How many civilians do you think that this Cop has already violated their rights without them even knowing? Don't forget to help these videos get out there to bring awareness to every one of their rights and expose the tyrant officers and government that try to avoid accountability by hitting the Like Button and leaving a comment with your thoughts on the video! End Qualified Immunity!
It seems to come down to the same thing we get all so often in the UK. Either the cop / security / official is not trained properly, in which case they are not fit for purpose, especially a public facing role. Or the only alternative is that they are deliberately ignoring the training and responsibilities, in which case they still aren't fit for purpose especially public facing roles. It can only be one or the other.
The cops had a perfect score. Literally wrong on every single argument of fact & law. They identified public property as private property. They identified private property as public property. They operated under the delusion that they are in charge of individual safety. No understanding of the ID laws. Unprofessional, ignorant, & iII-informed.
originally they were triangles, they made them square for OS. and then realized that will it be a reduced angle, squares still had points. and cops were REALLY stupid.
Don't tell me. Let me guess. Officer safety, obstruction, disturbing the peace, harassment. What other lies can these dummies come up with in a few minutes.
It really flabbergasts me how many audit channels there are and how much this actually occurs, and yet there’s still so many goons and tyrants don’t have a clue 🕵️♀️ 🤦♀️
You would think that all Police Academies would make showing cop-watching videos part of the syllabus to show trainees how NOT to behave towards the public.
I find this cop's tyranny bizarre. If he were my employee, I'd fire him for harassing people that are not breaking any laws, and therefore none of his business. Oh wait! There are taxpayers paying him that should be requiring him to do his job and leave everyone else alone!!! WE the taxpayers must require BETTER law enforcement behavior!!!
This auditor was smooth as glass. Every question the cop had he had the answer. He also was smooth in the delivery. Especially stating codes and statues. 👍👍2 thumbs up.
This cop looks like he’s five years past his retirement date. Also, the way he grabbed his head when the auditor started telling him about public property was priceless.
When anyone with a perceived authority says, "I understand that", then say something opposite of that understanding, they need to be told to take a walk unless they have a crime they are investigating
Isn't great that this cop is so concerned about the auditors safety to not be hit by a passing car. But I've no doubt he wouldn't have any problem using excessive force on the same person. For officer safety of course.
@@th4759 nope, you don’t have to commit a crime to be trespassed from a public place. The public authority with control of the land has the right to trespass you from said land.
@@MiningForPies Please show proof of where you can be trespassed from public property if you are somewhere you are legally allowed to be committing no crime. I’ll wait. 🤣🤣🫵🫵🤣
😂😂😂😂 It’s so hilarious to me that these cops think just because the words come out of their mouth that we’re just supposed to bend over and do what they say “oh yes officer I’m sorry I’ll just walk away!”
The most disgraceful thing about this interaction is the experienced senior officer, a Captain no less, is called to the scene and is every bit as ignorant and unlawful as his officers were. An investigation of how this department operates would probably not be impressive.
these cps need to take a refresher course in their ESCALATION & ENTRAPMENT class. They let this bad guy off without a beating, an arrest and, of course, a good case of PTSD
its simple - step1) a crime is committed or law is broken . step2) police do a LEGAL and LAWFUL investigation .step3) police arrest any GUILTY party or parties . ANYTHING else the police are not needed . are police crime stoppers or crime solvers ?! taking effing pictures/ videos in public is NOT a crime !!!!! I was involved in a car accident years ago( not my fault) , questioned/ protested why police were involved and got arrested - charges were dropped . things CAN happen that police aren't needed - much to disbelief of police .
*QUESTION* … How many people have ever been convicted in a court of law on a lone charge of suspicion? ~ If a cop is going to say that _”suspicion”_ is a misdemeanour, ask him/her that question. If it’s a misdemeanour, then *TRY* to charge me with suspicion, and see how that works, even if it goes to court. It won’t. Not ever.
