Because the new house holders defence was designed to assist house holders who use force against trespassers/burglars. If D was not a trespasser at the time of entry, you could argue that they go beyond their permission to be there as soon as the house holder believes reasonable force has become necessary.
In regards to the house holders section of the video, the 2nd criteria to be a householder case, why does D need to be a trespasser?
Because the new house holders defence was designed to assist house holders who use force against trespassers/burglars. If D was not a trespasser at the time of entry, you could argue that they go beyond their permission to be there as soon as the house holder believes reasonable force has become necessary.
@@thelawteacher5724 ohh okay, thanks for clearing that up.