Look.., iray is freaking fantastic and I have two of their scopes, and about to get my third. My t35 bolt image is equal to a trijicon 640-i know because I have both to compare. Night and day difference versus ATN. Only drawback which is not a deal breaker-a 3x is very difficult when shtf under 50 yds.....or scanning a 1000 acre field for multiple hours-even with a rifle on a tripod, moving back and forth with limited FOV for hours can beat you up. If you can afford it, the rh25 is a great addition for spotting and close quarter surprises (helmet setup), that a 3x scope cant provide. Other than that, if you are in the market for a thermal scope, there is no need to look at any other company, IMO. But once you buy one, beware, because they will have a new one with better technology in 6 months or less.......and then you buy another.... iray is a game changer.
Glad I have the money to get one!! I was wondering if you were planning to make a removable zoom system like on AN-PAS-23! it would be incredible for the RH25
It would be nice sensor in multi spectral scope combined with 100mm night vision lens and build in range finder. Why does not Iray make multi spectral scope ?
The rangefinder as a separate purchase for several hundred dollars more is bull crap. Kind of feel the thermal market is stagnant. Images are about the same as they have been for 5 years. The industry will hype up a new scope, charge you more for it and the picture quality is insignificant compared to the old model. Proprietary batteries are stupid. 18650's should be the standard and removable. There really isn't any need to spend the money on a $7k-$18 thermal. I've taken more coyotes with a 384 than a 640.
@@michaelangelo6217 I agree with you,I live in Nevada with lots of wide open spaces. Very rare to take shots past 100 yards and the 384 platform works great for me!
If your units are so got why do have such a pathetic battery life??? In cold condition lasted less than two hours!! Rubbish. Lrf clips on and is a pain, no ballistic charts. Outdated.
A gem of a gem with at totaly streight face. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Wow! What a great thermal site. Thanks for the great demonstration of it being used.
Ole Bearclaw making it happen - nice scope and good hunt !
Look.., iray is freaking fantastic and I have two of their scopes, and about to get my third. My t35 bolt image is equal to a trijicon 640-i know because I have both to compare. Night and day difference versus ATN.
Only drawback which is not a deal breaker-a 3x is very difficult when shtf under 50 yds.....or scanning a 1000 acre field for multiple hours-even with a rifle on a tripod, moving back and forth with limited FOV for hours can beat you up. If you can afford it, the rh25 is a great addition for spotting and close quarter surprises (helmet setup), that a 3x scope cant provide. Other than that, if you are in the market for a thermal scope, there is no need to look at any other company, IMO. But once you buy one, beware, because they will have a new one with better technology in 6 months or less.......and then you buy another....
iray is a game changer.
Buy the Tube TS60 then like I did, bigger sensor lower base mag. (2x)
wow I love it
Glad I have the money to get one!! I was wondering if you were planning to make a removable zoom system like on AN-PAS-23! it would be incredible for the RH25
It would be nice sensor in multi spectral scope combined with 100mm night vision lens and build in range finder.
Why does not Iray make multi spectral scope ?
There is a 1280x1024 thermal in a tube. It is called the Iray Bolt TS60.
Does iRay have plans to integrate a ballistic calculator via firmware update? RIX just did it.
The rangefinder as a separate purchase for several hundred dollars more is bull crap. Kind of feel the thermal market is stagnant. Images are about the same as they have been for 5 years. The industry will hype up a new scope, charge you more for it and the picture quality is insignificant compared to the old model. Proprietary batteries are stupid. 18650's should be the standard and removable. There really isn't any need to spend the money on a $7k-$18 thermal. I've taken more coyotes with a 384 than a 640.
The rangefinder comes in standard with the InfiRay Tube TS60 + the QD mount, plus a bigger sensor and a lower base mag.
I would have to agree with you on the 384 platform, don’t really see a huge difference!
@@johnmorrow5085you don’t see a difference between 384 and 1024?
@@michaelangelo6217 I agree with you,I live in Nevada with lots of wide open spaces. Very rare to take shots past 100 yards and the 384 platform works great for me!
If your units are so got why do have such a pathetic battery life??? In cold condition lasted less than two hours!! Rubbish. Lrf clips on and is a pain, no ballistic charts. Outdated.
But to have to buy the rangefinder is kinda bullshit and it’s not even direct mounted. Keep it
Lol where else can you get a 1024 sensor?
@@SpecOpsGearPulsar lol with built in lrf
@@ngaoutdoors4157 which model? Last i checked they were only 640 core
@@SpecOpsGear XL50
@@SpecOpsGear XL 50
$6,999 - NOPE. Not worth it.
So the rest of us can understand, please explain? Thx
You’re smoking crack lmao double the pixels of all the units in this price range, $1000 less than the closest comp (Thermion)
Give a year it will be $4999 facts