Subscribed. I have seen a major change in how police officers view citizens over the last decade or more. Their disregard for civil rights is shocking. Here is a fact: more citizens not committing a crime are killed by police officers in America than by criminals committing a crime. Something needs to change.
You are probably right about more civilians getting killed than criminals. This is because a real criminal will do anything to avoid being caught (but it usually ends badly when or if they are) whereas a civilian can be cornered by one or more cops and is then made to look like a criminal for the most trivial reason, e.g. 'you didn't signal 100' before you turned' and other similar BS. The cops should concentrate on real CRIME and not on trivial matters that have no victims or consequences. There are too many rules and regulations written just to give the cops something to do if they deem an infraction has occurred.
The police stated he was concerned about the autors safety until he told the police he threatened and suddenly he was no longer concerned about his safety LMAO
no a good cop would have nothing but observe from a distance and moved on when there was no crime being committed, this is all about power , control, and ego.
Police - “You may be lying to me.” Citizen - “The Supreme Court says it’s a crime for me to lie to the police but it’s fine for the Police to lie to a citizen so which of us is more likely to be telling the truth?” For me, it’s hard to have respect for someone who’s job is lying to the public.
With that knowledge, why would you believe a word they say? "I pulled you over for doing 40 in a 35 zone". I'm sorry, retail clerk, but I have to assume you're lying to me.
"Your stood in front of a penitentiary..." I mean technically he's also stood in front of the white house, buckingham palace, and the capitol building of north korea.... its all just a matter of distance....😅
best to do it with a friend and have the ability to go live in case they shut you down and tamper with evidence by erasing your video ,pretty easy to do this to a lone wolf. OH AND THEN CHARGE YOU WITH A LOAD OF BOGUS OFFENCES. auditoring is not for the faint hearted and a lot more dangerous than you think, they can and will cause physical harm and where you out financially if you are not properly prepared. if you are ready for this good luck and respect.
In the 1981 case Warren v. District of Columbia, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police have a general "public duty," but that "no specific legal duty exists" unless there is a special relationship between an officer and an individual, such as a person in custody. The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect. In its 1989 decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the justices ruled that a social services department had no duty to protect a young boy from his abusive father. In 2005'sCastle Rock v. Gonzales, a woman sued the police for failing to protect her from her husband after he violated a restraining order and abducted and killed their three children. Justices said the police had no such duty. Most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that police could not be held liable for failing to protect students in the 2018 shooting that claimed 17 lives at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Police Guidelines Police do have protocols for dealing with dangerous situations like the ones in Uvalde and Parkland, and these protocols emphasize the need for police to take rapid action. The International Association of Chiefs of Police, for instance, says, "Taking action during active shooter incidents, rather than waiting for specially equipped and trained officers, can save lives and prevent serious injuries. Time lost by delayed action is likely to result in additional casualties." IACP provides guidance on how officers in those situations should assess how to proceed with that rapid response. No matter how they do it, it will probably be extremely dangerous. They might be risking their own lives. But as courts have determined, they have no obligation to do that. So, the next time you see a police car roll by with "To Protect and Serve" emblazoned on the door, keep in mind they have no constitutional obligation to do that. If you need police to protect you, all you can do is hope they will. And this is why we have the 2nd amendment so use it before you lose it idot's.
Here's one to add to your repertoire. When they keep repeating/rehashing whatever nonsensical statement or question: "Are you OK? Are you having a stroke?"
We're allowed to be weird, bizarre, kooky, eccentric, nutty, zany, funny, sad, melancholy, bad dressers. We're allowed to be. Without the permission of the State or its agents I love when they know they're overmatched and try to break off, and the citizen isn't done with them. They just want to leave but they can't help but still give directives
You'd think that the police chiefs and / or mayors and / or city managers would ensure that the cops follow the law because of the potential law suits costing them money, and that is one thing they do pay attention to.
"Can we go to this parking lot and talk?" Sure! Lost the audit right there. Stand your ground next time. Also yes, I know this video is like 10 years old .
