The "Goldbach Conjecture" (26:00 in video) can be asked equivalently as: "Is every integer halfway between two primes?" The Goldbach Conjecture is equivalent to saying that for each integer N, we can find d so that N-d and N+d are both prime (when N is prime, then d=0). This just suggests a different way of thinking about the problem.
Great video. Also, a bit of related news; A new Mersenne prime was announced today and discovered a few days prior, the 48th we know of, and it's M(57,885,161). It's thanks to Dr. Curtis Cooper but mainly also thanks to the huge amount of GIMPS volunteers.
Since 2017 the largest is now M(77,232,917) , the 50th so far - there may be more between 47 and this one . Source / further reading : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime
If I may make a suggestion to the camera-men and the editor... When the speaker is referring to a slide, it is much easier for those of us who are not in the room to be able to see the slide as well. Not so much time needs to be spent with the camera on the speaker. Thank you.
Alternatively, could you make the slides available for download? Then it's up to us viewers which one we want to look at. Thanks for all the great videos, I subscribed last year so that I would not miss any uploads :-) (PS: How about 720p recording? Not a huge priority, it would just look better)
Just checked Fermat's Prime Generating function for the case where n = 5. At 19:08 the slide shows 2 raised to the 32nd power + 1 = 4,274,967,297. This is not divisible by 641 as shown on the slide. Because the correct answer is 4,294,967,296 + 1 = 4,294,967,297. Which is divisible by 641. Just sayin' ..... :)
The slides ARE available for download, and the transcript too - we put up everything we have on our website (follow the link in the video description above). We're always fighting to up the quality and we have a route to improving it over the coming month or so...
Mathematics translated into artistic harmonics reveberating from a single note this beauty abstract with imagery of non concrete intangibles within the finente are understandable as it is the philosophic under carriage silently bourne by the leviathan beneath the waves
infinity is a symbol though representing the "ongoingness" of numbers, and can't be quantified. Numbers go on forever, so as they do, there will always be more factors for them.
My dear Kanvij - Ms. Winder was evidently referring to Professor Flood's presumed sexual orientation, rather than a serious classification of mathematics as a science or a non-science. Please refer to Zanzibar native Freddy Mercury of the British rock group Queen for further edification.
Right at the beginning of the lecture, he cites Gausee as calling mathemtaics "the Queen of the sciences" and "number theory is the Queen of mathematics".
I think of maths as the cement that holds the whole of Science in its proper place. Ie, it gives the most precise structure to Science that is available to us.
Noticeable about primes.., is the way they assume dominance by "phase-locked" probabilities in continuity with the common unity, in continuing connection, so the search for conformity - the uncertainty principle -, generates a moving number sequence condensing out of the most probable existing primes in the selected circumstances, such as the resonant vibration of structures in everything from quarks to elephants. Each prime is a probability number coordinate system of other primes. At the limit of the process are the numbers that are innately constant algebraic functions, e, i, Pi etc "fitted" to the one connection in eternally shifting patterns of math, physics and chemistry, collectively called "Time". The symbol is not the thing, to believe in absolute proofs is a form of magical thinking, but in balance, not to attempt a proof is to avoid the dominant probability. Pedantic, and it takes the magic out of it so it's bad for fantasy. In the spirit of mathematics, opinion statements are the first guess approximations that introduce food for thought to exercise the mind. IMO Excellent presentation of core concepts.
Thanks! Delighted to hear that there are people there to enjoy these lectures!
Noted. Thank you for the feedback.
Always helpful when a speaker points to a screen and the camera stays locked on the speaker...
I should add that I am greatly enjoying the free education. Your work is greatly appreciated.
Thank you Raymond Flood and Gresham College!
The "Goldbach Conjecture" (26:00 in video) can be asked equivalently as: "Is every integer halfway between two primes?"
The Goldbach Conjecture is equivalent to saying that for each integer N, we can find d so that N-d and N+d are both prime (when N is prime, then d=0). This just suggests a different way of thinking about the problem.
Great video. Also, a bit of related news; A new Mersenne prime was announced today and discovered a few days prior, the 48th we know of, and it's M(57,885,161). It's thanks to Dr. Curtis Cooper but mainly also thanks to the huge amount of GIMPS volunteers.
Since 2017 the largest is now M(77,232,917) , the 50th so far - there may be more between 47 and this one .
Source / further reading :
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime
So do we!
"Sieve of Eratosthenes" is much simpler and authentic way of generating primes upto a number.
Excellent lecture. Bad assistant with the screen. We could not see the numbers Professor Flood was referring to.
