Navigating workplace dynamics as a problem-solver often feels like walking a tightrope-you see where things can improve, but convincing others to take that step is another story. That’s one reason I went back to school to focus on organizational leadership, stepping into roles where my skills and perspective could drive change more effectively. I’ve learned that while I thrive on challenges, many colleagues value stability and simplicity, especially when their priorities lie outside of work-on family, hobbies, or personal goals. In those cases, the best approach is often to meet them where they are. By presenting a nearly complete solution, along with clear plans to address potential issues, I make it easier for others to see the benefits of change without feeling disrupted. In many workplaces, especially those resistant to change, demonstrating results before proposing new methods is more effective. Ultimately, balancing personal drive with respect for others’ comfort levels ensures that necessary changes can take root without overwhelming those who prefer stable, consistent routines. It’s a delicate dance-earning trust while advancing ideas-but when done thoughtfully, even the most resistant environments can begin to shift, creating meaningful progress for everyone involved.
I really appreciate that response and perspective, thanks for sharing Logan! I can definitely sense the "delicate dance" you mentioned. The word trust stands out to me, and I think it's quite fitting in the workplace environment-building trust to share new ideas, unique ideas, out-of-the-box ideas-but also not imposing them as "the solution." Just offering ideas to consider and remaining open to others' ideas and responses.
Congratulations Justin 🎉 I am happy that your hard work is paying off. I hope that this helps you in your personal and professional life. Wishing you Godspeed in all of your future endeavors
I followed your path to WGU and now starting the Ed.D November 1st, what's crazy is that I am realizing a lot of leaders don't have the training or background. If the experience doesn't match the credentials and role it's very challenging to be over educated. People just want you to play your role or they find it overwhelming.
I love hearing about other people's educational paths, thank you for sharing! You're starting a new path soon. Being on the other side of the Ed.S., I can say I'm glad I chose South College. I agree, a misalignment between education and a role can be tough without strong, open-minded, strengths-focused leaders and team members. I've run into this throughout my career, both good and bad.
I've been exploring the program at South College, and I'm also curious about the doctorate program at the American College of Education. Have you had a chance to look into it? I've been in K-12 education for 24 years, starting as a classroom teacher, then moving to a district-level position, and I've been an administrator for the last eight years. I completed my undergraduate program and first graduate degrees at a state school and recently earned a master's from Western Governors University (WGU). While I appreciate the competency-based education (CBE) approach, I'm not sure about the economic feasibility of pursuing a doctorate with this model if it takes an extended period of time.
The problem isn’t that you’re over educated, it’s that you’re under experienced with way too much opinion about how things should be done. I’ve managed hundreds of people in my life, and I will take a person with no degree or a lower degree but with excellent and relevant experience over somebody with a doctorate any day. I don’t need someone who’s a professional test, taker and paper writer, I need someone who could do the damn job and then teach other people how to do it too.
I get that experience matters. In my situation, I've been in my line of work since 2011, and my education has given the research experience to complement the skills.
@@lifebyjustin then in my opinion that makes you atypical for people with doctorate because a lot of them come in with this air of arrogance because they think that the education is more important than the experience. So if you have learned to value both and you have both, then you’re doing very well.
@@1234jajadingdong Yeah, it's possible for some people to have an air of arrogance if they think their education surpasses experience. Similarly, to me, some leaders can also come across as arrogant simply because of their leadership role.
You bought into a system that was designed for you to fail . It’s amazing that you probably spent 200-300k on a degree that doesn’t even teach you work ethic, common sense , or critical thinking skills. In my experience , people who think of themselves as overeducated need to find some humility. If you were so darn smart and qualified to perform a task, why are we having issues finding a job? It’s because the job you’re seeking gives no real value to the world. I also noticed you specialize in teaching and researching . What actual experience could you have at your age to teach someone a skill? ….. Try mastering the skill before you try to teach it !!!
@@lifebyjustin There has been a consisted decline in the quality of education during these years.... coincidence? Childless 40 year olds should never be take seriously.
Keep doing YOU Justin........ you're rocking it!!!
Well that comment put a smile on my face from ear to ear, thank you Paula!
Navigating workplace dynamics as a problem-solver often feels like walking a tightrope-you see where things can improve, but convincing others to take that step is another story. That’s one reason I went back to school to focus on organizational leadership, stepping into roles where my skills and perspective could drive change more effectively.