He has no clue about public property and these cops are TOTALLY CLUELESS ABOUT WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON!!!!!!!!! I bet if that person made threats against his officers then he would have an issue with that guy but when the guy makes threats against a citizen that he swore an oath to protect then he dont care.
How many civilians do you think that this Cop has already violated their rights without them even knowing?
Don't forget to help these videos get out there to bring awareness to every one of their rights and expose the tyrant officers and government that try to avoid accountability by hitting the Like Button and leaving a comment with your thoughts on the video!
End Qualified Immunity!
It's ridiculous the bs this cop makes up. PigSplaining
Phucking thief .. old stolen video 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕
Every… single… one
1000s. What a total creep of a cop.
It seems to come down to the same thing we get all so often in the UK.
Either the cop / security / official is not trained properly, in which case they are not fit for purpose, especially a public facing role.
Or the only alternative is that they are deliberately ignoring the training and responsibilities, in which case they still aren't fit for purpose especially public facing roles.
It can only be one or the other.
The cops had a perfect score. Literally wrong on every single argument of fact & law.
They identified public property as private property.
They identified private property as public property.
They operated under the delusion that they are in charge of individual safety.
No understanding of the ID laws.
Unprofessional, ignorant, & iII-informed.
yeh but they won tthey made him move and he didnt go back to the same area.. so he failed
When egos outshine IQs
Donuts used to be square. They make them round for officer safety.
😂😂Beautiful
originally they were triangles, they made them square for OS.
and then realized that will it be a reduced angle, squares still had points. and cops were REALLY stupid.
Phucking thief .. old stolen video 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕
Don't tell me. Let me guess. Officer safety, obstruction, disturbing the peace, harassment. What other lies can these dummies come up with in a few minutes.
Square donut corners are sharper than any of these clowns.
How hypocritical, when a cop says you may be lying, but then again, cops lie constantly.
Cops are actually allowed to lie , to get info .. in certain cases
@nasapayrollsystem8701 Not only are they allowed, but they are trained to lie
@@nasapayrollsystem8701 only when conducting an investigation, interrogation or undercover work. They lie about the rest.
It really flabbergasts me how many audit channels there are and how much this actually occurs, and yet there’s still so many goons and tyrants don’t have a clue 🕵️♀️ 🤦♀️
I agree it's scary bad. Many are worse due evil personalities.
You would think that all Police Academies would make showing cop-watching videos part of the syllabus to show trainees how NOT to behave towards the public.
I find this cop's tyranny bizarre. If he were my employee, I'd fire him for harassing people that are not breaking any laws, and therefore none of his business. Oh wait! There are taxpayers paying him that should be requiring him to do his job and leave everyone else alone!!! WE the taxpayers must require BETTER law enforcement behavior!!!
Here here
A person recording should be ignored. Any wrongs would be self incriminating. Leave him ALONE.
Phucking thief .. old stolen video 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕
5:08 Public parking sign doesn’t mean its public parking……thier stupidity is astounding!!
This auditor was smooth as glass. Every question the cop had he had the answer. He also was smooth in the delivery. Especially stating codes and statues. 👍👍2 thumbs up.
This cop looks like he’s five years past his retirement date. Also, the way he grabbed his head when the auditor started telling him about public property was priceless.
Only 5 yes r u sure about that
I would have walked back across the street. If you are going to do this, stand your ground !
This is a Great example of know your rights as soon as he stated the code it was no longer I need your id…knowledge is power
"How do I know that?" STOP policing on hypotheticals!!! You don't have ANY reason to believe he is lying either!
"How about we move over here and ..." ... NO ... shouldn't have allowed him to lead you around.
The big problem is that citizens are finally learning their rights and cops can't get away with their bullying lies anymore. They hate that. 😂
Nothing more dangerous to a tyrant than a well informed person with a camera.
Nothing more dangerous to a person than a tyrant with a bruised ego.
