiel.
      As for the buildings, there are tens of thousands of catalogues from various companies that showcase, brickworks, stoneworks, masonry, concrete/cement, artificial stone, plasters, polymers, stuccos, etc.
      I'm in the process of collecting as many as possible which will then be published on the channel.
      There is substantial evidence to support these incredible buildings - but that does not mean it is the proof and I could very well be wrong. There is definitely mystery within our history.
      You seem to have it all figured out though - I merely align more with data and sources.

  • @REEFHOLIDAY-rc2us
    @REEFHOLIDAY-rc2us 9 місяців тому +2

    #50 - IS THAT A KID ?!?!?

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  9 місяців тому +3

      Yes and he is labeled as "Mascot" - straight up bizarre.

    • @Rajamak
      @Rajamak 9 місяців тому +1

      @@LatentLexiconused on initiations to gain the necessary blackmail material before you are allowed any secret knowledge. Think Epstein.

  • @researcherextraordinaire8867
    @researcherextraordinaire8867 9 місяців тому +5

    Perhaps the tree was removed from the pathway to hide the fact the buildings were much older than the historical narrative had stated.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  9 місяців тому +3

      Certainly possible - an episode on trees/landscaping and foliage on the grounds will be in the near future.

    • @pointzerotwo
      @pointzerotwo 3 місяці тому

      They were all paintings or combinations of paintings and photos of miniaturized sets.

  • @sllkevin8885
    @sllkevin8885 10 місяців тому +4

    Amazing research, keep going!

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  10 місяців тому +1

      Appreciate that, much more in the works - Thanks.

  • @onyx91977
    @onyx91977 4 місяці тому

    34:22 it looks like that square box of a building was drawn in to hide the building behind it. What year is the photo with out the bridge? And what building is that with the dome? 🤔

    • @vashman01
      @vashman01 2 місяці тому

      Oh there it is "looks like." Yeah, just because something "looks like" something else doesn't make it that thing. That's the problem with these conspiracy theories. Most of the evidence is something that "looks like" another thing, usually being identified by people who don't know what they're looking at or talking about.

  • @UtahGmaw99
    @UtahGmaw99 11 місяців тому +3

    Excellent, thank you.

  • @richardkennedy8481
    @richardkennedy8481 6 місяців тому

    Rand Mcnally and Company.

  • @SAnn-rf3oz
    @SAnn-rf3oz 6 місяців тому +1

    Yep, they used Photoshop early on in photography. They called it something else tho.

  • @pagerhoads1531
    @pagerhoads1531 9 місяців тому +4

    I think the Beatles Sgt. Pepper album cover was trying to tell us something but nobody was paying attention

  • @swainsongable
    @swainsongable 9 місяців тому +3

    Very persuasive and intriguing 🤔
    Something you can't unsee

  • @hagakureone1639
    @hagakureone1639 6 місяців тому +2

    Super good Video 🏅

  • @wollyhoodUSA
    @wollyhoodUSA 9 місяців тому +2

    Excellent research my friend

  • @SubCultureVulture702
    @SubCultureVulture702 9 місяців тому +2

    Sha~Zam! But when the excitement of discovery fades, the reality is hard to hold onto and shocking to me the way those who disagree about all the lies we are conditioned to accept always accuse me of being crazy or on drugs, they are who decides which insane asylum or prison or orphanage or world's fair for survivors of resets ... Buildings, events, people, fires, war, time, land, books, photos, etc. So what is left to trust ?

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  9 місяців тому +2

      Questioning our reality and the paradigms we have been told will surely isolate. I understand. Yet, even this small channel has many who are at least open to alternative theories and open to other possibilities.
      Trust yourself 🙏

  • @systemakhaosu810
    @systemakhaosu810 8 місяців тому +2

    Cheap mass market souvenir books books lied about how good and honest they were and used everyday common editing techniques to try and make their cheap souvenir stand out from the literally hundreds of others!? You're so smart to have been the first person to discover that mass produced souvenirs aren't 100% accurate and honest depictions of historic events, and that publishers will lie about how truthful and honest they are! They may have gotten away with it for 131 years, but not anymore!

  • @stevenbrown9837
    @stevenbrown9837 6 місяців тому +1

    Astute observations but I’m not sure we’re your going with all of this? Your focusing on extreme minutiae but what’s the bigger picture of your expose’? Certainly the fair itself is real because I’ve seen many photos of it. There’s plenty of other material about this fair that needs looking into such as the impossibility of this all being created in 2 years, as has been stated for example. These are merely cosmetic touch-ups and would be understandable for this time and topic. I DO appreciate your open mind though and smooth narrative. Your inquiries tend to be somewhat dense and, if I may say, unimportant. I do state this with utter respect though.