If I may make a suggestion to the camera-men and the editor... When the speaker is referring to a slide, it is much easier for those of us who are not in the room to be able to see the slide as well. Not so much time needs to be spent with the camera on the speaker. Thank you.
I commend the professor, an amazing lecture, very concise.
10:48 I’m more impressed at how he factored 30,031.
Nice lecture. Thanks for posting.
My greetings to all from the prime year of 2017!
I like this guy
I'm not sure if you're slightly joking, but you should that the kind mathematics he did is extremely beautiful.
A lot of thanks !
Alternatively, could you make the slides available for download? Then it's up to us viewers which one we want to look at. Thanks for all the great videos, I subscribed last year so that I would not miss any uploads :-) (PS: How about 720p recording? Not a huge priority, it would just look better)
Just checked Fermat's Prime Generating function for the case where n = 5. At 19:08 the slide shows 2 raised to the 32nd power + 1 = 4,274,967,297. This is not divisible by 641 as shown on the slide. Because the correct answer is 4,294,967,296 + 1 = 4,294,967,297. Which is divisible by 641. Just sayin' ..... :)
Fantastic videos guys. Keep em' coming!
The slides ARE available for download, and the transcript too - we put up everything we have on our website (follow the link in the video description above).
We're always fighting to up the quality and we have a route to improving it over the coming month or so...
Slides and transcripts and audio and a dedicated page per lecture : your service to both your lecturers and your audience is admirable
Gauss is one of the greatest genius ever!!!
how can I contact the professor, who is giving this lecture?
Hi,
We can forward emails to the professor. Our contact details are on our website: www.gresham.ac.uk
GreshamCollege thanks a lot
Mathematics translated into artistic harmonics reveberating from a single note this beauty abstract with imagery of non concrete intangibles within the finente are understandable as it is the philosophic under carriage silently bourne by the leviathan beneath the waves
does mathematics has a criterion?
39: Why in the hell don't you show the graph?
54:21 "Every time you see i squared, you replace it by 1"
Shouldn't it be -1 (minus one)?
Great lecture otherwise!
It still is a video of a great lecture.
So infinity! + 1 is the last prime.
infinity is a symbol though representing the "ongoingness" of numbers, and can't be quantified. Numbers go on forever, so as they do, there will always be more factors for them.
This was a little hard to follow since the slides are hidden way too quickly.
What do you mean by queen of mathematics in your title?Is it not queen of science? But mathematics is not science..
Mathematics is regarded as a Formal Science, subjects such as Physics and Chemistry are called Empirical Sciences.
My dear Kanvij - Ms. Winder was evidently referring to Professor Flood's presumed sexual orientation, rather than a serious classification of mathematics as a science or a non-science. Please refer to Zanzibar native Freddy Mercury of the British rock group Queen for further edification.
Right at the beginning of the lecture, he cites Gausee as calling mathemtaics "the Queen of the sciences" and "number theory is the Queen of mathematics".
I have seen other published sources referring to Gauss as "Prince of Mathematics" However he kinda reminds me of Grandpa Munster.
I think of maths as the cement that holds the whole of Science in its proper place. Ie, it gives the most precise structure to Science that is available to us.
That's amazing! Give computer programming and algorithms a try. If you get good at it, you don't even need a degree to get a job.
Noticeable about primes.., is the way they assume dominance by "phase-locked" probabilities in continuity with the common unity, in continuing connection, so the search for conformity - the uncertainty principle -, generates a moving number sequence condensing out of the most probable existing primes in the selected circumstances, such as the resonant vibration of structures in everything from quarks to elephants. Each prime is a probability number coordinate system of other primes. At the limit of the process are the numbers that are innately constant algebraic functions, e, i, Pi etc "fitted" to the one connection in eternally shifting patterns of math, physics and chemistry, collectively called "Time".
The symbol is not the thing, to believe in absolute proofs is a form of magical thinking, but in balance, not to attempt a proof is to avoid the dominant probability. Pedantic, and it takes the magic out of it so it's bad for fantasy.
In the spirit of mathematics, opinion statements are the first guess approximations that introduce food for thought to exercise the mind. IMO
Excellent presentation of core concepts.
Prime viewing lol good clever stuff
biography in hindi of gauss
Slides presentation is awful, but great arithmetic problems and tricks.
What
1(2) of my favs; soundcloud.com/riemann-gauss/uncertainty-principle?in=riemann-gauss/sets/we-move-in-periods
u claim to understand general relativity, yet all the math u know is calculus & complex numbers. LOL