Oh he’s a special deputy all right ! All badge and zero authority!!
haha cop got mad when dude put his notes out 😂❤
He is so used to citizens bending over for him, he doesn't know what to do when citizens stand up for their rights
So public parking doesn’t necessarily mean public parking? By definition that is exactly what it is! Lol you can’t make that stuff up!!😂😂
When anyone with a perceived authority says, "I understand that", then say something opposite of that understanding, they need to be told to take a walk unless they have a crime they are investigating
YES STRAIGHT TO THE POINT AND NO BEATING ARROUND THE BUSH.
He let himself be led across the street as if the tyrant cop was a sheep herder.
Phucking thief .. old stolen video 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕 👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕👎🖕
Trying to remove the only point worth something, agreed to follow "off road".
Isn't great that this cop is so concerned about the auditors safety to not be hit by a passing car. But I've no doubt he wouldn't have any problem using excessive force on the same person. For officer safety of course.
The stupidity and incompetence of today's law enforcement is astounding.
Just because it says public parking doesn't mean it is! 😂( You can't make this shit up)😂🤣
"Why don't YOU go" That earned a thumbs up.
I axed choo . A-S-K-E-D. No hold on the English language , but he has a badge .
It says public parking! Cop says “it doesn’t mean it is”!! 🤣🤣🤣 make that make sense Mr. Ossifer!!
You can still be trespassed from public property.
@@MiningForPies
Only if you commit a crime. Thats basic, elementary knowledge. We know this. So, did he commit a crime?
@@th4759 nope, you don’t have to commit a crime to be trespassed from a public place. The public authority with control of the land has the right to trespass you from said land.
@@MiningForPies
Please show proof of where you can be trespassed from public property if you are somewhere you are legally allowed to be committing no crime. I’ll wait. 🤣🤣🫵🫵🤣
@@th4759 Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, 53-54 (1999).
Speak to people who know the law, not unemployed auditors.
😂😂😂😂 It’s so hilarious to me that these cops think just because the words come out of their mouth that we’re just supposed to bend over and do what they say “oh yes officer I’m sorry I’ll just walk away!”
When it comes to law enforcement now days you just can’t make they’re type of stupid up
the only point where that is wrong it has all ways been like this the difference is the camera exposes them, not just these days
The most disgraceful thing about this interaction is the experienced senior officer, a Captain no less, is called to the scene and is every bit as ignorant and unlawful as his officers were.
An investigation of how this department operates would probably not be impressive.
You can be anywhere between that curb and those light poles!!!
these cps need to take a refresher course in their ESCALATION & ENTRAPMENT class. They let this bad guy off without a beating, an arrest and, of course, a good case of PTSD
That cop was an argumentative J - RK
its simple - step1) a crime is committed or law is broken . step2) police do a LEGAL and LAWFUL investigation .step3) police arrest any GUILTY party or parties . ANYTHING else the police are not needed . are police crime stoppers or crime solvers ?! taking effing pictures/ videos in public is NOT a crime !!!!! I was involved in a car accident years ago( not my fault) , questioned/ protested why police were involved and got arrested - charges were dropped . things CAN happen that police aren't needed - much to disbelief of police .
So much for needing a crime??
No situation anywhere that having law enforcement show up will not make it worse!
Your purpose is journalism, public interest, public education.
Every time cops start to give directives, it is best to calmly say to them "Remember to tie your shoelaces. Don't eat yellow snow."
*QUESTION* … How many people have ever been convicted in a court of law on a lone charge of suspicion? ~ If a cop is going to say that _”suspicion”_ is a misdemeanour, ask him/her that question. If it’s a misdemeanour, then *TRY* to charge me with suspicion, and see how that works, even if it goes to court. It won’t. Not ever.
Good job standing up to those cowards, but you answered many of their questions. Your day isn’t any of their business.
I.D. addiction strikes again.
Subscribed. I have seen a major change in how police officers view citizens over the last decade or more. Their disregard for civil rights is shocking. Here is a fact: more citizens not committing a crime are killed by police officers in America than by criminals committing a crime. Something needs to change.