I’ve learned that while I thrive on challenges, many colleagues value stability and simplicity, especially when their priorities lie outside of work-on family, hobbies, or personal goals. In those cases, the best approach is often to meet them where they are. By presenting a nearly complete solution, along with clear plans to address potential issues, I make it easier for others to see the benefits of change without feeling disrupted. In many workplaces, especially those resistant to change, demonstrating results before proposing new methods is more effective.
Ultimately, balancing personal drive with respect for others’ comfort levels ensures that necessary changes can take root without overwhelming those who prefer stable, consistent routines. It’s a delicate dance-earning trust while advancing ideas-but when done thoughtfully, even the most resistant environments can begin to shift, creating meaningful progress for everyone involved.
I really appreciate that response and perspective, thanks for sharing Logan! I can definitely sense the "delicate dance" you mentioned. The word trust stands out to me, and I think it's quite fitting in the workplace environment-building trust to share new ideas, unique ideas, out-of-the-box ideas-but also not imposing them as "the solution." Just offering ideas to consider and remaining open to others' ideas and responses.
Congratulations Justin 🎉 I am happy that your hard work is paying off. I hope that this helps you in your personal and professional life. Wishing you Godspeed in all of your future endeavors
That' a very kind message, thank you!
Thanks for sharing your perspective!
I followed your path to WGU and now starting the Ed.D November 1st, what's crazy is that I am realizing a lot of leaders don't have the training or background. If the experience doesn't match the credentials and role it's very challenging to be over educated. People just want you to play your role or they find it overwhelming.
I love hearing about other people's educational paths, thank you for sharing! You're starting a new path soon. Being on the other side of the Ed.S., I can say I'm glad I chose South College.
I agree, a misalignment between education and a role can be tough without strong, open-minded, strengths-focused leaders and team members. I've run into this throughout my career, both good and bad.
I've been exploring the program at South College, and I'm also curious about the doctorate program at the American College of Education. Have you had a chance to look into it? I've been in K-12 education for 24 years, starting as a classroom teacher, then moving to a district-level position, and I've been an administrator for the last eight years. I completed my undergraduate program and first graduate degrees at a state school and recently earned a master's from Western Governors University (WGU). While I appreciate the competency-based education (CBE) approach, I'm not sure about the economic feasibility of pursuing a doctorate with this model if it takes an extended period of time.
I know that lamp in the back...
Lol, I think it's one of those basic lamps everyone has from Ikea.
lamp? all i see is a bikini!
@@lifebyjustin That's from some visual ambiguity
The problem isn’t that you’re over educated, it’s that you’re under experienced with way too much opinion about how things should be done. I’ve managed hundreds of people in my life, and I will take a person with no degree or a lower degree but with excellent and relevant experience over somebody with a doctorate any day. I don’t need someone who’s a professional test, taker and paper writer, I need someone who could do the damn job and then teach other people how to do it too.
I get that experience matters. In my situation, I've been in my line of work since 2011, and my education has given the research experience to complement the skills.
@@lifebyjustin then in my opinion that makes you atypical for people with doctorate because a lot of them come in with this air of arrogance because they think that the education is more important than the experience. So if you have learned to value both and you have both, then you’re doing very well.
@@1234jajadingdong Yeah, it's possible for some people to have an air of arrogance if they think their education surpasses experience. Similarly, to me, some leaders can also come across as arrogant simply because of their leadership role.
You bought into a system that was designed for you to fail . It’s amazing that you probably spent 200-300k on a degree that doesn’t even teach you work ethic, common sense , or critical thinking skills.
In my experience , people who think of themselves as overeducated need to find some humility. If you were so darn smart and qualified to perform a task, why are we having issues finding a job? It’s because the job you’re seeking gives no real value to the world.
I also noticed you specialize in teaching and researching . What actual experience could you have at your age to teach someone a skill? ….. Try mastering the skill before you try to teach it !!!
Ya he is just another arrogant clown.
Oh brother, you haven't even watch this channel. I'm nearly 40 and been in my current line of work since 2011.
@@lifebyjustin There has been a consisted decline in the quality of education during these years.... coincidence? Childless 40 year olds should never be take seriously.