Session #1 - Bottleneck & Process Mapping

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @JadyGrudd
    @JadyGrudd 6 років тому +1

    This is great. The most concise and easy to follow video on process mapping and the underlying details that I have encountered. As an industrial production manager without a degree, I have seen a few. This one is the best, hands down.

  • @undermygarage
    @undermygarage 5 років тому +2

    Thank you for this very concise video, great work!

  • @ladej7739
    @ladej7739 6 років тому +1

    You’re a God send . Pls make more vids.

  • @nguyenhao8883
    @nguyenhao8883 3 роки тому

    Very detail, this is a great information

  • @loriboone1749
    @loriboone1749 8 років тому

    That was great information. Thanks!

  • @xercxees
    @xercxees 7 років тому

    In the bottleneck Example #1, after the categorization of loans, you should take the weighted average of the parallel processes. Since we are not given the percentage of the cases for either checking for credit rating or entering the loan application, you can make an assumption and continue based on that.

  • @dyla888
    @dyla888 3 роки тому

    thanksssssss!

  • @ladej7739
    @ladej7739 6 років тому +2

    More please

  • @willabates88
    @willabates88 6 років тому

    love this do more

  • @wantingchan6196
    @wantingchan6196 9 років тому

    What is the cycle time in Bottleneck Example #1 and how can I calculate it? Thanks

  • @abrahamlemma1616
    @abrahamlemma1616 6 років тому +1

    If the waiting time is more why dnon`t you take as bottleneck process?

  • @abrahamlemma1616
    @abrahamlemma1616 6 років тому

    when you change the process time from 20 to 10 min you have to take the bottleneck the process having 10min but when I see the waiting time it is 15 min. why don`t you take the waiting time as bottleneck than process having 10 min?

    • @JadyGrudd
      @JadyGrudd 6 років тому

      Probably because he was explaining the manner in which the bottleneck affects throughput time. He had just addressed the subject of identifying the bottleneck, and clearly (explaining your point perfectly). The error is one of context.