You are probably right about more civilians getting killed than criminals. This is because a real criminal will do anything to avoid being caught (but it usually ends badly when or if they are) whereas a civilian can be cornered by one or more cops and is then made to look like a criminal for the most trivial reason, e.g. 'you didn't signal 100' before you turned' and other similar BS. The cops should concentrate on real CRIME and not on trivial matters that have no victims or consequences. There are too many rules and regulations written just to give the cops something to do if they deem an infraction has occurred.
Do NOT call our taxpayer finded servants Sir!
They work for you!
Also, don't call them by military designations, they don't deserve that respect, even if they are veterans.
The police stated he was concerned about the autors safety until he told the police he threatened and suddenly he was no longer concerned about his safety LMAO
The ignorance is strong with these cops! The cop is lying, that’s a fact. Good cops would have resolved this in seconds and moved on.
You spelled pig wrong
no a good cop would have nothing but observe from a distance and moved on when there was no crime being committed, this is all about power , control, and ego.
They think you have a purpose acceptable to them. Totally uncalled for.
I wonder where is the disconnect between the public and the popo
He's a special deputy and he's extra special in his own head
@ 2:25 my man wishes he called in sick 😂
Another department... that apparently has given up their physical fitness requirements for police officers.
Police - “You may be lying to me.”
Citizen - “The Supreme Court says it’s a crime for me to lie to the police but it’s fine for the Police to lie to a citizen so which of us is more likely to be telling the truth?”
For me, it’s hard to have respect for someone who’s job is lying to the public.
With that knowledge, why would you believe a word they say? "I pulled you over for doing 40 in a 35 zone". I'm sorry, retail clerk, but I have to assume you're lying to me.
That old cop looked like he was about to have a stroke!
Shocking cops... happy to ignore the law to appease others they deem more important, more preferential.
The 1 is a glorified security guard
Cop admits he doesn't really care about your safety; he just doesn't want to do paperwork.
😂😂😂😂😂
'Don't tie your shoe laces together' fantastic
Good lord what an incompetent officer! He does do well copsplaining!! Please file a complaint on this clown
This auditor did a fantastic job. Wow!!
I see a cop at 1:35 with his hands in his pockets.
"Your stood in front of a penitentiary..."
I mean technically he's also stood in front of the white house, buckingham palace, and the capitol building of north korea.... its all just a matter of distance....😅
Im going to go buy a camera and gimbal today im sick of these thugs hiding behind badges this is my new job
best to do it with a friend and have the ability to go live in case they shut you down and tamper with evidence by erasing your video ,pretty easy to do this to a lone wolf. OH AND THEN CHARGE YOU WITH A LOAD OF BOGUS OFFENCES. auditoring is not for the faint hearted and a lot more dangerous than you think, they can and will cause physical harm and where you out financially if you are not properly prepared. if you are ready for this good luck and respect.
Outstanding. But file a complain to the Indiana Bar Assn about that cop practicing law without a license.
Never seen so many people so scared of a camera they must be so corrupt that it hurts when you don't obey them
Unbelievable. Really unbelievable. Why do these people have badges?
In the 1981 case Warren v. District of Columbia, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police have a general "public duty," but that "no specific legal duty exists" unless there is a special relationship between an officer and an individual, such as a person in custody.
The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect. In its 1989 decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the justices ruled that a social services department had no duty to protect a young boy from his abusive father. In 2005'sCastle Rock v. Gonzales, a woman sued the police for failing to protect her from her husband after he violated a restraining order and abducted and killed their three children. Justices said the police had no such duty.
Most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that police could not be held liable for failing to protect students in the 2018 shooting that claimed 17 lives at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
Police Guidelines
Police do have protocols for dealing with dangerous situations like the ones in Uvalde and Parkland, and these protocols emphasize the need for police to take rapid action. The International Association of Chiefs of Police, for instance, says, "Taking action during active shooter incidents, rather than waiting for specially equipped and trained officers, can save lives and prevent serious injuries. Time lost by delayed action is likely to result in additional casualties."