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  6 місяців тому +1

      I really appreciate this comment and will explain some of the direction.
      The main focus of this particular episode is to question that certainty you expressed in the imagery. Yes, there are thousands of images surrounding this event and are used as evidence, however, some of that evidence has been tampered with. As you mentioned, a large majority of it may be benign or merely cosmetic. I would agree, yet it is the awareness that this evidence can be manipulated to an extent that is indistinguishable from an original. In hindsight, the editing of images may not have been the ideal avenue, but it is an important piece of information to have in mind. To keep present while looking at all historical evidences.
      The other aspects you mentioned are what the series has shifted to. Looking at larger details such as the underground infrastructure, building materials, landscaping, accounts from primary resources and many more in the works.
      Finding that balance of presenting material that is both interesting and digestible will be a continuous battle. Constructive criticism is always welcome. It is the only way I can continue to improve.

  • @AquariusNation777
    @AquariusNation777 9 місяців тому +2

    New subscriber

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  9 місяців тому +1

      Welcome - Thanks for coming along for the ride!

  • @randomxaos
    @randomxaos 8 місяців тому +3

    23:55 although I'm not completely finished with this video I'm just pointing out that yes we know masking was used (And I'm looking for these answers as much as anyone) But I don't see any intentional deception yet... But I'm hoping I find it in this video.
    Finishe watching...
    Ok..great content.
    A few months ago I decided to go straight to the heart of the matter and since our country was just getting things together in the way that we know it today I knew there would be a paper trail if these things were built by "us"... So I decided to look for building permits and the addresses for these buildings and they exist but I don't know to what extent. I started looking and got really bogged down in the size of the library of Congress So if anyone has better research skills this is a hot tip

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  8 місяців тому +2

      This is an excellent thread to pull at. I may dig into this after publishing the next episode and appreciate the thought. Glad you enjoyed the video and I'm only presenting findings. I don't have definitive answers and am looking for different perspectives - like this comment. Hope you enjoy the rest of the series!

  • @lauralauren6432
    @lauralauren6432 Місяць тому

    The INVENTOR of Photoshop was Gustaf Rejlander. His best friend was DARWIN. Thank you

  • @joecaner
    @joecaner 11 місяців тому +1

    _"Me, I always tell the truth. Even when I lie. So say good night to the bad guy!."_
    ― Al Pacino: Tony Montana, Scarface (1983)

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  11 місяців тому +1

      Lies wrapped in truth or truth wrapped in lies - These topics are rarely black and white. Excellent quote choice. Love this movie!

  • @Lion0fJudah.
    @Lion0fJudah. 8 місяців тому +3

    I’m a little more than halfway through and so far I’m loving the video. Thank you for the information and perspective. I’m curious though, since a lot of these books have obvious photomanipulations, are there any books that you would recommend that are closest to the truth?

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  8 місяців тому +1

      Getting your hands on old Encylopaedia's would be beneficial in order to reference terms that may be changing in our current times. A few definitions may have been altered in the past few years. Some say this would be simply updating, yet it could also be outdating - suppose that is subjective.

  • @randyhaight1617
    @randyhaight1617 8 місяців тому

    /\ --- `HoodWinked`?!...Definitively, Yes; Of Course [We Are/Have (Been)]!...& ThanX, 4 This Additional Evidence/ Proof; 2 Our Already Existing Archives! Blessings, r.j.

  • @terryrustad1800
    @terryrustad1800 8 місяців тому +1

    Excellent Video 💫

  • @IamSOcalm888
    @IamSOcalm888 Місяць тому +1

    Commercial every 4 minutes the whole video what tf

  • @LexMarko
    @LexMarko 9 місяців тому

    old Soviet joke among historians; 'Did anything new happen yesterday?' ...., hope this is not what is customary in the West? sure not ...🤔

  • @fosholyfe6115
    @fosholyfe6115 6 місяців тому

    In the reprint of the sears robuxks 1908 catalogue, there's a contraption something like the red viewer you had as a kid, that xhanged pics when you pushed the thing down...
    Its something very similar... Wlso the quote or whatever on the inside cover/front page..

  • @dougch3707
    @dougch3707 9 місяців тому

    Please share this work with levi

  • @pieterb3449
    @pieterb3449 8 місяців тому

    I like it a lot!! ❤

  • @veramae4098
    @veramae4098 11 місяців тому +1

    I would have liked to watch this, but the slow pace and dense content defeated me.

    • @Market_Theory
      @Market_Theory 9 місяців тому +1

      Go ahead and watch your dense sports teams do the same thing over and over instead lol

  • @wendyweedwhacker
    @wendyweedwhacker 11 місяців тому +3

    So interesting... I've got to get back to work, but I'll be back. 👍

    • @LatentLexicon
      @LatentLexicon  11 місяців тому +4

      Very glad to hear, thanks for stopping by to watch! Hope you were able to catch the rest of it.

    • @wendyweedwhacker
      @wendyweedwhacker 11 місяців тому

      @@LatentLexicon of course! Well done. I look forward to more.