In the future, no one will blame you for slowing down or pausing your commentary altogether so you can focus on beating the clock. You would have won that game otherwise.
I think you should go back to doing a full game review after each game instead of having the URL in the description or putting the game review in its own seperate video 1 day later. This is because their is more then 1 key lesson in each game as a beginner going to intermediate player. Also making it in another video feels unnecessary that i would have to wait 1 day to see the review. You also can know more about tactics then a 600 rated player would know so if that 600 rated player goes through the review them self they would miss more tactics and wonder why is this the best move exactly while you would know. But other then that i think your channel is amazing and i always enjoy watching it so keep up the good work. Just consider the recommendations i mentioned above.
I’m a scotch gambit player - In game one, notice on turn 8 the computer said Qxc5 was only good and not best. The best move in that position is Qh5+ as an intermezzo to induce either Kf8 or g6, either of which are good for white, before capturing the bishop on the next move. Hope this helps!
I can see maybe it's not preferred by some but I really like this idea for the analysis. Instead of trying to understand crazy stockfish lines on the fly, just going over a couple of key moments or clear mistakes / great moves is more interesting and valuable. I think mostly small inaccuracies are not a big deal, especially at this level, and quite a bit further up probably too. We can't play like computers and nor should we really try to. And trying to decipher why one move is only great but another is considered best isn't very productive a lot of the time. I also think that the strength of your channel lies in your live commentary and enthusiasm and attitude as you play the game. So the focus on that makes sense :)
While finding the games themselves very entertaining, I have always enjoyed the full analysis after the game. Cutting it short makes your videos less instructive. 😢
At 12:00 you had a good sac if knight took, you could take rook, and if pawn... Well you saw that, damn it breaks my heart to see all those tactics in other people's games, and not in my(((
You dont have to take the knight to guarantee a draw because a knight is insufficient material to win, so that's a draw too. Also well played and sad to see you draw on time!
This is very funny when you touch a pawn and before making the move notice that your rook is under attack.
In the future, no one will blame you for slowing down or pausing your commentary altogether so you can focus on beating the clock. You would have won that game otherwise.
I agree.
I think you should go back to doing a full game review after each game instead of having the URL in the description or putting the game review in its own seperate video 1 day later. This is because their is more then 1 key lesson in each game as a beginner going to intermediate player. Also making it in another video feels unnecessary that i would have to wait 1 day to see the review. You also can know more about tactics then a 600 rated player would know so if that 600 rated player goes through the review them self they would miss more tactics and wonder why is this the best move exactly while you would know. But other then that i think your channel is amazing and i always enjoy watching it so keep up the good work. Just consider the recommendations i mentioned above.
I’m a scotch gambit player - In game one, notice on turn 8 the computer said Qxc5 was only good and not best. The best move in that position is Qh5+ as an intermezzo to induce either Kf8 or g6, either of which are good for white, before capturing the bishop on the next move. Hope this helps!
Correct
I can see maybe it's not preferred by some but I really like this idea for the analysis. Instead of trying to understand crazy stockfish lines on the fly, just going over a couple of key moments or clear mistakes / great moves is more interesting and valuable. I think mostly small inaccuracies are not a big deal, especially at this level, and quite a bit further up probably too. We can't play like computers and nor should we really try to. And trying to decipher why one move is only great but another is considered best isn't very productive a lot of the time.
I also think that the strength of your channel lies in your live commentary and enthusiasm and attitude as you play the game. So the focus on that makes sense :)
Second game. Stop hyper focusing on a piece. Threaten the knight with you bishop.
A tip on this line. Instead of capturing the bishop right away, give a check on h5 and then capture the bishop. Igor Smirnov Nation.
Nice! I was gonna suggest this too!
2:45 you allowed the opponent to take the pawn and when takes back fork
I get timed out as well. 10 minutes and my brain gets tired already. LoL
While finding the games themselves very entertaining, I have always enjoyed the full analysis after the game. Cutting it short makes your videos less instructive. 😢
I've been wallowing in the 1100s a while after hitting a peak of 1280. I think in 1179 as of this comment
Your commentary about non- linear progress was spot on.
At 12:00 you had a good sac if knight took, you could take rook, and if pawn... Well you saw that, damn it breaks my heart to see all those tactics in other people's games, and not in my(((
You dont have to take the knight to guarantee a draw because a knight is insufficient material to win, so that's a draw too. Also well played and sad to see you draw on time!
You're improving quickly also make sure to play more puzzles and study tactics
That sucks but stop pleyin if you loet more than 20 or 30 points that day
I played you the other day!