IACP provides guidance on how officers in those situations should assess how to proceed with that rapid response.
No matter how they do it, it will probably be extremely dangerous. They might be risking their own lives.
But as courts have determined, they have no obligation to do that.
So, the next time you see a police car roll by with "To Protect and Serve" emblazoned on the door, keep in mind they have no constitutional obligation to do that.
If you need police to protect you, all you can do is hope they will.
And this is why we have the 2nd amendment so use it before you lose it idot's.
Bam !! 😮
"For your safety, I need you to sit on my lap."
if there are power lines, you on a public easement.
period, end of sentence.
Here's one to add to your repertoire. When they keep repeating/rehashing whatever nonsensical statement or question: "Are you OK? Are you having a stroke?"
Don't call the pigs sir never ever ever call pigs sir never!!!
He let the cop bully him from his original spot. 😂
Never shake hands with them!!
Tree of liberty........
I have a badge do what I say lol
Why would anyone call dirty cop sir when he’s completely dishonest and harassing law obeying citizen, who knows lot more about about basic laws.
Another cop that napped through cop school, a long time ago.
HOW MANY YEARS HAS THIS COP BEEN DOING THIS.
Someone needs to tell these cops to come to the position of attention and sound off like they have a pair when directed?
Great content. Hopefully in the near future you can invest in a quality mic
never ever refuse to identify yourself.
make it clear that you refuse to waive rights such as miranda and brown.
"How do I know that?"
How does the cameraman know if he's not a modern day J.J. DeAngelo or George Gwaltney? That blade cuts both ways.
Those cops hit every stupid branch all the way down the academy. WOW. This place needs a follow up badly.
Right he is worried about his safety but "that guy threatened me" is between you and him. Only cares about his safety when he wants to control him
We're allowed to be weird, bizarre, kooky, eccentric, nutty, zany, funny, sad, melancholy, bad dressers. We're allowed to be. Without the permission of the State or its agents
I love when they know they're overmatched and try to break off, and the citizen isn't done with them. They just want to leave but they can't help but still give directives
BRICKS WITH BADGES NOTHING LESS.
I would of told that cop, Well i know that you are lying to me right now and that's a fact Jack!
That's got to hurt. He axed him. Ouch. Wonder if the auditor is ok.
Unbelievable the depth of utter ignorance in the police force they seem to know nothing about the law and hope their bluster will carry them through
Unless driving do not carry id. Only time you are required to have it.
😂😂😂 The reason he is there is absolutely none of your business !
so go mind your own!
They lie so much, they don’t believe anyone at anytime. 10:12
You'd think that the police chiefs and / or mayors and / or city managers would ensure that the cops follow the law because of the potential law suits costing them money, and that is one thing they do pay attention to.
No matter how many videos I watch I really struggle to believe cops are this bad.
So if you give the cop your ID, that will automatically tell he that you're not a lying.
"Can we go to this parking lot and talk?" Sure!
Lost the audit right there. Stand your ground next time. Also yes, I know this video is like 10 years old .
BETWEEN YOU AND HIM IF HE ASSAULTED YOU --- PITY THE PASSING CAR DID NOT CLIP THE PIG.
It doesn’t matter what you know and don’t know when there’s no crime
People lie to the cop all the time. And he never makes up the law. This is darn near a perfect world.
cops and "security" were complete flogs and need the learn the constitution, damn, i'm from AUS and know more about than those fools
That cop was SIMPLE; the jail guy was simple-er
They just can't accept citizens rights. Nor know the laws. Seem to just want to enforce what they think are laws!
5:37 Dude, stop following unlawful directives!!
He has no clue about public property and these cops are TOTALLY CLUELESS ABOUT WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON!!!!!!!!! I bet if that person made threats against his officers then he would have an issue with that guy but when the guy makes threats against a citizen that he swore an oath to protect then he dont care.
Time for Officer Gramps to retire.